UMass Amherst Proposal to Join the LSC Laura Cadonati University of Massachusetts, Amherst LSC-VIRGO meeting - Baton Rouge, March 19, 2007 LIGO-G070076-00-Z.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A walk through some statistic details of LSC results.
Advertisements

LIGO-G Z Status and Plans for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Data Analysis Patrick Sutton LIGO Laboratory, Caltech, for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Working Group.
| October 12, 2011 A Multiple Signal Classification Method for Directional Gravitational-wave Burst Search Junwei.
GWDAW-8 (December 17-20, 2003, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA) Search for burst gravitational waves with TAMA data Masaki Ando Department of Physics, University.
Pi of the Sky – preparation for GW Advance Detector Era Adam Zadrożny Wilga 2014.
Glitch Group S5 Activities LSC LSU, Baton Rouge August 15, 2006 G Z L. Blackburn, L. Cadonati, S. Chatterji, J. Dalrymple, S. Desai,
LIGO-G Z Coherent Coincident Analysis of LIGO Burst Candidates Laura Cadonati Massachusetts Institute of Technology LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
G Z April 2007 APS Meeting - DAP GGR Gravitational Wave AstronomyKeith Thorne Coincidence-based LIGO GW Burst Searches and Astrophysical Interpretation.
LIGO-G Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
1/25 Current results and future scenarios for gravitational wave’s stochastic background G. Cella – INFN sez. Pisa.
Observing the Bursting Universe with LIGO: Status and Prospects Erik Katsavounidis LSC Burst Working Group 8 th GWDAW - UWM Dec 17-20, 2003.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 21, 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida.
Marco Cavaglià –University of Mississippi - MIT, July 22-26, 2007 LSC in Mississippi: A proposal of membership Marco Cavaglià on behalf of the UMGr 2 LIGO-G Z.
Status of LIGO Data Analysis Gabriela González Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Dec.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
Proposal to add three new members to the existing UTB-LIGO MOU Soma Mukherjee on behalf of the UTB LSC members LIGO Tech Doc # G LSC meeting,
The Role of Data Quality in S5 Burst Analyses Lindy Blackburn 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge,
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting April 25, 2006 Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in Data from the.
LIGO-G Z The AURIGA-LIGO Joint Burst Search L. Cadonati, G. Prodi, L. Baggio, S. Heng, W. Johnson, A. Mion, S. Poggi, A. Ortolan, F. Salemi, P.
Data Quality Vetoes in LIGO S5 Searches for Gravitational Wave Transients Laura Cadonati (MIT) For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO-G Z.
1 GEO outlook Benno Willke (presented by Bernard Schutz) LSC meeting, MIT Nov 2006.
The Analysis of Binary Inspiral Signals in LIGO Data Jun-Qi Guo Sept.25, 2007 Department of Physics and Astronomy The University of Mississippi LIGO Scientific.
Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO Andrés C. Rodríguez Louisiana State University on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SACNAS
LIGO-G Z April 2006 APS meeting Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech) Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO’s S5 run Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech)
S.Klimenko, August 2005, LSC, G Z Constraint likelihood analysis with a network of GW detectors S.Klimenko University of Florida, in collaboration.
LSC glitch group report Shourov K. Chatterji for the LSC glitch group LSC/Virgo meeting 2007 October 24 Hannover, Germany LIGO-G Z.
Veto Selection for Gravitational Wave Event Searches Erik Katsavounidis 1 and Peter Shawhan 2 1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139,
Amaldi-7 meeting, Sydney, Australia, July 8-14, 2007 LIGO-G Z All-Sky Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts during the fifth LSC Science Run Igor.
1 Hierarchical glitch classification analysis. Soma Mukherjee CGWA, UTB LSC/Virgo Det Char, Baton Rouge, March 21, 2007 LIGO-G
Multidimensional classification of burst triggers from LIGO S5 run Soma Mukherjee for the LSC Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University of Texas.
15 Dec 2005GWDAW 10 LIGO-G Z1 Overview of LIGO Scientific Collaboration Inspiral Searches Alexander Dietz Louisiana State University for the LIGO.
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan (U of Maryland) for the LSC LIGO PAC Meeting June 15, 2007 An Overview of LSC Data Analysis Now with VIRGO !
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
1 Status of Search for Compact Binary Coalescences During LIGO’s Fifth Science Run Drew Keppel 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 California Institute.
LIGO-G Data Analysis Techniques for LIGO Laura Cadonati, M.I.T. Trento, March 1-2, 2007.
1 Laura Cadonati, MIT For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS meeting Tampa, FL April 16, 2005 LIGO Hanford ObservatoryLIGO Livingston Observatory New.
G Z 1 Real-time search for gravitational wave transients during S6/VSR2: Principles, thoughts and plans Erik Katsavounidis MIT for the LSC-Virgo.
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida for.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 21, 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida.
S.Klimenko, G Z, March 20, 2006, LSC meeting First results from the likelihood pipeline S.Klimenko (UF), I.Yakushin (LLO), A.Mercer (UF),G.Mitselmakher.
Coherent network analysis technique for discriminating GW bursts from instrumental noise Patrick Sutton (CIT) in collaboration with Shourov Chatterji,
Multidimensional classification analysis of kleine Welle triggers in LIGO S5 run Soma Mukherjee for the LSC University of Texas at Brownsville GWDAW12,
S.Klimenko, March 2003, LSC Burst Analysis in Wavelet Domain for multiple interferometers LIGO-G Z Sergey Klimenko University of Florida l Analysis.
LIGO-G Z GWDAW9 December 17, Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO Science Run 2 Data John G. Zweizig LIGO / Caltech for the LIGO.
LIGO-G All-Sky Burst Search in the First Year of the LSC S5 Run Laura Cadonati, UMass Amherst For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration GWDAW Meeting,
Results From the Low Threshold, Early S5, All-Sky Burst Search Laura Cadonati for the Burst Group LSC MIT November 5, 2006 G Z.
Peter Shawhan The University of Maryland & The LIGO Scientific Collaboration Penn State CGWP Seminar March 27, 2007 LIGO-G Z Reaching for Gravitational.
S5 First Epoch BNS Inspiral Results Drew Keppel 1 representing the Inspiral Group 1 California Institute of Technology Nov LSC Meeting MIT, 4 November.
G Z The LIGO gravitational wave detector consists of two observatories »LIGO Hanford Observatory – 2 interferometers (4 km long arms and 2 km.
LIGO PAC11, Nov 2001 Syracuse proposal to NSF LIGO-G Z 1 Proposal to NSF: “Research in Gravitational Wave Detection with LIGO” Peter R.
Igor Yakushin, December 2004, GWDAW-9 LIGO-G Z Status of the untriggered burst search in S3 LIGO data Igor Yakushin (LIGO Livingston Observatory)
LIGO-G Z Status of the LIGO-TAMA Joint Bursts Search Patrick Sutton LIGO Laboratory, Caltech, for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Working Group.
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan, for the LSC Burst Analysis Group LSC Observational Results Meeting November 4, 2006 The S4 LIGO All-Sky Burst Search.
GW – the first GW detection ! Is it a start of GW astronomy ? If “yes” then which ? «Счастлив, кто посетил сей мир в его минуты роковые !...» Ф.Тютчев.
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan for the LSC-Virgo Burst Analysis Working Group LSC-Virgo Meeting July 23, 2007 Eyes Wide Open: Searching for Gravitational.
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
LIGO-G Z Results from LIGO Observations Stephen Fairhurst University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Online all-sky burst searches during the joint S6/VSR2 LIGO-Virgo science run Igor Yakushin LIGO Livingston Observatory, Caltech For the LIGO Scientific.
Data Analysis report November, 2009 Gianluca M Guidi
Brennan Hughey MIT Kavli Institute Postdoc Symposium
ASIS Status Report Bruce Allen LSC Meeting, LHO, August 16, 2001
All-Sky Burst Searches for Gravitational Waves at High Frequencies
Igor Yakushin, LIGO Livingston Observatory
LIGO Scientific Collaboration meeting
S3 Glitch Updates Laura Cadonati
Coherent detection and reconstruction
Coherent Coincident Analysis of LIGO Burst Candidates
Status and Plans for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Data Analysis
Presentation transcript:

UMass Amherst Proposal to Join the LSC Laura Cadonati University of Massachusetts, Amherst LSC-VIRGO meeting - Baton Rouge, March 19, 2007 LIGO-G Z

G ZLSC-VIRGO, 03/19/20072 Proposal Summary I will join the Physics Department at UMass Amherst in the fall, after 5 years at MIT-LIGO I propose to start an LSC data analysis group consisting of: –1 postdoc –~2 graduate students (and ~2 undergraduates) Focus will be the search and validation of transient GW events in LIGO data: 1.Active role in the Burst Analysis Group 2.Work with Inspiral Analysis Group on vetoes and Inspiral-Burst-Ringdown followup 3.interface between Data Analysis and Detector through the Glitch Group I will continue my current services to the LSC: –Member of the Inspiral Review Committee since 2005 –Publication and Presentation Committee –Other?

G ZLSC-VIRGO, 03/19/20073 Where is Amherst, anyway? Western Massachusetts, Pioneer Valley – Five Colleges Area (UMass, Amherst College, Mt Holyoke, Smith College, Hampshire College) 90 miles west of Boston (2 hour drive from MIT), 175 miles from NYC Image: Google Maps

G ZLSC-VIRGO, 03/19/20074 UMass Amherst Enrollment (Fall 2006) –Students: 25,593 19,823 undergraduates 5,770 graduate students –Faculty : 1,169 Research –Supported research activities total > $134M/year Academics –87 bachelor's degree programs, 6 associate's, 73 master’s and 51 doctoral programs in 10 schools and colleges. Library –The library system is the largest at a state- supported institution in New England with more than 5.8 million items. Athletics –23 teams compete at the NCAA Division I level. Arts –The Fine Arts Center, six galleries for visual arts. The flagship campus of the University of Massachusetts system. From the UMass web page:

G ZLSC-VIRGO, 03/19/20075 A Very Important Bit of History Discovery of the Pulsar System PSR (1975) Joe Taylor and his graduate student Russel Hulse did all the work at UMass Source: HulseTaylor

G ZLSC-VIRGO, 03/19/20076 The Physics Department 37 faculty, 75 graduate students, 90 undergraduate students Diversified research I will be part of the HEP group: Atlas, BaBar, Veritas Medium Energy Nuclear Physics Condensed Matter (theory and experiment), Nanotechnology, Biophysics Theory group: Particle, cosmology, string theory Classical and quantum gravity There is also an astronomy department, part of the greater Five College Astronomy Department, 26 teaching and research faculty (20 at the University and 6 at the Colleges), 7 research fellows and postdoctoral associates, 20 graduate students, and approximately 60 undergraduate astronomy majors.

G ZLSC-VIRGO, 03/19/20077 Participation in the LSC Burst Group and its “eyes-wide-open” search for short transient GW events. The search is designed to be open to serendipity and independent of uncertainties in source models. As such, it heavily relies on coincident evidence in multiple detector, consistency tests and, more generally, the validation of candidate events. Proposed Activity: The Burst Search The current burst strategy is a coherent follow-up of candidate events identified as coincident excess power in more than one interferometer. New, fully-coherent search methods are becoming available within the LSC and VIRGO, to reconstruct the waveform and triangulate the source location in a network of detectors. We will contribute to the: → implementation of these algorithms in an end-to-end analysis, comparison of how different methods perform on large volumes of data and selection of the best performing strategy for certain classes of signals → tuning of consistency criteria, analysis cuts and vetoes for burst candidates in the LIGO- VIRGO network … within the scopes and needs of the Burst group.

G ZLSC-VIRGO, 03/19/20078 The Burst Search I have been an active member of the Burst Group since the analysis of S1 data, and a developer of the burst analysis pipeline, in close collaboration with many members of the burst group. In particular: * Formulation and implementation of the r-statistic waveform consistency test * Formulation and tuning of vetoes and analysis cuts * Construction of efficiency and upper limit curves * Participation in collaborative analysis efforts with other detectors: TAMA, GEO, AURIGA (task lead). LHO 4km Simulated waveforms + ΔtΔt Coincidence (time, frequency) Waveform consistency test burst candidate events (analysis cuts, vetoes) Filter ++ Filter, TimeFreq Filter, TimeFreq Filter, TimeFreq WaveBurst algorithm, Klimenko et al r-statistic test L. Cadonati, CQG 21 (2004) S1695 LHO 2km LLO 4km Key contributions to the following LSC papers: S1: LSC, PRD 69 (2004) S2: LSC, PRD 72 (2005) S2: LIGO-TAMA, PRD 72 (2005) S3: LSC, CQG 23 (2006) S29 S3: LIGO-AURIGA: in preparation S4: LSC, in preparation S4: LIGO-GEO, in preparation S5A: LSC, in preparation S5: …. analysis in progress …

G ZLSC-VIRGO, 03/19/20079 Proposed Activity: Glitch Group Continued active role in the Glitch Group (co-chair since 2003), a Detector Characterization subgroup, charged with the identification and classification of noise transients in the GW channel and the exploration of their correlation with transients in auxiliary channels. Data analysis talks to the detector… the glitch group is a forum for information exchange between data analysts and experimentalists, with important contribution of students, postdocs and instrument operators. → Online: off-site data analysis shifts where figure-of-merit trends, the output of “glitch”- finding algorithms and the loudest events from inspiral and burst online analysis are carefully examined. Prompt feedback to instrument on findings that need/can be addressed in commissioning. → Offline: identification of some data quality flags and study of their correlation to transients in the gravitational wave channel. Identification of statistically significant correlations between transients on various data channels. Tuning of vetoes for burst and inspiral searches. → Methods and findings of this group are part of the detection checklist for burst and inspiral candidates

G ZLSC-VIRGO, 03/19/ Proposed Activity: Inspiral-Burst-Ringdown Followup A coincident inspiral-burst-ringdown search combining the expertise of burst and inspiral searches, with focus on black hole mergers. Data analysis across Burst and Inspiral groups. Event Identification and Coincidence: just starting Exploiting existing burst, inspiral and ringdown searches: deeply embedded in LSC burst and inspiral groups Simulations: Sources, waveforms, technical aspects… I do not propose to do this all, but to follow closely all the good work that is already in progress. Data Quality and Veto Target transients that appear in more than one search – extend to IBR the work that is already happening in the glitch group for burst and inspiral veto Flanagan,Hughes PRD 57 (1998) 4566 Bonus: we also have lots to learn from such coincident analysis from a DetChar point of view.

G ZLSC-VIRGO, 03/19/ Conclusion Over the past five years I enjoyed working with you all, I learned a lot and had fun too. Now I am looking forward to more collaboration with LIGO and the LSC and I am committed to continue contributing to this great endeavor and bring UMass on board too.