An approach to the problem of optimizing channel parameters March 2001 Vlad Oleynik, Umbrella Technology Slide 1 doc.: IEEE 802.11-01/152 Submission.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bluetooth / IEEE Coexistence Reliability of IEEE WLANs in Presence of Bluetooth Radios Jim Zyren
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /037 Submission January 2001 Khaled Turki et. al,Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Simulation Results for p-DCF, v-DCF and Legacy DCF Khaled.
Doc.: IEEE /037r1 Submission March 2001 Khaled Turki et. al,Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Simulation Results for p-DCF, v-DCF and Legacy DCF Khaled.
Doc.: IEEE /567r0 Submission May 2003 Youngsoo Kim, Samsung/SNU and S. Choi, SNU Slide 1 Throughput Enhancement via Frame Aggregation – A Sequel.
Doc.: IEEE /567r1 Submission July 2003 Youngsoo Kim, Samsung/SNU and S. Choi, SNU Slide 1 Throughput Enhancement via Frame Aggregation – A Sequel.
Doc.: IEEE /0111r0 Zhanji Wu, et. Al. December 2012 Submission A Physical-layer Network Coding Relay scheme for IEEE Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /412r0 Submission S. Choi, Philips Research July 2001 Slide 1 Aligning e HCF and h TPC Operations Amjad Soomro, Sunghyun.
Doc.: IEEE /301R0 Submission May 2002 Terry Cole, AMDSlide 1 A More Efficient Protection Mechanism Terry Cole AMD Fellow +1.
Doc.: IEEE /320r0 Submission May 2002 Gerhard Fettweis, Systemonic AGSlide 1 ¼ Giga-Bit/s WLAN Gerhard Fettweis Gunnar Nitsche Systemonic AG.
Doc.: IEEE /081r0 Submission January 2001 Shoemake, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANS) Submission Title: [Staccato UWB PHY Proposal for TG4a] Date Submitted:
Submission Page 1 January 2002 doc.: IEEE 802.RR-02/018A-d1 Andrew Myles, Cisco Systems Report of ad hoc group relating to DFS and JPT5G proposal Andrew.
Università degli Studi di Firenze 08 July 2004 COST th MCM - Budapest, Hungary 1 Cross-layer design for Multiple access techniques in wireless communications.
College of Engineering Capacity Allocation in Multi-cell UMTS Networks for Different Spreading Factors with Perfect and Imperfect Power Control Robert.
Outline Transmitters (Chapters 3 and 4, Source Coding and Modulation) (week 1 and 2) Receivers (Chapter 5) (week 3 and 4) Received Signal Synchronization.
Doc.: IEEE /080r1 Submission January 2001 Jie Liang, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Jie Liang Texas Instruments Incorporated TI Blvd. Dallas,
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0868r0 July 2014 Johan Söder, Ericsson ABSlide 1 UL & DL DSC and TPC MAC simulations Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE / hew Submission March 2014 Raja Banerjea, CSRSlide 1 A Simplified Simultaneous Transmit and Receive Mechanism Date:
Doc.: IEEE /404r0 Submission July 2001 Georg Dickmann, BridgeCo AG.Slide 1 AV Timing Limits BridgeCo AG Georg Dickmann
Doc.: IEEE /0018r0 Submission May 2004 Steve Shellhammer, Intel CorporationSlide 1 IEEE Wireless Coexistence TAG Steve Shellhammer
Doc.: IEEE /0071r1 Submission January 2004 Aleksandar Purkovic, Nortel NetworksSlide 1 LDPC vs. Convolutional Codes for n Applications:
Doc.: IEEE /0849r1 Submission July 2013 Brian Hart (Cisco Systems) Slide 1 New Technique: Enabling Real World Improvement By Exposing Internal.
Submission March 2012 doc.: IEEE Slide 1 SINR and Inter-STA Interference Indication Feedback in DL MU-MIMO Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1409r0 November 2013 Adriana Flores, Rice UniversitySlide 1 Dual Wi-Fi: Dual Channel Wi-Fi for Congested WLANs with Asymmetric.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0343r0 Operator Oriented Wi-Fi — Problem Analysis and Proposals Dapeng Liu Chunju Shao Fang Xie Ge Liu China Mobile.
Doc.:IEEE /0037r0 Submission Jan. 17, 2011 Yong Liu, MarvellSlide 1 BW Indication in Non-HT Frames Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1278r0 Submission BSS load balancing for MU-MIMO Date: Authors: Nov 2010 Slide 1Daewon Lee, LG Electronics.
Doc.: IEEE /0783r0 Submission July 2010 Daewon Lee, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 MU-MIMO support for BSS load balancing Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1176r0 Submission Sep 2013 Reza Hedayat (Cisco Systems) Slide 1 Some Simulation Scenarios for HEW NameAffiliationPhone Reza HedayatCisco.
