Submission psc Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Integration WPAN with Operators Network] Date Submitted: [11 March, 2010] Source: [Cao Zhen, Liu Dapeng] Company [China Mobile Communications Corporation] Address [28 Xuanwumenxi Ave. Beijing, China] Voice:[ ], FAX: [ ], Abstract:[Mobile Terminals enable many new services and opportunities for the WPAN. It is desirable to integrate the WPAN with operators network in order to provide more precise and secure services.] Purpose:[For information and discussion, considering including the requirements into the PSC PAR] Notice:This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release:The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P

Submission psc Slide 2 Integrating WPANs with Operators Network Zhen Cao, Dapeng Liu September 10, 2010

Submission psc Background: Mobile Terminals enable many opportunities for new WPAN services Slide 3 Operator Networks Operator Services or Internet Services ……. WPAN WPAN devices

Submission psc Scenario: Integration WPAN Nodes to Operators Network Slide 4 FFD RFD UMTS Operator Core Network Operator Services or Internet Services Home Network Home sensor sends the information via 3G fixed terminal and service platform to mobile users, or vise versa Without authentication and authorization, malicious nodes can –Inject false data into the network, misleading decision makers;

Submission psc Requirements Authentication –Operator can authenticate both the cellular device and the peer devices within the PAN (directedly or indirectedly) –Accounting the peer devices behavior Key management –Pairwise key between the peer and coordinator –Pairwise key between the peers –Group key among a group of peers and the coordinator. Slide 5

Submission psc Current Practice Authenticating the PAN Coordinator to the operators network –Most of them are cellular enabled devices, and already have this capability Authenticating all the devices within the PAN to the operators network –Most of them are not cellular friendly device, and how to authenticating them is a challenge Slide 6

Submission psc Gap Analysis Whats been done Authentication –Can authenticate the cellular devices Confidentiality –Keys available to encrypt the data between cellular devices and –Envelope available to encapsulate encrypted data Whats not been done Authentication and accounting –Authenticate the peer devices –Account the peer devices Confidentiality –No key management –No secure association protocols –No group key association Slide 7

Submission psc Possible Directions of WPAN Authentication Open system –Admits any devices through the coordinator to access the operator network Shared key authentication –Admits devices to demonstrate their knowledge of a shared secret Extensible authentication –Asymmetric authentication using Public key cryptography –More extensible ways based on 802.1X and EAP Slide 8

Submission psc Authentication & Secure Association Slide 9 SGSN HLR Coordinator Peer Authentication to the operators core network Secure association protocol Authentication Secure Association Protocol

Submission psc Slide 10 Why a 15.4 amendment and whats included Define the authentication framework for the 15.4 network Define the authentication MPDU frame for the 15.4 network Define the secure association protocol between peers and coordinator after successful authentication

Submission psc Slide 11 Summary Background and scenario for authentication the WPAN nodes to the operators network Requirements and gap analysis Possible directions for the authentication framework

Submission psc Slide 12 Questions? Thank You!