doc.: IEEE /0953r1 Submission November 2009 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide TGmb Editor Report - Nov 2009 Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /0953r1 Submission November 2009 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 2 Abstract This document summarises editorial activities on the TGmb Draft since the last meeting Status of Draft Status of comments from LB149 Style E-Motions

doc.: IEEE /0953r1 Submission November 2009 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 3 November 2009

doc.: IEEE /0953r1 Submission November 2009 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 4 REVmb Draft Numbering History (>D1) D1.0, – Balloted as LB149 D1.01, – speculative resolution of editorials D1.02, – speculative resolution of minor technical comments D1.03, – editing of approved resolutions

doc.: IEEE /0953r1 Submission November 2009 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 5 Process for D1.04-D1.06 D1.04 contains speculative editing of ~200 non-editorial comment resolutions approved in Sept 2009 D1.04 was reviewed and ~xxx defects were reported D1.05 was prepared containing a roll-up of STD w D1.05 was reviewed and ~xxx defects were reported D1.06 was prepared containing bugfixes for the D1.04 and D1.05 defects. Thankyou to the reviewers:

doc.: IEEE /0953r1 Submission November 2009 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 6 LB149 Documents REVmb DRAFT (members area of website) –Draft P802.11REVmb_D1.06.pdf + Incremental redlines D1.04->D1.05 etc Composite comments (all ad-hocs) – m-revmb-wg-ballot-comments.xls Comments assigned to / held by editor –For: resolution, editing or other action – m-revmb-wg-ballot-editor-comments.xls

doc.: IEEE /0953r1 Submission November 2009 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 7 WG Ballot 149 Comments

doc.: IEEE /0953r1 Submission November 2009 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 8 Status by ad-hoc – (summary)

doc.: IEEE /0953r1 Submission November 2009 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 9 E-Motions

doc.: IEEE /0953r1 Submission November 2009 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 10 Go to ballot Motion Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from the first working group ballot on P802.11REVmb D1.0, Instruct the editor to prepare Draft 2.0 incorporating these resolutions and, Approve a 15 day Working Group Recirculation Ballot asking the question Should P802.11REVmb D2.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?

doc.: IEEE /0953r1 Submission November 2009 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 11 Sept 2009

doc.: IEEE /0953r1 Submission November 2009 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 12 Process for D1.01-D1.03 D1.01 contains speculative editing of editorial comment resolutions (~770 pages modified) D1.01 was reviewed (~100 defects reported) D1.02 contains speculative editing of minor technical comment resolutions, and resolution of the D1.01 defects (~410 pages modifed) D1.02 was reviewed (~20 defects reported) D1.03 contains editing of comment resolutions approved in July 2009, plus resolution of the D1.02 defects (~12 pages modified) D1.03 was reviewed and no defects were reported Thankyou to the reviewers: Bill, Eldad, Gary, Jon, Kaberi, Mark, Matthew, Michael, Peter, Stephen and Sudheer

doc.: IEEE /0953r1 Submission November 2009 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 13 LB149 Documents REVmb DRAFT (members area of website) –Draft P802.11REVmb_D1.03.pdf + D1.02, D1.01, D1.0 –+ Incremental redlines D1.02->D1.03 etc Composite comments (all ad-hocs) – m-revmb-wg-ballot-comments.xls Comments assigned to / held by editor –For: resolution, editing or other action – m-revmb-wg-ballot-editor-comments.xls

doc.: IEEE /0953r1 Submission November 2009 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 14 WG Ballot 149 Comments

doc.: IEEE /0953r1 Submission November 2009 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 15 Status by ad-hoc – (summary)

doc.: IEEE /0953r1 Submission November 2009 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 16 Style – Puttin on the Ritz ** Decisions on global edits made by TGmb are effectively creating a TGmb style Adrian and Bill are creating a document to describe this style –Based on decisions made by TGmb on editorial comments This style does not apply to amendments to STD-2007, but will apply to amendments to STD-20xx. Learnings from early TGn publication editing: publication editor will ensure stylistic consistency with STD-2007 Some unknowns: will publication editor of STD-20xx reverse some of these stylistic decisions? –Are we wasting our time worrying about this now? –Are we creating work for publication editor? **

doc.: IEEE /0953r1 Submission November 2009 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 17 Compiling the MIB Hide any editorial tags Save contents of Annex D and Annex Q as text Move contents of Annex Q just before END statement of Annex D. Comment out headings and Editorial Notes Run through MIB Browser –If any errors fix them up till the file compiles while making matching changes in the Annex D / Annex Q sources. –Freeware MIB browsers are available that can perform this compilation.

doc.: IEEE /0953r1 Submission November 2009 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 18 E-Motions

doc.: IEEE /0953r1 Submission November 2009 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 19 Editorial Motion 1 Approve resolutions of P802.11REVmb WG ballot 149 comments –in document r0 –on the Editorials tab Marshall/Stephens Motion # 6: 9,0,1

doc.: IEEE /0953r1 Submission November 2009 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 20 Editorial Motion 2 Approve resolutions of P802.11REVmb WG ballot 149 comments –in document r0 –on the Minor Technical tab Worstell/Montemurro Motion # 7: 6,0,4

doc.: IEEE /0953r1 Submission November 2009 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 21 Editorial Motion 3 Approve resolutions of P802.11REVmb WG ballot 149 comments –in document r1 –on the MIB tab Montemurro/Marshall Motion # 8 Withdrawn One comment (P), compile the MIB, see submission 11-09/0921r1

doc.: IEEE /0953r1 Submission November 2009 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 22 Editorial Motion 4 Approve resolutions of P802.11REVmb WG ballot 149 comments –in document r0 –on the Annex C tab Moved: Stephens / Myles Motion # 9: 5,4,2 Proposed resolutions replace Annex C by a placeholder.

doc.: IEEE /0953r1 Submission November 2009 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 23 Go to ballot Motion Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from the first working group ballot on P802.11REVmb D1.0, Instruct the editor to prepare Draft 2.0 incorporating these resolutions and, Approve a 15 day Working Group Recirculation Ballot asking the question Should P802.11REVmb D2.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?