Parental Satisfaction and Anxiety Following Newborn Hearing Screening Referrals in Utah Linda D. Goetze, Catherine C. Groseclose, Scott Grosse, Karl R.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Parental Anxiety Associated with Newborn Hearing Screening
Advertisements

Evaluation of a of a Statewide Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Program Karen M. Ditty, M.S.,CCC-A National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management.
Tracking and Data Management Technical Assistance Workshop for Universal Newborn Hearing Screening and Intervention Margaret Lubke, Ph.D. National Center.
Evaluation Utahs Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Program of Karl R. White, PhD National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management Utah State.
EHDI Information Management Les R. Schmeltz, MS, CCC-A Iowa Les R. Schmeltz, MS, CCC-A Iowa.
Delivering Screening Results: What Parents Want Janet DesGeorges Colorado Families for Hands & Voices Cami Geilenfeldt Iowa Hands & Voices.
Early Hearing Detection and Intervention in Mississippi EHDI-M Overcoming Barriers to Timely Diagnosis of Hearing Loss.
Collecting and Reporting EHDI Data in New Jersey Kathryn Aveni, RNC, MPH Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Program, New Jersey Department of Health.
Evaluation of EHDI Programs Terry Foust Karen Muñoz Kathleen Watts NCHAM Technical Assistance.
The Millennial Student at WCU Presentation to Council of Trustees and WCU Foundation Trustees 15 July 2008 Dr. Idna M. Corbett, Interim Dean of Undergraduate.
Educational Attitudes and Social Stratification: A Multivariate Analysis of the British Youth Panel Professor Vernon Gayle, University of Stirling, Scotland.
1 Monitoring Pediatric Emergency Room Use with the National Health Interview Survey Renee M. Gindi Division of Health Interview Statistics, NCHS National.
ENROLLED STILL UNINSURED Voices from the Newly- Enrolled And Still Uninsured A Survey about the Affordable Care Act’s First Open Enrollment Period June.
Public Perceptions of Carbon Capture and Storage: Survey Evidence from Indiana David C. Warren Sanya Carley John D. Graham John A. Rupp Rachel M. Krause.
Newborn Hearing Screenings in the Latino Population in Utah URLEND Leadership Project 2012 Vance Gunnell Blake Hansen Kaylyn Hum Krish Silva Vanesa Webb.
Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) ~ Challenges and Opportunities ~
Carl E. Bentelspacher, Ph.D., Department of Social Work Lori Ann Campbell, Ph.D., Department of Sociology Michael Leber Department of Sociology Southern.
Comparing Job Demands, Coping Resources and Well-being Across Different Health Care Providers Working Together Jane B Lemaire MD, Jean E Wallace PhD, Janet.
Pulse oximetry screening for congenital heart disease. Does it work? Is it worth it?
Teen Influences on Church Dropouts Spring Report Contents Methodology & Terminology3 Key Findings 5 Teen Church Attendance12 Family Influences.
Home-schooling as an extreme form of parental involvement Christa L. Green.
Washington State Hospital Association Washington state is one of the leaders in efficient use of services. Year-to-year differences in inpatient use patterns.
Identifying Health Insurance Predictors and the Main Reported Reasons for Being Uninsured Among U.S. Immigrants: The Role of Legal Status Arturo Vargas.
Cultural Difference: Investment Attitudes and Behaviors of High Income Americans Tahira K. Hira – Iowa State University
Rosana M. Aguilar Foster Care Research Group
Child Care and Children with Special Needs Challenges for Low-income Families.
Infant Hearing Screening in the US, 2001: Results from the ECLS-B Study May S. Chiu, B.S. Magdaliz Gorritz, B.S. Howard J. Hoffman, M.A. National Institute.
New York State Department of Health Outcomes of New York’s Newborn Hearing Screening Program Lynn Spivak, Ph.D., CCC-A Connie Donohue, M.A., CCC-A.
Using Birth Certification to Reach Families lost to Hearing Screening Follow-up Jeffrey Duncan, M.S. Director, Office of Vital Records and Statistics.
How to Explain the Numbers: Helping Staff, Parents, and Other Stakeholders Understand the Results of the NCSEAM Surveys for Part C and 619 Batya Elbaum,
+ Maegon Smith Ms. Jones English IV-3A Neonatal Nurse Practitioner.
Developing a Tool to Measure Health Worker Motivation in District Hospitals in Kenya Patrick Mbindyo, Duane Blaauw, Lucy Gilson, Mike English.
WHERE ARE THEY NOW: Children who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing Identified by Newborn Hearing Screening in Hawai`i 2005 Early Hearing Detection and Intervention.
Missing income data in the millennium cohort study: Evidence from the first two sweeps Authors: Denise Hawkes and Ian Plewis Discussant: Nicholas Biddle.
Introduction to the ALD Newborn Screening Study to be performed at Frederick Memorial Hospital and three other Maryland Hospitals PART 1: LOGISTICS – STUDY.
Service Learning Dr. Albrecht. Presenting Results 0 The following power point slides contain examples of how information from evaluation research can.
Cleveland Clinic Science Internship Program for Nursing How do Families of Surgical Patients Perceive Communication of their Family Members’ Surgical Status?
Teacher Satisfaction Whitney Zimmerman Christine Henry.
Q: Does a student’s perception of writing, help to improve writing skills? Q:Will the use of a blog improve students’ attitude towards, writing?
Inpatient Survey 2008 Joy Wilk AD Clinical Governance June 2009 Appendix 4.
Evaluation of EHDI Programs ________________________ Terry Foust, Au.D., CCC-A/SLP Karen Muñoz, Ph.D., CCC-A Kathleen Watts, M.S. National Center for Hearing.
A Good Start Parents’ evaluations of support following Newborn Hearing Screening in Trondheim, Norway.
Things teen moms need to know By: Jessica Jones. According to CDC approximately 410,000 teen girls give birth to babies in the united states each year.
Powered by parents' survey 2015 Tuesday, July 14, 2015.
A study of the effects of divorce on parent-child relationships Nicole Cloutier and Krista Doucette.
EVALUATING AN EHDI SYSTEM: PARENT SURVEY PROJECT Vickie Thomson, MA State EHDI Coordinator Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Janet DesGeorges.
Children with Hearing Loss in Hawai`i: Early and Late Identified (Session #8) 2006 Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Conference Washington, D.C.
Evaluating Families Satisfaction with EHDI in Massachusetts Jessica MacNeil, MPH Massachusetts Department of Public Health Boston, MA.
Developmental Dysplasia Hip (DDH) Parent satisfaction survey Presented by Heather Jennings W.I.T. Supervisors: Dr. Martina Gooney and Dr. Linda Sheahan.
Monday, June 23, 2008Slide 1 KSU Females prospective on Maternity Services in PHC Maternity Services in Primary Health Care Centers : The Females Perception.
The birth hospital is the first step to identifying newborn hearing loss and to educate and guide families on newborn hearing. There are many opportunities.
© 2015© 2016 Results and Analysis 2016 School Climate Survey: Jenkins Elementary School.
k Survey 27 th June Key findings Fractures For 70%, osteoporosis was not discussed by their health professional after.
.... Attachment Intervention with Parents and Infants in Early Substance Abuse Recovery Child abuse and neglect is major social problem Improving the relationship.
Undergraduate Student Persistence & Graduation advisor UI/WSU Advising Symposium September 9, 2011 Joel Michalski, Ph.D. Candidate & Karla Makus, Academic.
DESIGNING GOOD SURVEYS Laura P. Naumann Assistant Professor of Psychology Nevada State College.
AAMC Faculty Forward Engagement Survey Results
BROOKHAVEN HOSPITAL’S
Lisa Weiss, M.D. Brian F. Pendleton, Ph.D. Susan Labuda Schrop, M.S.
Anderson Diagnostics New Born Hearing Screening. About Hearing Screening Deaf people can do anything, except hear. A new born baby may suffer with a low.
The Early Hearing Detection & Intervention Program Overview
Peer Program Evaluation
Barriers to Follow-up in Newborn Hearing Screening Programs
First Annual National EHDI Meeting
Organizing the Hospital Program
2015/16 National Cancer Patient Experience Survey
Tracking and Data Management
Rosemary White-Traut, PhD, RN, FAAN
Parental Anxiety Associated with Newborn Hearing Screening
Division of Nursing and The Division of Clinical Support Services
Presentation transcript:

