The world of 2d electrons is exciting: enabling ‘ballistic high mobility transport’ modulation doping enabling ‘ballistic high mobility transport’ modulation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nanostructures on ultra-clean two-dimensional electron gases T. Ihn, C. Rössler, S. Baer, K. Ensslin C. Reichl and W. Wegscheider.
Advertisements

1 High order moments of shot noise in mesoscopic systems Michael Reznikov, Technion Experiment: G. Gershon, Y. Bomze, D. Shovkun Theory: E. Sukhorukov.
Solid state midterm report Quantum Hall effect g Chienchung Chen.
Pinning Mode Resonances of 2D Electron Stripe Phases in High Landau Levels Han Zhu ( 朱涵 ) Physics Department, Princeton University National High Magnetic.
Electrical Techniques MSN506 notes. Electrical characterization Electronic properties of materials are closely related to the structure of the material.
High frequency conductivity of the high- mobility two-dimensional electron gas Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 76, No. 6, 7 February 2000 Date : 2004/11/08.
Markus Büttiker University of Geneva The Capri Spring School on Transport in Nanostructures April 3-7, 2006 Scattering Theory of Conductance and Shot Noise.
S. Y. Hsu ( 許世英 ) and K. M. Liu( 劉凱銘 ) May 29, 2007 NSC M and NSC M Department of Electrophysics, National Chiao Tung University.
LPS Quantum computing lunchtime seminar Friday Oct. 22, 1999.
Laterally confined Semiconductor Quantum dots Martin Ebner and Christoph Faigle.
Scattering theory of conductance and noise Markus Büttiker University of Geneva Multi-probe conductors.
Lecture 25 Practice problems Boltzmann Statistics, Maxwell speed distribution Fermi-Dirac distribution, Degenerate Fermi gas Bose-Einstein distribution,
Fractional topological insulators
Application to transport phenomena  Current through an atomic metallic contact  Shot noise in an atomic contact  Current through a resonant level 
B.Spivak University of Washington with S. Kivelson, S. Sondhi, S. Parameswaran A typology of quantum Hall liquids. Weakly coupled Pfaffian state as a type.
Optics on Graphene. Gate-Variable Optical Transitions in Graphene Feng Wang, Yuanbo Zhang, Chuanshan Tian, Caglar Girit, Alex Zettl, Michael Crommie,
Julien Gabelli Bertrand Reulet Non-Gaussian Shot Noise in a Tunnel Junction in the Quantum Regime Laboratoire de Physique des Solides Bât. 510, Université.
Experiments on Luttinger liquid properties of
Single-shot read-out of an individual electron spin in a quantum dot J. M. Elzerman, R. Hanson, L. H. Willems van Beveren, B. Witkamp, L. M. K. Vandersypen,
The Origins of X-Rays. The X-Ray Spectrum The X-Ray Spectrum (Changes in Voltage) The characteristic lines are a result of electrons ejecting orbital.
Quantum Hall Effect Jesse Noffsinger Group Meeting Talk (As required by the Governor of the State of California) April 17, 2007.
© 2010 Eric Pop, UIUCECE 598EP: Hot Chips Conductance Quantization One-dimensional ballistic/coherent transport Landauer theory The role of contacts Quantum.
The noise spectra of mesoscopic structures Eitan Rothstein With Amnon Aharony and Ora Entin University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.
Quantum conductance I.A. Shelykh St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University, St. Petersburg, Russia International Center for Condensed Matter Physics,
Ballistic and quantum transports in carbon nanotubes.
ELCT564 Spring /17/20151ELCT564 Diodes, Transistors and Mixers.
Observation of neutral modes in the fractional quantum hall effect regime Aveek Bid Nature (2010) Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Science,
D. Borba 1 21 st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu China 21 st October 2006 Excitation of Alfvén eigenmodes with sub-Alfvénic neutral beam ions in.
1/f noise in devices 전광선.
Kaiserslautern, April 2006 Quantum Hall effects - an introduction - AvH workshop, Vilnius, M. Fleischhauer.
Why silicon detectors? Main characteristics of silicon detectors: Small band gap (E g = 1.12 V)  good resolution in the deposited energy  3.6 eV of deposited.
Electron coherence in the presence of magnetic impurities
Charge Carrier Related Nonlinearities
Introduction to fractional quantum Hall effect Milica V. Milovanović Institute of Physics Belgrade Scientific Computing Laboratory (Talk at Physics Faculty,
Chap. 41: Conduction of electricity in solids Hyun-Woo Lee.
Lecture Quantum Hall effect in 2D electron systems and its interpretation in terms of edge states of Landau levels Two-dimensional electrons in GaAs/AlGaAs.
Effects of Interaction and Disorder in Quantum Hall region of Dirac Fermions in 2D Graphene Donna Sheng (CSUN) In collaboration with: Hao Wang (CSUN),
Introduction to even-denominator FQHE: composite fermions Tejas Deshpande Journal club: 11 November, 2014.
L4 ECE-ENGR 4243/ FJain 1 Derivation of current-voltage relation in 1-D wires/nanotubes (pp A) Ballistic, quasi-ballistic transport—elastic.
Inductance and AC Circuits. Mutual Inductance Self-Inductance Energy Stored in a Magnetic Field LR Circuits LC Circuits and Electromagnetic Oscillations.
Special Issues on Nanodevices1 Special Topics in Nanodevices 3 rd Lecture: Nanowire MOSFETs Byung-Gook Park.
Two Level Systems and Kondo-like traps as possible sources of decoherence in superconducting qubits Lara Faoro and Lev Ioffe Rutgers University (USA)
Magnetothermopower in high-mobility 2D electron gas: effect of microwave irradiation Oleg Raichev Department of Theoretical Physics Institute of Semiconductor.
Ady Stern (Weizmann) Papers: Stern & Halperin , PRL
1 of xx Coulomb-Blockade Oscillations in Semiconductor Nanostructures (Part I & II) PHYS 503: Physics Seminar Fall 2008 Deepak Rajput Graduate Research.
Introduction to Semiconductor Technology. Outline 3 Energy Bands and Charge Carriers in Semiconductors.
Atoms in optical lattices and the Quantum Hall effect Anders S. Sørensen Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen.
Lesson 6 Magnetic field induced transport in nanostructures.
Progress Report: Tools for Quantum Information Processing in Microelectronics ARO MURI (Rochester-Stanford-Harvard-Rutgers) Third Year Review, Harvard.
The Puzzling Boundaries of Topological Quantum Matter Michael Levin Collaborators: Chien-Hung Lin (University of Chicago) Chenjie Wang (University of Chicago)
Basics of edge channels in IQHE doing physics with integer edge channels studies of transport in FQHE regime deviations from the ‘accepted’ picture Moty.
Quantum Hall Effect and Fractional Quantum Hall Effect.
University of Washington
1 The 5/2 Edge IPAM meeting on Topological Quantum Computing February 26- March 2, 2007 MPA Fisher, with Paul Fendley and Chetan Nayak Motivation: FQHE:
Application of photodiodes
From fractionalized topological insulators to fractionalized Majoranas
Fractional Berry phase effect and composite particle hole liquid in partial filled LL Yizhi You KITS, 2017.
Lecture #5 OUTLINE Intrinsic Fermi level Determination of EF
QHE discovered by Von Klitzing in 1980
Quantum Hall effect & Topology
(As required by the Governor of the State of California)
Quantum Hall effect in a nutshell
Strong Coupling of a Spin Ensemble to a Superconducting Resonator
Correlations of Electrons in Magnetic Fields
Taras Patlatiuk Zumbühl Group.
Michael Fuhrer Director, FLEET Monash University
FSU Physics Department
Ady Stern (Weizmann) The quantum Hall effects – introduction
Why silicon detectors? Main characteristics of silicon detectors:
Beyond Si MOSFETs Part 1.
Presentation transcript:

