College of Humanities and Fine Arts Spring Faculty Meeting Student Learning in CHFA Majors and Assessment February 13, 2008 Program prepared by the CHFA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Agenda December 11, 2008 Learning by Doing Break
Advertisements

Agenda - January 28, 2009 Professional Learning Community – Jefferson HS Learning by Doing What does the data tell us? ITED results SIP Goals Data Questions.
Confirming Student Learning: Using Assessment Techniques in the Classroom Douglas R. Davenport Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Truman State University.
Analyzing Student Work
Norah Fahim Jennifer Eidum Zinchuk University of Washington, Seattle, WA 2014 TESOL Convention, Portland OR Digital Composing: Utilizing Students’ Web.
PUT TITLE HERE Collaborating for Better IEPs Slide Deck No.4 Ministry of Education, 2009.
Workshop Goals and Objects Gain a deeper understanding of the six INtopFORM Learning Outcomes Discuss the relevance of the INtopFORM learning outcomes.
Assessing Learning for Classroom Success Friday, February 16, :00-3:00.
Slide 1 Building Students’ Teamwork Skills for Successful Integrated Projects Paula M. (Penni) Hudis, Ph.D., Director Pathway and Curriculum Development.
Who wants to be a Millionaire Board Game!. Unit Plan Summary Compete against your class mates and see who can become the first Millionaire! The learners.
Update from the UNC General Education Council [presented to the UNC Board of Governors’ Educational Planning, Programs, and Policies Committee on February.
Problem Based Lessons. Training Objectives 1. Develop a clear understanding of problem-based learning and clarify vocabulary issues, such as problem vs.
Looking at Texts from a Reader’s Point of View
Centennial High School School Wide Literacy Plan
2005 CELT Conference1 Strategies from the Assessment Trenches: A Self-Help Clinic presented by AURA.
Your English Department Agreed to do WHAT? Dr. Thomas Polito Department of Agronomy Department of Ag Education & Studies Dr. Dave Roberts Department of.
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
May 8 th Assessment Day 2015 Agenda Introductions Assessment Overview Review General Education Outcomes. Overview of past assessment work. What.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
Session Materials  Wiki
Write to Learn K-3 Partner Share With your partner discuss your current understanding and use of writing to learn.
Inter/National Coalition for Electronic Portfolio Research E-Portfolios at Thomas Thomas Edwards Colleen Burnham July 2007.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Classroom Assistive Technology Supports for Students.
Creating the Learning Environment and Classroom Management at the Middle Level William Bialecki And Nichole Hoffman.
How Do We Know What’s Working? A Guided Dialogue on SLOs and Assessment Lesley Kawaguchi Santa Monica College Chair, Committee on Student Learning Outcomes.
EDUC 304. Think Alouds Aloud _F8_FastStart_512k.swf
Close Reading in the Social Studies Classroom District Learning Day Location goes here Session time goes here August 5, 2015.
Curriculum Mapping: its MANY benefits of investing time and effort.
Dr. Timothy Mitchell Rapid City Area Schools
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH. Outcomes assessment can tell us if our students are really learning what we think they should be able to do.
Creativity and the Decision Making Process Business Management Chapter 8.2.
Prepared by M.A. Sana Yousif Ahmed College of Languages English Department Evening Classes.
Medicine Hat School District #76 PLC’s Building Capability Through Collaborative Learning Developing tomorrow’s citizens through improved learning, living.
March 21, 2011 Getting to Know the Common Core State Standards (CCSS)
Expectations What do you expect from: C&I Faculty? Yourself and other students? The Bachelor of Science in Education Program?
Types of writing assignments Source:
Budgeting for Outcomes November 28, 2012 ISAC Fall School of Instruction.
10 Principles of a Successful Classroom. Students are presented with meaningful, higher-order, activities that create the context for learning and build.
Module F Reviewing the Problem Solving Process Coaches’ Monthly Meeting Add DC Name Here.
Presentation 1 Roles for Discussing Student Work There are four roles for discussing student work: Presenting Teacher Participant Recorder Facilitator.
Ohio Department of Education OAT Toolkit for Social Studies 2007 OAT Toolkit for Social Studies Professional Learning Teams.
This template is designed to organize your project work for presentation. This to remember as you complete this presentation: 1.After you have completed.
Philosophical Chairs. Welcome Sign In Introductions Parking Lot Logistics Materials.
TIG Ensuring Vertical Articulation in the Science Curriculum.
Classroom Behavior Management Tips and Advices Ms. Elizabeth Garcia.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Module 1 Peer Coaching on Paper Peer Coach Training.
Innovate. Engage. Empower THE ONECLAY WRITES SCORING EXPERIENCE WELCOME! FIND A SEAT TALK TO OTHERS AT YOUR TABLE AND DISCUSS SUCCESSES SO FAR THIS YEAR.
MA DSAC Collaboration Institute for Special and General Education Leaders Session 4: February 28, 2012 Action Planning.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
DISCUSS WORKSHOPS AND PEER EDITING How to get the most out of your Peer Review.
Instructional Leadership: Applying Concern & Use Name Workshop Facilitator.
Critical Vocabulary for Every Student Words that make or break student understanding 1.
Collaborative Grouping 6-12 Math Teachers. Workshop Outcomes Participants will gain effective strategies for forming and facilitating a classroom culture.
Building Effective Content Literacy Tasks. The Cycle of Assessment Teach: Does the instruction and the tasks align to the identified learning target(s)?
January, 2010 Betsy Ott, Charlotte Creason Co-Chairs, Assessment Committee Molly McCoy Assistant Director, Institutional Effectiveness 1.
QCC General Education Assessment Task Force March 21 and 22, 2016 Faculty Forum on General Education Outcomes.
Key Stage 3 Strategy Design and Technology The Axe Valley Community College.
How can we use CATs in tutoring? Lee Helbert-Gordon Director, Institutional Research & Student Success Center Prairie State College.
Cal Poly Pomona University Strategic Plan 2011 ‐ 2015 Partial Assessment of Progress Presented to the University Strategic Planning Committee (USPC) 12/4/2014.
EDU 695Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
EDU 695 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
Institutional Learning Outcomes Assessment
its MANY benefits of investing time and effort
Institutional Effectiveness USF System Office of Decision Support
Using Canvas Outcomes & Rubrics.
PART TWO: Assessing Program Outcomes
Name Research expertise:
Presentation transcript:

