LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,,2005 1G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll. ICARUS (CERN-CNGS2) A Second-Generation Proton Decay Experiment and Neutrino.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recent Results from Super-Kamiokande on Atmospheric Neutrino Measurements Choji Saji ICRR,Univ. of Tokyo for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration ICHEP 2004,
Advertisements

MINOS+ Starts April 2013 for three years April
Sergio Palomares-Ruiz June 22, 2005 Super-NO A Based on O. Mena, SPR and S. Pascoli hep-ph/ a long-baseline neutrino experiment with two off-axis.
Neutrino oscillations/mixing
11-September-2005 C2CR2005, Prague 1 Super-Kamiokande Atmospheric Neutrino Results Kimihiro Okumura ICRR Univ. of Tokyo ( 11-September-2005.
Super-Kamiokande Introduction Contained events and upward muons Updated results Oscillation analysis with a 3D flux Multi-ring events  0 /  ratio 3 decay.
G. Sullivan - Princeton - Mar 2002 What Have We Learned from Super-K? –Before Super-K –SK-I ( ) Atmospheric Solar –SNO & SK-I Active solar –SK.
Search for spontaneous muon emission from lead nuclei with OPERA bricks M. Giorgini, V. Popa Bologna Group OPERA Collaboration Meeting, LNGS, 19-22/05/2003.
Sinergia strategy meeting of Swiss neutrino groups Mark A. Rayner – Université de Genève 10 th July 2014, Bern Hyper-Kamiokande 1 – 2 km detector Hyper-Kamiokande.
November 19, 2005 Sergio Palomares-Ruiz Physics of Atmospheric Neutrinos: Perspectives for the Future Topical Workshop on Physics at Henderson DUSEL Fort.
A Search for Point Sources of High Energy Neutrinos with AMANDA-B10 Scott Young, for the AMANDA collaboration UC-Irvine PhD Thesis:
F.Sanchez (UAB/IFAE)ISS Meeting, Detector Parallel Meeting. Jan 2006 Low Energy Neutrino Interactions & Near Detectors F.Sánchez Universitat Autònoma de.
NuMI Offaxis Near Detector and Backgrounds Stanley Wojcicki Stanford University Cambridge Offaxis workshop January 12, 2004.
21-25 January 2002 WIN 2002 Colin Okada, LBNL for the SNO Collaboration What Else Can SNO Do? Muons and Atmospheric Neutrinos Supernovae Anti-Neutrinos.
INDIA-BASED NEUTRINO OBSERVATORY (INO) STATUS REPORT Naba K Mondal Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai, India NUFACT Scoping Study Meeting at.
1 CC analysis update New analysis of SK atm. data –Somewhat lower best-fit value of  m 2 –Implications for CC analysis – 5 year plan plots revisited Effect.
MACRO Atmospheric Neutrinos Barry Barish 5 May 00 1.Neutrino oscillations 2.WIMPs 3.Astrophysical point sources.
Status of the OPERA experiment Yoshiaki Nonoyama Nagoya Univ.
New results from K2K Makoto Yoshida (IPNS, KEK) for the K2K collaboration NuFACT02, July 4, 2002 London, UK.
Aldo IanniNNN05 April 8, Status and future prospects of Gran Sasso Aldo Ianni INFN Gran Sasso Laboratory NNN05 Aussois, April 7-9.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
Shoei NAKAYAMA (ICRR) for Super-Kamiokande Collaboration December 9, RCCN International Workshop Effect of solar terms to  23 determination in.
1 Super-Kamiokande atmospheric neutrinos Results from SK-I atmospheric neutrino analysis including treatment of systematic errors Sensitivity study based.
A. Blondel, M.Campanelli, M.Fechner Energy measurement in quasi-elastics Unfolding detector and physics effects Alain Blondel Mario Campanelli Maximilien.
5/1/20110 SciBooNE and MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn TRIUMF For the SciBooNE and MiniBooNE collaborations A search for   disappearance with:
Caren Hagner CSTS Saclay Present And Near Future of θ 13 & CPV in Neutrino Experiments Caren Hagner Universität Hamburg Neutrino Mixing and.
Resolving neutrino parameter degeneracy 3rd International Workshop on a Far Detector in Korea for the J-PARC Neutrino Beam Sep. 30 and Oct , Univ.
The Earth Matter Effect in the T2KK Experiment Ken-ichi Senda Grad. Univ. for Adv. Studies.
Operation of and results from OPERA Ciro Pistillo LHEP Bern University CHIPP Plenary meeting Lausanne, EPFL-LPHE September
Long Baseline Experiments at Fermilab Maury Goodman.
Final results on atmospheric  oscillations with MACRO at Gran Sasso Bari, Bologna, Boston, Caltech, Drexel, Frascati, Gran Sasso, Indiana, L’Aquila, Lecce,
Dec. 13, 2001Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK-IPNS) NuInt01,
Karsten M. Heeger US Reactor  13 Meeting, March 15, 2004 Comparison of Reactor Sites and  13 Experiments Karsten Heeger LBNL.