II. Modulation & Coding. © Tallal Elshabrawy Design Goals of Communication Systems 1.Maximize transmission bit rate 2.Minimize bit error probability 3.Minimize.
Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum. Spread Spectrum Spread power of signal over larger than necessary bandwidth in order to: 1. Reduce interference by signal.
Strider : Automatic Rate Adaptation & Collision Handling Aditya Gudipati & Sachin Katti Stanford University 1.
FHSS vs. DSSS Presented by Ali Alhajhouj. Presentation Outline Introduce the issues involved in the system behaviors for FHSS and DSSS systems used in.
Optimization of pilot Locations in Adaptive M-PSK Modulation in a Rayleigh Fading Channel Khaled Almustafa Information System Prince Sultan University.
Modeling OFDM Radio Channel Sachin Adlakha EE206A Spring 2001.
Digital Data Communications Techniques Updated: 2/9/2009.
CEFRIEL Deliverable R4.1.5 MAIS adaptive and reconfigurable modem Giovanni Paltenghi Roma – 24 Novembre 2005.
Module contents Technologies overview Spread Spectrum Modulation
Adaptive modulation schemes for frequency selective fading channels Mª Carmen Aguayo Torres, José Paris Angel, José Tomás Entrambasaguas Muñoz Universidad.
Wireless Networking & Mobile Computing CS 752/852 - Spring 2012 Tamer Nadeem Dept. of Computer Science Lec #7: MAC Multi-Rate.
Training materials for wireless trainers Fundamentals of telecommunications.
College of Engineering Resource Management in Wireless Networks Anurag Arepally Major Adviser : Dr. Robert Akl Department of Computer Science and Engineering.
Page 1 January 2002 doc.: IEEE 802.RR-02/018A-d5 IEEE 802 IEEE 802 proposal relating to DFS and JPT5G proposal.
Pro-VIZOR: Process Tunable Virtually Zero Margin Low Power Adaptive RF for Wireless Systems Presented by: Shreyas Sen June 11, Paper 27.3, DAC 08.
Low Power Wireless Design Dr. Ahmad Bahai National Semiconductor.
Automatic Rate Adaptation Aditya Gudipati & Sachin Katti Stanford University 1.
Doc.: IEEE r0 Submission September 1999 Jim Zyren, Intersil Reliability of IEEE WLANs in Presence of Bluetooth Radios Jim Zyren
CWNA Guide to Wireless LANs, Second Edition Chapter Four IEEE Physical Layer Standards.
CWNA Guide to Wireless LANs, Second Edition Chapter Four IEEE Physical Layer Standards Modified.
Network Kernel Architectures and Implementation ( ) Physical Layer
SWE-DISH SATELLITE SYSTEMS
TCP-Cognizant Adaptive Forward Error Correction in Wireless Networks
Ubiquitous Computing Center A Rate-Adaptive MAC Protocol for Multi-hop Wireless Networks 황 태 호
802.11b PHY Wireless LANs Page 1 of 23 IEEE b WLAN Physical Layer Svetozar Broussev 16-Feb-2005.
Doc.: IEEE /536r0 Submission September 2001 A. Soomro and S. Choi, Philips Research, USASlide 1 Proposal to Add Link Margin Field in IEEE h.
Doc.: IEEE /1229r1 Submission November 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 Application of 60 GHz Channel Models for Comparison of TGad Proposals.
Outline Transmitters (Chapters 3 and 4, Source Coding and Modulation) (week 1 and 2) Receivers (Chapter 5) (week 3 and 4) Received Signal Synchronization.
Quality of Service Schemes for IEEE Wireless LANs-An Evaluation 主講人 : 黃政偉.
Doc.: IEEE /159r0 Submission March 2002 S. Hori, Y Inoue, T. Sakata, M. Morikura / NTT. Slide 1 System capacity and cell radius comparison with.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1181r0 Sep 2014 John Son, WILUS InstituteSlide 1 Measurements on A-MPDU performances under various channel conditions Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0635r1 Submission May 2014 Dynamic Sensitivity Control Implementation Date: 2014-May Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /2200r2 Submission July 2007 Sandesh Goel, Marvell et alSlide 1 Route Metric Proposal Date: Authors:
WiMAX 1EEE Protocol Stack
January 2002 doc.: IEEE 802.RR-02/018A-d2
On the Physical Carrier Sense in Wireless Ad-hoc Networks
Chapter 5: Third generation systems-Wideband Digital Modulation
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> January 2013
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> January 2013
Measurement Request and Report for Link Margin Information
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Mar. 2010
Presentation transcript:

An approach to the problem of optimizing channel parameters March 2001 Vlad Oleynik, Umbrella Technology Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /152 Submission

doc.: IEEE /152 Submission March 2001 Vlad Oleynik, Umbrella Technology Parameters determining potential Throughput Rate for a given medium state Transmitter Power Level increase Signal-to-Interference Ratio (SIR) Modulation/Coding (BPSK, QPSK, MBOK, CCK, QAM...) in extreme conditions, an modulation/coding scheme with bigger redundancy (lower bit rate) may have better throughput rate Packet Length when interference is present, smaller packet length will decreased PER value Continuous medium monitoring provides the right selection and adjustment of the channel characteristics in real time mode. Slide 2

doc.: IEEE /152 Submission March 2001 Vlad Oleynik, Umbrella Technology Major determination factors Load level of the communication channel(s) STA density and topology Activity Level of WLAN distortion from other WLAN Noise Interference properties Noise bandwidth Long term / Short term Statistical analyses for medium state To estimate medium conditions, it is possible to use available measurement parameters which depend on both the mediums state and the communication channel mode. Slide 3

doc.: IEEE /152 Submission March 2001 Vlad Oleynik, Umbrella Technology Medium Changes Adaptation To perform medium monitoring it is necessary to have P sum, summary power level PhN, phase noise value PER, time frame statistics To perform medium monitoring it is necessary to have P sum, summary power level PhN, phase noise value PER, time frame statistics Packets Noise/Interference Phase Noise Threshold Psum D AB A BA F G BA D A B E A Normal receiving begins. Psum is increased. Phase Noise (PhN) is less then the threshold level B Packet has been transmitted. Psum is decreasing. Phase Noise exceeds the threshold level C Interference. Psum is increased. Phase Noise exceeds the threshold level D Power level of the packet to be transmitted is decreased due to low phase noise level of the previous packet E Power level of the packet to be transmitted is increased due to high phase noise level of the previous packet F Packet was lost because of increasing interference level during packet transmission G Packet was normally received due to high transmission power level Slide 4

doc.: IEEE /152 Submission March 2001 Vlad Oleynik, Umbrella Technology Techniques of medium adaptation Measured parameters (Psum, PhN, PER) are used to determine the set (S) of the communication channel characteristics (P, PL, Mod) which are optimal for the given regulation strategy. Demodulator IF DSSS Processor MAC PER Statistics TPC processor Received Signal Power Level P sum Modulator Phase Fluctuation Chips CLK PhN Modulation Selector Packet Length Selector S S S S Slide 5

