Class 3 Activity Study Question 6 Analyses/Results Interpretation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Multiple-choice question
Advertisements

Birth Order Study Jamie Monzo, Saleha Chaudhry, Ann Kimble, Maria Lim, and Sara Torelli.
 Graduate symposium deadline Friday  CSBS student conference April 25 (deadline April 10)  Thesis defenses  Outline due on Friday.
Factorial Designs Passer Chapter 9
Randomized Experimental Design
Jeff Beard Lisa Helma David Parrish Start Presentation.
Week 5.  A psychologist at the local university agrees to carry out a study to investigate the claim that eating a healthy breakfast improves reading.
Basic Data Analysis for Quantitative Research
Experimental Design: Single factor designs Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology.
Chapter 10 Experimental Research Design ♣ ♣ Introduction   Research Designs with Threats to Internal Validity   Requirements of Experimental Research.
Stat 512 – Lecture 14 Analysis of Variance (Ch. 12)
Introduction to Analysis of Variance CJ 526 Statistical Analysis in Criminal Justice.
Experimental Control & Design Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology.
Empirical Studies of English
Stat 512 – Lecture 12 Two sample comparisons (Ch. 7) Experiments revisited.
Jeopardy! One-Way ANOVA Correlation & Regression Plots.
Lecture 16 Psyc 300A. What a Factorial Design Tells You Main effect: The effect of an IV on the DV, ignoring all other factors in the study. (Compare.
Causal Comparative Research: Purpose
Complex Design. Two group Designs One independent variable with 2 levels: – IV: color of walls Two levels: white walls vs. baby blue – DV: anxiety White.
2x2 BG Factorial Designs Definition and advantage of factorial research designs 5 terms necessary to understand factorial designs 5 patterns of factorial.
EVALUATING YOUR RESEARCH DESIGN EDRS 5305 EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH & STATISTICS.
Chapter 2: The Research Enterprise in Psychology
Basic Statistics Michael Hylin. Scientific Method Start w/ a question Gather information and resources (observe) Form hypothesis Perform experiment and.
Factorial Design Two Way ANOVAs
EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2013) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1-4.
Crosswalk Data Analysis Lynn White’s Stats Class Spring 2011 Add the names of all the team members to this first slide.
Two Way ANOVAs Factorial Designs. Factors Same thing as Independent variables. Referred to as factors when there are more than one in a study. Factorial.
Practice Odometers measure automobile mileage. Suppose 12 cars drove exactly 10 miles and the following mileage figures were recorded. Determine if, on.
Introduction Hypotheses and Plan of Analysis Socialization is one of the core deficit areas in individuals with High Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorders.
Review Exam 1.
Experiment Basics: Variables Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology.
1 of 46 MGMT 6970 PSYCHOMETRICS © 2014, Michael Kalsher Michael J. Kalsher Department of Cognitive Science Inferential Statistics IV: Factorial ANOVA.
T tests comparing two means t tests comparing two means.
The Research Enterprise in Psychology. The Scientific Method: Terminology Operational definitions are used to clarify precisely what is meant by each.
What variable predicts “LUV?”. Is it looks? But looks can be decieving.
Factorial Analysis of Variance One dependent variable, more than one independent variable (“factor”) 1 2.
Class 4 ANOVA; Writing, Regression Class 4 ANOVA; Writing, Regression Corkin et al. (2008), P&B 6, Linear Regression Handout.
1 Analysis of Variance ANOVA COMM Fall, 2008 Nan Yu.
Examination of Public Perceptions of Four Types of Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Programs Brandon Kopp Raymond Miltenberger.
Educational Research Chapter 13 Inferential Statistics Gay, Mills, and Airasian 10 th Edition.
The Chicago Guide to Writing about Multivariate Analysis, 2 nd edition. Interpreting multivariate OLS and logit coefficients Jane E. Miller, PhD.
1 Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Educational Technology 690.
Lab 9: Two Group Comparisons. Today’s Activities - Evaluating and interpreting differences across groups – Effect sizes Gender differences examples Class.
APA Results Section Results.
Assignment 1 February 15, 2008Slides by Mark Hancock.
Chapter 11.  The general plan for carrying out a study where the independent variable is changed  Determines the internal validity  Should provide.
Chapter 2 The Research Enterprise in Psychology. Table of Contents The Scientific Approach: A Search for Laws Basic assumption: events are governed by.
Overview and Common Pitfalls in Statistics and How to Avoid Them
College Student’s Beliefs About Psychological Services: A replication of Ægisdóttir & Gerstein Louis A. Cornejo San Francisco State University.
EPSY 8334 Class 1 and 2 (Spring 2015) Heppner et al 3 -4 Pyrczak & Bruce 1&4.
Class 3 Between Group Designs, Expo Facto Designs, Status Variable Chapters HWK 7 ( ),10 ( , 243-4) 12(308) ANOVA PDF.
Computer class III Download sga.sav.
1 Bandit Thinkhamrop, PhD.(Statistics) Dept. of Biostatistics & Demography Faculty of Public Health Khon Kaen University Overview and Common Pitfalls in.
The authors would like to acknowledge the families at the Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin Jane P. Pettit Pain and Palliative Care Center. For more information,
Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 12: Single Variable Between- Subjects Research 1.
Chapter 9 Two-way between-groups ANOVA Psyc301- Spring 2013 SPSS Session TA: Ezgi Aytürk.
Study Population In , 1,154 Mexican origin youth (aged years) indicated which of 50 movies (randomly selected from a pool of 250 popular movies.
8 Experimental Research Design.
Two-Way Independent ANOVA (GLM 3)
Review This template can be used as a starter file for presenting training materials in a group setting. Sections Right-click on a slide to add sections.
Between-Subjects, within-subjects, and factorial Experimental Designs
Two Way ANOVAs Factorial Designs.
2 independent Groups Graziano & Raulin (1997).
Interactions & Simple Effects finding the differences
Applied Statistical Analysis
Variables noise or quiet test score IV DV
Reporter For this in-class activity, each group needs to first identify a recorder/reporter for their group. This reporter will report back to the full.
More About Factorial Design
Introduction to Between-Subjects Experiments
Factorial Designs Factorial design: a research design that includes two or more factors (Independent Variables) A two-factor design has two IVs. Example:
Presentation transcript:

Class 3 Activity Study Question 6 Analyses/Results Interpretation

Treatment Study Independent Variables (2 X 2) Mother’s Place of Birth Child’s Gender US Mexico Boy Girl 2 Participants 100 Mothers year olds/ 50 boys Design: Between Groups, Expo-facto, Factorial, Dependent Variables Pre-test Self-Reported Parenting Skills

Main Effects Place of Birth: It is hypothesized that: Child’s Gender It is hypothesized that: 3

Main Effects Place of Birth: It is hypothesized that mothers born in the US will obtain higher scores in parenting skills than mothers born in Mexico Child’s Gender It is hypothesized that mothers of boys will obtain higher scores in parenting skills than mothers of girls 4

Moderation Effect Mother’s Place of Birth will moderate the association of child’s gender to pre-test parenting skills so that: Among mother’s born in US Among mother’s born in Mexico 5

Moderation Effect Mother’s Place of Birth will moderate the association of child’s gender to pre-test parenting skills so that: Among Mothers born in US, there will be no differences in parenting skills among mothers of boys compared to mothers of girls Among mothers born in Mexico, mothers of boys will obtain higher scores in parenting skills than mothers of girls 6

Table 4: 2X2 ANOVA with Moderation DV- SR Parenting Scale #6 IV DV- Pre-test SR Parental Skills Scale F statistic Mom Place of Birth Mexico vs. US (Mexico + USA) Main Effect NS Child Gender Boys vs. Girls (Boys + Girls) Main Effect* * p<.05 Child Gender x Mom P. Birth (M birth X Ch gender) Mexico-Boys USA - Boys Mexico -Girls USA- Girls Mom’s birth place as moderator* 7

Table 1 Mean Parenting Skills by Mom’s Country of Birth and Child’s Gender Main Effects Parenting Scale Mean Mean T-Test needed? Mom Birth Country Mexico 2.8 USA 2.9 p>.05 NS Child Gender Mom of Girls 2.3 Mom of Boys 3.3* *p<.05 Possible range of scores for parenting Scale = 1 to 5 8

Result Main Effects: Place of Birth Question #6 Table 5 Do moms born in USA obtain higher scores in parenting skills than moms born in Mexico? Answer: No 2.8 vs. 2.9 NS 9

Results Main Effects: Child’s Gender Question #6 Table 5 Do moms of boys obtain higher scores in parenting skills than moms of girls? Answer: Yes, 3.3 vs. 2.3 p<.05 10

Research Question Interaction Effects Study Q. #6: Mom’s Place Birth Moderator Does mom’s place of birth make a difference in the association of child’s gender to mom’s parenting skills: Among Moms born in Mexico, do moms of boys obtain higher scores in parenting skills than moms of girls? Among Moms born in USA, do moms of boys obtain higher scores in parenting skills than moms of girls? 11

Table 2 Means Parenting Skills Ratings by Child’s Gender within Mom’s Country of Birth Mexico U.S.A. Mom of Boys. 2.8* 2.6 Mom of Girls Is T Test Needed? *p<.05p>.05 NS 12

Research Question Interaction Effects Study Q. #6: Mom’s Place Birth Moderator Does mom’s place of birth make a difference in the association of child’s gender to parenting skills: Yes Among Moms born in Mexico, moms of boys obtained higher scores in parenting skills than moms of girls? 2.8* vs. 1.9 Yes Among Moms born in USA, do moms of boys obtained higher scores in parenting skills than moms of girls? 2.6 vs. 2.5 NS NO 13

Conclusions Only among Mom’s born in Mexico, moms of boys scored higher in the parenting skills questionnaire than mom’s of girls. Therefore, the main effect for child’s gender applies only to mom’s born in Mexico. Suggests that validity of parenting skills questionnaire may be related to mom’s acculturation to US- question for further research. 14

Research Question Interaction Effects Study Q. #6: Child’s Gender Moderator Does child gender make a difference in the relation of mom’s place of birth to parenting skills: Among Moms of boys, do moms born in the US obtain higher scores in the parenting scale than moms born in Mexico? Among Moms of girls, do moms born in the US obtain higher scores in the parenting scale than moms born in Mexico? 15

Table 6A Interaction Effects Place of Birth as Moderator Mexico U.S.A. T- Test Mom of Boys Mean P. Sc. 2.8 Mean P. Sc. 2.6 NS Mom of Girls Mean P. Sc. 1.9 Mean P. Sc. 2.5* * P <.05 P<.05 Stat. Sig P>.05 NS P<.05 Stat. Sig 16

Research Question Interaction Effects Study Q. #6: Child’s Gender Moderator Does child gender make a difference in the relation of mom’s place of birth to parenting skills: YES Among Moms of boys, moms born in the US obtain similar scores in the parenting scale than moms born in Mexico? 2.8 vs 2.6 Among Moms of girls, moms born in the US obtain higher scores in theparenting scale than moms born in Mexico? 1.9 vs. 2.5* 17

Comparison of Studies Study 1 Treatment2 IVs Manipulated (1), Status (1), both Categorical Both Status, Categorical DVsContinuous; Parenting SkillsContinuous: Parenting Skills DesignExperimental, factorial, Betw.-GAssociation, factorial, Betw-G Assignment Groups RandomAssigned AnalysisANOVA 2X2 18