LSc development for Solar und Supernova Neutrino detection 17 th Lomonosov conference, Moscow, August 2015 L. Oberauer, TUM.
1 DISCOVERY OF ATMOSPHERIC MUON NEUTRINO OSCILLATIONS Prologue First Hint in Kamiokande Second Hint in Kamiokande Evidence found in Super-Kamiokande Nov-12.
Preliminary Results from the MINER A Experiment Deborah Harris Fermilab on behalf of the MINERvA Collaboration.
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
Counting Electrons to Measure the Neutrino Mass Hierarchy J. Brunner 17/04/2013 APC.
Application of neutrino spectrometry
C.Vigorito, University & INFN Torino, Italy 30 th International Cosmic Ray Conference Merida, Mexico Search for neutrino bursts from Gravitational stellar.
1 IDM2004 Edinburgh, 9 september 2004 Helenia Menghetti Bologna University and INFN Study of the muon-induced neutron background with the LVD detector.
Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Oct. Neutrino Oscillation Experiment between JHF – Super-Kamiokande Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (Kamioka Observatory, ICRR)
Search for Electron Neutrino Appearance in MINOS Mhair Orchanian California Institute of Technology On behalf of the MINOS Collaboration DPF 2011 Meeting.
A review on the long baseline neutrino experiments Pasquale Migliozzi INFN, Sezione Napoli, Italy.
Results from RENO Soo-Bong Kim (KNRC, Seoul National University) “17 th Lomosonov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics” Moscow. Russia, Aug ,
Nucleon Decay Search in the Detector on the Earth’s Surface. Background Estimation. J.Stepaniak Institute for Nuclear Studies Warsaw, Poland FLARE Workshop.
Search for Sterile Neutrino Oscillations with MiniBooNE
Neutrino Oscillations at Super-Kamiokande Soo-Bong Kim (Seoul National University)
1 Luca Stanco, INFN-Padova (for the OPERA collaboration) Search for sterile neutrinos at Long-BL The present scenario and the “sterile” issue at 1 eV mass.
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
Accelerator-based Long-Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments Kam-Biu Luk University of California, Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
2 July 2002 S. Kahn BNL Homestake Long Baseline1 A Super-Neutrino Beam from BNL to Homestake Steve Kahn For the BNL-Homestake Collaboration Presented at.
Congresso del Dipartimento di Fisica Highlights in Physics –14 October 2005, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Milano Icarus: a multipurpose.
CP phase and mass hierarchy Ken-ichi Senda Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI) &KEK This talk is based on K. Hagiwara, N. Okamura, KS PLB.
Measurement of the neutrino velocity with the MINOS detectors and NuMI neutrino beam GdR Saclay – 11/04/08 Magali Besnier hep-ex – v3.
Status and oscillation results of the OPERA experiment Florian Brunet LAPP - Annecy 24th Rencontres de Blois 29/05/2012.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
Search for neutron-rich hypernuclei in FINUDA: preliminary results presented by M. Palomba 1 for the FINUDA Collaboration 1 INFN and Dipartimento di Fisica,
September 10, 2002M. Fechner1 Energy reconstruction in quasi elastic events unfolding physics and detector effects M. Fechner, Ecole Normale Supérieure.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
2008 European School of High-Energy Physics - Trest, Czech Republic - 19 August - 1st September Target Tracker Data Analysis In OPERA Experiment S. Dmitrievsky,
Review of experimental results on atmospheric neutrinos Introduction Super-Kamiokande MACRO Soudan 2 Summary Univ. of Tokyo, Kamioka Observatory.
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
Introduction Experimental procedure Beam characteristics and systematic OPERA and ICARUS performances Conclusion D.Duchesneau LAPP, Annecy GDR Neutrino.
Complementarity of Terrestrial Neutrino Experiments in Searching for  13 Pasquale Migliozzi INFN - Napoli P.M., F. Terranova Phys. Lett. B 563 (2003)
Status and results from the OPERA experiment Tomoko Ariga on behalf of the OPERA collaboration A. Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics LHEP, University.
Status of the OPERA experiment
Physics with the ICARUS T1800 detector
Davide Franco for the Borexino Collaboration Milano University & INFN
Atmospheric n’s in a large LAr Detector
Presentation transcript:

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,,2005 1G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll. ICARUS (CERN-CNGS2) A Second-Generation Proton Decay Experiment and Neutrino Observatory at the Gran Sasso Laboratory

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,,2005 2G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll. The ICARUS Collaboration 25 INSTITUTIONS, 150 PHYSICISTS CIEMAT Granada UCLA ETHZ INR IHEP Katowice Krakow Warsaw, Wroclaw L’Aquila, LNGS, Milano, Napoli, Padova, Pavia, Pisa, LNF

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,,2005 3G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll. The T600 modules are now at LNGS

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,,2005 4G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll. The milestones for T600 installation and operation at LNGS we are here

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,,2005 5G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll. We are on schedule On Monday 11 th April the Air Liquid work begins (T600 yard) T600 Mechanical frame construction completed

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,,2005 6G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll.

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,,2005 7G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll. ICARUS status o The ICARUS collaboration has built and run the T300 module on time and within budget o The T3000 design was approved o After that there were long delays not due to ICARUS responsibility o The project of the muon spectrometer has been indefinitely postponed by proponent groups o The two modules composing the T600 have been delivered to LNGS o INFN has provided essentially all the money for the T600, for the basic infrastructures and for the first T1200 module. o INFN correctly argues that the second T1200 module should be substantially funded by non italian collaborators. This is not yet the case. o At this time, a T1800 configuration (T600+T1200) running for a significant time interval has to be considered as a necessary firm (i.e. possible and financed) step in the ICARUS project towards the completion of the final mass design.

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,,2005 8G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll. T1200 o INFN has formally authorized the necessary calls for tender o However these steps are frozen waiting for the MoU document We need to have a green light as soon as possible

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,,2005 9G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll. The T1800 configuration

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,, G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll. Physics with T1800 o In view of the previous considerations, the physics goals achievable with the T1800 are being reviewed by the collaboration. o INFN also recommended this analysis, asking for an update of the previous documents on the physics goals, in the light of the recent progresses in the topics which are within the ICARUS interest.

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,, G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll. An update of The Physics Program with T1800 proton and neutron decay searches atmospheric neutrinos Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment solar neutrinos Cosmic neutrinos: SN,  -ray bursts, neutron star collapse uuduud ee dddd p 00

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,, G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll.

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,, G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll. Basic features of T1800 Instrumented volume of T600: m 3  t LAr Instrumented volume of T1200: m 3  t LAr Energy resolution:  /E = 11%/  E(MeV) E<50 MeV checked with  decay  /E = 3%/  E(GeV)  1% e.m. showers checked with   mass drift length: 3m drift length: 1.5m

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,, G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll. 1) Nucleon Decay This remains the original and most important physics item addressed by ICARUS The work exposed in the previous proposal documents remains valid full event simulation (FLUKA) with all relevant effects in Argon nuclei (including absorption or decay inside parent nucleus) background evaluated on a statistical sample of 100 kton yr exposure Topological and kinematical cuts as described in previous proposals essential ingredients:

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,, G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll.

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,, G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll. Comments on nucleon decay Despite the reduction in mass, T1800 has still the capability to improve the current limits for several channels even with an exposure of few years. In less than one year it is possible to improve SuperKamiokande limits on the following channels: p     n  e - K + In all cases where exclusive channels are considered, the background is found to be much below 1 ev/kton yr, thus allowing a discovery capability even with the observation of a single event

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,, G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll. 2) Atmospheric Neutrinos From the analysis of the Super-Kamiokande significative systematic uncertainties remain on the e sector, and in particular in the SubGeV region These appear in the comparison of absolute normalization between data and predictions (see Super-Kamiokande results)Super-Kamiokande results These SubGeV e events might be important for the progress of the understanding of neutrino oscillations ICARUS can study e events with an unprecedented level of experimental systematics in addition to a very low threshold in lepton momentum

