August, 2003 W.S. Graves 1 Electron beam diagnostic methods William S. Graves MIT-Bates Laboratory Presented at 2003 ICFA S2E Workshop DESY-Zeuthen August,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Velocity bunching SPARC Daniele Filippetto on behalf of SPARC team.
Advertisements

J. Rudolph, Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin EuCARD 2nd ANNUAL MEETING Slice emittance measurements at the ELBE superconducting RF photoinjector.
1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
Sub-femtosecond bunch length diagnostic ATF Users Meeting April 26, 2012 Gerard Andonian, A. Murokh, J. Rosenzweig, P. Musumeci, E. Hemsing, D. Xiang,
P. Emma, SLACLCLS FAC Meeting - April 29, 2004 Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P. Emma LCLS FAC Meeting April 29, 2004 LCLS.
Adnan Doyuran a, Joel England a, Chan Joshi b, Pietro Musumeci a, James Rosenzweig a, Sergei Tochitsky b, Gil Travish a, Oliver Williams a
C.Limborg-Deprey ERL Workshop, Jefferson March 20th 2005 Optimum electron distribution for space charge dominated beams.
Before aperture After aperture Faraday Cup Trigger Photodiode Laser Energy Meter Phosphor Screen Solenoids Successful Initial X-Band Photoinjector Electron.
Cecile Limborg-Deprey Injector Commissioning September Injector Commissioning Plans C.Limborg-Deprey Gun exit measurements.
Henrik Loos High Level 17 June 2008 High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning Henrik Loos.
Cecile Limborg-Deprey Injector October Injector Physics C.Limborg-Deprey Diagnostics and Commissioning GTL measurements.
David H. Dowell Injector Physics/Diagnostics/Gun&L0 RF April 29-30, 2004 Injector Physics / Diagnostics / Gun & L0 Linac.
Magnetic Compression of High Brightness Beams: Survey of Experimental Results Scott G. Anderson ICFA Sardinia July 2002.
Modelling of the ALICE Injector Julian McKenzie ASTeC STFC Daresbury Laboratory IOP Particle Accelerators and Beams Group Status and Challenges of Simulation.
Influence of the Third Harmonic Module on the Beam Size Maria Kuhn University of Hamburg Bachelor Thesis Presentation.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES BIW ’ 06 Lepton Beam Emittance Instrumentation Igor Pinayev National Synchrotron Light Source BNL, Upton, NY.
Steve LidiaICFA Workshop, Chia LagunaJuly, 2002 Flat Beam Photoinjectors for Ultrafast Synchrotron Radiation Sources Steve Lidia Lawrence Berkeley National.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
A. Doyuran, L. DiMauro, W. Graves, R. Heese, E. D. Johnson, S. Krinsky, H. Loos, J.B. Murphy, G. Rakowsky, J. Rose, T. Shaftan, B. Sheehy, Y. Shen, J.
R&D Towards X-ray Free Electron Laser Li Hua Yu Brookhaven National Laboratory 1/23/2004.
Velocity Bunching: experiment at Neptune Photoinjector P. Musumeci UCLA Dept. of Physics and Astronomy.
LCLS Accelerator SLAC linac tunnel research yard Linac-0 L =6 m Linac-1 L  9 m  rf   25° Linac-2 L  330 m  rf   41° Linac-3 L  550 m  rf  0°
Recent Experiments at PITZ ICFA Future Light Sources Sub-Panel Mini Workshop on Start-to-End Simulations of X-RAY FELs August 18-22, 2003 at DESY-Zeuthen,
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Two Longitudinal Space Charge Amplifiers and a Poisson Solver for Periodic Micro Structures Longitudinal Space Charge Amplifier 1: Longitudinal Space Charge.
Beam Modulation due to Longitudinal Space Charge Zhirong Huang, SLAC Berlin S2E Workshop 8/18/2003.
Beam Dynamics and FEL Simulations for FLASH Igor Zagorodnov and Martin Dohlus Beam Dynamics Meeting, DESY.
A bunch compressor design and several X-band FELs Yipeng Sun, ARD/SLAC , LCLS-II meeting.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Extended ALICE Injector J.W. McKenzie, B.D. Muratori, Y.M. Saveliev STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Longitudinal Space Charge Micro- bunching in SDL (DUV-FEL) T. Shaftan, L. Carr, H. Loos, B. Sheehy,
J. Wu J. Wu working with T.O. Raubenheimer, J. Qiang (LBL), LCLS-II Accelerator Physics meeting April 11, 2012 Study on the BC1 Energy Set Point LCLS-II.
W.S. Graves 2002 Berlin CSR workshop 1 Microbunching and CSR experiments at BNL’s Source Development Lab William S. Graves ICFA CSR Workshop Berlin, Jan.,
P. Krejcik LINAC 2004 – Lübeck, August 16-20, 2004 LCLS - Accelerator System Overview Patrick Krejcik on behalf of the LCLS.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Jorg Kewisch, Dmitri Kayran Electron Beam Transport and System specifications.
ICFA Workshop on Future Light Source, FLS2012 M. Shimada A), T. Miyajima A), N. Nakamura A), Y. Kobayashi A), K. Harada A), S. Sakanaka A), R. Hajima B)
1 Short Electron Pulses from RF Photoinjectors Massimo Ferrario INFN - LNF.
What did we learn from TTF1 FEL? P. Castro (DESY).
X-band Based FEL proposal
J. C. T. Thangaraj Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 1 Experimental studies on an emittance exchange beamline at the A0 photoinjector.
Applications of transverse deflecting cavities in x-ray free-electron lasers Yuantao Ding SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory7/18/2012.
B. Marchetti R. Assmann, U. Dorda, J. Grebenyuk, Y. Nie, J. Zhu Acknowledgements: C. Behrens, R. Brinkmann, K. Flöttmann, M. Hüning,
Multi-bunch Operation for LCLS, LCLS_II, LCLS_2025
Summary of SPARC first-phase operations
Beam dynamics for an X-band LINAC driving a 1 keV FEL
Sara Thorin, MAX IV Laboratory
Slice Parameter Measurements at the SwissFEL Injector Test Facility
Tunable Electron Bunch Train Generation at Tsinghua University
Thermal emittance measurement Gun Spectrometer
Application of a Streak camera at PITZ
MIT Compact X-ray Source
Review of Application to SASE-FELs
What did we learn from TTF1 FEL?
Injector: What is needed to improve the beam quality?
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
Injector Commissioning C
Beam Characterization
Linac/BC1 Commissioning P
VELA TDC: Bunch Length and Longitudinal Phasespace Measurements Update
LCLS Commissioning P. Emma, et al
LCLS Tracking Studies CSR micro-bunching in compressors
High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning
Injector Experimental Results John Schmerge, SSRL/SLAC April 24, 2002
Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P
Transverse size and distribution of FEL x-ray radiation of the LCLS
Simulations for the LCLS Photo-Injector C
COMB beam: TSTEP simulations up to THz station
Linac Diagnostics Commissioning Experience
LCLS Injector Commissioning P
Diagnostics overview Beam profile monitors Cherenkov radiators Summary
Electron Optics & Bunch Compression
Presentation transcript:

August, 2003 W.S. Graves 1 Electron beam diagnostic methods William S. Graves MIT-Bates Laboratory Presented at 2003 ICFA S2E Workshop DESY-Zeuthen August, 2003

August, 2003 W.S. Graves 2 Experimental Methods Hardware/software controls. Thermal emittance measurement using solenoid scan. Cross-correlation of UV photoinjector drive laser with 100 fs IR oscillator. Streak camera time resolution Electron beam longitudinal distribution measured using RF zero phasing method. Slice transverse parameters are measured by combining RF zero phase with quadrupole scan. Will not address undulator diagnostics. See Shaftan, Loos, Doyuran. Enables injector optimization and code benchmarking.

August, 2003 W.S. Graves 3 DUVFEL Facility at BNL 1.6 cell gun with copper cathode 70 MeV Bend 50 m 5 MeV Bend Dump Coherent IR diagnostics RF zero phase screen UndulatorsLinac tanks Bunch compressor with post accel. 30 mJ, 100 fs Ti:Sapphire laser NISUS 10m undulator Photoinjector: 1.6 cell BNL/SLAC/UCLA with copper cathode 4 SLAC s-band 3 m linac sections Bunch compressor between L2 and L3 Approximately 60 CCD cameras on YAG screens. Triplet MeV

August, 2003 W.S. Graves 4 Control system Automated measurements very important for gathering large amounts of data and repeating studies. All sophisticated control is done in the MATLAB environment on a PC. Physicists quickly integrate hardware control with data analysis. Low level control is EPICS on a SUN and VME crates.

