Scrambler Mismatch and MAC FEC: Is there a problem?

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Doc.: IEEE /037 Submission January 2001 Khaled Turki et. al,Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Simulation Results for p-DCF, v-DCF and Legacy DCF Khaled.

Advertisements

Doc: IEEE /705ar0 Submission Javier del Prado et. al November 2002 Slide 1 Mandatory TSPEC Parameters and Reference Design of a Simple Scheduler.

Doc.: IEEE /567r0 Submission May 2003 Youngsoo Kim, Samsung/SNU and S. Choi, SNU Slide 1 Throughput Enhancement via Frame Aggregation – A Sequel.

Doc.: IEEE /567r1 Submission July 2003 Youngsoo Kim, Samsung/SNU and S. Choi, SNU Slide 1 Throughput Enhancement via Frame Aggregation – A Sequel.

Doc.: IEEE /0527r0 Submission March 2010 Slide 1 A Periodic 5 MHz Measurement Pilot for Channel Scan Date: Authors:

March 2002doc.: IEEE /221r0 Slide 1Submission Chris Heegard, TI Texas Instruments 141 Stony Circle, Suite 130 Santa Rosa California (707)

Doc.: IEEE /0237r0 Submission February 12, 2009 Rolf de Vegt (Qualcomm)Slide 1 Inputs for a ac Spec Framework Methodology Date:

Doc.: IEEE /383 Submission November 2000 Yasuo Harada, Matushita Electric Slide 1 A consideration on FEC Bit error Performance of concatenation.

Doc.: IEEE /320r0 Submission May 2002 Gerhard Fettweis, Systemonic AGSlide 1 ¼ Giga-Bit/s WLAN Gerhard Fettweis Gunnar Nitsche Systemonic AG.

Doc.: IEEE /383 SG3a Submission Marcus Pendergrass Time Domain Corporation (TDC) September 2002 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.

Doc.:IEEE /1275r0 Submission Laurent Cariou Nov, 2010 Slide 1 Complexity reduction for time domain H matrix feedback Authors: Date:

Doc.: IEEE /0534r1 Submission Duration in L-SIG Date: Youhan Kim, et al.Slide 1 Authors: May 2010.

Doc.: IEEE /0909r0 Submission July 2006 David Tung, RalinkSlide 1 On L-SIG TXOP Protection Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE.

Doc.: IEEE /1290r0 Submission November 2010 Allert van Zelst, QualcommSlide 1 VHT-SIG-B in NDPs Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0104r0 Submission March 2008 Stephen Kuffner, MotorolaSlide 1 IEEE Packet Error Rates for MSF1 and MSF2 IEEE P Wireless.

Doc.: IEEE /0365r0 Submission July 2007 Monisha Ghosh, PhilipsSlide 1 Rate ¼ Convolution Code IEEE P Wireless RANs Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0043r0 Submission November 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Inc.Slide 1 A Method of Curve Fitting to BER Data Notice: This document.

PHY Abstraction for TGax System Level Simulations

Doc.: IEEE /380r0 Submission May 2002 Duncan Kitchin, IntelSlide WG Assigned Numbers Authority Duncan Kitchin Intel Corporation.

Doc.: IEEE /543r0 Submission April 2006 Richard van Nee, Airgo NetworksSlide 1 Transmitter CCA Issues in 2.4 GHz April /543r0 Richard van.

Doc. :IEEE /314r0 Submission Sai Shankar et al., Philips ResearchSlide 1 May 2002 TXOP Request: in Time vs. in Queue Size? Sai Shankar, Javier.

January 6, 2002doc.: IEEE /044r0 SubmissionRishi Mohindra, MAXIMSlide 1 Proposal for IEEE802.11g Receiver Adjacent Channel Rejection Requirement.

Doc.: IEEE /0785r0 Submission July 2009 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Investigation of PA Model Sample Rate for TGac Date:

Doc.: IEEE /1106r0 Submission September 2012 Osama Aboul-Magd, Huawei TechnologiesSlide 1 A Short-Header Frame Format Date: Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0657r1 May 2012 Panasonic Slide 1 Target PER at receiver sensitivity power level for use case 1g Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0018r0 Submission May 2004 Steve Shellhammer, Intel CorporationSlide 1 IEEE Wireless Coexistence TAG Steve Shellhammer

Doc.:IEEE /321r0 Submission May 2002 Y. Liu, et al Slide 1 CC/RR Performance Evaluation Yonghe Liu, Jin-meng Ho, Matthew B. Shoemake, Jie Liang.