Parental Satisfaction and Anxiety Following Newborn Hearing Screening Referrals in Utah Linda D. Goetze, Catherine C. Groseclose, Scott Grosse, Karl R. White, and Kay W. Hansen Early Intervention Research Institute Utah State University Logan, UT Presented at: National Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Conference Washington, DC February 19, 2004

Overall Project Outline  Maintained cost web page:  Family Survey—Completed Year 1 data collection activities and began Year 1 data analyses; began Year 2 data collection  Hospital Data Collection—Initial hospital cost and time diary data collection completed with 8 Utah hospitals; began hospital cost data analyses  Diagnostic Cost—Finalize methodology and sample, collect data

Family Surveys  Diagnostic survey FFF (n = 52)  Outpatient survey FFP (n = 37)  Inpatient survey FP (n = 44)

Family Survey Results  Descriptives  Parental Satisfaction and Anxiety Cohort Differences –analysis of variance –controlling for insurance differences, income, and parents’ education  Results Summary

Mean Baby Stay in Hospital After Being Born Hours Between Cohort Differences p <.01

Percentage of Babies in NICU Between Cohort Differences p <.001 2% 14% 33%

Percentage of Respondents Who Knew Baby was Screened for Hearing Loss Between Cohort Differences n.s. 98% 95% 100%