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,, G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll. Why SubGeV e are important There is no evidence for atmospheric e oscillation: sin 2  13 is consistent with 0 in the present 3 flavor analysis (  m 2 23, sin 2  23, sin 2  13 ) After solar and KamLAND results, we can say that oscillation of low energy e should appear at some level even if sin 2  13 = 0 sub-leading oscillations driven by  m 2 12 F osc e = F 0 e P( e  e ) + F 0  P(   e ) F 0 e,F 0   flux w/o osc. = F 0 e [ P( e  e ) + r P(   e ) ] r = F 0   / F 0 e :  /e flux ratio = F 0 e [ 1 – P 2 + r cos 2  23 P 2 ] P 2 = |A e  | 2 : 2 transition probability e   in matter driven by  m 2 12 (F osc e / F 0 e ) – 1 = P 2 ( r cos 2  23 – 1) screening factor for low energy ( r ~ 2 ) ~ 0if cos 2  23 = 0.5 (sin 2  23 = 0.5) 0.5) > 0if cos 2  23 > 0.5 (sin 2  23 < 0.5)

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,, G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll. Consequences The knowledge of the absolute level of SubGeV e can provide the best possible measurement of  23 and of its octant. Of course, from the point of view of statistical significance, this requires a very high exposure This can be achieved in a next detector generation in the ICARUS programme, but the unique features of T1800 can provide a first important indication and comprehension of the experimental systematics of SubGeV e. T1800 can explore for the first time the region with P e <100 MeV/c

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,, G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll. New improved detector simulation a first study of containment using full simulation FLUKA + NUX with 3-f oscillations with matter effects (with F.Vissani, LNGS) Atmospheric neutrino Fluxes (2002). Baseline exposure: 1 yr 600 Tons + 4 yr 1800 Tons: 6.36 kton yr Choice of oscillation parameters (SK and solar exp. results)  m 2 23 = (1.5) – (3.4) x10 -3 eV 2 (positive)  m 2 12 = 8.3x10 -5 eV 2 sin 2 2  12 = sin 2 2  23 = 1.  CP = 0 o   13 = Chooz limit 11 o merging with K2K:  m 2 23  = 2.5 x10 -3 eV 2 Generated Statistics: 20 times larger

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,, G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll. Event selection and definition Follow SK denomination but with different limits: Sub-GeV Evis < 1.0 GeV (SK: <1.33 GeV) Multi-GeV Evis > 1.0 GeV (SK: >1.33 GeV) Super-Kamiokande Icarus e (single prong) 100 MeV10 MeV muon (single prong)200 MeV10 MeV Multi.prong muon600 MeV10 MeV CC Interaction rates: evt/kton yr  m 23 2

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,, G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll. 1  statistical uncertainty level on e normalization achievable with T1800 for the baseline exposure { 15% excess level as seen by Super-Kamiokande Main results Possibility to separate charges (~75% probability capture for   ) With containment requirement we can measure  - /  + with ~ 25% error or less T.Suzuki et al., Phys. Rev. C35 (1987) 2212

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,, G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll. We can use charge id by  -decay to test the nuclear model: important for many future neutrino experiments Our model prediction: in SubGeV  -like events (~all q.e.) there is a recoiling proton with E>50 MeV in: ~42% of  interactions ~14% of  interactions examples of “anomalies”:   p decay p  

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,, G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll. ICARUS T600+T1200 ν τ appearance To be combined with expected OPERA results Increase the overall sensitivity Δ m 2 = 2.5 x eV 2 5 years exposure of T600(5y) +T1200 (4y) Expected rate Nominal CNGS beam: 6.5 ν τ with 0.3 bg events CNGS x 1.5 beam intensity 9.8 ν τ with 0.5 bg events 3) Neutrino oscillations with the CNGS beam

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,, G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll. ICARUS T600+T1200 ν e appearance New beam simulations with latest optics 3 Flavour oscillations with matter effects Full simulation in LAr Fiducial volume 90% Cut on Evis < 20 GeV optimized for background reduction All backgrounds included ν τ CC τ →e 12.6 ev ν e + ν e intrinsic CC 47 ev Neutral currents suppressed by e / π 0 discrimination: 0.1% π 0 misidentification with 90% e efficiency

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,, G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll. ICARUS T600+T1200 ν e appearance Evis spectra Δ m 2 23 = eV 2 Sin 2 (2 θ 13 )= 0.14 (CHOOZ limit) 25 oscillated events 90% confidence level Full = CNGS std. 1y t600 +4y t1800 Dashed = CNGS x 1.5 5% systematic error on background

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,, G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll. CNGS low energy 5 y CNGS low energy focalization, 400 GeV p on 1m long target pot/y Average ν μ energy 1.8 GeV, 0.9% ν e / ν μ CC Evis <2.5 GeV Δ m 2 23 = eV 2 Sin 2 (2 θ 13 )= 0.14 (CHOOZ limit) 13.5 oscillated events over 2.9 background events 90% CL sensitivity. Factor 4 over CHOOZ Full: CNGS Low-e Dashed: CNGS τ

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,, G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll. Muons from ν interactions in GS rock All details of μ transport included Expected: 43.6 μ /m 2 /10 19 pot  0.98 μ/m 2 /day  196 μ/m 2 /year In T600 : 3700 μ/year, of which 870 μ/year with P μ >20GeV ( mostly from ν μ with E ν >40GeV) Importance: a)beam monitoring b)measurement of the high energy sector of neutrino flux: they mostly come K which also contribute to e contamination

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,, G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll. 4) Solar neutrinos Solar neutrino event rates rescaled to T1800 volume. Fluxes taken from BP04 SSM ( 8 B flux larger by 14% with respect to BP2000)BP04 SSM Calculation of the absorption cross-section in the neutrino energy range 1.5 – 15 MeV from new measurements from 40 Ti  + decay A full simulation based on FLUKA package was performed, using a detailed description of the different layers and materials of the T600 detector, to study the topology and the rates of the solar neutrino and neutron capture background Detailed analysis of background neutron sources: a) External sources (natural radioactivity of the rocks): 2  10 6 capt/year b) Internal sources (Al, stainless steel, etc…): 3  10 6 (optimistic) capt/year 13  10 6 (pessimistic) capt/year

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,, G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll. We must increase the threshold of 5 MeV previously quoted in the original proposal due to the Q-value of the neutron capture processes on 36 Ar, no background is expected above 9 MeV. ICARUS T1800 can therefore provide accurate information on the high energy region of the solar neutrino spectrum, between 9 and 15 MeV. Background free events per year (oscillated)

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,, G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll. 5) Cosmic neutrinos ICARUS T1800 is a unique instrument, with high sensitive mass, able to detect neutrinos in a wide energy region of interest (from one to thousands MeV) from: Supernovae (SN) Neutron star collapse into black hole Active Galactic Nuclei and GRB (according to some non standard models) The time correlation with other neutrino detectors (LVD, Borexino, SK, SNO) and X- gamma detectors (SWIFT, AGILE) or with international networks (SNEWS, GCN) can reduce the background effects and give reliability to the observations of such phenomena. Number of expected SN events in ICARUS T1800 for inverted (normal) hierarchy

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,, G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll. Sensitivity for SN search

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,, G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll. Conclusions 1 T600 is now at LNGS the work to install T600 has started and schedule is being respected We ask for the green light to continue the approved program: building the first T1200 module T600+1 st T1200 = T1800 is an important intermediate step in the path of the complete ICARUS project towards the final mass design and has already the possibility to start a real physics investigation. T600 alone would remain just a demonstrative tool

LNGS Scientific Committee – April 8,, G.Battistoni for the ICARUS Coll. Conclusions T1800 has already important physics discovery capabilities in nucleon decay searches. T1800 already allows to have a new initial investigation with negligible or null experimental systematics of the SubGeV range of atmospheric neutrinos. T1800 has already discovery capability for  appearance, and, as far as  - e transitions are concerned, a factor of 2 of improvement with respect to Chooz limit is already possible We reinforce our convincement that resources must be allocated to obtain an improved neutrino beam: a) increasing intensity, b) a different beam (like CNGS- LE) in a second period. The validity of the project has to be evaluated in the long period. In general it must be put in evidence that T1800 is a fundamental step in the ICARUS programme: beyond the topic of nucleon decay the Liquid Argon technology emerges as a fundamental tool to investigate low energy neutrino physics. The validity of the project has to be evaluated in the long period.