Price Responsive Load Next Steps – Data Collection Paul Wattles Karen Farley DSWG and RMS sub team October 16, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Advertisements

Introduction Build and impact metric data provided by the SGIG recipients convey the type and extent of technology deployment, as well as its effect on.
Time-of-Use and Critical Peak Pricing
Results from the 2013 Survey of LSEs to Obtain Retail DR and Dynamic Pricing information Public Summary Frontier Associates LLC June
Gloria Godson VP, Federal Regulatory Policy Reliability Pricing Model Part 2.
Retail DR and Price Response 2014 Product Headcounts Paul Wattles, ERCOT Market Design & Development DSWG Feb. 3, 2015.
Price Responsive Load / Retail DR Workshop Paul Wattles Karen Farley DSWG/REP Workshop April 9, 2014.
The Benefits of Dynamic Pricing of Default Electricity Service Bernie Neenan UtiliPoint International Prepared for Assessing the Potential for Demand Response.
RMS Update December 14,  Advanced Meter Settlement Impacts  January 2012 – ERCOT settling 4.4M ESIIDs using Advanced Meter data  January 2012–
Measurement, Verification, and Forecasting Protocols for Demand Response Resources: Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Price Responsive Load / Retail DR Data Collection Project and Lessons Learned Paul Wattles Karen Farley DSWG March 2014.
Welcome New York Independent System Operator. (Pre-NYISO) Regulated Market Physical contracts Regulated industry Cost Based System Two Party Deals Bundled.
ERS Update for DSWG June 1, Agenda June – September 2012 Procurement XML Project Update Clearing Price discussion NPRR 451 Q & A.
Retail Smart Grid Trends Paul Wattles Senior Analyst, Market Design & Development UT Energy Week: “How Smart Grids Enable Consumers” Feb. 18, 2015.
Price Responsive Load / Retail DR Update to RMS Karen Farley June 3, 2014.
COMMUNICATIONS AND SETTLEMENTS WORKING GROUP (CSWG) April 2015 Update to COPS.
FERC’s Role in Demand Response David Kathan ABA Teleconference December 14, 2005.
Price Responsive Load / Retail DR Workshop Paul Wattles Karen Farley DSWG/REP Workshop April 2014.
1 Welcome to Load Participation Orientation Elev MenWomen Phones Info Presentation and other Load Participation information will be posted at:
Price Responsive Load Survey Draft Results Paul Wattles Karen Farley DSWG and RMS Aug. 22, 2012.
1 Presented to ERCOT Retail Market Subcommittee January 9, 2002 Profiling Working Group Darryl Nelson, Chair Load Profiling Operating Guides (LPOG)
Distributed Energy Resources Concept Document Discussion ERCOT Staff DREAM Task Force Aug. 25,
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Linking the Wholesale and Retail Markets through Dynamic Retail Pricing Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September.
Leading the Way in Electricity TM Tariff Programs & Services Customer Services Business Unit Overview of Demand Response At Southern California Edison.
ERCOT Demand Response Spring 2015 ERCOT Operator Seminar.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
Advanced Metering’s Next Frontier: Demand Response Interim Report Advanced Metering Implementation Team/ ERCOT Demand Side Working Group February 2012.
Demand Response Status Report Calvin Opheim October 9, 2007.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
Load Participation in Real-Time Market: LMP Minus G.
Retail Metering Working Group Progress Report 04/15/09.
DSWG – March 9, 2015 Four-CP Response in ERCOT Competitive Area Carl L Raish.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
Final Report Weather Sensitive Emergency Response Service (WS ERS) Pilot Project Carl Raish, ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee November 7, 2013.
Emergency Demand Response Concept Overview and Examples Presented to: ERCOT December 3, 2004 Presented by: Neenan Associates.
RMS/COPS Workshop VI 1 October 06, Antitrust Admonition ERCOT strictly prohibits Market Participants and their employees who are participating in.
Price Responsive Load / Retail DR RMS Update Paul Wattles Carl Raish October 6, 2015.
Sept. 28, 2007 Interim Update Load Response Survey.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Smart Meter Technology.
Price Responsive Load / Retail DR Workshop Paul Wattles Carl Raish Karen Farley REP Roundtable August 5, 2015 – Updates in RED.
01/17/ CP Discussion October 16,2002 Retail Market Subcommittee Austin, Texas.
ERS Update – DSWG Presentation September 21, 2012.
Retail DR and Price Responsive Load Next Steps – Data Collection Paul Wattles Karen Farley Updates to DSWG & RMS January 2013.
An Overview of Demand Response in California July 2011.
Price Responsive Load / Retail DR DSWG Update Paul Wattles Carl Raish September 17, 2015.
Demand Response Task Force. 2 2 Outline  Overview of ERCOT’s role in the CCET Pilot  Overview of Stakeholder Process – What’s been done to date?  Questions.
Government’s Evolving Role in Resource Planning and Environmental Protection Arthur H. Rosenfeld, Commissioner California Energy Commission April 19, 2002.
Price Responsive Load / Retail Demand Response 2013 Analysis Report Overview ERCOT Staff & Frontier Associates RMS Meeting August 5, 2014.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
Overview of Governing Document for Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Stakeholder Workshop Mark Patterson, ERCOT Staff March 1, 2013.
1 New MO Projects June COMS Extract, Report & Web Services Monitoring & Usage Statistics Jackie Ashbaugh.
ERCOT Public 1 Project Panel 1 Dan Woodfin Director, System Operations August 15, 2014.
DSWG Update to WMS 2/9/2011. EILS Procurement Results from 1/31 Business Hours 1 HE 0900 through 1300, Monday thru Friday except ERCOT Holidays; 425 hours.
Status Report on DSWG Task 11: Retail DR/Dynamic Pricing Project Presentation to the ERCOT Demand Side Working Group Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates LLC.
Proxy $G and other Loads in SCED 2 Litmus Tests Loads in SCEDv2 Subgroup Dec. 2, 2014.
CEC Load Management Standards Workshop March 3, Update on the CPUC’s Demand Response and Advanced Metering Proceedings Bruce Kaneshiro Energy Division.
Price Responsive Load / Retail DR RMS Update Paul Wattles Carl Raish September 1, 2015.
Demand Response Options Review Carl Raish November 27, 2007.
Thoughts on DER Aggregations ERCOT Staff DREAM TF Sept. 28, DER Aggregations.
Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Proposal March 7, 2013 TAC Meeting.
Draft NPRR Weather Sensitive ERS Loads December 2012.
1 City of Palo Alto Utilities Large Commercial Customer Pilot Demand Response Program Customer Meeting March 8, 2012.
AMIT-DSWG Workshop ‘AMI’s Next Frontier: Demand Response Part 2’
Analysis of Load Reductions Associated with 4-CP Transmission Charges in ERCOT Carl L Raish Principal Load Profiling and Modeling Demand Side Working Group.
Principal Load Profiling and Modeling
MARS Taskforce RMS Update December 9, 2009.
Reflecting Losses in DR within ERCOT August 22, 2012
Presentation transcript:

Price Responsive Load Next Steps – Data Collection Paul Wattles Karen Farley DSWG and RMS sub team October 16, 2012

2 Why it’s important to understand retail DR & price response Resource adequacy concerns –Brattle report underscores the important role of DR in the ERCOT markets Advanced metering –Enablement of DR is an important element in the return on the AMI investment There are limits on the amount of DR that the ISO can contract for (e.g., Ancillary Services and ERS) The bulk of new DR will likely need to be enabled by LSEs: –Price and 4CP-responsive Load –Other retail DR incentives and technologies Ability to track growth of these products is a key metric in measuring the success of the ERCOT retail market October 16, 2012DR/Price Response

3 June-July 2012 LSE Survey Survey sought counts of customers on various DR/price response products 86 REPs and 40 NOIEs responded (representing 96% of total ERCOT Load) Total of 9.46 million meters reported Total of 79,069 premises on some type of dynamic pricing contract Total of 0.83% of total premises on dynamic pricing/DR products Just as important: numerous LSEs are considering adding new DR/price response products in the future Presentation of survey results can be found here – October 16, 2012DR/Price Response

4 Reminder of the bigger picture Some existing and developing smart grid initiatives: -- AMI -- Smart thermostats -- Other DLC NOIE boundary meter Load subject to 4CP tariffs AMI deployment nearly complete ESI IDs settled on their 15-minute interval data Premises >700kW have IDR meters and are subject to 4CP transmission tariffs MWh 12/1/10 thru 8/11/11 Retail Competitive ChoiceNon-Opt In Entities Competitive ChoiceNOIE October 16, 2012DR/Price Response

5 Dynamic pricing under consideration Real-Time Pricing YESNO REPsNOIEsREPsNOIEs Large C&I Small Commercial241 Residential251 LSEs were asked if they have plans to initiate products in the future: Critical Peak Products YESNO REPsNOIEsREPsNOIEs Large C&I Small Commercial163 Residential143 Time of Use YESNO REPsNOIEsREPsNOIEs Large C&I Small Commercial2312 Residential2811 October 16, 2012DR/Price Response

6 The need to dig deeper Phase 1 – Survey –Results shared at Aug RMS and DSWG Phase 2 – Data collection –Transition into this phase today –Begin discussion with market on what and why Phase 3 – Analysis –After data collection, evaluation of price elasticity and how it affects: Load forecasting Wholesale market price formation Resource adequacy –Analysis will be at the aggregate, no specific market participant information will be shared October 16, 2012DR/Price Response We are here!