Doc.: IEEE /0071r1 Submission January 2004 Aleksandar Purkovic, Nortel NetworksSlide 1 LDPC vs. Convolutional Codes for n Applications:

Doc.:IEEE /1281r0 Submission Nov Brian Hart, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 Bandwidth Indication and Static/Dynamic Indication within Legacy Date:

Doc.: IEEE MHz-11n-impact-on-bluetooth Submission July 2008 Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 IEEE n 40 MHz Impact on BT Performance.

Doc.: IEEE /0612r0 Submission May 2007 H. Zhang., et al.Slide 1 Comment Resolution on TX Beamforming CSI/Steering Feedback Quantization Bitwidth.

Submission doc.: IEEE /0328r0 Nokia Internal Use Only March 2012 Slide 1 Date: Authors: PS-Poll Enhancements Chittabrata Ghosh, Nokia.

Doc.: IEEE /289r0 Submission Bobby Jose,Slide 1 March 2002 CC/RR Alternatives HCF Adhoc Discussion Work Sheet V00.04 Bobby Jose, et.al

Doc.: IEEE /0612r3 Submission May 2007 H. Zhang., et al.Slide 1 Comment Resolution on TX Beamforming CSI/Steering Feedback Quantization Bitwidth.

Doc.: IEEE /1278r0 Submission BSS load balancing for MU-MIMO Date: Authors: Nov 2010 Slide 1Daewon Lee, LG Electronics.

Doc.: IEEE /1234r0 Submission November 2009 Sameer Vermani, QualcommSlide 1 Interference Cancellation for Downlink MU-MIMO Date: Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE /1249r1 Backhaul Support in NG 60 September 2014 Monisha Ghosh (InterDigital)Slide 1 Authors: Date:

Submission May, 2000 Doc: IEEE / 086 Steven Gray, Nokia Slide Brief Overview of Information Theory and Channel Coding Steven D. Gray 1.

Doc.: IEEE /0706r2 Submission Bandwidth and Packet Type Detection Schemes for 40-50GHz Millimeter Wave Communication Systems Authors: May 2015.

Doc.: IEEE /xxxx Submission Control PHY Design for 40-50GHz Millimeter Wave Communication Systems.pptx Authors: May 2015 Slide 1Jianhan Liu, et.

Modeling OFDM Radio Channel Sachin Adlakha EE206A Spring 2001.

Non-Uniform Constellations for 64-QAM

Doc.: IEEE /0705r1 Submission Control PHY Design for 40-50GHz Millimeter Wave Communication Systems Authors: May 2015 Slide 1Jianhan Liu, et.

Doc.: IEEE /180r0 Submission March 2002 Monisha Ghosh, et al., Philips Slide 1 On The Use Of Multiple Antennae For Monisha Ghosh, Xuemei.

Doc.: IEEE /1484r1 Submission November 2011 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 11ah Data Transmission Flow Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /945r0 Submission August 2004 Pen C. Li, et al, Philips Slide 1 Begonya Otal, Job Oostveen, Joerg Habetha, Monisha Ghosh, Pen Li, Ronald.

Doc.: IEEE /663r3 Submission May 2012 Zhanji Wu, et. Al.Slide 1 Low-rate compatible BCC for IEEE ah lowest MCS Date: Authors:

Submission doc: IEEE /0807r0 July 2010 R. Kudo et al., NTT Slide 1 PHY Abstraction for MU-MIMO Date: Authors: Name AffiliationsAddressPhone .

March 2002 Jie Liang, et al, Texas Instruments Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /0207r0 Submission Simplifying MAC FEC Implementation and Related Issues Jie.

Doc.: IEEE /0535r0 Submission May 2008 Thomas Kenney, Minyoung Park, Eldad Perahia, Intel Corp. Slide 1 PHY and MAC Throughput Analysis with 80.

