Joe Kwak, InterDigital 1 Submission PSNI: New PHY Measurement a subjective, comparative measurement to support network management Joe Kwak InterDigital.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /300R0 Submission May 2002 Terry Cole, AMDSlide 1 Slides to Assist with Joint Meeting of TgE and TgG Terry Cole AMD Fellow
Advertisements

A Brief Introduction to the IEEE802.11h Draft
Legacy Coexistence – A Better Way?
Doc.: IEEE /0237r0 Submission February 12, 2009 Rolf de Vegt (Qualcomm)Slide 1 Inputs for a ac Spec Framework Methodology Date:
Doc.: IEEE /080r0A Submission January 2003 Black/Kasslin/Sinivaara, NokiaSlide 1 A Framework for RRM Simon Black, Mika Kasslin, Hasse Sinivaara.
Doc.: IEEE /301R0 Submission May 2002 Terry Cole, AMDSlide 1 A More Efficient Protection Mechanism Terry Cole AMD Fellow +1.
An approach to the problem of optimizing channel parameters March 2001 Vlad Oleynik, Umbrella Technology Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /152 Submission.
Doc.: IEEE /202r1 Submission July 2000 Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 1 of 22 Frequency Domain Modulators for b Mark Webster Intersil Corporation.
9/15/03IEEE Singapore Meeting1 FER: Do We Need It? Joseph Cleveland Anna Tee Jin Weon Chang Samsung Spetember 15, 2003 IEEE C /83r1.
Doc.: IEEE /081r0 Submission January 2001 Shoemake, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANS) Submission Title: [Staccato UWB PHY Proposal for TG4a] Date Submitted:
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANS) Submission Title: [Staccato UWB PHY Proposal for TG4a] Date Submitted:
Submission Page 1 January 2002 doc.: IEEE 802.RR-02/018A-d1 Andrew Myles, Cisco Systems Report of ad hoc group relating to DFS and JPT5G proposal Andrew.
Doc.: IEEE /543r0 Submission April 2006 Richard van Nee, Airgo NetworksSlide 1 Transmitter CCA Issues in 2.4 GHz April /543r0 Richard van.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0353r0 March 2014 Dongguk Lim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Suggestion on PHY Abstraction for Evaluation Methodology Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE Comment #1 from WG Comment: In Section 5.2.b two examples of spectrum resource measurements are given: PER and.
Doc.: IEEE / hew Submission March 2014 Raja Banerjea, CSRSlide 1 A Simplified Simultaneous Transmit and Receive Mechanism Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0071r1 Submission January 2004 Aleksandar Purkovic, Nortel NetworksSlide 1 LDPC vs. Convolutional Codes for n Applications:
Doc.: IEEE /531 Submission July 2003 Hart/Skellern CiscoSlide 1 EVM vs PER Plot Not Promising for PSNI Brian Hart, David Skellern (Cisco Systems)
Doc.: IEEE /286r0 Submission May 2001 Shoemake and Batra, TI Range vs. Rate Comparison of Remaining IEEE g Proposals: PBCC and CCK-OFDM.
Interference Cancellation for Downlink MU-MIMO
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0343r0 Operator Oriented Wi-Fi — Problem Analysis and Proposals Dapeng Liu Chunju Shao Fang Xie Ge Liu China Mobile.
Submission doc.: IEEE ai November 2012 Lei Wang, InterDigital CommunicationsSlide 1 Proposals for the FD Frame Capability, Security and.
Doc.: IEEE /0782r0 Submission July 2010 Daewon Lee, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 STA MU-MIMO Group Management Signaling Design Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1278r0 Submission BSS load balancing for MU-MIMO Date: Authors: Nov 2010 Slide 1Daewon Lee, LG Electronics.
Doc.: IEEE /0783r0 Submission July 2010 Daewon Lee, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 MU-MIMO support for BSS load balancing Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1234r0 Submission November 2009 Sameer Vermani, QualcommSlide 1 Interference Cancellation for Downlink MU-MIMO Date: Authors:
1 Understanding and Mitigating the Impact of RF Interference on Networks Ramki Gummadi (MIT), David Wetherall (UW) Ben Greenstein (IRS), Srinivasan.
September 2002 Steve Pope, TISlide 1 doc.: IEEE /520r0 Submission Issues Related to RSSI Measurement Steve Pope Texas Instruments September.
Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Discussions on the Definition of CCA Threshold
Doc.: IEEE /124r0 Submission January 2003 Byoung-Jo “J” KimSlide 1 RRM Requirements for Public WLAN Service Provider Byoung-Jo “J” Kim AT&T Labs-Research.
1 Physical Layer ผศ. ดร. อนันต์ ผลเพิ่ม Asst. Prof. Anan Phonphoem, Ph.D. Computer Engineering Department.
Doc.: IEEE /383 Submission November1998November 1998 Jamshid Khun-Jush, ETSI-BRANSlide 1 BRAN#11 PHY Decisions & Issues to Resolved with
IEEE802.11a 指導教授 : 高永安 學生 : 陳穎俊. PLCP preamble.
Doc.: IEEE s Submission September 2015 Hidetoshi Yokota and Ruben Salazar, Landis&GyrSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for.
January 2003 Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications Corporation
SubmissionJoe Kwak, InterDigital1 BSS Load: AP Loading Metric for QOS Joe Kwak InterDigital doc: IEEE /0079r1May 2005.
RRM Architecture Considerations
Doc: IEEE /0779r1September 2005 Submission Joe Kwak, InterDigital 1 RSNI: Simple SNIR for TGk Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Submission Page 1 November 2002 doc.: IEEE /677r0 Daryl Kaiser, Cisco Systems Radio Measurement Actions Daryl Kaiser (Cisco Systems) 12 November.
802.11b PHY Wireless LANs Page 1 of 23 IEEE b WLAN Physical Layer Svetozar Broussev 16-Feb-2005.
Doc.: IEEE /536r0 Submission September 2001 A. Soomro and S. Choi, Philips Research, USASlide 1 Proposal to Add Link Margin Field in IEEE h.
SubmissionJoe Kwak, InterDigital1 BSS Load: AP Loading Metric for QOS Joe Kwak InterDigital doc: IEEE /0079r0January 2005.
SubmissionJoe Kwak, InterDigital1 RCPI: Improved RSSI Measurement a quantized power measurement to support network management Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications.
Submission Page 1 January 2003 doc.: IEEE /029r0 Daryl Kaiser, Cisco Systems New Radio Measurement Actions within the h Framework Daryl.
Doc.: IEEE /618r0 Submission August 2002 Bobby Jose,Slide 1 RRM Requirements discussion on CCA Bobby Jose.
SubmissionJoe Kwak, InterDigital1 Retrieving MIB contents from STA’s Joe Kwak, Marian Rudolf InterDigital doc: IEEE /554r0July 2003.
SubmissionJoe Kwak, InterDigital1 Two New MAC Measurements loading measurements for STA transmit traffic and AP service ability to support network management.
SubmissionJoe Kwak, InterDigital1 PHY measurements for interference reduction from 11h Joe Kwak, Marian Rudolf InterDigital doc: IEEE /537r0July.
Doc.: IEEE g Submission March 2010 Tim Schmidl (Texas Instruments), Emmanuel Monnerie (Landis & Gyr), Shusaku Shimada (Yokogawa Co.),
Doc.: IEEE /034r0 Submission January 2002 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGg ChairpersonSlide 1 TGg Report to the IEEE Working Group Matthew B. Shoemake.
Doc.: IEEE e submission Kondou (Sony)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
Doc.: IEEE /457 Submission May 2003 Hart/Ryan/Skellern CiscoSlide 1 Use of EVM to Measure Rx Output Signal Quality Brian Hart, Phil Ryan, David.
CCA Sensitivity Date: September 2017
January 2003 Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications Corporation
March t Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [A Simple System Kept Simple]
AP Service Load: Improved Definition
January 2003 Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications Corporation
January 2003 Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications Corporation
Signal Quality Measurements
January 2003 Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications Corporation
The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator
EVM vs PER Plot Not Promising for PSNI
March t Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [A Simple System Kept Simple]
January 2003 Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications Corporation
Simple SNIR for TGk 2005-JULY-21 Authors: Joe Kwak, InterDigital
CCA Sensitivity Date: September 2017
False L-STF Detection Issue
January 2003 Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications Corporation
Presentation transcript:

Joe Kwak, InterDigital 1 Submission PSNI: New PHY Measurement a subjective, comparative measurement to support network management Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications Corporation doc: IEEE /100r3January 2003

doc: IEEE /100r3January 2003 Submission Joe Kwak, InterDigital 2 Outline Need for new PHY measurement Difficulties with objective measurements RSSI Limitations Perceived Post-Processing S/(N+I) Indicator (PSNI) PSNI Specification details Tasks for next meeting

doc: IEEE /100r3January 2003 Submission Joe Kwak, InterDigital K PHY Measurements TGK is tasked with providing interfaces, measurements, and mechanisms to support higher layer functions for efficient network management currently has several PHY measurements, none of which seem suitable for handoff or network management purposes. RSSI: reportable parameter for each received frame, but unquantized and not fully specified. Can be used to compare frames from different AP sources. SQ: another unquantized indicator of code sync, but applicable only to DSSS PHY. RPI histogram: quantized and specified, but measures channel power from all sources: x, radars, and other interferers. Cannot target measurement on any AP using particular PHY.

doc: IEEE /100r3January 2003 Submission Joe Kwak, InterDigital 4 Network Management Needs Comparative PHY (sects. 15, 17, 18, 19) Measurement 1. To compare AP signals on same channel, same PHY, in same STA 2. To compare AP signals on same channel, same PHY, in different STAs 3. To compare AP signals on different channels, same PHY, in same STA 4. To compare AP signals on different channels, same PHY, in different STAs 5. To compare AP signals on different PHYs in different STAs 6. To compare AP signals on different PHYs in same STA Comparative measurements are crucial to QOS and handoff decisions for Network Management, as discussed at Tutorial at last meeting. Comparative measurements are important for load management and interference mitigation. RSSI, as currently defined, only addresses needs #1 and #3.

doc: IEEE /100r3January 2003 Submission Joe Kwak, InterDigital 5 RSSI definitions in PMD_RSSI.indicate(RSSI): The RSSI shall be a measure of the RF energy received by the DSSS PHY. RSSI indications of up to 8 bits (256 levels) are supported RXVECTOR RSSI: The allowed values for the receive signal strength indicator (RSSI) parameter are in the range from 0 through RSSI maximum. This parameter is a measure by the PHY sublayer of the energy observed at the antenna used to receive the current PPDU. RSSI shall be measured during the reception of the PLCP preamble. RSSI is intended to be used in a relative manner, and it shall be a monotonically increasing function of the received power PMD_RSSI.indicate: This primitive shall provide the following parameters: PMD_RSSI.indicate(RSSI) The RSSI shall be a measure of the RF energy received by the OFDM PHY. RSSI indications of up to eight bits (256 levels) are supported PMD_RSSI.indicate: This primitive provides RSSI parameter as 0–8 bits of RSSI. The RSSI is a measure of the RF energy received by the High Rate PHY RSSI: The RSSI is a measure of the RF energy received by the ERP. The value depends on the value of the MODULATION parameter: CCK, ER-PBCC: the 8 bit value of RSSI as described in ERP-OFDM, DSSS-OFDM, the 8 bit value is in the range of 0 to RSSI maximum as described in

doc: IEEE /100r3January 2003 Submission Joe Kwak, InterDigital 6 RSSI Limitations RSSI is a monotonic, relative indicator of power at the antenna connector, which indicates the sum of desired signal + noise + interference powers. In high interference environments, RSSI is not an adequate indicator of desired signal quality. RSSI is not fully specified: no unit definitions, no performance requirements (accuracy, fidelity, testability). Since so little about RSSI is specified, it must be assumed that widely variant implementations already exist. It is not possible to compare RSSIs from different STAs and perhaps not even from different channels/bands within same STA. RSSI may have limited use for evaluating AP options within a STA and within a given PHY, but not between PHYs. RSSI is rescaled between DSSS and OFDM PHYs. RSSI is clearly not useable by network management for load balancing or load shifting. RSSI from one STA does not relate to RSSI from any other STA.

doc: IEEE /100r3January 2003 Submission Joe Kwak, InterDigital 7 Desired Signal RF Power level and resulting Signal-to-Noise ratio (S/N+I) at antenna input are both directly proportional to FER at output. Options for PHY measurements Radio front end A/D FEC Decoder (optional) Demodulator and tracking loops (PHY specific) A: RF power, RF S/(N+I) from each AP DC B A B: BB S/(N+I) from each AP, (BB power constant by AGC) C&D: Bit Error Rate data rate Frame Check (CRC) E E: Frame Error Rate data rate AGC

doc: IEEE /100r3January 2003 Submission Joe Kwak, InterDigital 8 Best Choice for K PHYs? Accurate S/N+I (or RSSI power) measurement at A is interesting but because RF/demod implementations vary widely, it cannot be used comparatively between STAs to evaluate delivered signal quality. Accurate FER measurement at E is ideal, but cannot be measured frame by frame. FER can only be accurately measured over 100s-1000s of frames. Also, FERs are comparable only at same frame size and data rate. Good STA Med STA Marginal STA AE 10db 10E-2 10E-4 10E-5 Good STA Med STA Marginal STA AE 10db 12db 15db10E-5 Signal at same objective S/N Signal at same subjective S/N Best choice is somewhere in the middle.

