LegumeCHOICE Output 1 Ingrid Oborn Update February 2, 2015 LegumeCHOICE Output 1 Reporting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Engendering Agricultural Censuses: The case of Malawi By Gunvor Iversen Moyo Statistics Norway Presented at the Global Forum on Gender Statistics, Accra.
Advertisements

Exploring potential to link smallholder dairy farmers in Kenya with carbon markets Andreas Wilkes UNIQUE forestry and landuse GmbH
A suite of proven, farmer- and system-specific legume-based options for system intensification Output 2: Progress.
Project development And Program Design following the Tamale, Addis Ababa and Dar workshops Dar es Salaam, Tanzania workshop Feb 2012 Jerry Glover.
A multi-discipline effort to provide options for sustainable intensification of African smallholder farming systems Ben Lukuyu 2, Adebayo Abass 1, Mateete.
Applying a Systems Framework to Research on African Farming Systems CRP1.1 Regional Inception Workshop East and Southern Africa 5-7 June 2012.
80 Impact evaluation of upgrading cassava value chains through post- harvest engineering and processing research-for-development in sub- Saharan Africa.
Legume CHOICE: a simple tool for prioritizing legume interventions Alan Duncan Legume CHOICE Expert Meeting, Nairobi, Kenya Jan 13-15, 2015.
Sustainable Intensification of Cereal-Livestock based Farming Systems in sub-Saharan Africa: M &E Meeting, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 5-7 September 2012.
A business case to reduce rural poverty through targeted investments in water in sub-Saharan Africa WWF5 Session How can food market measures boost.
Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Small-Scale Irrigation Alan Duncan Ethiopia Partner meeting, Mar From Plan to Action Field Studies and Ex Ante.
Africa RISING Research Framework. Research output 1: Situation Analysis and Programme-wide Synthesis. Includes the activities that are necessary to.
LegumeCHOICE Output 1 Action and Time Plan, February 4, 2015 LegumeCHOICE Output 1 Reporting.
Progress of the First Year Legume CHOICE Project Activities In- Ethiopia Legume CHOICE Project Ethiopia Planning Meeting March 9, 2015 Addis Ababa.
Objectives LegumeCHOICE Planning meeting: Feb 2-4, Addis  Discuss progress on activities accomplished in the first year, identifying gaps and modifications.
LegumeCHOICE: LegumeCHOICE: Realizing the underexploited potential of multi-purpose legumes towards improved livelihoods and a better environment in crop-livestock.
Research on Sustainable Intensification in the CGIAR Research Programs.
Improved Crop-livestock management systems for enhanced smallholder income and nutrition N. Karbo (Chairman) R. Abaidoo E.O. Otchere G. Gamor H. Abu S.S.
Africa RISING Ethiopian Highlands Research Component 1 - Characterization Alan Duncan, Beth Cullen, Aster Grbrekristos, Stefan Shultz Africa RISING-EH.
Agricultural Market Information System (AMIS): State of Play AMIS First Meeting of the Rapid Response Forum 11 April 2012 Mexico City Abdolreza Abbassian,
Mali Work Packages. Crop Fields Gardens Livestock People Trees Farm 1 Farm 2 Farm 3 Fallow Pasture/forest Market Water sources Policy Landscape/Watershed.
CCAFS Vision of intended impact By 2020, contribute to cross-sectoral efforts to reduce poverty by 10%, increasing the incomes of hundreds of millions.
‘Realizing the underexploited potential of multi-purpose legumes towards improved livelihoods and a better environment in crop- livestock systems in East.
Assessments. Assessment in the Project Cycle DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING EVALUATION ASSESSMENT.
MARKETS II M&E FRAMEWORK AND CHALLENGES Joseph Obado.
WLI ANNUAL REPORT 2013 GUIDELINE Bezaiet Dessalegn
Legume CHOICE: a simple tool for prioritizing legume interventions Alan Duncan Legume CHOICE Co-ordination Meeting, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Feb 2-4, 2015.
Sustainable and productive farming systems The livestock sector --POINTS TO PONDER-- Jimmy Smith.
Research framework J.Rusike Research Review & Planning Meeting Africa RISING – West Africa Project October 2012, Tamale, Ghana.
Sustainable Intensification of Maize-Legume Systems for the Eastern Province of Zambia (SIMLEZA) Sustainable Intensification of Maize-Legume Systems for.
WLE Strategy Results Framework. Challenges that we have been tasked with CGIAR process to develop coherent IDOs Developing a coherent a logical frame.
Towards the making of a workplan for the ESA Project Mateete Bekunda and Irmgard H.-Zeledon.