August, 2003 W.S. Graves 5 Thermal Emittance (1) (2) (3)

August, 2003 W.S. Graves 6 Projected emittance vs charge and FWHM FWHM (ps) Emittance (mm-mrad) Charge (pC) Emittance (mm-mrad) Charge 2 pC Energy 3.7 MeV Laser spot 0.5 mm RMS FWHM 3 ps Energy 3.7 MeV Laser spot 0.5 mm RMS HOMDYN simulations estimate limits on maximum bunch length and charge. Choose working parameters of 2 pC, 2 ps FWHM. Simulation YAG:Ce screen very useful for low charge, high resolution profiles. Screen thickness, surface quality, multiple reflections, and camera lens depth-of-focus and resolution are all important issues.

August, 2003 W.S. Graves 7 Solenoid Scan Layout CCD Camera YAG screen Mirror Solenoid 1.6 cell photoinjector Dipole trim 1cm 65 cm 12 cm33 cm Can measure charge energy x and y centroid x and y beamsize px and py Telecentric lens magnif. = 1 YAG:Ce screen very useful for low charge, high resolution profiles. Screen thickness, surface quality, multiple reflections, and camera lens depth-of-focus and resolution are all important issues. See SLAC GTF data.

August, 2003 W.S. Graves 8 Low Energy Beam Measurements x Solenoid Current (Amp)  11 File: a10pc.txt  =  1.7  = 8.11  0.44 m  N =  mm-mrad  =  mm  ' = 2.94  mrad E = 3.69 MeV pop02a.bmp Hor. RMS width = 39.5 um Beam size (um) Intensity (A.U.) pixels Video processing 3x3 median filter applied. Dark current image subtracted. Pixels < few % of peak are zeroed. Error estimates Monte Carlo method using measured beam size jitter.

August, 2003 W.S. Graves 9 Emittance vs laser size Horizontal RMS laser size (mm)  N (mm-mrad) Horizontal  N (mm-mrad) Vertical Horizontal RMS laser size (mm) FWHM2.6 ps Charge2.0 pC Gradient85 MV/m RF phase30 degrees Emittance shows expected linear dependence on spot size. Small asymmetry is always present.

August, 2003 W.S. Graves 10 Beam size and divergence vs laser spot size Error bars are measured data. Blue lines are from HOMDYN simulation using RF fields from SUPERFISH model and measured solenoid B-field. Upper blue line has 1/2 cell field 10% higher than full cell. Lower blue line has 1/2 cell field 10% lower than full cell RMS laser hor. size (mm) RMS e-beam hor. size (mm) RMS laser hor. size (mm) RMS ebeam hor. divergence (mrad) High Low SizeDivergence

August, 2003 W.S. Graves 11 Error bars are measured data points. Curve is nonlinear least squares fit with β rf and Φ cu as parameters: β rf = / and Φ cu = / eV. The fit provides a second estimate of the electron kinetic energy E k = 0.40 eV, in close agreement with the estimate from the radial dependence of emittance. Emittance vs RF phase

August, 2003 W.S. Graves Time (ps) Phase matching angle (mrad) Signa l (V) Time profile of UV laser pulse Phase matching angle of harmonic generation crystals used to produce UV affects time and spatial modulations. Cross-correlaton difference frequency generation – experiment by B. Sheehy and H. Loos 100 fs IR 5 ps UV BBO crystal 200 fs blue Power meter Note: “Sub-ps” streak camera is inadequate for this measurement

August, 2003 W.S. Graves 13 Above: Laser cathode image of air force mask in laser room. Below: Resulting electron beam at pop 2. Above: Laser cathode image with mask removed showing smooth profile. Below: Resulting electron beam showing hot spot of emission. Laser masking of cathode image

August, 2003 W.S. Graves 14 Streak Camera Streak image Time Hammamatsu FESCA fs FWHM measured resolution Reflective input optics ( nm) Wide response cathode ( nm) Optical trigger (<500 fs jitter) Designed for synchroscan use. Also good single-shot resolution. 6 time ranges: 50 ps - 6 ns 50 ps window Very helpful for commissioning activies and for timing several optical signals. Limited time resolution below 1 ps.