doc: IEEE /100r3January 2003 Submission Joe Kwak, InterDigital 9 Proposal: Use a demodulator-specific, subjective estimator of S/(N+I) to provide quantized FER indication. All digital demodulators use tracking loops and complex post-processing to demodulate received symbols. Many internal demodulator metrics are proportional to perceived S/(N+I). Examples: PSK: baseband phase jitter DSSS: spreading code correlation quality OFDM: frequency tracking and channel tracking stability Demodulator internal metrics are available on a frame-by-frame basis. Demodulator metrics proportional to analog S/(N+I) are available at all data rates. Metric may be rate dependant or not. Demodulator internal metrics may be calibrated with respect to actual FER performance (at any specified data rate/coding rate) in controlled environment to accurately indicate perceived or delivered S/(N+I). Such demodulator internal metrics are fast estimators of S/(N+I) in both interference environments and interference-free (noise only) environments. TGK need not specify which demodulator metrics to use, but needs only to specify how the quantized indicator relates to S/(N+I) and FER

doc: IEEE /100r3January 2003 Submission Joe Kwak, InterDigital 10 Perceived Signal to Noise Indication (PSNI) Specified like RSSI: 8-bit unsigned value, monotonically increasing with increasing S/(N+I). PSNI shall be logarithmically scaled to perceived S/(N+I) which relates directly to FER performance. Specify PSNI output indication value at two FER points: first point to anchor indicator, second point to quantize and scale indicator range of values. Specify accuracy of output indicator for the selected two FER points. PSNI range shall span the lower 40 db portion of the operating range of S/(N+I) to cover high FERs at data rates from 1 to 54 Mbps.

doc: IEEE /100r3January 2003 Submission Joe Kwak, InterDigital 11 First Draft Spec Wording for PSNI PSNI: The PSNI indicator is a measure of the perceived, post-processing signal-to-noise- plus-interference (S/N+I) ratio in the demodulator. The allowed values for the Perceived Signal to Noise Indicator (PSNI) parameter shall be an 8 bit value in the range from 0 through 255. This parameter shall be a measure by the PHY sublayer of the perceived signal quality observed after RF downconversion and is derived from internal digital signal processing metrics of the demodulator used to receive the current frame. PSNI shall be measured over an entire received frame. PSNI is intended to be used in a relative manner, and it shall be a monotonically increasing, logarithmic function of the perceived S/(N+I). PSNI accuracy and range shall be specified at two different FER operating conditions for each PHY: For DSSS PHYs at 1, 2, 5.5, and 11Mpbs: 1. At an FER of 10% for 1000 octet frames received at an uncoded data rate of 11Mbps, PSNI shall indicate 128 +/ At an FER of 10% for 100 octet frames received at an uncoded data rate of 11Mbps, PSNI shall indicate 121 +/- 7. For OFDM PHYs at 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 54Mpbs: 1. At an FER of 10% for 1000 octet frames received at a data rate of 12Mbps using R=1/2 coding, PSNI shall indicate TBD. 2. At an FER of 10% for 100 octet frames received at a data rate of 12Mbps using R=1/2 coding, PSNI shall indicate TBD.

doc: IEEE /100r3January 2003 Submission Joe Kwak, InterDigital 12 PSNI Supercedes RSSI in Existing Specs The definition of PSNI meets the requirements for RSSI: 8-bit unsigned value (for DSSS PHYs) Proportional to received signal power TGK can specify that for STAs which comply with K, STAs shall report PSNI in any data field calling for RSSI. This makes the PSNI indicator broadly applicable as a frame quality measurement useful for all PHYs and STAs. RSSI(PSNI) elements and reporting/posting may further be mandated in the MIB by K to make the PSNI improvements available to higher layers.

doc: IEEE /100r3January 2003 Submission Joe Kwak, InterDigital 13 PSNI specified on BER/FER curves For 11 Mbps For 5.5 Mbps For 2 Mbps For 1 Mbps PSNI Two specified points on logarithmic scale: STA front-end losses, antenna configs, or demod losses do not affect PSNI measure.

doc: IEEE /100r3January 2003 Submission Joe Kwak, InterDigital 14 Partial DSSS PSNI table

doc: IEEE /100r3January 2003 Submission Joe Kwak, InterDigital 15 Need to place OFDM curves on PSNI scale Figure 3: BER Curves for Coded and Uncoded OFDM

doc: IEEE /100r3January 2003 Submission Joe Kwak, InterDigital 16 Tasks for Next Meeting Complete OFDM mapping onto PSNI scale. Complete PSNI table for OFDM Verify PSNI scale range. Discuss ease of implementation with modem manufacturers. Discuss PSNI accuracy spec: +/- 7 units == +/- 1.1 dB. Discuss PSNI accuracy, for full range of log scale, when specified at only two points. Consider feedback, criticism and alternate approaches.