Creating a Future for Engineers Formula Student Germany FSAE-CFRP monocoque.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structural scales and types of analysis in composite materials
Advertisements

Fibre Volume Fraction and Laminate Thickness
Mechanics of Composite Materials
RecreationAutomotive Aerospace Industrial Inflatable World Leader in Braided Reinforcements QISO TM and Bimax TM Webinar May 9, 2012.
Solution partners CDT 2000 Proprietary Dr. Olivier Guillermin Composite Design Technologies, Inc. Monte Carlo, Monaco June 7-9, 2000 An Integrated Solution.
Processes contd Filament Winding Processes contd Dry Lay-up bafore infusion.
Fiber Reinforced Plastic beam manufacturing process
Elastic Properties of K13D2U/Epoxy Prepreg
Composite Mold Design Project 1 – prepreg press mold.
Creating a Future for Engineers Formula Student Germany Wet laminated CFRP monocoque Manuel Baumann amz.ethz.ch.
P09221: Innovative Composite Parts for a Formula SAE Racecar
Insight into Reverie & autoclaved composites By Simon Farren Presented at US Distributor Sector th April 2009.
John Klintworth MSC.Software Ltd. Evolving Composites Simulation Requirements and Solutions.
Optimize Global Shipments with Customized Dunnage Solutions
Introduction – Concept of Stress
Introduction – Concept of Stress
Team 7: Vincent Borsello, Michael Brill, Daniel Gempesaw, Travis Mease
CH3 MICROMECHANICS Assist.Prof.Dr. Ahmet Erklig. Ultimate Strengths of a Unidirectional Lamina.
Classical Laminated Plate Theory
FAA/NASA Meeting on Industry Composite Specifications August 2002 FAA Report on Proposed Industry Prepreg Specifications Ric Abbott Abbott Aerospace Composites.
Bolted joint failure modes
Introduction – Concept of Stress
Introduction – Concept of Stress
MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF METALS. INTRODUCTION Materials subjected to forces/load – Thus need to learn properties to avoid excessive deformation leading.
Automotive Design Guidelines for Composite Manufacturing Techniques
Adhesive bonding.
1 COMPOSITE MATERIALS What are composite materials? Two or more materials bound together Example from civil engineering: Concrete reinforced with steel.
How to fabricate optimum/complex materials from single materials
J. McPherson; October Sensitivity of Carbon/Epoxy Laminates to Void Content A Thesis Proposal Submitted to the Graduate.
Structural Engineering
1 Chap. 9 Design of Composite Materials 9-1. Advantages of Composite Materials in Structural Design The main advantages of using composites in structural.
Mechanical Engineering Department Advanced Composites Dr. Talal Mandourah 1 Lecture 11 & 12 Processing Routes Molding Compound -Short fibers, preimpregnated.
CTC / MTC 222 Strength of Materials Final Review.
The A380, Leader on Manufacturing technology FARNBOROUGH 20 th /21 st July 2004 Neil HARRIS Presented by.
Application of Advanced Composites to Helicopter Structures Design for Manufacturing Nothing can replace hands on shop experience as a prerequisite to.
Substrate-Paddle-Base Peter Cooke. Peter Cooke 28 Feb - 1 March VELO PRR2 Substrate- Paddle-Base Substrate Production Paddle – Base – Feet Component.
Unit V Lecturer11 LECTURE-I  Introduction  Some important definitions  Stress-strain relation for different engineering materials.
MECHANICS OF MATERIALS Third Edition Ferdinand P. Beer E. Russell Johnston, Jr. John T. DeWolf Lecture Notes: S.A.A.Oloomi CHAPTER © 2006 Islamic Azad.
Mechanical Engineering Department Advanced Composites Dr. Talal Mandourah 1 Lecture 7 & 8 Comparison of Fibers.
MECHANICS OF MATERIALS Fourth Edition Ferdinand P. Beer E. Russell Johnston, Jr. John T. DeWolf Lecture Notes: J. Walt Oler Texas Tech University CHAPTER.
Tool-Free Adjustable Foot Stretcher For Hudson Rowing Shells Brent Davis Casey Haddock Audrey Harper Jennifer Hoover Wes McGee Georgia Institute of Technology.
Stress and Strain – Axial Loading
Introduction – Concept of Stress
Overview of Mechanical Engineering for Non-MEs Part 2: Mechanics of Materials 6 Introduction – Concept of Stress.
CTC / MTC 222 Strength of Materials Chapter 1 Basic Concepts.
Comparison of strength behavior of unidirectional HMC and HSC composite subjected to biaxial loading J. Krystek, R. Kottner, L. Bek 19 th Conference on.
Mechanical Engineering Department Advanced Composites Dr. Talal Mandourah 1 Lecture 9 & 10 Processing Routes Hot-melt Impregnation system Step 1 Preparation.
Course No.: MEBF ZC342 MACHINE DESIGN
LHCb Radiation Shielding Wall – Lifting Tool Overview.
Machining: Family of Material Removal Processes  Material is removed from a starting work part to create a desired geometry.
Class A Carbon Fibre Reinforced Plastic (CFRP) Body Panels on The MG Rover SV.
Modelling Composite Materials: ANSYS & ACP
Orbit Engineering Moonbuggy Wheels James Roland Jacob Lloyd Ian Henry Kevin Beckman.
STREET & RACING TECHNOLOGY. SRT brand discussion Videos (SRT) Vehicle Functionality Develop High Tech Strategy World premier GT Vehicle Lighter Weight.
MECHANICS OF MATERIALS Fifth SI Edition Ferdinand P. Beer E. Russell Johnston, Jr. John T. DeWolf David F. Mazurek Lecture Notes: J. Walt Oler Texas Tech.
Machining: Family of Material Removal Processes
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL AND MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING
University of Washington, Seattle
Introduction – Concept of Stress
Concept of Stress.
Design of parts for static loading
Modeling Layered Composites the Simple Way
Structure I Course Code: ARCH 208 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg
Introduction – Concept of Stress
Structure I Course Code: ARCH 208 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg.
LECTURE-I Introduction Some important definitions
Machining: Family of Material Removal Processes
Concept of Stress.
Yielding And Fracture Under Combine Stresses
Computer-Aided Design (CAD)
Presentation transcript:

