Teamwork: Developing SMART Goals Together Massachusetts Association of School Business Officials September 12, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Department Leadership Teams Involving Everyone in the Plan on a Page! November 17, 2009.
Advertisements

The Baldrige Model of Performance Excellence A framework for continuous improvement.
Welcome!. Guiding Questions “Alberta Education has set the direction – each district must now set the course…..” (Special Education Conference, 2010)
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
2025 Planning Contacts Meeting November 8, 2012 K-State 2025.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
Developing Performance Goals That Work For You and ANR Performance Training and Workshop for County Directors November 1, 2013.
System Office Performance Management
Performance Appraisal System Update
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
System Office Performance Management
Professional Learning Communities in Schools Online Workshop.
Staff performance management. agenda why timeline what’s different key components of step 1 creating goals overall process questions.
Whose Job Is It? Part Two © Iowa Association of School Boards At the Board Table Discussion Tool.
Collaboration and continuous learning are the focus.
Student Assessment Inventory for School Districts Inventory Planning Training.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Superintendent Goals Update. District Level Leadership Research McRel Internationally recognized private, non-profit organization in Denver,
Kentucky Department of Education Council Development & Planning Branch 2005 Organizing School Improvement Plans Planning for Proficiency.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
CIV 1 Lincoln County Administrators Total Instructional Alignment.
Public Charter School Grant Program Workshop Aligning Teacher Evaluation, Professional Development, Recruitment and Retention March 3, 2014.
Staff Performance Evaluation Process
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
Evaluator Workshop for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Rhode Island Model The contents of this training were developed under a Race to the Top grant from.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Charter School 2015 Annual Finance Seminar Grant Management Office of Grants Fiscal September 11, 2015.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
This presentation:  is “ready-to-use” for presentations to school division administrators, board members, library personnel, teachers, etc.  incorporates.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
Our Theory of Action and Multi-Tiered Framework are anchored in the Vision and Mission for the Superintendent of Public Instruction. Office of Student.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Leading Learning in a School & District Dr. Brad Balch, Indiana State University Mrs. Leslie Ballard, AdvancED Indiana
October 2015 STRATEGIC PLANNING Prepared by: Strategic Cancer Initiatives Aboriginal Health & Community Wellness Department of Health and Social Services.
Planning for Continuous School Improvement
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Supporting Effective Teaching: An Introduction to Educator Performance Evaluation Introduction to Educator.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Supporting Effective Teaching: An Introduction to Educator Performance Evaluation.
KLA - ISLN Updates January Introducing the Content Specialists.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Professional Growth Through Self-Assessment and Goal Writing September 2012.
2015/16 Staff Performance Appraisals Webinar for ANR Supervisors Spring 2016.
What is a Service Level Agreement? Service level agreements are part of a quality approach to help teams identify and agree what ‘good quality’ looks like.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Last Updated: MONTH, YEAR Team: M. W. (Team Leader)R. F. T. D.M.G. T. L.D. J. (Sponsor) Green Belt Project Objective: TITLE Green Belt Project Objective:
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Goal Setting and Professional Development Plan Teacher Overview.
SMART GOALS Dr. Ann M. Papagiotas.
Targeted District Review Report
Targeted District Review Report
My Performance Journey
Implementing the Specialized Service Professional State Model Evaluation System for Measures of Student Outcomes.
Objectives for today If we have done our job today, you will:
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Roles, Goals & Performance Expectations
My Performance Journey
My Performance Journey
Strategic Planning Final Plan Team Meeting
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

Teamwork: Developing SMART Goals Together Massachusetts Association of School Business Officials September 12, 2013

The Educator Evaluation Five-Step Cycle Where do I excel? Where would I like to grow What are my district’s priorities? What do our students need? What will I focus on this year? What are my goals? What steps will I take to accomplish my goals?

Standards and Indicators of Effective Administrative Leadership

Types of Goals  Professional Practice Goal Educator practice in relation to the performance Standards and Indicators  Student Learning Specific improvement in student learning, growth, and achievement

What makes a goal S.M.A.R.T.?  S pecific and S trategic  M easurable  A ction-Oriented  R ealistic and R esults-focused  T ime-bound and T racked

SPECIFIC AND STRATEGIC  Straightforward and clearly written  Addresses something that is of importance to the district  Aligned to mission, vision or strategic plan  Likely to have a significant impact Key Question: How is this goal going to contribute to our strategic plan goals?

MEASURABLE  How will you know when you’ve met your goal?  What measure will help you determine if performance has improved?  Are you measuring quantity, quality, or impact?  How will progress be measured?

ACTION-ORIENTED  Use of active versus passive verbs  Who is doing what?  Words to avoid:

RESULTS-FOCUSED  What is going to be different if this goal is achieved?  What will I, as a School Business Official, know and do better?

TIME BOUND AND TRACKED  Needs to have a deadline  Timelines for all key actions  When will each key action step be accomplished  When will the goal have been achieved  Consider multi-year goals

Sample SMART Goals  In support of the district’s transition to MA’s Revised Curriculum Frameworks (the Common Core) during the school year, I will help to ensure that all instructional staff are prepared to design and/or implement new standards- based units of instruction consisting of well-structured lessons and appropriate assessments through the appropriate allocation of resources targeting (1) professional development on the Common Core, (2) curriculum materials, and (3) technology in support of data collection and analysis for all staff.  Increase by 25% the amount of funds received during FY 2011 for payments online at mySchoolBucks.com from the amount received in FY 2010.

Sample Smart Goals  Collaborate with Purchasing on best procurement procedures, to include p‐card and direct pays, and assist Purchasing on the language of the communication to the end users, thus decreasing purchase orders issued by 10% by 6/30/11. Included will be reviewing and updating purchasing categories to make it easier for users to select the correct categories and associated object codes; revising the chart of accounts and providing definitions for use of object codes; and implementing a method to ensure all purchases are coded correctly.  Update Finance and Budget policies and procedures to reflect current practices and to make them easier to follow and more understandable to our audience. This is a two year goal that will update 50% of the Finance and Budget policies and procedures by 6/30/11 and the remaining 50% by 6/30/12.

Your Assignment  Each table has a Standard, Indicator, and Element number assigned  Your job as a team is to discuss this particular element and develop a professional practice goal for that element  Hold each other accountable and push each other to make the goal SMART  Continue to apply the SMART test to the goals  Once your goal has been completed, write it on the chart paper and post it somewhere on the wall  At breaks, peruse the SMART goals  These goals will be collected and posted on the MASBO website