Predicting future injury in runners using participant-specific models of internal structural loading.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Effect of an Unstable Shoe Construction on Lower Extremity Gait Characteristics Nigg, Benno M. Ferber, Reed Gormley Tim Human Performance Laboratory University.
Advertisements

Treatment of Lower Extremity Pain in Runners Dick Evans PT, OCS
Vicon Workstation Motion Capture Essentials
Kinetic Analyses of Two Fencing Attacks–Lunge and Fleche
DAVE HAIGHT, MD Sports Medicine Fellow April 2009
Inverse Dynamics and Joint Power Analysis
Kinetics of Hula Hooping: An Exploratory Analysis
An Overview of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
GAME-SIMULATED MOTION CAPTURE 8 camera VICON F20 (240 Hz), 2 Kistler force plates (960 Hz)) Two highest velocity pitches in the first (pitches 1-20) and.
Biomechanics of Locomotion D. Gordon E. Robertson, PhD, FCSB Biomechanics, Laboratory, School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada D.
Thornbers Podiatry “Promoting optimum health and performance”
Stud Type Affects Knee Biomechanics on Infilled Synthetic Turf during a 180° Cut, but not during a Single-Leg Land-Cut Task 1 Biomechanics/Sports Medicine.
Proposal study: Differentiation between idiopathic toe walking and mild diplegia using random forest.
Biomechanics of Gait Walking
Ellen Vanderburgh HSS 409 4/21/10. Stress Fractures: What are They?  Over-use injury  Cumulative mechanical trauma to bone or muscle  Muscle strain.
Results Table 1: Muscle force and relative difference to control Fig. 2: Muscle force during stance phase for a) m.tibialis posterior; b) m. tibialis anterior;
Kinetics versus Kinematics for Analyzing Locomotor Coordination D. Gordon E. Robertson, Ph.D. School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CANADA.
Effects of Age on the Landing Techniques of Boys and Girls Ashley Swander Ashley Swander 1 Michael Pavol Michael Pavol 2 Dept. of Mechanical Engineering.
 Injury Prevention for Basketball Officials River Valley Health.
Moment Power and Work of the Ankle, Knee and Hip during Three Bimanual Lifting Techniques Maria Nicolaou, B.Sc.* D. Gordon E. Robertson. Ph.D.** *Department.
Biomechanics of Walking
supervised by: Asst. Prof. Dr. Ergin Tönük Prof. Dr. Turgut Tümer
TARA MARKOVICH. FITIVITY What is Fitivity? -A Physical Therapy app customized workout programs -Workouts customized for ankle sprain rehab, knee,
Walking Gait Cycle Swing Phase: begins with TO and ends w/ IC
V v Anterior cruciate ligament ruptures are frequently noncontact in nature and most commonly occur during deceleration motions. 1 It is estimated that.
RUNNING SHOES And Your Feet
TRAINING AFFECTS KNEE KINEMATICS AND KINETICS IN CUTTING MANEUVERS IN SPORT CASEY GRAHAM TIFFANY MEIER MICHELE BENANTI.
MEDIAL TIBIAL STRESS SYNDROME Most common lower leg injury in sports Accounts for 6-16% of all running injuries and 50% of all lower leg injuries.
THE INFLUENCE OF CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN ON THE SPINE AND HIP JOINT EXCURSIONS AND JOINT TORQUES DURING FORWARD BEND TASKS Stacey L. Moenter, Nikki J. Vander.
THE INFLUENCE OF CHRONICE LOW BACK PAIN ON THE SPINE AND HIP JOINT EXCURSIONS AND JOINT TORQUES DURING FORWARD BEND TASKS Stacey L Moenter, Nikki J Vander.
Effect of a 6 week Depth Jump Training Program on Agility and Vertical Jump in Varsity Female Athletes Introduction Methods References DiscussionPurpose.
Kinetics of Hula Hooping: An Exploratory Analysis Tyler Cluff D. Gordon E. Robertson Ramesh Balasubramaniam School of Human Kinetics Faculty of Health.
COMPARISON OF KINETICS OF RAMP AND STAIR DESCENT Andrew Post, B.Sc. and D.G.E. Robertson, Ph.D., FCSB School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa,
Is it harmful to Heel Strike when running? Making initial contact with the forefoot [circle] is thought to reduce the potential for injury by improving.
Comparison of Loaded and Unloaded Ramp Descent Jordan Thornley, B.Sc. and D. Gordon E. Robertson, Ph.D., FCSB School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa,
Marian Abowd, Dr. Cindy Trowbridge, Dr. Mark Ricard EFFECTS OF PATTERNED ELECTRICAL NEUROMUSCULAR STIMULATION ON KNEE JOINT STABILIZATION AbstractResultsConclusion.