Creating a Future for Engineers Formula Student Germany FSAE-CFRP monocoque

Creating a Future for Engineers Contents  Motivation  Concept  Dimensioning  Design  Cuts  Manufacturing

Creating a Future for Engineers +mass-specific mechanical properties +safety +lightweight design possibilities +integration of functions +(new challenge) Motivation -time and cost (depends) -design complexity -maintenance and repair Why a Monocoque? Has to be answered during design event!

Creating a Future for Engineers  axle to axle ↔ front-only  more interaction  no additional load transmissions  one-piece ↔ multi-part  manufacturability  no joint  push- ↔ pullrod  considerable influence on MC-design Concepts – Basic Options  manufacturing method  wide influence on MC-design  influence on cost  joint ↔ integrated  manufacturability  no joint  ergonomy und package  tool  mock-up  shouldn‘t change too often

Creating a Future for Engineers Concepts – Geometry Variation  simplified FE-model  qualitative analysis of concepts  initially: isotropic material  presumed weaknesses:  upper wishbones  cockpit

Creating a Future for Engineers Influence on Torsional Stiffness

Creating a Future for Engineers 300 mm F = 177 kN Preliminary Design: Frontal Crash

Creating a Future for Engineers no.materialE || EE G    Corres ponding  1E-Glas / EP ,2520,6 2HTA/MTM ,3351,550,6 3T700S/MTM ,331,550,6 no.materialR || t R  c RtRt RcRc R  || Corres ponding  1E-Glas / EP ,6 2HTA/MTM ,323289,30,6 3T700S/MTM ,3180,256,80,6 loads n x [N/mm]-147,5 laminate lay-up lamina t k [mm]  material 1 0,11600, ,116900, ,116450, , , ,46200, , , ,116450, ,116900, ,11600,498 lamina angle [  ]   [%]   [%]   [%]   [N/mm 2 ]   [N/mm 2 ]   [N/mm 2 ] f E,FF f E,IFF Fracture mode Fracture angle weakening 10,00-0,170, ,60,500,150,01A03 290,000,05-0,17051,6-12,900,030,06C51, ,07-0,06 0,23-63,8-6,28,60,050,08B ,07-0,06 -0,23-63,8-6,2-8,60,050,08B02 50,00-0,170, ,60,500,150,01A ,07-0,06 -0,23-63,7-6,2-8,60,050,08B02 745,07-0,06 0,23-63,7-6,28,60,050,08B02 890,000,05-0,17051,6-12,900,030,06C51,22 90,00-0,170, ,20,500,150,01A03 reserve factor laminate fracture 6,6 reserve factor first inter-fibre fracture 6,6 CLT

Creating a Future for Engineers FE-Model  anisotropic material  align element coordinate system!  shell elements  Ansys: SHELL99, SHELL91  Input of single plies enables CLT and Puck to be used in Ansys  reasonable results without tests?

Creating a Future for Engineers 1.Load Transmission 2.Bonded Joint 3.Cockpit Reinforcement Design in Detail 1 2 3

Creating a Future for Engineers Load Transmission  critical  safety seat belt  suspension  complex detailed calculations  tests are more reasonable  integration of functions  roll hoops

Creating a Future for Engineers Bonded Joint

Creating a Future for Engineers Cockpit Reinforcement

Creating a Future for Engineers Machine-Cut Plies (Vistagy Fibersim, CATIA Composite Design, NX Laminate Composites) +less wasted material +faster manufacturing +higher quality each cut  CAD surface model 3d surface  2d contour  *.dxf NX4 splines  lines and circular arcs reduce number of segments nesting Autocad

Creating a Future for Engineers Ply Book  ply book pages for overview and for each cut  in sequence of actual manufacturing steps  if necessary: exact position and alignment

Creating a Future for Engineers Manufacturing  Epoxy blocks cut  and bonded  5 axis mill

Creating a Future for Engineers  fine-grained abrasive paper  mould release agent  alignment pins  CFK tooling prepregs  (2x200gr | 3x650gr | 1x200gr)s

Creating a Future for Engineers  autoclave curing of negative moulds  defrosting of prepregs  CNC cut plies

Creating a Future for Engineers  labeling and arranging  first face  positioning via pins

Creating a Future for Engineers  inserts are also nested  CFK panel  jet cutting  honeycomb core machine cut  insert positioning via pins

Creating a Future for Engineers  vacuum  parts to be cured in autoclave  2 or 3 shots

Creating a Future for Engineers  removing alignment pins  demoulding  bonding  tension belts

Creating a Future for Engineers Tips for a Start  Concept  examine concepts and solutions of other teams  define manufacturing method early (depends on your options and those provided by partners)  Design  define package early  lightweight construction!  symmetrical ply layout  complete CAD model  avoid unnecessary joints  Material  high-tension fibres aren‘t beneficial for axial compression  high modulus fibres: brittle, low ultimate elongation!  fabric: fine, compact, not wavy  twill or sateen (e. g. 3k-yarn: 200g/m² for instance)  local UD reinforcements (e. g. for distinct, not varying state of stress)  core: e. g. fine aluminum honeycombs of low density

Creating a Future for Engineers 05. – 09. August 2009 See you at Hockenheim