An overview of the National Performance Measures 118 NOVEMBER 2011 THE CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL & COMMUNITY SERVICE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Coordinated Veterans Care (CVC) Program Social Assistance and its delivery through the Veterans Home Care Program 1.
Advertisements

Designing Effective Action for Change
My AmeriCorps Release 3 State Commissions and Programs User Roles and Management – Implementing Presentation developed for the Corporation for National.
National Prevention Strategy
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Introduction to Performance Measurement for Senior Corps Project STAR Support and Training for Assessing Results Recorded 9/10/2007.
[Add your name and Commission here]. What is AmeriCorps? Provides grants to organizations to run AmeriCorps programs. Organizations design AmeriCorps.
Evidence 2/8/2014 Evidence 1 Evidence What is it? Where to find it?
Overview of Performance Measurement. Learning Objectives By the end of the module, you will be able to: Describe what performance measurement is, and.
Focus on Impact CNCS Performance Measurement Framework.
High Quality Performance Measures What is Performance Measurement? What makes a high quality performance measure? Copyright © 2012 by JBS International,
CNCS Definition of Capacity Building A set of activities that expand the scale, reach, efficiency, or effectiveness of programs and organizations. Activities.
2010 AmeriCorps State & National Grantee Meeting 2010 NOFO & APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS HIGHLIGHTS.
An overview of the National Performance Measures 118 NOVEMBER 2011 THE CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL & COMMUNITY SERVICE.
An overview of the National Performance Measures 118 NOVEMBER 2011 THE CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL & COMMUNITY SERVICE.
An overview of the National Performance Measures 118 NOVEMBER 2011 THE CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL & COMMUNITY SERVICE.
An overview of the National Performance Measures 118 NOVEMBER 2011 THE CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL & COMMUNITY SERVICE.
Performance Measurement: Not just for breakfast anymore Performance Measurement and the Strategic Plan Senior Corps Virtual Conference August 2012.
An overview of the National Performance Measures 118 NOVEMBER 2011 THE CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL & COMMUNITY SERVICE.
Whats New: 2010 Admin-PDAT- Disability Grants AMERICORPS GRANTEE MEETING FY 2010 September 16 – 18, 2009 Arlington, VA Amy Borgstrom Jewel Bazilio-Bellegarde.
1 Managing to Outcomes Creating a Result-Driven Culture September 15, 2010 Jewel Bazilio-Bellegarde, CNCS Ken Terao and Anna Marie Schmidt, Project STAR.
An overview of the National Performance Measures 118 NOVEMBER 2011 THE CORPORATION OF NATIONAL & COMMUNITY SERVICE.
Performance Measurement Overview 2/8/2014 Performance Measurement Overview 1 What is it? Why do it?
Alignment and Quality 2/8/2014 Alignment and Quality 1 What is it? What do I need to look for?
My AmeriCorps AmeriCorps and VISTA Programs Create and Manage an eGrants Account Presentation developed for the Corporation for National and Community.
1 Creating Strong Reports New Mexico AmeriCorps April 20, 2006 Sue Hyatt, Project STAR Coach.
Welcome to the COMMISSIONER ORIENTATION. Enabling Legislation National and Community Service Trust Act of 1993.
NCATS REDESIGN METHODOLOGY A Menu of Redesign Options Six Models for Course Redesign Five Principles of Successful Course Redesign Four Models for Assessing.
1 DPAS II Process and Procedures for Teachers Developed by: Delaware Department of Education.
Program Goals, Objectives and Performance Indicators A guide for grant and program development 3/2/2014 | Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.
1 Mid-Term Review of The Illinois Commitment Assessment of Achievements, Challenges, and Stakeholder Opinions Illinois Board of Higher Education April.
Mini-Grant Application: Quality Improvement in the Area of Immunizations Catherine Shoults, M.P.H., Kansas Health Institute Kansas Public Health Conference.
Privacy Impact Assessment Future Directions TRICARE Management Activity HEALTH AFFAIRS 2009 Data Protection Seminar TMA Privacy Office.
OH 3-1 Finding and Recruiting New Employees Human Resources Management and Supervision 3 OH 3-1.
Presenter: Beresford Riley, Government of
Management Plans: A Roadmap to Successful Implementation
A Roadmap to Successful Implementation Management Plans.
UWSEM Investment Guidelines and Strategy Frameworks for
1 Quality Indicators for Device Demonstrations April 21, 2009 Lisa Kosh Diana Carl.
ABC Technology Project
Introduction AmeriCorps State & National 1 The following presentation will guide AmeriCorps State and National Program users through how to create Applicant-Determined.
The Road to Community Impact: New Answers to Old Questions.
Session 2: Introduction to the Quality Criteria. Session Overview Your facilitator, ___________________. [Add details of facilitators background, including.
Evaluation Capacity Building Identifying and Addressing the Fields Needs.
VOORBLAD.
Benefits for All. Overview History What is Simplify? How Data Sharing Works RWJF Case Study Standards Setting Key Players Why Funders Should Participate.
Orientation and Training Susan A. Abravanel Sydney Taylor June 25 th, 2014.
Strategic Financial Management 9 February 2012
Settlement Program Logic Model
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012.
Grant Management Seminar 1 District 5930 Grant Management Seminar.
Employment Ontario Program Updates EO Leadership Summit – May 13, 2013 Barb Simmons, MTCU.
AmeriCorps*State Becoming a Virginia Program Sponsor Program Year Virginia Office on Volunteerism & Community Service.
Key elements to develop a national strategic plan for TB control Malgosia Grzemska Stop TB Department WHO, Geneva, Switzerland EURO/TBTEAM Regional Workshop.
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: Establishing a Screening Process
2014 AmeriCorps State and National Symposium Basic Steps in Conducting an Evaluation.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
Database Administration
PSSA Preparation.
Using Data to Measure and Report Program Impact Anne Basham, MFA MEMconsultants.
President’s Interfaith and Community Service Campus Challenge Webinar Co-sponsored by The White House, the Department of Education, the Corporation for.
Abuse Prevention and Response Protocol.
1 Extending the Service Pipeline AmeriCorps Funding Opportunities for Organizations Serving Veterans and Military Families November 18, 2009.
Performance Measures AmeriCorps Project Director Training Saratoga, NY October 7 th – 9 th, 2013.
Performance Measurement Overview 9/18/2015 Performance Measurement Overview 1 What is it? Why do it?
Strengthening Communities Awarded to support the development and implementation of collaborate and innovative community projects that address economic.
Presentation transcript:

An overview of the National Performance Measures 118 NOVEMBER 2011 THE CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL & COMMUNITY SERVICE

Definition and Description of Capacity Building The Value of Capacity Building at CNCS Performance Measures Alignment Selection rules Training and Technical Assistance It will be helpful to have the 2012 National Performance Measures Instructions for Capacity Building and the Capacity Building Framework open as you review this presentation. They can be found here: tail.asp?tbl_nofa_id=91 and tail.asp?tbl_nofa_id=91 building-framework pdf 2

Maximize the value we add to grantees, partners and participants 3

A set of activities that expand the scale, reach, efficiency, or effectiveness of programs and organizations. Activities may also leverage resources for programs and/or organizations. For example, capacity building activities may expand services, enhance delivery of services, or generate additional resources. These activities achieve lasting positive outcomes for the beneficiary populations served by CNCS-supported organizations. See the Capacity Building Framework companion document for examples of activities. (A web link is provided in the Resources section of this document.) 4

Scale/reach – The scope of a programs services. Increased scale/reach can be measures by the number of new people served, new populations served, and/ or new or expanded services. Effectiveness – Improved ability of the organization to achieve outcomes resulting in better success rates or better quality of outcomes achieved. Efficiency – Improved outcomes with the same level of resources; improved or consistent quality of services with fewer resources. CNCS supported organizations – comprises organizations with National Service participants (AmeriCorps members) and organizations that receive CNCS funds. This term includes your organization/commission, your operating sites/sub-grantees, and your service locations. 5

As a general rule, capacity building is indirect services that enable organizations to provide more, better and sustained direct services Intended results: Support or enhance the program delivery model Respond to the organizations goal of increasing, expanding or enhancing services Enable the organization to provide a sustained level of more or better direct services after NSPs (National Service Participants) term of service has ended 6

Activities that are solely intended to support the administration or operations of the organization Activities that increase capacity during the national service participants (NSP) term of service, but the new level of capacity is not sustained when the NSP leaves 7

Indirect services: refers to the provision of skills, abilities, knowledge and efforts to support a program or organization in fulfilling its primary mission, obligations and programming. 8

Indirect services Do not involve the one-to-one provision of benefits between a national service participant and a member of the beneficiary community. Effect institutional change within CNCS supported organizations with the intention of supporting or enhancing the program delivery model. Volunteer generation, developing materials for a new service to be offered by the organization, and outreach to cultivate new partners for referral services are three examples of indirect service. 9

Direct services: Any form of assistance provided directly to the individuals, targeted groups and communities that make up the beneficiary population. Meeting with clients about their health care needs, renovating a house for an elderly individual, and tutoring a child are direct services. 10

Supporting/enhancing the program delivery model: Capacity building activities lead to community or beneficiary change (as opposed to just organizational change). 11

Sustainability: A lasting outcome of the capacity building activity or intervention. This may include maintaining service after the CNCS resource is gone, maintaining enhanced or increased services after the CNCS resource is gone, or both. Sustainable projects and programs have institutional procedures, resources and processes that assure the continuation of expanded or enhanced beneficiary services. 12

Creating an online community to foster better communication among case workers to better serve clients. This is capacity building because the activity creates a communications system that will be sustained beyond the AmeriCorps members term of service. Setting up the organizations server. This is not capacity building because the purpose of the activity is to support the organizations operations rather than the program. 13

Serving as the organizations web-master with the goal of promoting the organizations brand This is not capacity building because the activity does not benefit the program or its beneficiaries. Developing a new website to inform clients about services. This is capacity building because the activity is part of a sustainable marketing strategy. 14

Increasing the agencys clientele by informing community residents about available services. This is not capacity building because the increase in clients wont be sustained without the AmeriCorps member. 15

Programs must document the need for capacity building. Capacity building activities should be undertaken in organizations that address compelling community needs Capacity building activities should address a well- documented, compelling, unmet need related to a programs specific capacity challenges 16

In addition to documenting that the need exists, programs must describe how the interventions the AmeriCorps members and volunteers are engaged in are both evidence-based and will have a measureable impact. The term evidence-based refers to data that supports the presence of a cause and effect relationship between the intervention and the outcome. The evidence provided must support the programs theory of change, which articulates why the intervention (member and volunteer activities) will lead to the outcomes identified by the program. 17

Demonstrating the Evidence-Basis for Capacity Building Activities The specific capacity building activities (interventions) that you choose should be the ones that the evidence suggests are best at creating the increased efficiency and effectiveness that you seek The evidence-basis is the explanation for why the activities are likely to be successful 18

Sources of Evidence May Include: Past performance measurement data Results from an impact evaluation of the program Research studies documenting the outcomes of similar programs Evaluations documenting the outcomes of similar programs 19

Programs must have at least one aligned performance measure that captures the measurable impact of their primary service activity. Aligned measures have two key components: Output and Outcome Outcomes will result from the intervention and output 20

Outputs are counts of the amount of capacity building service that national service participants (NSPs) have completed, but do not provide information on benefits to or other changes in the lives of beneficiaries or CNCS supported organizations. For example: The number of volunteers recruited. 21

Intermediate outcomes are the change in efficiency, effectiveness, or scale/reach that result from the capacity building service completed by the NSPs. End outcomes are measurable changes in the lives of the programs beneficiaries that result from increased capacity. End outcomes are optional. Programs are not required to select end outcomes 22

Output-Outcome alignment in the Capacity Building Measures is a bit different from alignment in the other (Goal 1 Strategic Plan) Focus Area Measures CNCS recognizes that different programs have different models, and not all programs will measure end outcomes. Unlike other national measures, the aligned capacity building measures in many cases may not have the same units of measure. This would not be acceptable in other Focus Areas Because capacity building measures are agency-wide, some of the activities, such as fundraising, may be prohibited by AmeriCorps requirements. (Note the warnings on G3-3.1, G3-3.2, G3-3.7, G3-3.8, G3-3.12, G and G ) 23

National Performance Measures are organized into five Tiers Priority Measures (Tiers 1 & 2) roll up into the CNCS strategic plan Pilot Measures (Tier 3) are additional national performance measures in the Focus Areas Tiers 4 and 5 are for applicants not using national measures Capacity Building measures fall into Tier 2 (Priority Measures) and Tier 3 (Pilot Measures) 24

Capacity Building measures are in Tier 2 (Priority Measures) and Tier 3 (Pilot Measures). If your program model focuses on volunteer recruitment or management capacity building activities for CNCS-supported organizations, you MUST select among the Tier 2 measures. If your program model focuses on other capacity building activities for CNCS-supported organizations, you may choose to select among the Tier 3 measures. Refer to the 2012 Performance Measures Instructions for Capacity Building for more detailed information on selecting and measuring capacity building measures 25

Tier 2 Outputs G3-3.1 Number of community volunteers recruited by CNCS- supported organizations or national service participants G3-3.2 Number of community volunteers managed by CNCS- supported organizations or national service participants All applicants using the above Tier 2 output measures MUST select the following intermediate outcome measure: G3-3.3 Number of organizations implementing three or more effective volunteer management practices as a result of capacity building services provided by CNCS-supported organizations or national service participants 26

If you select any Tier 3 capacity building measures, you MUST select the following output measure: G3-3.4 Number of organizations that received capacity building services from CNCS-supported organizations or national service participants You may select additional outputs from the Capacity Building Measures Chart in the 2012 National Performance Measures Instructions for Capacity Building. For each additional output measure you select, you MUST also select at least one aligned intermediate outcome measure of increased capacity from the Capacity Building Measures Chart. 27

Applicants MAY select among the following end outcome measures that are consistent with program activities: G Number of new beneficiaries that received services as a result of capacity building efforts in: Disaster Services, Economic Opportunity, Education, Environmental Stewardship, Healthy Futures, and/or Veterans and Military Families G Number of new beneficiaries from one or more targeted or underserved populations (counts by target population, e.g., racial or ethnic group) that received services as a result of capacity building efforts in: Disaster Services, Economic Opportunity, Education, Environmental Stewardship, Healthy Futures, and/or Veterans and Military Families (Goal 1) Community and/or Beneficiary Outcomes in CNCS six Focus Areas (consult separate NOFO Performance Measures Instructions for Goal 1 Focus Area-specific outcome measures) 28

Selecting an aligned end outcome measure is optional – and if done, must be above and beyond selecting a required pairing of an aligned output and intermediate outcome showing how the increased capacity led to the organizations ability to achieve the end outcome. Once you have selected an aligned set of measures from the Capacity Building Measures Chart, applicants MAY also select applicant-determined measures – if the measures in the chart do not reflect your program model.. 29

OutputsIntermediate Outcomes If you select: You may also select as an aligned measure: G3-3.4 Number of organizations that received capacity building services from CNCS-supported organizations or national service participants G Number of additional activities completed and/or program outputs produced by the program as a result of capacity building services provided by CNCS- supported organizations or national service participants in a) Disaster Services, b) Economic Opportunity, c) Education, d) Environmental Stewardship, e) Healthy Futures and/or f) Veterans and Military Families 30

Intermediate OutcomesEnd Outcomes If you select: You may also select as an aligned measure: G Number of additional activities completed and/or program outputs produced by the program as a result of capacity building services provided by CNCS-supported organizations or national service participants in a) Disaster Services, b) Economic Opportunity, c) Education, d) Environmental Stewardship, e) Healthy Futures and/or f) Veterans and Military Families G Number of new beneficiaries that received services as a result of capacity building efforts in: Disaster Services, Economic Opportunity, Education, Environmental Stewardship, Healthy Futures, and/or Veterans and Military Families 31

2012 National Performance Measures Instructions ofa_detail.asp?tbl_nofa_id=91 Other Performance Measurement Resources, including Webinars and Sample Instruments CNCS Capacity Building Framework Document capacity-building-framework pdf capacity-building-framework pdf Information on the AmeriCorps Grant Competitions or