Introduction of PCA and energy flow pattern in lower limb Reporter: Yu-shin Chang Date: 99/02/05.
Learning to Run: Simple Prevention Strategies for the Novice Runner
The right foot forward, or the right shoe?
Introduction Problem Defined The understanding of human gait is an active research topic. New approaches reveal the need to apply more sophisticated mathematical.
Gesture and Posture As Important Factors in 3D Kinematic Assessment of the Knee Lavoie F 1, Laplante M 2, Parent G 1, Duval N 1,3, Doré S 1,2, de Guise.
Effects of Foot Placement on Trunk Kinematics During Baseball Pitching Rebecca Smith/Kinesiology/Junior/Physical Therapy Sakiko Oyama Baseball Pitching.
Treatment Rationale: Terminology
KINETIC ANALYSIS OF THE LOWER LIMBS DURING FORWARD AND BACKWARD STAIR DESCENT WITH AND WITHOUT A FRONT LOAD Olinda Habib Perez & D. Gordon E. Robertson.
Status of Reference Network Simulations John Dale ILC-CLIC LET Beam Dynamics Workshop 23 June 2009.
Ground Reaction Forces in Running: A Reexamination C F Munro, D I Miller & A J Fuglevand.
Introduction Results Browning, R.C., Baker, E. A., Herron, J.S., Kram, R. Effects of obesity and sex on the energetic cost and preferred speed of walking.
Introduction Hypothesis and Purpose Statement 1. Arampatzis A, Bruggemann G, Metzler V. The effect of speed on leg stiffness and joint kinetics in human.
Gender Differences in Frontal Plane Gait Biomechanics During Declined Walking With a Heavy Load Becky Krupenevich, Jake Ridings, Rachel Tatarski, Patrick.
  Improved Health Benefits  Drastically reduced Injuries  Superior Running Economics Why Run Barefoot?
SS5305 – Popular Marker Setups 1. Objectives Marker Data Measurement Sequence Project Automation Framework (PAF) Popular marker setups PAF Interface 2.
RUNNING MEDICINE Common injuries and causes, core strength evaluation and treatment options Daniel Day, DO Sports Medicine Physician Western New York Sports.
Metabolic and Mechanical Energy Saving Mechanisms in
The Fatigue Effects of Single-leg Landing in Volleyball Players Cheng-Yu Chen 1, Dian-Ying Lee, 1 Fan-Wu Meng 2, Ke-Chou Chen 2 and Chin-Shan Ho 1 1 National.
1 Gait Analysis – Objectives To learn and understand: –The general descriptive and temporal elements of the normal walking movement –The important features.
COMPARISON OF ANKLE, KNEE AND HIP MOMENT POWERS DURING STAIR DESCENT VERSUS LEVEL WALKING François G. D.Beaulieu, M.A.; Lucie Pelland, Ph.D. and Gordon.
COMPARISON OF LOADED AND UNLOADED STAIR DESCENT Joe Lynch, B.Sc. and D.G.E. Robertson, Ph.D., FCSB School of Human Kinetics,University of Ottawa, Ottawa,
Acute Effect of Kinesio Tape on Knee Joint Biomechanics
Simulation Analysis: Estimating Joint Loads
The immediate effect of foot orthoses on lower limb neuromotor control in people with patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis: a pilot study Narelle Wyndow1,
Variation in Shoulder Elevation
Akhilesh Jha’s Information & Goals
Date of download: 1/15/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Injury Prevention & Rehabilitation Revision
ERGOnomics TECHnologies
Rick Csintalan, MD August 20, 2018
Result 1: 3D Visualization of the 2D model
Estimating Joint Contributions in Functional Motions to Create a Metric for Injury Prevention using Motion Capture and OpenSim: A Preliminary Study Alexander.
Ankle marker vertical position versus time data just prior to touchdown and during the initial ground contact phase for a representative rear-foot strike.
Presentation transcript:

Predicting future injury in runners using participant-specific models of internal structural loading

Background Incidence of running injury is high o 18.2 – 92.4% No decline despite years of research

Background Limitations 1.External variables  vGRF  Pronation  Footwear  Strike

Background

ΔITBσ/t PFCF or ΔPFCF/t AJCF or ΔAJCF/t PLσ or ΔPLσ/t ? AJCF or ΔAJCF/t ?

Background Limitations 2.Cross-sectional and retrospective designs

Background Overcoming previous limitations o Estimates internal loading o Prospective design

Presentation aims Discuss methods and analyses

Recruitment Strength Testing MoCap Surveys Nexus Visual3D OpenSim Arnold 2010 Lenhart 2014 MatLab or Excel Analysis

Recruitment Strength Testing MoCap Surveys Nexus Visual3D OpenSim Arnold 2010 Lenhart 2014 MatLab or Excel Analysis

Recruitment n = 102 o >18 yrs. old o run ≥3 per wk. o no running-related/lower-limb injury within 6 mos. o no other sports at competitive level, or >2 per wk.

Recruitment Strength Testing MoCap Surveys Nexus Visual3D OpenSim Arnold 2010 Lenhart 2014 MatLab or Excel Analysis

Recruitment Strength Testing MoCap Surveys Nexus Visual3D OpenSim Arnold 2010 Lenhart 2014 MatLab or Excel Analysis

MoCap 45-marker set 50m indoor track 8 Kistler force plates o Embedded in series 12 Vicon cameras (T-40, T-160) 4 Hyun-Joon laser speed gates

MoCap 2 conditions o Constrained  3m/s±5%  5 min.  ~18 to 20 laps (~3 to 3.3m/s) o Typical  “Use the pace that you run for the majority of your mileage”  5 min.  ~17 to 26 laps (~2.8 to 4.3m/s)

Recruitment Strength Testing MoCap Surveys Nexus Visual3D OpenSim Arnold 2010 Lenhart 2014 MatLab or Excel Analysis

Recruitment Strength Testing MoCap Surveys Nexus Visual3D OpenSim Arnold 2010 Lenhart 2014 MatLab or Excel Analysis

Vicon Nexus Next steps… o Label data o ~40 trials / participant x 102 participants ~4000 trials

Vicon Nexus Next steps… o Label data o ~40 trials / participant x 102 participants ~4000 trials S’up undergrads?

Vicon Nexus Next steps… o Label data o ~40 trials / participant x 102 participants ~4000 trials  Auto-labelling?

Recruitment Strength Testing MoCap Surveys Nexus Visual3D OpenSim Arnold 2010 Lenhart 2014 MatLab or Excel Analysis

Recruitment Strength Testing MoCap Surveys Nexus Visual3D OpenSim Arnold 2010 Lenhart 2014 MatLab or Excel Analysis

Visual3D Next steps… o Export labelled data o Correct coordinate systems o Build an Inverse Kinematics model o Calculate external variables o joint forces and moments o vGRF, ΔvGRF/t o pronation o etc…

Recruitment Strength Testing MoCap Surveys Nexus Visual3D OpenSim Arnold 2010 Lenhart 2014 MatLab or Excel Analysis External variables

Recruitment Strength Testing MoCap Surveys Nexus Visual3D OpenSim Arnold 2010 Lenhart 2014 MatLab or Excel Analysis External variables

Strength testing Biodex o Isotonic  Ankle, knee, hip  2 trials: 10°/s “away,” 60°/s “toward”  2 trials: 60°/s “away,” 10°/s “toward”

Recruitment Strength Testing MoCap Surveys Nexus Visual3D OpenSim Arnold 2010 Lenhart 2014 MatLab or Excel Analysis External variables

Recruitment Strength Testing MoCap Surveys Nexus Visual3D OpenSim Arnold 2010 Lenhart 2014 MatLab or Excel Analysis External variables

MatLab: Strength Next steps… o Participant-specific strength parameters o Write into OpenSim

Recruitment Strength Testing MoCap Surveys Nexus Visual3D OpenSim Arnold 2010 Lenhart 2014 MatLab or Excel Analysis External variables

OpenSim Next steps… o Build model…  Arnold et al., 2010  Lenhart et al., 2014  44 muscle lower-limb with patella o Import…  V3D IK models  Strength parameters

Recruitment Strength Testing MoCap Surveys Nexus Visual3D OpenSim Arnold 2010 Lenhart 2014 MatLab or Excel Analysis External variables Internal variables

Recruitment Strength Testing MoCap Surveys Nexus Visual3D OpenSim Arnold 2010 Lenhart 2014 MatLab or Excel Analysis External variables Internal variables

Surveys Baseline o Sex o Experience  years  competitive level o Past habits  other PA  mileage  location  warm up o Footwear  shoes  orthotics o Lower-limb and running injury history

Surveys 26 weekly o Other PA o Mileage, time per day o Changes in footwear o Pain/Injury  Location  Pain severity  Differential diagnosis  Changes in running/PA

Recruitment Strength Testing MoCap Surveys Nexus Visual3D OpenSim Arnold 2010 Lenhart 2014 MatLab or Excel Analysis External variables Internal variables

Recruitment Strength Testing MoCap Surveys Nexus Visual3D OpenSim Arnold 2010 Lenhart 2014 MatLab or Excel Analysis External variables Internal variables

~500 columns per participant per survey 102 participants x 26 surveys ~ 2600 surveys

Recruitment Strength Testing MoCap Surveys Nexus Visual3D OpenSim Arnold 2010 Lenhart 2014 MatLab or Excel Analysis External variables Internal variables Baseline and Prospective variables

Recruitment Strength Testing MoCap Surveys Nexus Visual3D OpenSim Arnold 2010 Lenhart 2014 MatLab or Excel Analysis External variables Internal variables Baseline and Prospective variables

Analysis External variables o Δ vGRF/t o Pronation o Footstrike Internal variables o PLσ o ΔPLσ/t o PFCF o ΔPFCF/t o AJCF o ΔAJCF/t o ΔITBσ/t o Achilles…? o Plantar fascia…? Baseline and prospective variables o Sex o Experience o History of injury o Footwear o Frequency  Mileage  Estimated strides o Injury  # reported  Time off/altered  Pain

Analysis External variables o Δ vGRF/t o Pronation o Footstrike Internal variables o PLσ o ΔPLσ/t o PFCF o ΔPFCF/t o AJCF o ΔAJCF/t o ΔITBσ/t o Achilles…? o Plantar fascia…? Baseline and prospective variables o Sex o Experience o History of injury o Footwear o Frequency  Mileage  Estimated strides o Injury  # reported  Time off/altered  Pain

Analysis Injury # reported Days missed Pain Proposed internal variable

Analysis Covariates...? More complex or hierarchical models…? Fitting data to theoretical curve…?

Analysis Proposed internal variable Estimated strides/week

Analysis Aggregate loading metric…? o Average z-score of each injury-related variable

Analysis Group-wise comparisons…? o Footstrike (fore vs. rear) o Footwear (minimal vs. support)