Road blocks & remedies for linking & using data Follow the Yellow Brick Road: Part C to part B 619 Mary Peters, DaSy, ECTA Center Debbie Cate, ECTA Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preschool Special Education A Review of State Performance Indicators and The Child Outreach Network.
Advertisements

Transition from Early Intervention RIDE Winter Leadership Conference February 2007.
Updates on APR Reporting for Early Childhood Transition (Indicators C-8 and B-12)
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619* Part C to B Transition by Three Jessica Brady, Noel Cole Michigan Department of Education Office.
STANISLAUS COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION/ CENTRAL CALIFORNIA MIGRANT HEAD START CHILD OUTCOMES SYSTEM CHILD OUTCOMES SYSTEMS Training Plan * Outcomes Awareness.
Welcome! Review of the National Part C APR Indicator 4 Family Data FFY 2011 ( ) Siobhan Colgan, ECTA, DaSy Melissa Raspa, ECTA.
From Here to Here Transition from Infant and Toddler Connection Programs to ECSE School Division Programs.
Transition from Part C to Part B in Louisiana (Session # S & 115)
Early Childhood Transition Forums Sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education,
File Review Activity Lessons learned through monitoring: Service areas must ensure there is documentation supporting the information reported in the self-
Use of Data for Monitoring Part C and 619 Debbie Cate, ECTA Krista Scott, DC 619 Bruce Bull, DaSy Consultant 1 Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Washington,
Early Childhood Transition Presenters: Kimberly Mitchell Ginger Sheppard Jessica Spataro NOVEMBER 2011.
Kathy T. Whaley, NECT AC Presentation for the Utah Special Education Law Conference August 2011 UPDATED January 2012.
CHRISTINA SPECTOR WENDI SCHREITER ERIN ARANGO-ESCALANTE IDEA Part C to Part B Transition.
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
1 Early Childhood Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education Early Childhood Special Education Maria Synodi.
Erin Arango-Escalante & Sandra Parker. EC Indicators At-a-Glance.
Opening Doors to Success: The Status of State Transition Policies and Practices Beth Rous University of Kentucky Gloria Harbin University of North Carolina.
The RRCP Program A Framework for Change Presented to our SPDG Partners June 2010.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
Noel Cole, Coordinator Michigan Department of Education, Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services.
MSDS Report: Student Count by Primary Ed Setting Sample Report Center for Educational Performance and Information - Michigan Student Data System Student.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Sarah Walters - Part C Coordinator KDHE Tiffany Smith - Part B ECSE Coordinator KSDE 1.
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Results of FFY 2007 Monitoring Indicators For The Annual Performance Report & State Performance Plan.
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 19 Planning Transitions to Support Inclusion.
Early Childhood Transition: Effective Approaches for Building and Sustaining State Infrastructure Connecticut Maria Synodi, 619 Coordinator Connecticut.
Creating Supports for Transition Ann Hains, UW-Milwaukee Sarah Hadden, UW-Eau Claire Jill Haglund, DPI Donna Miller, DHFS.
Supporting Early Childhood Transition: State of the Evidence and Implications for Policy and Practice Beth Rous Caroline Gooden.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
1 Charting the Course: Smoother Data Sharing for Effective Early Childhood Transition Wisconsin’s Journey Lori Wittemann, Wisconsin Department of Health.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
National, State and Local Inclusion Data: Accessing and Using Data to Increase Inclusive Opportunities Mary Peters, ECTA Debbie Cate, IDC, ECTA Inclusion.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Benefits and Challenges of Integrating Data in Early Childhood: The Case of Early Intervention and Early.
Aren’t they all the same? Differences Between Part B, Part C, and Michigan Mandatory Special Education (MMSE) Teri Johnson Assistant Director of Special.
07/20/2007 State Performance Plan Indicators Jessica Wolf Infant/Toddler and Family Services Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services Michigan.
1 Transition: Part C to Part B Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Spring/Summer 2007.
1 Indicator 7 Child Outcomes: Changes & Updates June 2011 Indicator 7 Child Outcomes: Changes & Updates June 2011.
CSEFEL State Planning Rob Corso. CSEFEL  National Center focused on promoting the social emotional development and school readiness of young children.
Presented by the Early Childhood Transition Program Priority Team August 11, 2010 Updated September 2010.
Early Childhood Transition Part C Indicator C-8 & Part B Indicator B-12 Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports.
2010 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career Dan Schreier, Gregg Corr, Jill Harris, Ken Kienas, Kate Moran,
Timely and Effective Transition at Age 3 David P. Lindeman, Peggy Miksch & Phoebe Rinkel Kansas Division for Early Childhood Conference Wichita, Kansas.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP) Toronto District School Board January 20, 2015.
Transitioning Children from Part C to Part B Toby Long, PhD, PT, FAPTA Rachel Brady, PT, DPT, MS January 14, 2011 Office of State Superintendent of Education,
©2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 19 Planning Transitions to Support Inclusion.
Early Childhood Transition: Effective Approaches for Building and Sustaining State Infrastructure Indiana’s Transition Initiative for Young Children and.
Florida’s Participation in the National Transition Initiative WHY US? Strand 3 – Collaborative Leadership Session # S3 107 &
State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (SPP/APR/CIPP) Buncombe County Schools 2013.
Developing Strong Transition Protocols Infant Toddler Program, Head Start and Early Childhood Special Education Shannon Dunstan Idaho State Department.
Connecticut Part C State Performance Plan Indicator 11 State Systemic Improvement Plan Phase II.
Chapter 2 The Assessment Process. Two Types of Decisions Legal Decisions The student is determined to have a disability. The disability has an adverse.
Early Intervention Colorado TA Call December 5, 2013 Annual Performance Report.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
What’s New for Transition to Special Education Services? Paula E. Goff, Part C Coordinator May 23, 2013.
Early Childhood Outcomes Trying to Get The Word Out Maria Synodi, 619 Coordinator Connecticut State Department of Education NECTAC National TA Meeting.
Early Childhood Conference: Improving Data, Improving Outcomes September 10-11, 2014 New Orleans, LA.
How High-Quality IDEA Data Supports Systemic Change in States Dave Phillips, Co-Project Director, Center for IDEA Fiscal Reporting (CIFR) Bill Huennekens,
1 Early Childhood Transition: Facts, Figures, Fantasies and the Future Objectives 1. To share selected findings based on the SPP/APR and NECTC study 2.
ARC Chairperson Training
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
Supporting Improvement of Local Child Outcomes Measurement Systems
Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference
ARC Chairperson Training
The Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center
Siobhan Colgan, ECTA, IDC Michelle Lewis, NH Parent Training Institute
Early Childhood Transition APR Indicators and National Trends
Supporting Improvement of Local Child Outcomes Measurement Systems
2018 Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference
Implementing, Sustaining and Scaling-Up High Quality Inclusive Preschool Policies and Practices: Application for Intensive TA September 10, 2019 Lise.
Presentation transcript:

Road blocks & remedies for linking & using data Follow the Yellow Brick Road: Part C to part B 619 Mary Peters, DaSy, ECTA Center Debbie Cate, ECTA Center

Objectives Share Indicator C8 & B12 data processes, collection and, data sharing Explore data transfer mechanisms Discuss strengths and roadblocks Review Part C and 619 state and local data use Identify needed supports and resources

Part C, Indicator 8 A: Percent of IFSPs with transition steps and services in place B: Percent of children potentially eligible for Part B services for whom notification was given to the Lead Education Agency (LEA) C: Percent of children potentially eligible for Part B services for whom a transition conference was held

Part C, Indicator C8B, FFY 2011

Notification to LEA (C8B) Number and Percent of States Reporting Census Approach Yes36 (64%) No16 (29%) FFY 2011

Part B, Indicator 12 Early Childhood Transition Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age three and who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthday

Part B, Indicator 12 Data Sources Over Time Data Collection Source Number of States by Year FFY 2006 FFY 2007 FFY 2008 FFY 2009 FFY 2010 FFY 2011 State data system Monitoring, includes system- wide file review Other (LEA spreadsheets) Not reported or unclear Total

Improvement due to institutional collaborative activities, strategies, policies, procedures and practices Progress in building state-level data systems, particularly the ability to share Part C and Part B child-specific data Most states demonstrate high performance Transition C to B

Part CPart B All Children A Child specific name or ID of each child B Census reporting, numbers Some Children C Reporting a portion of children through monitoring or other EOther Transition Process for Reporting

Part CPart B All Children 1 Web-based Data System ALL Children by name or ID Web-based State Education Data System ALL Children by name or ID 2 Web-based Special Education Data System ALL Children by name or ID 3 Web-based Data System S ome information supplemented from other sources 4 Excel Table or Web Report/Template ALL Children by name or ID Excel Table or Web Report/Template ALL Children by name or ID 5 Excel Table or Web Report/Template ALL children by aggregate numbers Excel Table or Web Report/Template ALL children by aggregate numbers Some Children 6 Reporting, Monitoring or File review A portion of all children Reporting, Monitoring or File review A portion of all children 7Other Transition Data Mechanisms

Part CPart B All Children Ruby Slippers Web-based Data System, Fully Integrated System C and B Sharing data for ALL Children by name or ID Flying Monkeys Part C Web-based Data System, C to B Integrated Components - ALL Children by name or ID, sharing some child specific data into 619 system Part B Web-based Data System, C and B Integrated Components - migrates some child specific data into 619 system Tin Men Table or Report/Template with Part C information - ALL Children by name or ID shared with State 619 Table or Report/Template with Part C information merged or compared with 619 state data Lions Part C information ALL Children by name or ID shared with State 619 and local LEA Part C information compared or merged at local level Toto No Comparison of Part C data at the child level Transition Data Sharing

Part CPart B All Children Web-based Data System Fully Integrated System C and B Sharing data for ALL Children by name or ID Ruby Slippers

Part CPart B All Children Part C Web-based Data System, C to B Integrated Components - ALL Children by name or ID, sharing some child specific data into 619 system Part B Web-based Data System, C and B Integrated Components migrating some child specific data into 619 system Flying Monkeys

Tin Men Part CPart B All Children Table or Report/Template with Part C information - ALL Children by name or ID shared with State 619 Table or Report/Template with Part C information merged or compared with 619 state data

Part CPart B All Children Part C information ALL Children by name or ID shared with State 619 and compared at local level Part C information compared or merged at local level Local Lions

Toto Part C child specific transition data is not being compared to Part B transition data at the child level

Data Sharing Specifics Supports, such as written agreements Communication and/or PD strategies Collaborative data analysis (C and 619) Data verification Follow up, TA, or CAPs State and local data use Discussion Topics

Resources and Technical Assistance

Thank you for your participation Mary and Debbie Thank you for your participation Mary and Debbie