AmeriCorps State and State Service Commissions Overview.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Key Concepts for AmeriCorps. Session Objectives Provide an opportunity for participants to network in program specific group Discuss key fiscal and grant.
Advertisements

SHOW ME THE MONEY BUDGETING 101.
Key Concepts for Senior Corps. Session Objectives Provide an opportunity for participants to network in program specific group Discuss key fiscal and.
Grant Closeout Reconciling Grants at Closeout
2012 New Project Directors’ Orientation
Performance Measurement: Not just for breakfast anymore Performance Measurement and the Strategic Plan Senior Corps Virtual Conference August 2012.
Whats New: 2010 Admin-PDAT- Disability Grants AMERICORPS GRANTEE MEETING FY 2010 September 16 – 18, 2009 Arlington, VA Amy Borgstrom Jewel Bazilio-Bellegarde.
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Meeting of State Commission Executive Directors Discussion of T/TA Prioirities/Issues, April 5, AC T/TA Funds projected for FY 06 Statutory Realities.
Fiscal Monitoring: Ensuring Accountability of Your Sub-Grantees
Welcome to the COMMISSIONER ORIENTATION. Enabling Legislation National and Community Service Trust Act of 1993.
MSCG Training for Project Officers and Consultants: Project Officer and Consultant Roles in Supporting Successful Onsite Technical Assistance Visits.
Program design overview Pre-contract to post-program year Office on Volunteerism and Community Service.
Applying for Federal Grants White House Faith-Based and Community Initiative
Local Control and Accountability Plan: Performance Based Budgeting California Association of School Business Officials.
Documenting Cash and In-Kind Match Project Director Training & Annual Meeting.
Alaska Native Education Program (ANEP) Technical Assistance Meeting September 2014 Sylvia E. Lyles Valerie Randall Almita Reed.
Chapter 43 An Act Relative to Improving Accountability and Oversight of Education Collaboratives Presentation to Board of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act An overview FRANK R. TRINITY General Counsel May 2009 FRANK R. TRINITY General Counsel May 2009.
1 Program Performance and Evaluation: Policymaker Expectations 2009 International Education Programs Service Technical Assistance Workshop Eleanor Briscoe.
1 Susan Weigert, Project Officer GSEGs Overview of GSEG Management.
Emerging Latino Communities Initiative Webinar Series 2011 June 22, 2011 Presenter: Janet Hernandez, Capacity-Building Coordinator.
Roles and Responsibilities of School Principals
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Governance Fundamentals Roles, Responsibilities and Expectation Setting for Stronger Staff and Board Partnerships 1 Local Government Commission November.
Ensuring an Equitable Review AmeriCorps External Review Training.
Introduction to Proposal Writing Proposal Development Team Office of Research & Sponsored Projects (ORSP) September 30, 2009.
Programmatic and Fiscal Compliance as a Team Effort 2014 Project Director Training & Annual Meeting1.
PREPARING FOR SUPPLEMENTAL MONITORING PERKINS COMPLIANCE Monieca West ADHE Federal Program Manager October 19, 2012.
Effective Management and Compliance 1 ANA GRANTEE MEETING  FEBRUARY 5, 2015.
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
Monitoring & Oversight Adult Education and Literacy (AEL) Programs Brenda B. Williams Project Manager Texas Workforce Commission Regulatory Integrity Division.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Team Procedures Overview Guide Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health.
Trends in Corporate Governance Dr. Sandra B. Richtermeyer, CMA, CPA President, Institute of Management Accountants (IMA) June 21, 2011.
Best Practices: Financial Resource Management February 2011.
2 Donations that Aren’t Dollars: In Kind Contributions Session Objectives Have participants understand: Implication of in-kind contributions as related.
The Life of a Policy Council Member
2008 California AmeriCorps Conference1 Federal and Grants Management for Program and Fiscal Staff.
AmeriCorps Education Award Program Student Orientation.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AND COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
High Quality Performance Measures Managing the CNCS Partnership.
1 Michigan’s AmeriCorps Outreach Information Program Year
TEAM Coordinating Committee Training (TCC).  Introductions  Mission of the TEAM Program  Design of the TEAM Program  Overview of the Module Process.
NOAA Cooperative Institutes John Cortinas, Ph.D. OAR Cooperative Institute Program, Program Manager NOAA Cooperative Institute Committee, Chairperson.
Title IV Administration is a Team Sport
1 Cross-Cutting Issues 5310-JARC-New Freedom U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration SAFETEAU-LU Curriculum August 7, 2007.
Fundamentals of Grants Management SLARI Training Workshop.
High Quality Performance Measures AmeriCorps Member Management.
HOW TO BE AN EFFECTIVE RECORDS OFFICER Tennessee Secretary of State Records Management Division 1.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
AITA Conference AFP Institute Board Development Joey Wallace RESNA/NATTAP January 24, 2007.
PERKINS IV AND THE WORKFORCE INNOVATION AND OPPORTUNITY ACT (WIOA): INTERSECTIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES.
Board Assessment Governing Board Online Training Module.
1 Introduction Overview This annotated PowerPoint is designed to help communicate about your instructional priorities. Note: The facts and data here are.
FY2013 OneCPD+ TA NOFA Q & A Webcast U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) Community Planning & Development (CPD) July 15,
Welcome. Contents: 1.Organization’s Policies & Procedure 2.Internal Controls 3.Manager’s Financial Role 4.Procurement Process 5.Monthly Financial Report.
Informational Webinar Troy Grant Assistant Executive Director for P-16 Initiatives Tennessee Higher Education Commission.
Effective Practices for a Successful Standards Review.
January 23,  Balance state’s higher education long range plan and agency operations in the required strategic plan;  Involve agency staff in.
First Things First Grantee Overview.
Board Roles & Responsibilities
School Community Council Roles and Responsibilities
Indiana Grants Management Policy
National Service in Missouri
Managing Federal grants
Centralization of Texas State Contract Compliance Functions
Step 3. Initiate Proposal
Presentation transcript:

