1 StaFF Progress Report David Urner University of Oxford.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Frequency Scanning Interferometry (FSI) measurements
Advertisements

Stephen Gibson, ATLAS Offline Alignment, 2 nd July Incorporating FSI with the Offline Alignment Overview ATLAS Group, University of Oxford Stephen.
S. M. Gibson, IWAA7 November ATLAS Group, University of Oxford, UK S. M. Gibson, P. A. Coe, A. Mitra, D. F. Howell, R. B. Nickerson Geodetic Grids.
MONALISA: Interferometric Position Monitor at the Nanometre Scale David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Oxford University.
ILC roles Interferometry Results 2009 / 2010 Mon 20 Apr :00 JST (01:00 UTC) MDI TILC09 – Tsukuba OXFORD MONALISA 1.
Accelerator and Beam Delivery The LC-ABD (Linear Collider: Accelerator and Beam Delivery) consortium is a group of UK institutes aiming to develop new.
The Linear Collider Alignment and Survey (LiCAS) Project Richard Bingham*, Edward Botcherby*, Paul Coe*, Grzegorz Grzelak*, Ankush Mitra*, Johannes Prenting.
LiCAS Project: FSI Overview Richard Bingham, Edward Botcherby, Paul Coe, John Green, Grzegorz Grzelak, Ankush Mitra, John Nixon, Armin Reichold University.
Initial Calibration and Stability Results from the LiCAS RTRS FSI System John Dale for the LiCAS Collaboration IWAA February 2008.
Final Doublet Stability and in-detector Interferometry MONALISA David Urner Oxford University.
Sta bilization of the F inal F ocus : Stabilization with Nano-Meter Precision.
QA for the Fibre Tracker 28 October 2004Brunel QA for fibre bundling Dr Paul Kyberd and Dr Peter Hobson School of Engineering & Design Brunel University,
StaFF: Motion Stabilization with Nano-Meter Precision Proposed experiment conducted within framework of StaFF (Stabilization of Final Focus for ILC). Funded.
S. M. Gibson, P. A. Coe, Photon02, 5 th September Coordinate Measurement in 2-D and 3-D Geometries using FSI Overview ATLAS Group, University of.
LumiCal Alignment System Status report Leszek Zawiejski, Tomasz Wojtoń, Arkadiusz Moszczyński Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Cracow 25th FCAL Collaboration.
MONALISA David Urner, Armin Reichold, Paul Coe, Matthew Warden, Geoff Rayner Monitoring Alignment and Stabilisation with high Accuracy (Previously known.
IPBPM piezo-mover system and plans for in situ monitoring of calibration and stability Current status and plan for ATF2 Philip Bambade Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur.
Status of IPBSM Improvement N. Terunuma, KEK 2012/July/13 ATF2 Weekly Meeting.
ATF2 Status and Plan K. Kubo ATF2, Final Focus Test for LC Achievement of 37 nm beam size (Goal 1) – Demonstration of a compact final focus.
NA62 Gigatracker Working Group Meeting 2 February 2010 Massimiliano Fiorini CERN.
Status on MONALISA presented by D. Urner 6 th stabilization day 9. June 09.
MONALISA David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Oxford University.
Optical Anchor / Interferometer Status: June, 2004 Josef Frisch.
Concepts for Combining Different Sensors for CLIC Final Focus Stabilisation David Urner Armin Reichold.
Chapter 9 Electromagnetic Waves. 9.2 ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES.
David Urner, Oxford University, RHUL – June StaFF Stabilization of Final Focus Motion Stabilization with Nano-Meter Precision David Urner Paul Coe.
LASER AND ADVANCES IN METROLOGY
1 Plans for KEK/ATF 1. Introduction 2. Related Instrumentations at ATF 3. Experimental Plans for Fast Kicker R&D at ATF Junji Urakawa (KEK) at ILC Damping.
Development & validation of an absolute FSI network STATUS & NEXT STEPS SU internal meeting 16 July 2015 Solomon William KAMUGASA.
UK/EU Plans for ATF2 G.A. Blair ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-0ff meeting, Annecy, 8 th October 2006 Overview EUROTeV UK.
