Types of Assessment Satisfaction of the customer. Satisfaction of the worker. Workflow effectiveness and speed. Service delivery effectiveness and speed.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Connecting Libraries to Organizational Mission: Using Assessment to Strengthen the Academic Health Sciences Librarys Institutional Role James Shedlock,
Advertisements

R LibQUAL+: A Measurement Tool for Special Libraries? Susan Scheiberg Assistant Director, Library RAND Corporation David Shumaker Manager, Information.
Using LibQUAL+ to Develop Accountability with Key Stakeholders Raynna Bowlby Based upon presentation made w/co-presenter Dan O’Mahony (Brown U. Library)
Changes in Library Usage, Usability, & User Support Denise A. Troll Distinguished Fellow, Digital Library Federation Associate University Librarian, Carnegie.
. The Balanced Scorecard and MIS— Strategy Development and Evolution Jim Self Management Information Services University of Virginia Library 20 th Pan.
Two Decades of User Surveys The Experience of Two Research Libraries from 1992 to 2011 Jim Self, University of Virginia Steve Hiller, University of Washington.
Recap of IS214. Placing this course in context Creating information technology that helps people accomplish their goals, make the experience effective,
OS 352 4/22/08 I. Reminders. Read Hammonds and Combs et al. articles for Thurs. There will be a check of articles so please bring them to class. II.Exam.
Medicine: Early Adopters What are the markers of excellence in a digital library? Usefulness Effectiveness Learnability Satisfaction.
The Balanced Scorecard and Collection Management Jim Self University of Virginia Library June 17, 2002.
ARL strategies, tools and projects that demonstrate the value of the library in the academy 20 th Pan Hellenic Conference of Academic Libraries.
Summary of Reading Assignments: Web Assessment Models Dr. Deepak Khazanchi.
Library Process Management Brian Harlan, Ph.D. Director, Access Services University of Southern California Los Angeles.
Presented by Beverly Choltco-Devlin Reference and Electronic Resources Consultant Mid-York Library System September 25, 2009 REVVED UP FOR REFERENCE CONFERENCE.
MANSFIELD LIBRARY Kate Zoellner Associate Professor Assessment Coordinator Sue Samson Professor Library Instruction Coordinator Outcomes Assessment 1.
The Library Balanced Scorecard: The Results Please! Joe Matthews American Library Association June 2007.
P e r f o r m a n c e Measuring Results of Organizational Performance Lesson 4 Performance Methodology: The Balanced Scorecard.
County Scorecard Update NACS Ronnie L. Taylor NGS State Advisor – Branch Chief Brett Howe NGS Headquarters Staff 7 March, 2008 Joe Whitsitt NGS Headquarters.
ARL perspectives on accuracy in web analytics reporting on digital libraries CNI Fall 2013 Task Force Meeting Washington, DC December 9, 2013.
Core Performance Measures FY 2005
Swiss Army Assessment Diana Hartle, Amy Watts University of Georgia Assorted Tools for Evaluating Instruction.
Measures that matter: Designing and developing your own Balanced Scorecard Karin de Jager & Jim Self 7th Northumbria International Conference on Performance.
Technological Tools for Assessment New Ways of Listening to Library Users Workshop Washington, DC November 4 - 5, 2005 Jonathan D. Sousa Technical Applications.
Library User Studies Hsin-liang Chen SLIS, Indiana University.
LibQUAL + ™ Data Summary An overview of the results of the LibQUAL+™ 2003 survey with comparisons to the 2001 survey.
Alice’s Adventures in LibQual-Land Kitty Tynan Assistant Director for Public Services CUA Libraries All illustrations from The Victorian Web: A Tenniel.
of Research Libraries Assessing Library Performance: New Measures, Methods, and Models 24 th IATUL Conference 2-5 June 2003 Ankara,
ODINCINDIO Marine Information Management Training Course February 2006 Evaluating the need for an Information Centre Murari P Tapaswi National Institute.
Library Assessment in North America Stephanie Wright, University of Washington Lynda S. White, University of Virginia American Library Association Mid-Winter.
The Assessment Environment in North American Research Libraries Stephanie Wright, University of Washington Lynda S. White, University of Virginia 7th Northumbria.
Outcome Assessment Tools for the Library of the Future ACRL Conference 2005 April 7, 2005 Minneapolis, MN Martha Kyrillidou Director, ARL Statistics.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
LibQUAL+ TM at the University of Lethbridge 2005 January 26 L. Jacobs.
Collaborative Assessment: Using Balanced Scorecard to Measure Performance and Show Value Liz Mengel, Johns Hopkins University Vivian Lewis, McMaster University.
Balanced Scorecard Managerial Accounting Prepared by Diane Tanner University of North Florida Chapter 27.
9 th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services Charles B. Lowry, Ph.D. Executive Director,
TM Project web site old.libqual.org Process Management Presented by LibQUAL+™
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
Frank Haulgren Collection Services Manager & Assessment Coordinator Western Libraries Lite 2010 Survey Results.
Group. “Your partner in developing future Lifelong Learners” UROWNE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY.
Web-Based Usage Surveys MINES for Libraries TM Brinley Franklin University of Connecticut Terry Plum Simmons GSLIS
ARL and SCONUL Assessment Initiatives: Synergies and Opportunities Stephen Town University of York, UK LibQUAL+ Exchange Florence, 2009.
Institutional Considerations
LibQUAL+™ Process Management: Using the Web as a Management Tool Amy Hoseth Massachusetts LSTA Orientation Meeting Boston, MA October 21, 2005 old.libqual.org.
Assessment: Research in Context Allison Sivak University of Alberta Libraries June 13, 2008.
© Prentice Hall, 2005Excellence in Business, Revised Edition Chapter Fundamentals of Marketing, Customers, and Strategic Marketing Planning.
The Balanced Scorecard
Re-Visioning the Future of University Libraries and Archives through LIBQUAL+ Cynthia Akers Associate Professor and Assessment Coordinator ESU Libraries.
Framework for the Creation of Digital Knowledge Resources to meet the Challenges for Digital Future: A Librarian’s Perspective Dr. Harish Chandra Librarian.
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES Colleen Cook, Texas A&M University Martha Kyrillidou, Association of Research Libraries.
Re-thinking customer service training: A curricular solution to a familiar problem Sharon Epps Sheridan Sayles Judi Kidd Toni Negro November 13, 2014 Access.
Anmai University Library Reconstruction Project Team Three
MINES for Libraries™ Presented by Martha Kyrillidou Director of the ARL Statistics and Service.
We’re an Edge library! Applying Edge Results to Elevate Digital and Technology Services Insert Library Logo Here.
March 14, 2009 ACRL 14 th National Conference Seattle, WA ClimateQUAL™: Organizational Climate and Diversity Assessment Presented by Martha Kyrillidou,
ClimateQUAL™: Organizational Climate and Diversity Assessment Sue Baughman Texas Library Association April 2009.
Changing Role of Librarians in Digital Era and Need of Professional skills, Efficiency & Competency By Goutam Biswas
Library/Press/University Collaborations The Electronic Publishing Initiative at Columbia.
Cornell Xin Li For ARL Assessment Forum January 11, 2008.
IT Leading the Way to Institutional Effectiveness Presenter: Kendell Rice, Ph.D. July 11, 2007.
Balanced Scorecard René Ewing Governor’s Special Assistant for Management and Quality Improvement Balanced Scorecard René Ewing Governor’s Special Assistant.
LibQUAL+ TM Library Survey LIBQUAL+ “ Only customers judge quality – all other measures are irrelevant”
Webmetrics Workshop American Library Association Chicago, IL June 24, 2004 Martha Kyrillidou Director, ARL Statistics and Measurement Program Association.
Planning and Executing Library Assessment: Basic Methods and Tools
Draft - Enterprise Risk Management Risk Universe
9th Northumbria International Conference on
Library Assessment Tools & Technology
Master of Library Science
Assessing Library Performance:
DCB Annual Review of Teaching Performance
Presentation transcript:

