doc.: IEEE Submission November 2012 Li (NICT), Kim (LGE), Lee (CUNY) Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Reports on Telconferences After Palm Springs Meeting] Date Submitted: [November 2012] Source: Huan-Bang Li [NICT], Suhwook Kim[LGE], Myung Lee [CUNY] Address [3-4 Hikarino-oka, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan] Voice:[ ], FAX: [:[ ], Re: [Report on TG15.8 call conferences] Abstract:[Summary of teleconfernces] Purpose:[This document is to provide a summary on TG15.8 teleconferences] Notice:This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release:The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P

doc.: IEEE Submission November 2012 Li (NICT), Kim (LGE), Lee (CUNY) Slide 2 Reports on Telconferences After Palm Springs Meeting Huan-Bang Li, Suhwook Kim, Myung-Jong Lee (NICT), (LGE), (CUNY)

doc.: IEEE Submission November 2012 Li (NICT), Kim (LGE), Lee (CUNY) Two Teleconferences were set after Palm Springs Meeting 1 st teleconference: October 9 (Tuesday), US EST US EST 8:00pm, 5:00pm PST, Japan, Korea: 9:00am, China: 8:00am TGD Discussion 2 nd teleconference October 30 (Tuesday), US EST US EST 9:00am, PST 6:00am, Japan, Korea, 10:00 pm, China 9:00pm. Discussion forTGD and CFP Plan for November meeting Slide 3

doc.: IEEE Submission November 2012 Li (NICT), Kim (LGE), Lee (CUNY) Slide 4 DCN: : Views of PAC operation and requirements Main discussion PAC device (PD) can provide bridge to infrastructure but not necessary. Multi-hop relay. Universal interoperability. Data integrity and confidentiality. ID and multiple ID for a PD Discovery identity (DID) Teleconference On 9 th October, 2012

doc.: IEEE Submission November 2012 Li (NICT), Kim (LGE), Lee (CUNY) Slide 5 PAC features including discovery shall be independent and without intervention from/to (higher layers of) infrastructure. Main features (various IDs, security) must be self- contained, while allowing optional access to infrastructure. Besides PAC IDs, higher layer IDs (Universal ID in special case) are necessary, which can be deployed without infrastructure. Need a specific peer identity information for peer discovery. Continuing Argument By After 1 st Teleconferences

doc.: IEEE Submission November 2012 Li (NICT), Kim (LGE), Lee (CUNY) Slide 6 DCN: : TG8 Technical Guidance Document - additional requirements Main discussion All PDs shall support at least one common communication mode. That is true when at a same frequency band A PD may use multiple discovery identities at the same time. Need to clarify definition first. Discovery ID Need to clarify definition first. Teleconferences On 30 th October, 2012

doc.: IEEE Submission November 2012 Li (NICT), Kim (LGE), Lee (CUNY) Slide 7 Towards next step Encourage presentations on definitions of various IDs at November meeting. Solicit contributions related to regulations and channel models to facilitate drafting Call For Proposal. Require further comments on TGD of revision 6. (DCN ) and clean version TGD (DCN568-00) Teleconferences On 30 th October, 2012 (Continue)