Taikan SUEHARA, 3 rd ATF2 project KEK, 2006/12/18 Status of Shintake-monitor Optics (focused on phase stabilization) Taikan SUEHARA The University.
ATF2 meeting LAPP; David Urner 1 David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Geoffrey Rayner MPhys alumnus MONALISA Monitoring, Alignment.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES BIW ’ 06 Lepton Beam Emittance Instrumentation Igor Pinayev National Synchrotron Light Source BNL, Upton, NY.
MONALISA an Update David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Monitoring, Alignment & Stabilisation with high Accuracy.
Stabilization of Focus at ATF2 David Urner University of Oxford.
Energy Spectrometer for the ILC Alexey Lyapin University College London.
ATF DR Overview Introduction Low emittance history Present status S.Kuroda ( KEK ) GDE Review 3rd Apr.2013.
Frequency Scanned Interferometer Demonstration System Tim Blass, Jason Deibel, Sven Nyberg, Keith Riles, Haijun Yang University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
MONALISA David Urner Oxford University. Straightness Monitor Build from Distance Metres Decision taken this workshop to move from existing extraction.
1/10 Tatsuya KUME Mechanical Engineering Center, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-off meeting (Oct. 10, 2006) Phase.
Welcome to MONALISA A brief introduction. Who we are... David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Electronics support from CEG Central Electronics.
The stabilisation of the final focus (StaFF) system Sun 12 th March 2006 MDI – LCWS06 at I I Sc Bangalore David Urner, Paul Coe, Armin Reichold.
LASER FRAME: Straightness monitor (Tentative results of resolution test) Third Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF May 30-31,2005 KEK Nano BPM Group Y.Higashi,
MONALISA David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Monitoring, Alignment & Stabilisation with high Accuracy.
MONALISA Compact Straightness Monitor (CSM) simulation and Calibration Summer Project 2008.
1/13 Tatsuya KUME Mechanical Engineering Center, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-off meeting (Oct. 9, 2006) Mount.
09:40 – 10:00 (JST) Wed 5 Mar 2008 MONALISA : JAI Oxford MDI ATF2 TILC08 Sendai Japan 1 / 26 MONALISA Laser based alignment and stability monitoring.
SLAC ESA T-474 ILC BPM energy spectrometer prototype Bino Maiheu University College London on behalf of T-474 Vancouver Linear Collider.
MONALISA Update David Urner ATF2 Meeting Dec
ATF2 beam operation status Toshiyuki OKUGI, KEK The 9 th TB&SGC meeting KEK, 3-gokan Seminar Hall 2009/ 12/ 16.
Taikan SUEHARA, ATF2 meeting, KEK, 2006/11/22 Status of fringe stabilization of Shintake-monitor Taikan SUEHARA The University of Tokyo.
Simulations - Beam dynamics in low emittance transport (LET: From the exit of Damping Ring) K. Kubo
ATF2 weekly meeting 4 July 2007 MONALISA: Attachment of Vacuum Vessels for ATF2 David Urner.
May 31, 2005Mike Hildreth – ATF 2005 Energy Spectrometry and ATF Components of the nano-BPM Test Program and Plans for Future Tests Mike Hildreth University.
CERN, 27-Mar EuCARD NCLinac Task /3/2009.
Taikan SUEHARA, Joint Meeting of PRPPC in Honolulu, Hawaii, 2006/10/30 Laser Fringe Stabilization of 35nm IP Beam Size Monitor (Shintake monitor) for ATF2/ILC.
Progress of Shintake Monitor (ATF2 IP-BSM) ATF2 weekly meeting 2008/9/3 Takashi Yamanaka The University of Tokyo.
Piezo and retroflector calibration Understanding the details of interferometer performance.
ATF2 Status N.Terunuma, KEK
David Urner Oxford University/JAI
Summary FD Support System
UNIT-3 ADVANCES IN METROLOGY
Topics on Vibration Issues
David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Oxford University
INTERFERENCE.
ILC Main Linac Alignment Simulations
LightGage™ Frequency Scanning Technology
IP configuration session
David Urner, Armin Reichold , Paul Coe, Matthew Warden, Geoff Rayner
Presentation transcript:

1 StaFF Progress Report David Urner University of Oxford

2 Cast Dr. David Urner Dr. Paul ColeDr. Armin Reichold Stephanie Yang (mechanical engineering) Tony Handford (workshop) Roy Wastie (electrical engineering)

3 Measuring Motion At the ILC beam delivery system many magnets have to be stable with respect to each other to achieve high luminosities. –Final focus doublet –Critical magnets in BDS –Position monitoring of BPM’s in energy chicane. Often no direct line of sight: –Correlate position information of magnet to stable platform (e.g. anchored in ground) interferometrically. –Can be coupled with very large accelerometer performing better at small frequencies. –Correlate the stable platforms interferometrically.

4 Generic Tools Straightness monitor Distance meter (build first)

5 Distance Meter: Method of Measurement Distance meter 2 modes: –Michelson mode: fast, relative distances resolution nm –FSI mode: slow Absolute distances Precision 1  m. Distance Meters Laser Reference Interferometer Wavelength: 1550nm DAQ Pump (optical amplifier) Keep costs down for distance meters so that overall cost scale favourably.

6 Laser tune I The Distance Meter: FSI Mode Blue (long) arm reflected at Retro-reflector returning light at same angle –Slightly defocus lens → returning light is spread to ~1mm circle at launch plane. Red (short arm) reflected at far end of lens –Both arms cross same amount of material (1. order) –Close end of lens has to be anti-reflection coated. –Chose lens: short arm is reflected into small region. Red (short arm) and blue (long arm) interfere. FSI: Needs only one return line. Tune laser from nm. –#wavelength-#wavelength changes –For constant tuning speed: constant FSI frequency.

7 The Distance Meter: FSI Mode Measure fringe frequency using fast Fourier transformation. –#fringes * frequency → total phase advance. –Known effective length of reference → effective length of distance meter. –Fourier spectrum measures all frequencies → all interferences at all distances! I

8 Laser Reference Interferometer Distance Meters Wavelength: 1550nm Tuning: DAQ FSI: Reference Interferometer Laser: Constant tuning speed? –Unfortunately no. Reference interferometer developed for LiCAS. Use Reference interferometer to unfold phase advance. Then correct phase information from all distance meters. time Phase

9 The Distance Meter: Michelson mode Length motion leads to change in interference pattern –Measure intensity I. I Fixed Laser Frequency

10 The Distance Meter: Michelson mode Length motion leads to change in interference pattern –Measure intensity I. Add more lines –Each line will have another path length difference. –4 lines enough to calculate exact motion. Fixed Laser Frequency

11 Pay Attention to Systematic Effects Understanding the behaviour of laser is key! FSI mode: –Can we get better handle on tuning speed? Reference Interferometer Distance Meters Wavelength: 1550nm Tuning: nm DAQ Laser

12 Piezzo Driven Monitor Tuning laser Single Point measurement (Derive phases modulo 2  from intensity data) Moving mirror: Measure Intensity pattern

13 3–D mechanical model, detector side removed for clarity

14 Systematic Effects: Laser Understanding the behaviour of laser is key! FSI mode: –Can we get better handle on tuning speed? Reference Interferometer Distance Meters Wavelength: 1550nm Tuning: nm DAQ Laser Piezzo driven monitor

15 Systematic Effects: Laser Understanding the behaviour of laser is key! Michelson mode: –Stable frequency needed (unbalanced arm length) at level ~30kHz! Lock Laser to absorption line (very hard at 1550nm). Equip reference with Michelson Mode readout. → Change of reference interferometer information measures frequency change (assuming length is stable). Reference Interferometer Distance Meters Wavelength: 1550nm Tuning: nm DAQ Laser Piezzo driven monitor Lock to absorption line