Doc.: IEEE /1484r4 Submission January 2012 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 11ah Data Transmission Flow Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0213r1 Submission Slide 1 David Tung, et al. (Ralink Technology) March 2005 On the Efficiency of TGnSync Preambles David Tung,

Doc.: IEEE /0216r1 Submission February 2012 James Wang et al, MediaTekSlide 1 Comment Resolution Receiver Parameters Date: Authors:

WUR Link Budget Analysis Follow-up: Data Rates and SIG Bits Protection

GI Overhead/Performance Impact on Open-Loop SU-MIMO

Rate Mapping for SISO, AWGN channel

Complex Beacon Pros and Cons

On The Use Of Reed Solomon Codes For n

Higher Rate b: Double the Data Rate

May 2015 Bandwidth and Packet Type Detection Schemes for 40-50GHz Millimeter Wave Communication Systems Authors: Frank Hsu, et. al. (MediaTek)

160 MHz Transmission Flow Date: Authors: September 2010

Sean Coffey, Ph.D., Chris Heegard, Ph.D.

Questions Concerning the PBCC-22 Proposal for High Rate b

FEC Ad Hoc Group Activity Update

Repetition and interleaver design for MCS0-Rep2

160 MHz Transmission Flow Date: XX Authors: September 2010

Comparisons of HARQ transmission schemes for 11be

Comparisons of HARQ transmission schemes for 11be

Performance Analysis of Outer RS Coding Scheme

Presentation transcript:

Scrambler Mismatch and MAC FEC: Is there a problem? September 2002 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/636r0 September 2002 Scrambler Mismatch and MAC FEC: Is there a problem? Monisha Ghosh, Vasanth Gaddam Philips Research. Monisha Gosh et. al. Philips Monisha Gosh et. al. Philips

September 2002 Problem Statement The first 7 bits of the service field carry the scrambler initialization information. This field is not RS encoded in the MAC. A single bit error in this 7-bit sequence can cause the entire packet to be in error, since it is not RS encoded. Hypothesis: this will limit the effectiveness of the MAC FEC. Monisha Gosh et. al. Philips

Past Results/Solutions September 2002 Past Results/Solutions Assuming the bit error rate (BER) to be uniform over the bit stream, it has been shown by analysis that a scrambler error can limit the MAC FEC performance. The analysis assumed AWGN only. Multipath can cause error bursts that will limit the efficacy of the MAC FEC independent of scrambler errors. Solutions proposed: dual precoding (can cause error propagation), extra bytes (increased overhead). Monisha Gosh et. al. Philips

September 2002 BER of a trellis code The 7-bit sequence containing the scrambler initialization is at the start of the bit sequence to be encoded. The trellis at that point is not “fully connected”, i.e. there is only a single path entering each state for the first 6 trellis transitions. The analytical expression for BER of a trellis code considers a fully connected trellis. Monisha Gosh et. al. Philips

September 2002 Hypothesis The BER for the first 7 bits of the trellis is lower than elsewhere in the trellis. The analytical results presented to date do not take this into effect. Simulation results indicate that indeed there is about an order of magnitude difference between the error rate of the scrambler initialization (7 bits) and bytes elsewhere in the data stream. Monisha Gosh et. al. Philips

September 2002 Simulation Results: 54 Mbps, 1616 bytes/packet, 5000 packets, AWGN Channel Monisha Gosh et. al. Philips

September 2002 Simulation Results: 54 Mbps, 496 bytes/packet, 100000 packets, AWGN + Multipath Channel Even though the byte error rate is higher when there is a scrambler initialization error, the packet error rate is not. This means that when there is an error in the scrambler initialization field, there are also errors in the rest of the data packet Monisha Gosh et. al. Philips

September 2002 Simulation Results Comparing Scrambler Initialization Error Rate with Byte Error Rate 54 Mbps, 50 byte packets, Multipath + AWGN channel, 1 million packets, SNR = 28 dB. The size of packets was reduced to make the simulation run faster. Byte Error Rate, assuming perfect initialization: 2.12e-05 Scrambler Error rate: 2.0e-06 25 byte packets, 4 million packets, SNR = 29 dB, Byte Error Rate = 5.38e-06, Scrambler error rate = 7.5e-07. Monisha Gosh et. al. Philips

September 2002 Conclusions The position of the 7-bit initialization sequence at the beginning of the trellis gives it added protection not accounted for in the analysis. Simulation results corroborate the above hypothesis: no discernable effect of scrambler error on packet error rate was noticed especially at higher SNRs. Simulation results indicate approximately an order of magnitude difference in the error rates of the scrambler initialization field versus the byte error rate. The MAC FEC gives a gain of about 2 dB. The limitation seems to be more from the lack of interleaving than from scrambler initialization errors. Monisha Gosh et. al. Philips