Types of Assessment Satisfaction of the customer. Satisfaction of the worker. Workflow effectiveness and speed. Service delivery effectiveness and speed. Cost benefit analysis. Legality of actions performed. Social justice and ethics.

Assessment Instruments Surveys Focus groups Web usability studies Secret shopper Specific testing Best practices Service level agreements

Assessment Instruments continued Balanced Scorecard (an array of assessment tools in four areas) Financial – How does the library look to stakeholders? Customer – How do customers see the library? Internal – In what areas must the library excel? Innovation and learning – Can the library continue to improve and create value?

ARL New Measures Program User satisfaction Market penetration Ease and breadth of access Library impact on teaching and learning Library impact on research Cost effectiveness of library operations and services Library facilities and space Organizational capacity

ARL New Measures Program LibQUAL+™ is a rigorously tested Web-based survey that libraries use to solicit, track, understand, and act upon users' opinions of service quality. The DigiQUAL™ project is modifying and repurposing the existing LibQUAL+™ protocol to assess the services provided by digital libraries.

ARL New Measures Program MINES for Libraries™ is an online transaction- based survey that collects data on the purpose of use of electronic resources and the demographics of users. Climatequal

Collectively all three are under the name StatsQual See

ARL New Measures Program Assessment conference proceedings

Building an Assessment Program Leadership Who does it (individual, committee) Infrastructure (measurement and evaluation skills, data collection methods, sampling, analysis software) Library culture (political process, positive deviance) Environment and constituencies Rewards and incentives