The Africa Research in Sustainable Intensification for the Next Generation (AfricaRISING) initiatives: issues of land degradation, land heath, agricultural.
Africa RISING Programme West Africa – Ghana and Mali East and Southern Africa – Tanzania, Malawi and Zambia Ethiopian Highlands – Tigray – Amhara – SNNPR.
CRP1.1 Dryland Systems: Integrated and Sustainable Agricultural Production Systems for Improved Food Security and Livelihoods in Dry Areas Regional Inception.
1 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Naman Keita FAO Statistics Division Joint UNECE/EUROSTAT/FAO/OECD Meeting on Food and Agricultural Statistics, 2005.
BFP grant – GECAFS Objectives 1.Improve understanding of vulnerability of food systems to the stresses induced by GEC 2.Document food systems and analyze.
The World Vegetable Center AVRDC 1 Annual Workshop ********** 2014/2015 Achievements of AVRDC Sikasso, 26 February 2015 Sustainable Intensification of.
A presentation by Charles Chikwiramadara Value Chain & Marketing Specialist ACDIVOCA PRIZE PROGRAM Zimbabwe address:
Stefano Padulosi Global Coordinator MS Swaminathan Research Foundation, Chennai, India, February 2015 Reinforcing the resilience of poor rural communities.
Malawi Team: Agro-ecological Intensification Sept Day 1 discussions Africa RISING Planning Meeting, Lilongwe.
Output 2 intervention planning Sources of information : Output 1 FGD Baseline Farm characterization  Entry points definition LegumeCHOICE tool FCD : context/farmer.
ObjectivesResearch questionsActivities Nutrition, food safety and value addition 1.1 Improving HH food and nutrition security, particularly the vulnerable.
Objective 1: To increase resilience of smallholder production systems Output -Integrated crop-livestock systems developed to improve productivity, profitability.
Phase 2 Research Questions Theme 1: Nutrition, food safety and value addition 1)Which combinations of technology packages can reduce household vulnerability.
Multipurpose legumes in integrated crop-livestock systems in east Africa: farmers preference, decision making and legume productivity Tarirai Muoni, Alan.
Year 2 Planning Boundaries and Principles I. Hoeschle-Zeledon Africa RISING East/Southern Africa Coordinator Research Review & Planning Meeting Africa.
Realizing the underexploited potential of multi-purpose legumes towards improved livelihoods and a better environment in crop- livestock systems in East.
Water Related Indicators for Sustainable Crop-Livestock Intensification Planning in Ethiopia: ‘Quick-Water’
Scaling forages and forage seed in Ethiopia: suggested purpose and outcomes of this national stakeholder consultation Barry Shapiro, on behalf of a brainstorming.
Themes, loose ends & new research topics THEMESLOOSE ENDSNEW RESEARCH TOPICS Sustainable land and water management Landscape management and environmental.
Output 4, IITA lead. 4.1 Development of strategic partnerships and action plans within specific Humidtropics R4D platforms for facilitating an enabling.
The CGIAR Research Program on Integrated Systems for the Humid Tropics Teklu Erkossa (PhD) Researcher, Land and Water Resources International Water Management.
OutcomeObjectivesResearch questionsOutputs Activities Smallholder families adopt technology packages that improve food, nutrition and income security 1.To.
Remarks on Demand-driven, Participatory Agricultural Extension Services for Cambodia William Bradley, Agriculture Officer USAID/Cambodia.
Future Agricultures and climate change: Outline of a new theme Lars Otto Naess Thomas Tanner FAC Annual Review and Planning Meeting Brighton, UK 30 March.
Fodder and feed as a key opportunity for driving sustainable intensification of crop livestock systems in Ethiopia “Quick Feeds” Presented by Alan Duncan.
4 th Inter-Agency and Expert Group Meeting (IAEGM) Dead Sea, Jordan 9-10 May 2016 The Gender Disaggregated Data in Agriculture and Rural Development Mohamed.
Output 1: Activity Indicators Activity 1 Farm level diagnosis of current functions Activity 2 Analysis of overall production environment Activity 3 Identification.
Monitoring and Evaluating Rural Advisory Services
Legume CHOICE tool: A decision support framework for enhancing the contributions of legumes to farmer livelihoods Irene Okeyo, Ingrid Oborn ,ICRAF; Generose.
Project Overview Tassilo Tiemann
Dar es Salaam, Tanzania workshop
Legume CHOICE_Project
Intensifying Livestock Production (Theme 3)
Okeyo I1*., Shiluli, M.2 , Oborn I 1., Ochinga T1., and Muriuki J 1.
Carsten/Maurice/Mary/Tarirai/Irene
Flagship 1 Priority Setting & Impact Acceleration
4.2 Identify intervention outputs
Presentation transcript:

LegumeCHOICE Output 1 Ingrid Oborn Update February 2, 2015 LegumeCHOICE Output 1 Reporting

Farming system diagnosis and related entry points for multi-purpose legumes in farming systems and synthesis of lessons learnt across all Action Sites Output 1 sets the scene for project interventions by: Assessing current contributions of legumes to rural livelihoods (Activity 1.1) Assessing current institutional environment within which smallholders operate (Activity 1.2) Identification of entry points for legume intensification and diversification, based on results from above activities and secondary information (Activity 1.3) A cross-site analysis of the lessons learnt through will produce IPGs, for use within and beyond the Humidtropics Action Areas (Activity 1.4) LegumeCHOICE Output 1 Reporting

MayJuneJulyAugustSeptOctNovDec Assemble maps of key layers in each field site ( Bernard ) List of wealth indicators on which to base typology (Alan/Peter) Decision on criteria for stratification (Generose) First village meeting to introduce project, confirm typologies, decide thresholds ( country team ) Collect typology indicators in each country (CGIAR and country teams) Decision on sub-locations (CGIAR and country teams) Draft method for farming system characterization (ICRAF/IITA/UHoh ) Checklist for constraints analysis through FGD (ICRAF/IITA) Training of field technicians on the above 2 approaches (ICRAF/IITA) Implementation of FGD ( CGIAR and country teams ) Implementation of farm system characterization at HH ( CGIAR and country teams) Develop checklist of key informant discussion on socio-technical conditions at field site level ( Paul, Maurice/Generose/Ellie/Getnet) Implement socio-technical characterization to inform local actors and for 1.3 (CGIAR and country teams Synthesize entry themes (ICRAF) Output 1 activities LegumeCHOICE Output 1 Reporting

Assessing current contributions of legumes to rural livelihoods (Activity 1.1) Site selection. 3 Humidtropics Action Sites (AS), 2 Field Site (FS) per AS, 2 Implementation Sites per FS. Stratification: population density (high), market access (medium, good) We have 3*2*2= 12 Implementation sites (9 in proposal) LegumeCHOICE Output 1 Reporting

Example Selected Field Sites and Implementation Sites in Western Kenya Agree on names to be used in reporting/publications Action SiteField SiteMarket access Implementation Site Western Kenya Kisii CountyGoodKitutu Chache North Sub-county Medium Nyaribari Chache Sub-county Migori County GoodRongo Sub-county Medium Suna West Sub- county

Assessing current contributions of legumes to rural livelihoods (1.1), cont. Farm typology: Agreed to use 3 typologies; high, medium and poor resource availability. Three indicators agreed: -Farm size, area of land -Livestock, type and number -Access to Inputs; amount of mineral fertilizer to the farm Field or Implementation Site specific indicator intervals identified through village meetings (compile from all sites) LegumeCHOICE Output 1 Reporting

Assessing current contributions of legumes to rural livelihoods (1.1), cont. Village meetings in all Implementation sites -Guideline and checklist for village meeting -Inform about LegumeCHOICE -Discuss and agree on farm typologies and site specific indicator intervals, e.g. LegumeCHOICE Output 1 Reporting

Assessing current contributions of legumes to rural livelihoods (1.1), cont. Quick baseline survey: 1.Select farmers for Farm characterization based on typology (area, livestock, input) 2.Area under legumes, type of legumes, inter- or mono- cropping, harvested amount LegumeCHOICE Transect Walk Data Collection Sheet developed Training workshop in Nairobi, July, Baseline survey carried out Aug-Sep/Oct (all 12 IS) CSProo data entry form, data entered, validated Statistical data analysis and report writing per Action Site Cross-site comparison LegumeCHOICE Output 1 Reporting