AmeriCorps State and State Service Commissions Overview

Introduction This overview includes: The organizational structure of CNCS; The structure of the AmeriCorps State and National Team; A snapshot of State Commissions; and Role of your program officer in connecting you to CNCS resources.

CNCS Programs Learn & Serve America AmeriCorps NCCC AmeriCorps State & National VISTA Senior Corps RSVP Foster Grandparents Senior Companions

Big Picture of State Commissions Support National Service Programs. Promote, Engage and Increase Volunteerism and Civic Engagement. Ensure compliance (commission and programs) with CNCS and other federal requirements and effective use of CNCS Resources.

Commissions – finer details Similarities and Differences: –Could be housed in a: Nonprofit Organization – 9 Educational Institution – 2 State Agency – 21 Governors Office –Where Housed May affect: Size of the Commission Scope and Focus (may have multiple initiatives and programs)

Commission Capacity Communication Resources $$ & T/TA ExpertiseComplianceEngagement Program Officers Connect Assets to Commissions Communication Resources Expertise Compliance Engagement

POs connect assets to commissions by building a Grantee Support Team OGM OLDT State Offices Other Offices Other Offices would include as appropriate Public Affairs, RPD, Government Affairs, OGC, OEM, Trust, Learn & Serve, VISTA, NCCC, Senior Corps PO

Communication: a 2-Way Street How to Communicate with your PO: –Expectations are that POs are responsive to Commissions in a timely manner. –POs are your first Point-of-Contact. –Regular communication and responsiveness is important.

AmeriCorps Calendar Helping you to Manage Multiple Priorities that range from: –Submitting Competitive and Formula Applications. –Admin/PDAT/Disability Applications –GPR and FSR –National Conferences and Meetings –Cluster Calls –Monitoring, Standards and Site Visits by CNCS –Ad-hoc requests by CNCS for information (Note: The Calendar Provided is a Working Draft and Subject to Change.)

Questions and Comments?

Understanding Your Role As An Executive Director

Key Roles Good steward of federal dollars Know the core deliverables of your commission and ensure that they are obtained; using the most effective methods Maintain good relationships with stake holders (both internal and external).

Executive Directors Core Responsibilities The Missouri Community Service Commissions core deliverables are to administer AmeriCorps*State funding in Missouri by awarding monetary grants to qualifying applicants and to provide technical assistance and support to those applicants to ensure that the National and Community Service federal dollars spent in Missouri has the greatest impact.

Award Grants to Qualifying Applicants New Applications –Filter your applicants Informational Workshops –AmeriCorps*State –VISTA –SeniorCorps –Learn & Serve Concept Papers AmeriCorps Specific Application Workshops Re-competes and Continuations –Educate your decision-makers Read applications Keep commissioners informed –Issues –Accomplishments

Administer AmeriCorps*State Funding Contracts –Grant Agreement –Member Contract Training –Program Directors –Members Moral Support –Encourage commissioners to attend the 1 st hour of site visits –Encourage commissioners and staff to attend special functions Inductions Graduations Celebrations Inform Commission –Share great stories –Hold meetings at program sites Ask site to provide a one-hour tour and presentation

Fiscal Oversight General Ledger Desk Monitoring Reconciliations Checks & Balances (separation of duties) Programmatic Oversight Risk Analysis Site Visits Reports to Commission (during regularly scheduled quarterlies) Human Resource Management Staff Commissioners Internal & External Stakeholders Strategic Planning Administering AmeriCorps*State Funding (contd)

Assessment/Human Resources Staff roles & responsibilities –Perceptions –Reality Tasks list Division of roles & responsibilities

Resources Standards – Program Officers Communications Center – Other States AmeriCorps Provisions Resource Center – State Statutes Executive Orders

Grasping GARP

Purpose Provide an opportunity to gain a general understanding of the Corporation grant application and review process.