doc.: IEEE /152 Submission March 2001 Vlad Oleynik, Umbrella Technology Techniques of medium adaptation TransmitterMedium Monitoring: PhN, PER,Psum (P, PL, Mod) Is Medium Changed? No Yes Calculation: New P, PL, Mod PhN Psum PER P Mod P, PL, Mod Updated P, PL, Mod PL Receiver Variations in medium state are represented by parameters (Psum, PhN, PER). They are the basis by which to determine the new parameter set S new = (updated Pmin/P, PL, Mod) optimized to the variable medium. Slide 6

doc.: IEEE /152 Submission March 2001 Vlad Oleynik, Umbrella Technology Techniques of medium adaptation AP STA AP's S(AP) = (P, PL, Mod) AP adaptation process - Measures PhN, Psum, PER - Determines new AP Set(P, PL, Mod) Normal frame transmission + next AP S(STA) = (P, PL, Mod) STA - Measures PhN, Psum, PER - Determines new STA Set(P, PL, Mod) AP's transmission + next STA S(AP) = (P, PL, Mod) AP Slide 7

doc.: IEEE /152 Submission March 2001 Vlad Oleynik, Umbrella Technology Transmitter Power Control Initial points for min necessary power level calculation Slide 8

doc.: IEEE /152 Submission March 2001 Vlad Oleynik, Umbrella Technology Transmitter power level adaptation Transmitter power level adaptation is based on the forecast, which is formed by real time measurement of the propagating condition change Signal/Interference Ratio (SIR) - interference level changes involve adequate transmitter power level changes Generating a forecast of the minimum necessary power level is based on RSSI and measurement of phase noise fluctuations, taking into account PER statistics optimum transmission power level is achieved and maintained adaptation of the transmitter mode to the typical changes of the medium when affected by changing interferences Slide 9

doc.: IEEE /152 Submission March 2001 Vlad Oleynik, Umbrella Technology Packet Length Adaptation Packets Noise/Interference Phase Noise Packets Threshold Phase Noise When interference is present, smaller packet length corresponds with decreased PER value Slide 10

doc.: IEEE /152 Submission March 2001 Vlad Oleynik, Umbrella Technology Packet Length Adaptation Adaptation of the packet length is based on analysis of the recent propagating conditions as well as on the cumulative statistics-based forecast for the given modulation/coding and power level Packet length adaptation to achieve maximum throughput rate is suitable for extreme conditions. For any extreme condition it is possible to determine the right packet length to provide an advantage in throughput rate Slide 11

doc.: IEEE /152 Submission March 2001 Vlad Oleynik, Umbrella Technology Packet Length Adaptation At a sufficiently high BER value the best average throughput will be achieved by selecting optimal packet length and proper modulation/coding method (not necessarily with max bit rate). Slide 12

doc.: IEEE /152 Submission March 2001 Vlad Oleynik, Umbrella Technology Packet Length and Modulation/Coding Adaptation Light magenta zone - is throughput advantage of 1 Mbps (BER 1e-5) vs 11 Mbps (BER 1e-3) Zone between - is throughput advantage of 2 Mbps (BER 1e-4) vs 11 Mbps (BER 1e-3) Zone between - is throughput advantage of 5.5 Mbps (BER 1e-4) vs 11 Mbps (BER 1e-3) At a sufficiently high BER value and for each modulation method there is a packet length which provides the maximum Throughput Rate For the same medium the BER is different for different modulation methods, and modulations with smaller bit rates may have smaller BER values Slide 13

doc.: IEEE /152 Submission March 2001 Vlad Oleynik, Umbrella Technology Adaptation of modulation methods Adaptation of modulation methods Adaptation of modulation/coding methods is based on analysis of the current state of the medium and propagation condition forecast including multi-path channels for a given power level and packet length Switching modulation method to achieve maximum throughput rate is suitable for extreme conditions. For extreme conditions a modulation/coding scheme with bigger redundancy (less bit rate) may have the advantage in throughput rate Slide 14