the world of 2d electrons is exciting: enabling ‘ballistic high mobility transport’ modulation doping enabling ‘ballistic high mobility transport’ modulation doping easy electrostatic control close to surface easy electrostatic control close to surface unique excitations (quasiparticles) unique excitations (quasiparticles)

exchange statistics in the 2d world richer than the 3d world

exchange statistics in 3d fermions bosons both

fermionsbosons consequences…

exchange statistics in 2d  abelian (Laughlin qp’s) anyons

exchange statistics in 2d  non-abelian degenerate ground state exchange  unitary non-abelian anyons

basics of edge channels in IQHE doing physics with integer edge channels studies of edge transport in FQHE regime deviations from the ‘accepted’ picture Moty Heiblum QHE Regime Edge States in QHE Regime …. their nature & use

my 2d world high mobility 2DEG GaAs-AlGaAs

B V H V xx I L W X Lorentz electric field B R xx R xy classical Hall effect  xx =  xx =0

classical electron trajectories B most convenient picture…

quantizing the Hall effect

choice of gauges for H

m=0 harmonic oscillator EnEn n n degeneracy=B /  0 00 useful in interference experiments m = 1, 2, 3

useful in understanding edge modes do not carry energy / current harmonic oscillator

most convenient (another) gauge resembling classical orbits

= number of filled LL = number of electrons per flux quantum  0 =h/e EFEF energy NeNe e EFEF NeNe =2 summary

what started it… in a Si MOSFET nsns R xx = 0 R H = ( e 2 /h ) -1 B = const.