August, 2003 W.S. Graves 15 Streak camera time profiles of laser pulses signal (arb units) streak delay (picoseconds) signal (arb units) streak delay (picoseconds) signal (arb units) streak delay (picoseconds) Oscillator796 nm FWHM765 fs Amplified IR 796 nm FWHM1.01 ps single shot UV266 nm FWHM2.40 ps singleshot Time resolution depends on photon energy: energetic UV photons create photoelectrons with energy spread that degrades time resolution

August, 2003 W.S. Graves 16 L1L2L3L4 RF zero-phase time profile L3 phase = +90, amp. set to remove chirp L4 phase = +/-90, amp. set to add known chirp L2 phase varies, amp. fixed L1 phase = 0, amp. fixed Chicane varies from 0 cm < R56 < 10.5 cm L4 phase = -90 degreesL4 phase = +90 degrees L3 corrects residual chirp, L4 is off Pop 14 YAG screen YAG images at pop 14

August, 2003 W.S. Graves 17 Quad scan during RF zero phase Movie of slice emittance measurement.

August, 2003 W.S. Graves 18 Right side Circle is matched, normalized phase space area at upstream location. Ellipse is phase space area of slice at same location. Straight lines are error bars of data points projected to same location. Left side Beam size squared vs quadrupole strength. Each plot is a different time slice of beam. Software is used to time-slice beam. Collaboration with Dowell, Emma, Limborg, Piot

August, 2003 W.S. Graves 19 Slice emittance and Twiss parameters Note strongly divergent beam due to solenoid overfocusing at tail, where current is low. Space charge forces near cathode caused very different betatron phase advances for different parts of beam.  is parameter that characterizes mismatch between target and each slice.  = ½ (  0  – 2  0  +   0 )  0,  0,  0 are target Twiss param. , ,  are slice Twiss param. Beam Parameters: 200 pC, 75 MeV, 400 fs slice width

August, 2003 W.S. Graves 20 Different slices require different solenoid strength HeadTailHeadTailHeadTail HeadTailHeadTailHeadTail Increasing solenoid current Vertical dynamics Lattice is set to image end of Tank 2 to RF-zero phasing YAG. Particles in tail of beam are diverging, and in head converging. Head has higher current and so reaches waist at higher solenoid setting. Current projection Time

August, 2003 W.S. Graves 21 Solenoid = 98 A Solenoid = 108 A Solenoid = 104 A Slice emittance vs solenoid strength. Charge = 200 pC. Solenoid Eyn Alpha Beta 98 A 3.7 um (3.2) 0.4 (1.0) 1.3 m (1.3) 104 A 2.1 um (2.8) -6.9 (-3.6) 9.8 m (6.8) 108 A 2.7 um (2.7) -9.0 (-9.6) 45 m (36) Projected Values (parmela in parentheses) Data Parmela

August, 2003 W.S. Graves 22 Slice parameters vs charge 10 pC 100 pC 200 pC 50 pC Low charge cases show low slice emittance and little phase space twist. High charge cases demonstrate both slice emittance growth and phase space distortion.

August, 2003 W.S. Graves 23 Longitudinal structure Time (ps) Current (A) File: csr01, FWHM = 2.2 ps Analysis of RF zero phasing data can be complicated by modulations in energy plane. See contribution from T. Shaftan for detailed description.

August, 2003 W.S. Graves 24 RF zero phasing Method uses accelerating mode to “streak” the beam by increasing the energy spread (chirping). Uncorrelated energy spread is ~5 keV and coherent modulations can be ~20 keV. Streak chirp must be much larger than this. Time and energy axes are difficult to disentangle. RF deflector cavity Transverse momentum is ~ 1 eV/c. Relatively small deflecting field gives excellent time resolution. Less sensitive to coherent energy modulations. Can obtain simultaneous time/energy/transverse beam properties when combined with dipole in other plane. RF zero phasing vs RF deflectors

August, 2003 W.S. Graves 25 Concluding Remarks Experience seems to indicate that most differences between experiment and simulation are due to experimental inaccuracies. Beam can be used to diagnose many hardware/applied field difficulties. “Easy to use” control system integrating realtime analysis and hardware/beam control very important. With adequate diagnostics, meeting beam quality and FEL performance goals is straightforward. See work by Shaftan, Loos, Doyuran of BNL on undulator diagnostics and trajectory analysis.