Monitoring AT Efficacy Brian W. Wojcik, MS. Ed., ATP SEAT Center Illinois State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is problem-solving? A decision making process that uses data 1. Problem Identification 2. Problem Analysis 3. Plan Development 4. Plan Implementation.
Advertisements

Administrators Meeting April 21, Key Areas of Grant-Based Monitoring Schools to be Served Instructional Assessments Instructional Strategies and.
Brian W. Wojcik, Ed.D., ATP SEAT Center Illinois State University.
Understanding Challenging Behavior
Response to Instruction and Intervention Process Presentation.
 EC Professional Development Day February 18, 2013.
Assistive Technology Overview. What is Assistive Technology? Assistive technology (AT) is equipment or software that is used to increase, maintain, or.
Evidence, Ethics, and the Law Ronnie Detrich Wing Institute.
Considering Assistive Technology and the AT Plan Sara Menzel, ATP UCP Michigan Assistive Technology Center
Ideas from the Outcomes Think Tank. Gather family’s concerns and general information about child following program procedures Use 3 global outcomes as.
Brian W. Wojcik, Ed.D., ATP SEAT Center Illinois State University.
Assistive Technology: Making it Real! Brian W. Wojcik, Ed.D., ATP SEAT Center Illinois State University.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
Universal Screening: Answers to District Leaders Questions Are you uncertain about the practical matters of Response to Intervention?
Positive Behavioral Intervention and Support (PBIS) A New Way to Manage By: Annie Schave and Emily Smith.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Presented by Ashley Adamo and Brian Mitchell January 6, 2012.
Supporting the Instructional Process Instructional Assistant Training.
Using Targeted Interventions to Support School Improvement Presenter: Kathleen Smith Director Office of School Improvement.
Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring Nebraska Department of Education Response-to-Intervention Consortium.
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is RTI?
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Georgia’s Pyramid. Pyramid Vocabulary  Formative Assessment  Universal Screening  Intervention  Progress Monitoring.
A Model for Developing AT Competencies for Education Professionals Brian W. Wojcik George R. Peterson-Karlan H Phillips Parette SEAT Center, Illinois State.
Assistive Technology: Making it Real! Brian W. Wojcik, MS. Ed, ATP SEAT Center Illinois State University.
Higher Physical Education
Power Pack Click to begin. Click to advance Congratulations! The RtI process has just become much easier. This team member notebook contains all the information.
IEP Training Module Two Data. Cypress-Fairbanks I.S.D. Purpose of Training The purpose of these training modules is to refine and expand your current.
2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2pt 3 pt 4pt 5 pt 1pt 2pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4pt 5 pt 1pt FBA or FA AssessmentTerms Data Collection.
MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.
Interventions ARC Chairperson Training Special Education Regulation 1997 Special Education Regulations …providing incentives for whole-school.
Overview of Evaluation Designs. Learning objectives By the end of this presentation, you will be able to: Explain evaluation design Describe the differences.
Progress Monitoring Intensive Behavior Supports, 2008 December, 2008.
Progress Monitoring for All Student Adapted from the Kentucky Systems of Interventions Guidance Document.
4- Step Middletown’s Response to Intervention process.
EVALUATION OF HRD PROGRAMS Jayendra Rimal. The Purpose of HRD Evaluation HRD Evaluation – the systematic collection of descriptive and judgmental information.
+ PROGRESS MONITORING: IEP Goals and Benchmarks By Marlene Chavez.
Environmental Management Plan (EMP) Required for: Full EIA based on Palestinian EIA Policy Category A projects based on World Bank Policy.
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619 Measurement of Preschool Outcomes-SPP Indicator #7 Training Sessions-2010.
What is Response to Intervention (RTI)? Response to Intervention is the practice of providing high-quality instruction and interventions matched to student.
Jeopardy The LawDataFiscal CentsCEIS PlanExtras Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Final Jeopardy.
Climbing the Ladder Special Education OVERVIEW Niles North High School, District 219.
TigerLIFE Behavioral Unit J. Brian Smith, Ed.D., BCBA Marissa Harris, M.S., Ed.D. Graduate Student.
Assistive Technology: Making it Real! Brian W. Wojcik, MS. Ed, ATP SEAT Center Illinois State University.
 Three Criteria: Inadequate classroom achievement (after intervention) Insufficient progress Consideration of exclusionary factors  Sources of Data.
1 Scoring Provincial Large-Scale Assessments María Elena Oliveri, University of British Columbia Britta Gundersen-Bryden, British Columbia Ministry of.
Chapter 6: High-Leverage Practice 1: Formative Evaluation.
Sept. 16, Session #2 PED3106 : Agenda - Housekeeping: Hardcopy course outlines, Assignment 1 (8:30AM-8:45AM) - Complimen-tree, Inclusion in I/S Schools.
Assistive Technology: Making it Real! Brian W. Wojcik, Ed.D., ATP SEAT Center Illinois State University.
1 Controls in Strategic management Dr. Fred Mugambi Mwirigi JKUAT.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
Chapter 23: Overview of the Occupational Therapy Process and Outcomes
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
Mock Action Research Proposal Presentation Heather Boyden.
Module 5: Communication Plan and Process for Addressing Barriers
Reporting Student Progress
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Clinical Studies Continuum
The Financial Planning Process
CHAPTER 2: Steps in the Assessment Process
Office of Education Improvement and Innovation
Response to Intervention = RTI
BIP Progress Monitoring
FBA or FA Data Collection Intervention Planning Assessment Terms
Brodhead, Cox, and Quigley (2018)
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Assistive Technology Implementation
Disproportionality Prevention Support
Introduction to Planning
Monitoring and Evaluating FGM/C abandonment programs
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

Monitoring AT Efficacy Brian W. Wojcik, MS. Ed., ATP SEAT Center Illinois State University

What We Know: IDEIA requires that AT devices and services be ‘considered’ when developing IFSPs & IEPs AT consideration process should identify appropriate AT devices for children to perform targeted tasks Data collection regarding AT impact on skill development is necessary to make informed decisions both before and after AT implementation

Assistive Technology (AT): A Compensatory Intervention Remember that effective AT allows a student to perform a task that, without the AT, the student would not be able to do. Effective AT results in greater performance on a given task but may not result in a change in the skill level related to the task.

Concurrent Time Series Smith (2000) outlined a procedure referred to as the “time series concurrent and differential approach” Involves a series of measures taken over time of a student’s performance on a particular task both with and without the AT. Works best when consistent probes are used to measure and subsequently monitor progress.

Process Questions What are possible AT interventions? (Consideration) What tasks are involved? What is the behavior to measure? (Impacted Area of Performance) What is the unit of measurement? What is the measurement method? What is the frequency of measurement?

Developing Probes Observable, Measurable, Reliable, Targeted Behavior Common Denominator (e.g., specific time period, number of available attempts)

Probe Frequency In General, ▫Probes should be administered at a ratio of 5 to 1 (with AT and without AT) ▫Probes are administered at a higher frequency during a consideration phase than an implementation phase

What are the “AT Questions”? Consideration… ▫Is AT needed? ▫Is it a good initial match? ▫How does one AT perform relative to another AT? Implementation and Evaluation ▫Is the AT Working Over Time? ▫Does the AT Continue to be Needed by the Student?

Let’s look at some scenarios…

Thinking about the potential ‘match’ of AT

Performance on Task AT Trial Phase Consideration

Performance on Task Consideration AT Trial Phase

Performance on Task Consideration AT 1 AT 2 AT 3 AT Trial Phase

Performance on Task Consideration AT Trial Phase

Investigating the efficacy of AT over time

Performance on Task Time Implementation and Evaluation

Performance on Task Time Implementation and Evaluation

Performance on Task Time Implementation and Evaluation

Performance on Task Time Implementation and Evaluation

Performance on Task Time Implementation and Evaluation

Benefits of Concurrent Time Series Allows for Data Based Decision Making ▫Provides support for initial need for AT ▫Ensures that the reletive effectiveness of AT over time can be monitored ▫Monitors any ‘side effects’ that may occur during AT use Once established, easy to monitor over time

Using the Tool!

Questions