16 Other Systematic Effects FSI mode: –Length change of distance meter during tuning (1nm → ~40nm error). Scan rapidly → Piezzo driven monitor will not work! Use Michelson information of distance meter to track length change. Use both methods. Vacuum enclosure of distance meters needed. Temperature effects. Reference Interferometer Distance Meters Wavelength: 1550nm Tuning: nm DAQ Laser Piezzo driven monitor Lock to absorption line

17 Reference channels Thermometer channels First Temperature Measurements

18 Status of Distance Meter Development Double peak found in two different prototypes. Ruled out possibility of analysis artefact. No obvious reflective surfaces Software in place now to analyse data within minutes after data taking should enable us to trace the problem Raw data of 2 channels recorded simultaniously Fourier spectrum

19 Distance meter simulation Simulation done with Zemax Use non-sequential mode –Take into account polarisation → correct interference pattern –Allows stray light analysis Allow analysis of chromatic aberrations

20 Distance meter simulation Simulation done with Zemax Use non-sequential mode –Take into account polarisation → correct interference pattern –Allows stray light analysis Allow analysis of chromatic aberrations

21 Simulated Interference Patters

22 A Straightness Monitor Made from Distance Meters Setup planned at KEK Red lines: Distance meter. Multilateration measure 6D coord. of A with respect to B. A B

23 A Straightness Monitor Made from Distance Meters Information related via central triangle Floor node A B Ceiling node 1

24 A Straightness Monitor Made from Distance Meters 3 nodes on each object, with 3 distance meters to each triangle node Floor node A B Ceiling node 1

25 A Straightness Monitor Made from Distance Meters 3 nodes on each object, with 3 distance meters to each triangle node Floor node A B Ceiling node 1

26 ATF at KEK

27 Implement system at ATF/KEK relating positions of nano-BPM’s Advantage: –Nano-BPM have nm resolution: cross check of results –Test of distance meter in accelerator environment Nano-BPM Built by SLAC group Nano-BPM Built by KEK group

28 Spider web Design with Opto- Geometrical Simulation: Simulgeo

29 Spider web Design with Opto- Geometrical Simulation: Simulgeo Allows objects to be placed (6D) in hierarchal structure –Reference placements. –Fixed placements (with error). –Variable placements (the objects to measure). Objects can be points, mirrors, distance meters… –Distance meter assume measurement between points with error. Big matrix inversion takes into account all errors and constrains 6D position of all points.

30 Spider web Design with Opto- Geometrical Simulation: Simulgeo Resolution of distancemeter: 1nm Mount precision of distancemeter: 1nm Angle precision of distancemeter holder: 10  rad. SLAC BPM: reference KEK BPM variable (6D): Position: x:32 y:19 z:2 nm Angle: x:0.01 y:0.01 z:0.1  rad ~1  m absolute distance resolution needed to determine constants required to solve geometry.

31 Triangle Nodes Distance meter heads located in triangle nodes. Floor node –Overall resolution improves if firmly anchored. –Dome anchored separately from interferometers. Ceiling nodes: position stability unimportant.

32 First Concept on how to Align Distance Meters in Network

33 BPM Nodes One wide angle retro- reflector (cateye) for each node Challenges: –Relative position between retro-reflector needs to be known to 1nm Requires measurement between 3 nodes on each nano-BPM.(blue lines). –Attachment of vacuum lines to BPM’s Requires zero-force design.

34 Force Free Mount Here attach vacuum tube for interferometer Attached to BPM. Holds retro reflector. Firm connection Strain Gauge Needs bellow to allow motion of BPM –Vacuum causes a force order of 100N! Develop small force vacuum mount using double bellow system. Allows small motion (~1 mm) of BPM-system Test stand to measure remaining (perpendicular) force on BPM frame. -1mm-3mm1mm3mm 1N 2N -1N 0N -2N -3N Force exerted on carbon frame (BPM) ±1mm: < 0.5N/mm ±3mm: < 0.8N/mm Force exerted by perpendicular motion

35 Concluding Remarks Developing –Software to understand distance meter. –Hardware to characterize laser. –Temperature sensing system. First optical simulation in place. Force Free mount system seems to work. Starting work on Mount/Alignment system for distance meter setup at KEK Still much to do –but things start to fall into place