= number of electrons per flux quantum

R H =(e 2 /3h) -1 continued with… in a GaAs MODFET

= number of electrons per flux quantum

energy gap plateaus in  xy and minima in  xx  energy gap E (  0 ) = E (0) gauge invariance  E (  0 ) = E (0)  xy = e 2 /h  xx =0 Magnetic Field, B (Tesla)

EFEF NeNe localized does not contribute to current delocalized contributes to current e weak disorder disordered 2DEG  bulk picture of QHE plateau

gauge invariance, =1/3… =e / 3 ohmic contact J (r ) 00 r

state of the art QHE states

few basics of IQHE IQHE edge channels

e e B near the edge skipping orbits 2d layer

approaching the edge … approaching the edge  energy curves up finite drift velocity v d =  /B truncated harmonic oscillator

simplistic view B >>0 B=0

incompressible compressible density increasing reaching maximum density of LL EFEF electrons move from LL n + 1 to n gaining cyclotron (Zeeman) energy charge imbalance charging energy competing with cyclotron energy LL

proposed edge structure compressible strips separated by incompressible strips where does current flow? in the insulating strips? in the conducting strips? arguments continue until today… local measurements of current distributions still lacking

edge channels immune to back scattering 1d edge channel carries E f +eV EfEf EfEf

hot spot He4 bubble ballistic, but with energy dissipation

is the simplistic view of non-interacting 1d edge channels correct ?  inter-channel interaction  intra-channel interaction

inter-channel… = 2 g Q = 2 e 2 /h e2/he2/h e2/he2/h e/2 -e/2 neutral charge slow ‘neutral’ mode fast ‘charge’ mode LL 1 LL 2 non interacting  Landau levels e injecting electrons  >0  =0 with interactions  new basis Berg et al., PRL (2009)

electronic beam splitter Quantum Point Contact (QPC) V gate V source r F t QPC 0 < t < 1

preferential backscattering of edge channels reflected higher LLs transmitted lower LLs partitioned LL V gate

how to test ? injecting and detecting LL 1 LL 2 e inducing noise in LL 1 (hot mode) via QPC e/2 -e/2 neutral charge projecting via QPC to LL 2 (cold mode) v v injecting electrons into LL 1 looking for fluctuations in LL 2 with no net current

current fluctuations shot noise

hot filament cathode anode + - emitted electrons noisy current in vacuum tubes shot noise classical shot noise Schottky, 1918 it started with - noise in vacuum tubes

classical shot noise  large number of impinging electrons  very small escape probability time 0 current time S i (0)=2 e I spectral density (A 2 /Hz)

V applied ~h/eV applied zero temperature ordered electrons are noiseless ! shot noise =0 …. full Fermi sea ( non-partitioned electrons) Khlus, 1987 Lesovik, 1989

shot noise - single channel t <<1 poissonian S =2eI Schottky formula incoming transmitted binomial S =2eI (1-t ) t Khlus, 1987 Lesovik, 1989 spectral density of current fluctuations (A 2 /Hz)

conductance and shot noise in QPC conductance (g 0 ) gate voltage, V g noise current responsible for noise = V g 0 t i I t 1 =1 t 2 =1 2DEG QPC VgVg S  t (1-t )

shot noise in QPC - experimental results current noise, S ( A 2 /Hz) current, I (nA) T =57 mK t =0.37 I

experimental considerations 2DEG : n s =1.1x10 11 cm -2 ;  =4 x10 6 cm 2 /Vs shot noise signal S i (0)=2e * I= A 2 /Hz...…………… T*~ 40 mK Johnson noise……………………………………………. T ~ (10-30) mK noise in ‘warm electronics’……….....……………………T*~ 3.5 K “home made” (MODFET) cryogenic preamplifier (T= 4.2 K) T*~ mK at f 0 = MHz (above 1/f noise knee)

difficulties in measurements  QPC resistance R ~ 100 k    coax capacitance C ~ 60 pF f max = 1/(2  RC) ~ 30 kHz  1/f noise is large coaxial cable 60cm 60pF QPC  i) 2  V=R  i cooled preamp (hot, 4.2 K)(cold, 50 mK) spectrum analyzer R

experimental setup * frequency above 1/f noise corner of preamplifier; * capacitance compensated by resonant circuit; QPC cooled preamp L R C calibration signal spectrum analyzer f 0,  f 0 C<< 50  ; 300 K 1 G  warm preamp voltage gain = 1000 coax averaging time,  noise DC current V DC cryostat ‘home made’

injecting and detecting LL 1 LL 2 e inducing noise in LL 1 (hot mode) via QPC e/2 -e/2 neutral charge projecting via QPC to LL 2 (‘cold ‘ channel ) open QPC …………………………... no net current no low frequency noise partition QPC ………………………no net current low frequency noise semi-classically: mutual capacitance between the two edge modes high frequency (~GHz) noise in hot LL 1 is induced n LL 2 stochastic partitioning by QPC adds low-frequency spectrum

partitioning also the ‘cold channel’ G G GG T Inoue et al, PRL (2014)

T 2 dependence current of ‘cold mode’ T 1 =0.5 no net current T 1 dependence ~T 2 (1-T 2 )

intra-channel…

cold channel hot channel V D1 warm channel V D2  QD QD – narrow BPF

energy distribution (QD)  =1  =0 -

energy equilibration with distance e - e equilibration due to e - e interactions

simplistic view of integer edge channels fails interactions are dominant we make use of it…