MC Type-B fit up review1 Review of MC Type B assembly clearances reviewing A-to-B and B-to-C interfaces 3/1/07 Summary: Wing interfaces look okay between.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sectional Assembly and Installation
Advertisements

Welding Joints, Positions, and Symbols
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
1 of 4 LESSON #13 A REVIEW OF ORTHOGRAPHIC PROJECTION
Graphic Communication
C2 to C5 fit up review-R41 Review of MC Type C to C assembly clearances with C2 to C5 shell surface interface details 12/19/06 Rev 4.
NCSX Mod Coil C1 features requiring rework at PPPL.
WING SUPPORT CONCEPTS FOR WINGS # 2,3,6,7 AND 9 GARY MCGINNIS 09/19/ – TAPPING HOLES FOR STUDS 2 – STUD AND INSERT WELDING 3 – WELDING BRACKETS.
WALL FRAMING Section 6 of AS 1684 relates to the regulations governing timber wall construction.
Status of Modular Coil Design D. Williamson, 4/9/03 Prototype Winding Form - Interim model based on m50_e03 - PF/TF supports, poloidal break added - To.
CSWA
AMS-02 tracker mechanics status of assembly and integration at UniGe Outer planes: - Tests of evaporator (cooling loop) integration - Tools to develop.
Bellwork Clickers A pair of parallel lines are revolved about an axis to make a pair of cones. What is the volume of the shell if the two lines look like.
1 Stage 3 Peer Review October 26, 2006 T. Brown. 2 Field Period Assembly (FPA) 1.Make sure the requirements for the tooling is well defined (including.
NCSX Vacuum Vessel Joint Design Mike Viola PPPL July 1 st, 2003.
Peregrine the Martian Lander Assembly Instructions Mission to Mars 2008.
1 Dimensional Control for the National Compact Stellarator Experiment R. Ellis, A. Brooks, T. Brown, W. Reiersen, S. Raftopoulos, B. Stratton Presented.
1 Stage 3 Peer Review October 26, 2006 T. Brown. 2 Field Period Assembly (FPA) – Stage 3 1.Make sure the requirements for the tooling is well defined.
1 MCHP-1 clamp and MC port opening metrology review ProE model: stb-mchp-1_vvsa1_pppl_best_fit.asm stb-fpa_mech_left_side.asm, Rep: mchp-1_clamp_metrol_pts.
Engineering H191 - Drafting / CAD Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Lect 5P. 1Autumn Quarter Design Process Isometric Drawings Lecture 6.
Modular Coil Assembly Bolted Joint PDR 2/22/07. Objectives The review objectives include... Define the location of additional inboard bolts Finalize the.
After considerable pushing and shoving, this configuration show some promise. I have taken some liberties with the geometry and turned mounts inside-out.
NCSX A. Brooks, P. Fogarty, G. Lovett, D. Williamson June 3, 2005 Modular Coil Type-C Final Design Review – Part II.
1 MC Assembly over the VV FPA Station 3 FDR Review July 17, 2007 T. Brown.
Upon entering the site a “pre-loader” will cache the contents of the site on the user’s computer. Visually, a “Zen Circle” brush stroke will animate to.
11/30/20151Robin Lafever The existing 300 K Flange This is certainly an older version but is useful to illustrate The proposed modifications.
Drawing Abilities Teacher
Thermocouples Isolated Omega Type-E T/C as used on vessel, ~$30 ea In-house signal conditioning equipment Instrument one 3-coil set: Winding pack near.
An Analysis of Shell Structure for Dead Load H.M. Fan PPPL September 16, 2005.
What's New in SA Point Cloud Auto Thinning Point Clouds automatically thin for quick rendering when rotation or panning the view with the right.
This is the finished body RADIUS LOFT EXTRUDE. Creating the body taper Open the wing Click on new part in context.
1 Field Period Assembly Office of Science Project Review Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton, NJ November 2, 2005 T. Brown Princeton Plasma Physics.
1 MC Assembly over the VV FPA Station 3 FDR Review July 13, 2007 T. Brown.
SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 NCSX Field Period Assembly Mike Viola NCSX Field Period Assembly Manager NCSX Project Review April 8-10, 2008.
SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 NCSX Machine Assembly E. D. Perry.
Johnstone High School Graphic Communication Rectangular Pyramids
1 Assembly Tooling PU Workshop on NCSX Cost & Schedule Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton, NJ Mar 1-4, 2007 T. Brown Princeton Plasma Physics.
Structural Drafting Assembly Clearance Dimensions.
The Lego Man Basic 3D Modelling. The Head Use the Revolve Tool to get the sketch from 2D to 3D.
Nonlinear Analyses of Modular Coils and Shell structure for Coil Cool-down and EM Loads Part 1 – Results of Shell Structure and Modular Coils H.M. Fan.
1 FPA Stage 2 Peer Review May 12, 2006 T. Brown. 2 FPA Stage 2 Status Summary of Stage 2 activities Review current design status Review schedule details.
The Design: Totally bolted, electrically isolated 6 top and 6 bottom inboard flange holes, with tapped holes in one flange and a thru holes in mating flange.
RFQ Cold model manufacture, June 2006 Peter Savage The Front End Test Stand Collaboration 1 OFC RFQ Cold Model Manufacture The first step is to convert.
1 Modular Coil Assembly Fixture (MCAF) Information Meeting February 23, 2005.
SEPT 20, 2006 T. Brown, M. Cole, P. Fogarty, P. Goranson, K. Freudenberg, D. Williamson NCSX STAGE 2 COIL TO COIL ASSY.
1 FPA Stage 2 MC Flange Assembly Issues and Design Proposals June 20, 2006 T. Brown.
Pins in Holes Shear Panels Rev 0 Stress Analysis By Leonard Myatt & ORNL Myatt Consulting, Inc.
1 MC B3 Inspection MTM data: dated 12/22/06 1/6/07 Pro/E model: b3_mtm_data_check.asm T. Brown / D. Williamson.
1 MC B1 Inspection MTM data: FIDUCIALS.IGS DATA.IGS 9/26/06 Pro/E model: b1_mtm_data_check.asm.
SURFACE AREA & VOLUME RECTANGULAR PRISM – AREA RECTANGULAR PRISM – VOLUME.
Project Document Number GTMP-5076 L-1011oem Wing Upgrades W. M. Langford Advanced Models Systems & Sensors Branch 22 June 2004 (a.k.a. L-1011_mod1) Generic.
Courtesy Eric Witherspoon, Sonex plans #815 Photo 1: What it is. Photo 2: How it works. Sonex Wing Stand Answer to photos 3 and 4: Want leading.
Completed Front and Rear Standard 10 ½” 1 ½” 3 ¼” 4 ½” 1” ¾” 1 ½” 6” ¾” Channel Length: 5 ¼”, ¾” from end.
Simulation: Contact Types for Simulation. © 2016 Autodesk Design Academy Contact Types for Simulation Overview of contact types you can specify between.
Rigaku Rotary Assembly Top View shows “Inlet” side. This couples with 4-ea ¾“ bolts to “Offset” flange. This flange has central hole 1” offset from center.
5.4 Inequalities in One Triangle
Drawing Abilities Teacher
Day 1.
ادوات الرسم الهندسي T1- مسطرة حرف 2- مثلثات 45 و مسطرة قياس
STEP 1: ASSEMBLE ANGLE PLATES
Reading Objects Lecture 8 Instructor:
2.2 Gallon TourTank Installation
Alternate Views Introduction to Engineering Design
Introduction to SolidWorks
Gaskets and Packing An introduction to Gaskets Packing
Contact dynamics during keratocyte motility
C H A P T E R 72 Auxiliary Views.
Break down Lance rack Cut one of each of these for each rack
Print Reading.
Arcs and Sectors Circles Lesson 2.
Presentation transcript:

MC Type-B fit up review1 Review of MC Type B assembly clearances reviewing A-to-B and B-to-C interfaces 3/1/07 Summary: Wing interfaces look okay between A/B and B/C. There is clamp interferences between A/B (see slide 3) and between B/C (see slide 11 and 12).

2 Type-A Top Bottom Type-B A side Type-B B side Top Bottom Type-B to Type-A interface

3 Type A Section Cut Looking Inboard Top Type B 0.162” clearance These clamps have an interference Hole # 59 Hole # 61 Type-AType-B Clamps on A and B where there is interference or close contact is indicated. Clamp measured needed. Hole # 58 Hole # 60 A-to-B Fit-up See next slide for winding form interface.

” Type A Top Type B This will be a tight region. Metrology data of the winding form and winding in this area would be useful.

5 MC Type-A to Type-B large wing interface clearance is 0.378” at the edge in the CAD model. Type-B wing Type-A wing pocket Type-B A side

6 MC Type-A to Type-B large wing pocket interface clearance is 0.358” in the CAD model. Underside surface of Type-A shown in yellow.

7 MC Type-A to Type-B small wing pocket interface clearance is 0.445” in the CAD model. Type-B, Side A Type-A pocket surface

8 Type-B Top Bottom Type-C Cut-Away View Type-B to Type-C interface

9 Outside Wing Flange B Side MC Type-C to Type-B interface clearance at wing flange B side edge is 0.272” in the CAD model located at the edge of the wing. Interfacing Type-C surface Only the edge indicated in the circle area needs to be measured. See next slide for further details.

10 MC Type-B to Type-C large wing interface surface clearance is 0.628” in the CAD model. There area should be ample space for the interfacing surface.

11 Type-C Type-B 0.247” shell clearance along this local region. Rotated expanded view of area indicated. This will be a tight region. It appears that the winding itself will fit okay (see next slide) although there is clamp problems

12 Ignoring the clamps their appears to be no winding interferences. Type-C Clamp 61 and clamp hardware interferes with the Type-B winding and local cable. Hole 61…I think! Hole # 63 Hole # 65

13 MC Type-C to Type-B large wing pocket minimum interface clearance is 0.249” in the CAD model.

14 Measurements using the Leica laser tracker desired for flange surfaces.

” clearance over most of this length. Type-B Side A Measurement needed along this local edge of the Type-B winding form.

16 Type A Type B Measurement needed at the top of the Type-B in this region at the top of the MC. 0.72”