Monitoring AT Efficacy Brian W. Wojcik, MS. Ed., ATP SEAT Center Illinois State University
What We Know: IDEIA requires that AT devices and services be ‘considered’ when developing IFSPs & IEPs AT consideration process should identify appropriate AT devices for children to perform targeted tasks Data collection regarding AT impact on skill development is necessary to make informed decisions both before and after AT implementation
Assistive Technology (AT): A Compensatory Intervention Remember that effective AT allows a student to perform a task that, without the AT, the student would not be able to do. Effective AT results in greater performance on a given task but may not result in a change in the skill level related to the task.
Concurrent Time Series Smith (2000) outlined a procedure referred to as the “time series concurrent and differential approach” Involves a series of measures taken over time of a student’s performance on a particular task both with and without the AT. Works best when consistent probes are used to measure and subsequently monitor progress.
Process Questions What are possible AT interventions? (Consideration) What tasks are involved? What is the behavior to measure? (Impacted Area of Performance) What is the unit of measurement? What is the measurement method? What is the frequency of measurement?
Developing Probes Observable, Measurable, Reliable, Targeted Behavior Common Denominator (e.g., specific time period, number of available attempts)
Probe Frequency In General, ▫Probes should be administered at a ratio of 5 to 1 (with AT and without AT) ▫Probes are administered at a higher frequency during a consideration phase than an implementation phase
What are the “AT Questions”? Consideration… ▫Is AT needed? ▫Is it a good initial match? ▫How does one AT perform relative to another AT? Implementation and Evaluation ▫Is the AT Working Over Time? ▫Does the AT Continue to be Needed by the Student?
Let’s look at some scenarios…
Thinking about the potential ‘match’ of AT
Performance on Task AT Trial Phase Consideration
Performance on Task Consideration AT Trial Phase
Performance on Task Consideration AT 1 AT 2 AT 3 AT Trial Phase
Performance on Task Consideration AT Trial Phase
Investigating the efficacy of AT over time
Performance on Task Time Implementation and Evaluation
Performance on Task Time Implementation and Evaluation
Performance on Task Time Implementation and Evaluation
Performance on Task Time Implementation and Evaluation
Performance on Task Time Implementation and Evaluation
Benefits of Concurrent Time Series Allows for Data Based Decision Making ▫Provides support for initial need for AT ▫Ensures that the reletive effectiveness of AT over time can be monitored ▫Monitors any ‘side effects’ that may occur during AT use Once established, easy to monitor over time
Using the Tool!
Questions