Household Income Before Taxes (n = 119) Number of Cases Mean = 6.8 (~ $35,000) SD = = Less than $5,000 2 = $5,000 - $9,999 3 = $10,000 - $14,999 4 = $15,000 - $19,999 5 = $20,000 - $24,999 6 = $25,000 - $ = $35,000 - $44,999 8 = $45,000 - $54,999 9 = $55,000 - $64, = $65,000 - $74, = > $75,000

Education of R and Partner (n = 133) Number of Cases Mean = 7.1 SD = = Less than 12 years 2 = High School Diploma 3.5 = Technical Degree 3.5 = 2 Year Associate Degree 5 = College Degree 6 = Graduate/Post-College

Type of Insurance by Cohort No insurance n = 5 3.8% Medicaid n = % Private ins n = %

After all screening was complete, how did you feel...? Mean Score: Glad hearing screening was done at this hospital Between Cohort Differences n.s. 1 = Strongly disagree 5 = Strongly agree

Tell us about your experience in getting the screening test while a patient at the hospital. The screening test was carefully explained to me. Between Cohort Differences p <.05 1 = Strongly disagree 5 = Strongly agree

Before you and your baby left the hospital, how did you feel when you were told your baby needed another screening after discharge from the hospital? Very worried – Not worried Between Cohort Differences p <.05 1 = Very Worried 5 = Not Worried

Before you and your baby left the hospital, how did you feel when you were told your baby needed another screening after discharge from the hospital? Not Supported – Supported Between Cohort Differences p = Not supported 5 = Supported

Before you and your baby left the hospital, how did you feel when you were told your baby needed another screening after discharge from the hospital? Between cohort differences controlling for other variables p <.01 Average household income = 6.8 Average education of R and partner = = Not Supported 5 = Supported Adjusted Means No insurance n = 5 Medicaid n = 36 Private ins n = 69

Angry - Calm Between Cohort Differences p <.01 1 = Angry 5 = Calm Before you and your baby left the hospital, how did you feel when you were told your baby needed another screening after discharge from the hospital?

Between cohort differences controlling for other variables p <.01 Average household income = 6.8 Average education of R and partner = = Angry 5 = Calm Adjusted Means No insurance n = 5 Medicaid n = 36 Private ins n = 69

Confused - Confident Between Cohort Differences p <.01 1 = Confused 5 = Confident Before you and your baby left the hospital, how did you feel when you were told your baby needed another screening after discharge from the hospital?

Between cohort differences controlling for other variables p <.05 Average household income = 6.8 Average education of R and partner = = Confused 5 = Confident Adjusted Means No insurance n = 5 Medicaid n = 36 Private ins n = 69

After all screening was complete (before diagnosis was done), how did you feel? Worried about my baby’s hearing. Between Cohort Differences p < = Strongly disagree 5 = Strongly agree

Before you and your baby left the hospital, how did you feel when you were told your baby needed another screening after discharge from the hospital? Worried about my baby’s hearing. Between cohort differences controlling for other variables p <.01 Average household income = 6.8 Average education of R and partner = = Strongly disagree 5 = Strongly agree Adjusted Means No insurance n = 5 Medicaid n = 36 Private ins n =

After all screening was complete (before diagnosis was done), how did you feel? Confident about what to do next. Between Cohort Differences p < = Strongly disagree 5 = Strongly agree

Before you and your baby left the hospital, how did you feel when you were told your baby needed another screening after discharge from the hospital? Confident about what to do next. Between cohort differences controlling for other variables p <.01 Average household income = 6.8 Average education of R and partner = = Strongly disagree 5 = Strongly agree Adjusted Means No insurance n = 5 Medicaid n = 36 Private ins n =

How much do you earn per hour (before baby)? Between Cohort Differences n.s.

How much do you earn per hour (after baby)? Between Cohort Differences p.059

Family Survey Results Summary  Overall respondent ratings of screening were positive  Respondents with babies diagnosed with hearing loss felt less supported, more worried, less confident, less calm, and more confused than respondents in the other cohorts.  Even after controlling for level of education, income, and insurance differences, these cohort differences remained.  When education, income, and insurance differences were included in the multivariate analysis, only the cohort was statistically significant in explaining parental satisfaction and anxiety.  Does this imply that the concerns about the negative effects of “false positive” impacts on families are negligible?  What can staff involved in screening and diagnosis do to improve how families feel about the process?

Family Survey Results Summary (continued)  Differences were suggested in wage rate of respondents with diagnosed babies after the baby was born compared to families with babies who did not have a diagnosed hearing loss  ….yet no significant differences in hourly wage between groups reported prior to the baby’s birth  All but one inpatient who did not return to work have very low hourly wage rates before baby was born (lower average income)  Data suggest that mothers with high wages and very low wages are less likely to return to work after their baby is born  At least two diagnosed who left work did so because of the baby’s diagnosis; one father of a diagnosed infant was fired because he spent “too much time at the hospital”  A larger sample may clarify reasons for the changes in hourly rates

Suggestions Suggestions about improvement of the project are welcome. Please Dr. Linda Goetze about any suggestions for the cost study at: