Doc.: IEEE 802.11-01/412r0 Submission S. Choi, Philips Research July 2001 Slide 1 Aligning 802.11e HCF and 802.11h TPC Operations Amjad Soomro, Sunghyun.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /272a Submission June 2001 S. Choi, Philips Research Slide 1 Problems with IEEE (e) NAV Operation and ONAV Proposal Javier del.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /402r0 Submission July 2001 Baruch Altman, CommPrize Inc.Slide 1 H²CF: Hiperlan2 Hybrid Coordination Function; Ideas on coexistence.
Doc.: IEEE /0465r0 Submission March 2011 Mark RISON, CSRSlide 1 A-MPDUs with U-APSD Authors:
Doc: IEEE /705ar0 Submission Javier del Prado et. al November 2002 Slide 1 Mandatory TSPEC Parameters and Reference Design of a Simple Scheduler.
Doc.: IEEE /567r0 Submission May 2003 Youngsoo Kim, Samsung/SNU and S. Choi, SNU Slide 1 Throughput Enhancement via Frame Aggregation – A Sequel.
Doc.: IEEE /567r1 Submission July 2003 Youngsoo Kim, Samsung/SNU and S. Choi, SNU Slide 1 Throughput Enhancement via Frame Aggregation – A Sequel.
Doc.: IEEE /372r0 A New Approach to the NAV June, 2001 Matthew Sherman, AT&T Labs - ResearchSlide 1 A New Approach to the NAV Author: Matthew.
Doc.: IEEE /413r0 Submission S. Choi, Philips Research July 2001 Slide 1 Can EDCF Support QoS? Sunghyun Choi Philips Research-USA Briarcliff Manor,
Protocol for SU and MU Sounding Feedback
Doc.:IEEE /223r1 Submission March 2002 J. del Prado and S. Choi, Philips Slide 1 CC/RR Performance Evaluation - Revisited Javier del Prado and.
Doc.: IEEE /080r1 Submission January 2001 Jie Liang, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Jie Liang Texas Instruments Incorporated TI Blvd. Dallas,
Doc.: IEEE /1355r2 11ah Submission Date: Authors: Nov 2012 James Wang, MediaTek Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0613r0 Submission May 2012 Ron Porat, Broadcom US Channelization Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc. :IEEE /314r0 Submission Sai Shankar et al., Philips ResearchSlide 1 May 2002 TXOP Request: in Time vs. in Queue Size? Sai Shankar, Javier.
Doc.: IEEE /0696r2 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Slot-based Power Save without PS-Poll Date: Authors: Date: July, 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /630r1a Submission S. Choi, Philips Research November 2001 Slide 1 HC Recovery and Backoff Rules Sunghyun Choi and Javier del Prado.
January 2002 Khaled Turki et. al, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 doc.: IEEE /022r0 Submission TID Field Usage in QoS CF-Poll Khaled Turki and Matthew.
Doc.: IEEE /0229r0 SubmissionAssaf Kasher, Intel BF Corrections presentation Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0342r0 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Power Efficient PS Poll Date: Authors: Date: March, 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0608r2 Submission May 2012 Shoukang Zheng et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 Low-Power PS-Poll Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0328r0 Nokia Internal Use Only March 2012 Slide 1 Date: Authors: PS-Poll Enhancements Chittabrata Ghosh, Nokia.
Doc.: IEEE /0881r0 Submission July 2012 Anna Pantelidou, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 PS Mode Enhancements with Timing Indication Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/1329r0 PS-Poll for Downlink Bufferable Units Date: Slide 1Eric Wong, Broadcom November 2012 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1325r0 Submission Nov PS-Poll TXOP Date: Authors: David Xun Yang, Huawei, et. al.Slide 1.
PS-Poll TXOP Using RTS/CTS Protection
Doc.: IEEE /0324r0 Submission Slide 1Michelle Gong, Intel March 2010 DL MU MIMO Error Handling and Simulation Results Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0567r0 Submission Slide 1Michelle Gong, Intel May 2010 DL MU MIMO Analysis and OBSS Simulation Results Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /630r4a Submission S. Choi, Philips Research January 2002 Slide 1 HC Recovery and Backoff Rules Sunghyun Choi and Javier del Prado.
Doc.: IEEE /0517r0 May 2013 Submission Slide 1 Authors: Combining Process in Virtual CS Mechanism for ah Date: Lv kaiying, ZTE.
Doc.: IEEE /289r0 Submission Bobby Jose,Slide 1 March 2002 CC/RR Alternatives HCF Adhoc Discussion Work Sheet V00.04 Bobby Jose, et.al
Doc.:IEEE /0037r0 Submission Jan. 17, 2011 Yong Liu, MarvellSlide 1 BW Indication in Non-HT Frames Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1123r0 Submission September 2010 Zhu/Kim et al 1 Date: Authors: [TXOP Sharing for DL MU-MIMO Support]
Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /1092r0 Submission Simone Merlin, Qualcomm Incorporated September 2010 Slide 1 ACK Protocol and Backoff Procedure for MU-MIMO.
Doc.: IEEE /1190r2 September 2014 Submission Kaiying Lv (ZTE) Frame Exchange Control for Uplink Multi-user transmission Slide 1 Date:
Doc.: IEEE /067r1a Submission March 2001 S. Choi and S. Mangold, Philips Research/ComNetsSlide a/(e) and HiperLAN/2 Interworking via CCEPC.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0081r0 Michelle Gong, et alSlide 1 Transmission Rules for Wider Bandwidth TXOP Date: Authors: Jan
Doc.: IEEE /605r3 Submission November 2001 S. Kandala, et. al. Slide 1 CFB Ending Rule under HCF Srinivas Kandala, Ken Nakashima, Yashihiro Ohtani.
Doc.: IEEE /195r1 Submission July 2000 Sunghyun Choi, Philips ResearchSlide 1 Dynamic Channel Selection (DCS) Scheme for G. Cervello, S.
IEEE EDCF: a QoS Solution for WLAN Javier del Prado 1, Sunghyun Choi 2 and Sai Shankar 1 1 Philips Research USA - Briarcliff Manor, NY 2 Seoul National.
Doc.: IEEE /195 Submission July 2000 Sunghyun Choi, Philips ResearchSlide 1 Dynamic Channel Selection (DCS) Scheme for G. Cervello, S.
Doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission AP Assisted Medium Synchronization Date: Authors: September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /536r0 Submission September 2001 A. Soomro and S. Choi, Philips Research, USASlide 1 Proposal to Add Link Margin Field in IEEE h.
Doc.: IEEE /157 Submission June 2000 Sunghyun Choi, Philips ResearchPhilips Research- USA Slide 1 Channel Model Proposal v2.0 for e MAC.
Doc.: IEEE /0409r6 Submission July 2012 Shoukang Zheng et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 Channel Access Supporting Low Power Operation Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0098r0 January 2016 Assaf Kasher, IntelSlide 1 Channel bonding proposals Date: Authors:
Resolutions to Static RTS CTS Comments
Doc.:IEEE /566r2 Submission November 2001 S. Choi, Philips & M.M. Wentink, Intersil Slide 1 Multiple Frame Exchanges during EDCF TXOP Sunghyun.
Doc.: IEEE /110 Submission May 2000 Sunghyun Choi, Philips ResearchSlide 1 QoS Support in : Contention-Free MAC Perspective Sunghyun Choi.
EDCF TCID, Queues, and Access Parameters Relationship
HCF medium access rules
EDCF TXOP Bursting Simulation Results
CC/RR Performance Evaluation - Revisited
HCF Duration Field Set Rules
Proposed Modifications in TGh Draft Proposal
Hybrid Coordination Function (HCF) Frame Exchange and NAV Details
RTS CTS Rule Amendment Date: Authors: Date: January 2011
EDCF Issues and Suggestions
Clarification on Some HCF Frame Exchange Rules
Management Frame Channel Access Latency in TGh
Clarification on Some HCF Frame Exchange Rules
HCF medium access rules
Acknowledgement for Multicast Streams
Multiple Frame Exchanges during EDCF TXOP
July 2007 doc.: IEEE /2090r0 Aug 2007 Discussion on CCA Sensing on 20/40 MHz Secondary Channel with PIFS and DIFS Date: Authors: Notice:
Schedule Element Synchronization and Simplification
NAV Operation Rules under HCF
802.11g Contention Period – Solution for Co-existence with Legacy
HCF Channel Access And Inter-BSS Channel Sharing
NAV Operation Rules under HCF
TXOP Request: in Time vs. in Queue Size?
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /412r0 Submission S. Choi, Philips Research July 2001 Slide 1 Aligning e HCF and h TPC Operations Amjad Soomro, Sunghyun Choi, and Javier del Prado Philips Research-USA Briarcliff Manor, New York

doc.: IEEE /412r0 Submission S. Choi, Philips Research July 2001 Slide 2 Outline Introduction Transmit Power Control under HCF Proposed rules to improve TPC under HCF

doc.: IEEE /412r0 Submission S. Choi, Philips Research July 2001 Slide 3 References IEEE e QoS draft D1.0 IEEE /169r2: DFS and TPC Joint Proposal for h by S. Choi, et al IEEE /373r0: NAV Operation Rules under HCF by J. del Prado, S. Choi, and A. Soomro

doc.: IEEE /412r0 Submission S. Choi, Philips Research July 2001 Slide 4 Transmit Power Control (TPC) Mechanism to reduce energy consumption and co-channel interference Adapt the radio transmit power to the minimum level required to ensure correct reception of a frame

doc.: IEEE /412r0 Submission S. Choi, Philips Research July 2001 Slide 5 Baseline TGh is working on Transmit Power Control (TPC) 01/169r2 (baseline of.11h) is assuming per- STA power control during CFP and CFB under the HCF operation But...

doc.: IEEE /412r0 Submission S. Choi, Philips Research July 2001 Slide 6 TPC under HCF TPC may not be very efficient under the current rules of HCF: –HC needs to hear (i.e., CCA busy) all the frames within its QBSS. Otherwise, it will reclaim the channel after sensing the medium idle for DIFS –HC needs to receive certain frames for the correct operation of the QBSS (e.g., to update TC queue sizes) Inefficiency: in ESTA-to-ESTA communications, the transmit power may not be as low as it could be

doc.: IEEE /412r0 Submission S. Choi, Philips Research July 2001 Slide 7 Example Under current rules of HCF, TxOP holder, i.e., ESTA 1, will need to transmit frames so that they can be received by ESTA 2 and at least heard (and preferably received) by the HC. Transmission range of ESTA 1 ESTA-to-ESTA communication: ideal case But the HC need to hear the frames HC ESTA 2 ESTA 1 CCA busy range of ESTA 1 HC ESTA 2 ESTA 1

doc.: IEEE /412r0 Submission S. Choi, Philips Research July 2001 Slide 8 Proposed HCF Rules for TPC

doc.: IEEE /412r0 Submission S. Choi, Philips Research July 2001 Slide 9 Goal Reduce the energy consumption: –Increase TPC efficiency for direct ESTA-to-ESTA transmissions under HCF

doc.: IEEE /412r0 Submission S. Choi, Philips Research July 2001 Slide 10 For the First Frame in a Granted TxOP... CCA busy range of ESTA 1 The TxOP holder shall transmit the first frame in a granted TxOP at a high enough power so that the HC can hear it and the destination ESTA can receive it Use the best power/data rate combination with the above constraint The HC needs to hear the first frame to determine whether the polled ESTA received the QoS CF-poll frame correctly or not Transmission range of ESTA 1 HC ESTA 2 ESTA 1

doc.: IEEE /412r0 Submission S. Choi, Philips Research July 2001 Slide 11 For the Subsequent Frames …. Transmission range of ESTA 1 The TxOP holder may transmit at the best power/data rate combination so that the destination ESTA can receive the frame correctly To update the TC queue size, or update or request a new TxOP, the TxOP holder should transmit at a power/data rate combination so that both the destination ESTA and the HC can receive the frame correctly HC ESTA 2 ESTA 1

doc.: IEEE /412r0 Submission S. Choi, Philips Research July 2001 Slide 12 For Last Frames in a Granted TxOP... Transmission range of ESTA 1 An ESTA should transmit at least the following types of frames at a power/data rate combination to be received by both the HC and the destination ESTA: –QoS data frame with NF=0 –QoS CF-ACK responding to the QoS frame with NF=0. Desirable to save bandwidth, especially when the TxOP holder finishes earlier than the originally granted TxOP HC ESTA 2 ESTA 1

doc.: IEEE /412r0 Submission S. Choi, Philips Research July 2001 Slide 13 HC Reclaim Operation Rules The HC can reclaim the channel only in the following situations: –When the CCA stays idle for PIFS time immediately after the end of the QoS CF- Poll frame –Upon reception of a frame from the TxOP holder with NF=0 and a relevant QoS CF-ACK frame if the normal ACK policy is used –The granted TxOP expires Note that the HC cannot reclaim the channel after sensing the medium idle for DIFS unconditionally –The first difference from e D1.0

doc.: IEEE /412r0 Submission S. Choi, Philips Research July 2001 Slide 14 During a TxOP, only the TxOP holder is responsible for recovery from the absence of an expected reception. –The second difference from e D1.0 The recovery can be done by: –Retransmiting the frame –Sending a frame to another ESTA –Sending a QoS Null Data to the HC with the NF bit equal to 0 (In this manner, the TxOP ends and the HC can reclaim the channel) All other ESTAs, including the HC, shall not initiate channel recovery since they cannot determine if the TXOP holder is transmitting/receiving a frame or not Recovery Rules