Project Goal and Indicators Goal: To improve food and nutrition security, reduce poverty, and enhance the production environment of smallholder farmers and rural populations, in particular women, through facilitation of the smart integration and use of multi-purpose legumes, providing food, protein, feed, fuel, and/or organic matter, in crop-livestock systems. Goal indicators: As a result of this project, at least 4,500 (1,500 per country) smallholder farmers (households) within the target areas, will have increased the farm area under legumes by at least 20%, the productivity of already present legumes by at least 20%, and the farm-level contribution of biologically fixed N by at least 50 kg N per farm. (Quick baseline survey) The Goal indicators will be delivered through the Humidtropics R4D platforms and require more time than the 3-year project duration. LegumeCHOICE Output 1 Reporting

Data analysis, reporting and publishing Quick baseline survey Farm typology indicators. Test thresholds and revise where needed (to be discussed and agreed, what proportion of hh fall into resource wealthy, medium, poor?) Legume baseline, area under legume, type, how it is grown, production/productivity, biological N-fixation (to be discussed and agreed during this meeting) When data entered from all Action sites are validated one file will be formed and exported to suitable programs for further data analysis (cross-site analysis, 1.4) Prepare Action site manuscripts, baseline survey only or including farm characterization survey (discuss and agree) LegumeCHOICE Output 1 Reporting

Area per household in implementation site A Area per household (ha) Typology, criteria used Farm-size (ha) Low resource, <x Medium resource, x-y High resource,>y LegumeCHOICE Output 1 Reporting

Livestock, types in no of hh in implementation site A Typology, criteria used Livestock (oxen, local cattle or improved breeds, etc) Low resource, <x Medium resource, x-y High resource,>y LegumeCHOICE Output 1 Reporting

Fertilizer input, kg per farm Typology, criteria used Chemical Fertilizer (kg per farm) Low resource, <x, or none Medium resource, x-y, below recommended High resource,>y, recommended or above LegumeCHOICE Output 1 Reporting

Assessing current contributions of legumes to rural livelihoods (1.1), cont. Farm characterization Farm Characterization tool developed Training workshop in Nairobi, July, Field hh survey carried out Sep/Oct (all 12 IS ?) 24 hh per Implementation site (8 per typology) selected based on quick baseline survey CSProo data entry form prepared, data being entered, need to be validated Statistical data analysis and report writing per Action Site (agree format and time plan) Cross-site comparison (agree format and time plan) LegumeCHOICE Output 1 Reporting

Assessing current institutional environment within which smallholders operate (Activity 1.2) Markets (input and output), institutions (advisory service, policy, etc) at Field Site level. Secondary information, e.g. Humidtropics Situation Analysis and national surveys Developed checklist of key informant discussion on socio-technical conditions at field site level (in Kisii) Implement socio-technical characterization to inform local actors and for 1.3 (where are we?) LegumeCHOICE Tool tests at expert meeting indicate that many constraints for legume intensification & diversification is at the level above farm hh LegumeCHOICE Output 1 Reporting

Identification of entry points for legume intensification & diversification, based on results from above activities & secondary information (1.3) Guideline and checklist for Focus Group Discussions (FGD) developed and agreed FGDs carried out in Implementation sites in gender differentiated groups (8 FGD per Action Site); legume use, types, production system, challenges/constraints, and niches/opportunities Discuss how to use baseline and farm characterization data to inform the entry point identification (Addis) Second round FGD using the LegumCHOICE tool will also inform entry points (to be carried out in Febr 2015) LegumeCHOICE Output 1 Reporting

Cross-site analysis of the lessons learnt through will produce IPGs, for use within and beyond the Humidtropics Action Sites (1.4) CSProo data entry and export of data to excel or statistical programs enable cross-site Agree on hypothesis, questions, analysis to be carried out Scientific publication plan, start to draft manuscript 1 in Addis, agree on target journal and time plan What more? LegumeCHOICE Output 1 Reporting

Communication Blog published from the Farm Characterization training workshop unified-solution-food-fodder-soil-fertility/ Conference presentation, Morocco (Irene Okeyo) Any more? Internal/external – I promise to start add all documents on the wiki LegumeCHOICE Output 1 Reporting

Output 1 Activities to discuss and agree February 2-4, 2015 LegumeCHOICE Output 1 Reporting