College of Humanities and Fine Arts Spring Faculty Meeting Student Learning in CHFA Majors and Assessment February 13, 2008 Program prepared by the CHFA SOA Committee

Addressing the Issues: Learning Outcomes How did departments decide what learning goals and outcomes to assess?

Learning Outcomes continued: Paired Discussion: Has your department used any of these methods for identifying learning goals and outcomes? Would any of the methods discussed here work in your department?

Addressing the Issues: Faculty Involvement How did you become involved in Student Outcomes Assessment (SOA)? How has your department encouraged faculty commitment and involvement?

Faculty Involvement Continued: Paired Discussion: In your department, how involved do faculty want to be/need to be with SOA? What methods would you suggest for encouraging faculty commitment?

Addressing the Issues: Assessment Methods How did you choose the assessment methods? How were they developed? What are some of your methods?

Critical Reading Rubric SOPHISTICATEDCOMPETENTPARTIALLY COMPETENT COMPREHENSION--Distinguished/extracted main ideas/thesis --Paraphrased clearly and concisely --offers examples/ideas that support main thesis/idea of the text --Distinguished/extracted main idea/thesis, but could be more clear: writing sample included additional or unnecessary ideas related to main idea/thesis; omitted ideas important to understanding the main idea/thesis --Paraphrased clearly, but could be more concise --Failed to recognize main idea/thesis --No apparent ranking of most important ideas/thesis --Needs to work on paraphrasing clearly and concisely --examples only partially support main idea/thesis ANALYSIS--Makes clear and comprehensive connections between examples and main idea/thesis --Makes somewhat clear connections between examples and main idea/thesis or, only some connections between examples and main idea/thesis are made --Links between examples and main idea/thesis need to be forged SYNTHESIS--Question has significant implications for strengths/weaknesses of author's thesis --Question has some implications for strengths/weaknesses of author's thesis --Question does not reveal an understanding of the strengths/weaknesses of the author's thesis

Addressing the Issues: Assessment Methods continued Paired Discussion: What are some methods you have tried or some methods that you would like to try?

Addressing the Issues: Using the Data What were some of the findings from your assessment? What are you doing now with the results? How is SOA connected to other curricular initiatives in your department?

Addressing the Issues: Using the Data Paired Discussion: How are you connecting SOA with other curricular initiatives in your department?

Addressing the Issues: What Challenges Have You Faced in Implementing Assessment? Some in our department are concerned that SOA is a fad and are unwilling to invest time and energy in it as a consequence. Our small major has little data in any given year on which to base curricular decisions. Confusion remains in our department about the purposes of assessment. Does it focus on individual students? The curriculum? Our biggest challenge is remembering what we did last year and what we have promised to do next year. We live in the assessment present! We wish assessment weren’t an “add on” and that we could embed meaningful assessment more often in what we already do in the classroom. What are the respective responsibilities of department heads and faculty for assessment? Should heads be entirely “hands-off?” We don’t have time to do high quality assessment, which would require the collaborative examination of a large number of artifacts generated by students in our large major.

Challenges Continued: Paired Discussion: From the list of challenges, on the previous slide, choose one to discuss. Brainstorm solutions and write them on the giant post-it note.

Addressing the Issues: Future Directions Please fill out the following survey before leaving today. How can individual departments in CHFA be supported in their SOA work? What are some strategies for CHFA to use to continue to build a culture of assessment?