7 Phase 2 – Data collection Thanks to the survey, now we know: –About how many premises are on retail contracts for dynamic pricing and/or demand response What we don’t know: –Locations and characteristics of the price-responsive Loads –Whether and how Loads on dynamic pricing products respond –What the DR impacts are October 16, 2012DR/Price Response

8 What details do we need and why? ERCOT would like to correlate premises to the types* of products they are on –RTP – Real Time Pricing –B&I – Block & Index –CPP – Critical Peak Pricing –CPR – Critical Peak Rebates –4CP – Four Coincident Peak –TOU – Time of Use –OLC – Other Load Control –OTH – Other Voluntary Demand Response Product Do we have the right categories to start? –Ideally, the process can remain flexible to accommodate new product types as they may be added * See appendix for definitions October 16, 2012DR/Price Response

9 Data Collection – next steps Now that we know what ERCOT will need –How often? –What method of communication? –When is the right time to start receiving? –Once we’ve agreed upon what to collect and how often, we will need to discuss where to document it (market guide, other binding document, etc). DR/Price ResponseOctober 16, 2012

10 Options for the REP vehicle – AM session (starting at 9:30a) What ERCOT needs for analysis: –ESIID –A code for product type/category –Periodic updates (frequency to be discussed) –Potentially: strike prices (if applicable to product) What ERCOT doesn’t need: –Customer-specific information October 16, 2012DR/Price Response

11 Options for the NOIE vehicle – PM session (starting at 1:30p) ERCOT is open to suggestions on how to quantify price response and retail DR in the NOIE areas –No ESI IDs –No premise-level data submitted to ERCOT today –No 15-minute metering requirements (although many NOIE premises are equipped with advanced metering) One option: mimic data submission process used in ERS –Premise-level data directly from NOIE TDSP, or –Premise-level data attested by a PE Additional considerations –Periodic updates (frequency to be discussed) –Potentially: strike prices (if applicable to product) October 16, 2012DR/Price Response

12 Future ERCOT analysis Collecting premise-level data on these retail products would allow ERCOT to quantify retail DR and track trends: –Chart market growth in participation for each product type –Develop models (baselines) for the premise load based on historical usage –Compare the baselines to usage on days with likely DR events, depending on identified triggers: High LMPs (for Real-Time or Critical Peak products) Probable 4CP signals (for 4CP products) Energy Emergency Alerts –Evaluate TOU premise peak usage vs. baselines and/or control groups –Provide periodic progress reports to the market on an aggregated basis October 16, 2012DR/Price Response

13 Questions? ON OFF October 16, 2012DR/Price Response

14 Appendix - Definitions RTP – Real Time Pricing - retail prices based on ERCOT Real-Time Settlement Point Prices for the premise Load Zone, calculated every 15 minutes, or other real-time wholesale price indicator(s). B&I – Block & Index – fixed pricing for a defined volume of usage, coupled with pricing indexed to the wholesale market for usage exceeding the block. Block prices and volumes may vary by time of day/week. CPP – Critical Peak Pricing – contracts that call for prices to rise dramatically during critical peaks: limited duration, dynamically set periods of time that usually correlate to high prices in the real-time wholesale market. Critical peak events typically occur a limited number of times per year and typically are communicated in advance to participants. CPR – Critical Peak Rebates - contracts that pay rebates to customers for load reductions taken during defined during critical peaks (see above). DR/Price ResponseOctober 16, 2012

15 Appendix - Definitions 4CP – Four Coincident Peak – predictor signals or direct load control provided to customers in advance of potential Four Coincident Peak (4CP) intervals during summer months (June through September). Reducing load during such intervals lowers transmission charges. –4CP charges apply to large customers (peak demand ≥700 kW) in competitive choice areas, and also to NOIEs at the boundary meter level. TOU – Time of Use - charges based on usage across defined blocks of hours, with prices and schedules known in advance. (As used here, does not apply to seasonal fuel factor-related rate adjustments). OLC – Other Direct Load Control – contracts that allow the LSE or a third party to control the customer’s load remotely for economic or grid reliability purposes. This category applies to Direct Load Control (DLC) with different deployment criteria than described elsewhere. (Avoid double counting if DLC data was reported in other categories.) OTH – Other Voluntary Demand Response Product – any retail product that includes a demand response incentive or signal not covered in the other categories. DR/Price ResponseOctober 16, 2012