Life Cycle of a CNCS Competitive Grant Documents that Guide the Application Preparation Peer Review Process Staff Review Strategy CNCS Grant Decision Making Process OverviewOverview

1.Program/Financial Report Review 2.Site Visits/Desk Reviews 3.Follow up/continuous improvement 4.Audits & audit reviews 5.Cash management analysis Compliance/Monitoring 1.CEO Review 2.Certify funds for grants and for the Trust obligations 3.CEO sign off 4.Notification of Board, Appropriators, Congress, and applicants 5.Feedback to applicants 6.Reconsideration 1.Deobligatoin 2.Program Review 3.Property/Equipment disposition 4.Funds account management 5.Records retention & management 1.Develop and conduct outreach strategy for applications and reviewers 2.Provide program T/TA via calls, FAQs, responses to inquiries 3.Provide eGrants T/TA 1.Log in applications 2.Compliance check (eligibility and other publicized criteria) 3.Sort applications into panels 4.Select and assign Peer Reviewers and facilitators 1.Peer Review 2.Quality control, Inter-rater reliability 3.Conduct Staff Review 4.Prepare Recommendations Closeout Grantee Award Life Cycle of Competitive Grants 1.CNCS Board of Directors approves annual program plan. 2.Corporation-wide calendar of Grant Reviews for the year is created 3.Develop documents/processes NOFA Application Instructions FAQs Grant review plan 4.Obtain necessary Senior Management approvals on documents 5.Obtain OMB approval for necessary documents 6.Publicize competition Approval, Certification and Notification Reviewing Applications Receiving Applications Soliciting and Supporting Applications and Reviewers 1.CNCS Management Information Systems Reporting 2.Federal MIS reporting 3.Grant Amendments Training and Technical Assistance 1.Partnership/program development 2.T/TA direct assistance and referral Planning Congress approves funds Routine Administration

Documents that Guide the Application Preparation Notice of Funds Opportunity (NOFO) Application Instructions Regulations Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Notice of Funds Opportunity (NOFO) Description of DocumentHow it is used when preparing application Overview of grant opportunity. Includes what is new for the funding cycle. Includes application submission information and deadlines, eligibility, program design expectations. Describes the intent of the program and how it fits into other work of the Federal Agency. Specifies how to find additional information. Public reads to determine eligibility and applicability to its mission/goals. Should be the first document read. Helps public understand the big picture of how this grant program fits into the other work of CNCS. Should be referred to while drafting the application to be sure that the application aligns with intent and addresses relevant details that may appear only in this document.

Application Instructions Description of DocumentHow it is used when preparing application Details what information CNCS is collecting. Provides directions on how to use the forms. Specifies what should be included in the application. Explains how to calculate various budget items; what are the selection criteria. Used as a companion document with the NOFO. Guides the applicant in how to tell their story about the program proposed, what information is necessary, what specific items are included in each section of the application. May be referred to regularly.

Regulations Description of DocumentHow it is used when preparing application Details policies developed to implement statute. Provides more details on program rules and implementation of policies. Applicant reads before drafting the application to understand how program operates; how to budget; how to submit. Includes the selection criteria which will be used throughout the review. May be referred to regularly.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Description of DocumentHow it is used when preparing application Provides questions and answers about the grant program, the application and the process. These are developed from previous years questions, questions staff anticipate that applicants will ask, and material staff deem necessary to clarify complex information. May be referred to regularly as needed to clarify points raised by reviewers.

Preparing for Peer Review placement, rural/urban, program focus. For example: - Recruitment/outreach/training of peer reviewer - Conflict of interest review - Assigning reviewers to panels based on expertise - Assigning applications to panels based on program models, member placement, rural/urban, program focus. For example: Community Corps Model –Tutoring/Literacy –Team-Based –Environment –Other Human Needs –After School Programs –Housing/Rehab/Construction –Statewide Initiative –Miscellaneous Education Youth Corps Model Professional/Pre Professional/ Entrepreneur Corps Campus Based Model (2) Homeland Security/Disaster Response Model Service Learning Model Intergenerational Model Rural Corps Model Higher Ed Institutions Disaster Recovery/Preparedness

Peer Review AmeriCorps Process is generally a two stage peer review –Reviewers read and assess individually –Panels convene for consensus discussions and documentation Additional reviews for strategic reasons: –Inter-rater Reliability Review –Quality Control Review Continuous program and GARP officer availability to support panels

Moving applications from peer to staff review includes analysis of: –Peer review results (consensus bands/rankings) –Challenges documented by facilitators and staff –CNCS regulatory priorities, Strategic initiatives and other priorities published in the NOFO. –Commission rankings –New applications –Availability of resources Peer to Staff Review Process

Modeled on the panel process of peer review Staff review the entire application Consider the entire body of knowledge the Corporation has on a competing program and commission Note: For specific questions about staff review, please talk to your Program Officer. Staff Review Strategy

CNCS Grant Decision Making Program staff and CEO review and analyze data from the applications received. CEO provide strategic direction on portfolio composition. Program staff conduct their review of the whole application, and other relevant regulatory data. Program staff prepare preliminary recommendations under the direction of AmeriCorps Director. AmeriCorps Director presents preliminary recommendations to COO.

CNCS Grant Decision Making (cont.) Staff present funding recommendation package to CEO for decision. Internal clearance process includes signatures of senior managers and internal controls for funds and Trust obligations. Appropriators and Hill Staff are notified. Legal applicants are notified. CNCS distributes press release.