Teaching the Science Base of MCH Donna Strobino, PhD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process
Advertisements

Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process
Chronic disease self management – a systematic review of proactive telephone applications Carly Muller Dean Schillinger Division of General Internal Medicine.
Yiu-fai Cheung, MD Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine LKS Faculty of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong, China Sharing in GRF.
Program Goals Just Arent Enough: Strategies for Putting Learning Outcomes into Words Dr. Jill L. Lane Research Associate/Program Manager Schreyer Institute.
Development of a Community SPIRIT ‘The Journey so Far’ Alun E Morgan MPhil Student.
Evaluation for 1st Year Grantees Shelly Potts, Ph.D. Arizona State University
8. Evidence-based management Step 3: Critical appraisal of studies
Reading the Dental Literature
CHAPTER 2 THE RESEARCH PROCESS. 1. Selection of topic  2. Reviewing the literature  3. Development of theoretical and conceptual frameworks  4.
ANAPHI competencies. 2 Competency context PHERP (Commonwealth) programme funded National DELPHI process – very broad consultation in all states.
Find 8 scholarly articles related to your dependent variable and target population. How does the literature theoretically define your dependent variable?
Evidenced Based Practice; Systematic Reviews; Critiquing Research
Writing the Syllabus Teaching Skills Purpose of Syllabus Communicates what the course is about Communicates what students need to know in the beginning.
Topics - Reading a Research Article Brief Overview: Purpose and Process of Empirical Research Standard Format of Research Articles Evaluating/Critiquing.
Problem Analysis Intelligence Step 2 - Problem Analysis Developing solutions to complex population nutrition problems (such as obesity or food insecurity)
Critique of Research Outlines: 1. Research Problem. 2. Literature Review. 3. Theoretical Framework. 4. Variables. 5. Hypotheses. 6. Design. 7. Sample.
Writing Up the Research Paper for Medical Journals Jeanne M. Ferrante, M.D., M.P.H. Associate Professor Department of Family Medicine.
USING STUDENT OUTCOMES WHEN INTEGRATING INFORMATION LITERACY SKILLS INTO COURSES Information Literacy Department Asa H. Gordon Library Savannah State University.
September 26, 2012 DATA EVALUATION AND ANALYSIS IN SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.
An Introduction to Systematic Reviews Shakila Thangaratinam Professor of Maternal and Perinatal Health Women’s Health Research Unit R & D Director of Women’s.
How to Write a Scientific Paper Hann-Chorng Kuo Department of Urology Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital.
Writing a Research Proposal
RESEARCH FRAMEWORK Yulia Sofiatin Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics 2012 YS 2011.
1 The Literature Review March 2007 (3). 2 The Literature Review The review of the literature is defined as a broad, comprehensive, in- depth, systematic,
Reporting & Ethical Standards EPSY 5245 Michael C. Rodriguez.
Evidence-Based Practice Current knowledge and practice must be based on evidence of efficacy rather than intuition, tradition, or past practice. The importance.
Argumentation in Middle & High School Science Victor Sampson Assistant Professor of Science Education School of Teacher Education and FSU-Teach Florida.
By Dr.Eslamipour.  We learned:  What is EBD?  Why EBD?  Evidence-based practice process.
CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE
Systematic Reviews.
Literature review Osama A Samarkandi, PhD, RN BSc, GMD, BSN, MSN, NIAC EMS 423; EMS Research and Evidence Based Practice.
Epidemiology Literature Critique Outline and guidelines.
Evaluating a Research Report
Session I: Unit 2 Types of Reviews September 26, 2007 NCDDR training course for NIDRR grantees: Developing Evidence-Based Products Using the Systematic.
ScWk 242 Course Overview and Review of ScWk 240 Concepts ScWk 242 Session 1 Slides.
Appraising Randomized Clinical Trials and Systematic Reviews October 12, 2012 Mary H. Palmer, PhD, RN, C, FAAN, AGSF University of North Carolina at Chapel.
Landmark Trials: Recommendations for Interpretation and Presentation Julianna Burzynski, PharmD, BCOP, BCPS Heme/Onc Clinical Pharmacy Specialist 11/29/07.
System error Biases in epidemiological studies FETP India.
Systematic Reviews Michael Chaiton Tobacco and Health: From Cells to Society September 24, 2014.
Project Thesis 2006 Adapted from Flor Siperstein Lecture 2004 Class CLASS Project Thesis (Fundamental Research Tools)
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 5 Theory, Research, and Evidence-Based Practice.
The Practical Aspects of Doing Research An Giang University June, 2004 Dennis Berg, Ph.D.
Evidence Based Practice RCS /9/05. Definitions  Rosenthal and Donald (1996) defined evidence-based medicine as a process of turning clinical problems.
META-ANALYSIS, RESEARCH SYNTHESES AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS © LOUIS COHEN, LAWRENCE MANION & KEITH MORRISON.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Intelligent Consumer Chapter 14 This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following.
The Research Process.  There are 8 stages to the research process.  Each stage is important, but some hold more significance than others.
The Development and Validation of the Evaluation Involvement Scale for Use in Multi-site Evaluations Stacie A. ToalUniversity of Minnesota Why Validate.
1 Commissioned by PAMSA and German Technical Co-Operation National Certificate in Paper & Pulp Manufacturing NQF Level 4 Apply knowledge of statistics.
Evidence-Based Practice Evidence-Based Practice Current knowledge and practice must be based on evidence of efficacy rather than intuition, tradition,
Unit 11: Evaluating Epidemiologic Literature. Unit 11 Learning Objectives: 1. Recognize uniform guidelines used in preparing manuscripts for publication.
National Science Education Standards. Outline what students need to know, understand, and be able to do to be scientifically literate at different grade.
PhD in Social Work and Social Policy at FPN UBG Prof dr Nevenka Zegarac Department of Social work and social policy Faculty of political sciences UBG TEMPUS.
PSY 325 AID Education Expert/psy325aid.com FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
Critiquing Quantitative Research.  A critical appraisal is careful evaluation of all aspects of a research study in order to assess the merits, limitations,
Critical thinking in the context of biology CETL Workshop February 25, 2015 Ben Montgomery NSE (Biology)
1 Copyright © 2012 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Copyright © 2008 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 15 Evidence-Based Practice.
HCS 465 OUTLET Experience Tradition /hcs465outlet.com FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
Building an Evidence-Based Nursing Practice
Writing a sound proposal
Designing Your Study and Selecting a Sample
TJTS505: Master's Thesis Seminar
EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE
HCS 542 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
HCS 542 Education for Service/snaptutorial.com
Reading Research Papers-A Basic Guide to Critical Analysis
Planning a Learning Unit
Big Idea 4: Synthesize Ideas — Moving from AP Seminar to AP Research
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PRACTICES
Presentation transcript:

Teaching the Science Base of MCH Donna Strobino, PhD

TEACHING THE SCIENCE BASE OF MCH OBJECTIVE: To present examples of approaches to teaching the evidence base of MCH

ASSUMPTIONS OF EXAMPLES SOLID GROUNDING IN: Biostatistics Epidemiology Evaluation or Study Design in the Social Sciences or Health Services Research

EXAMPLES OF APPROACHES Critiquing a research article Synthesizing the literature on an intervention/program Translation of a study to practice or policy Debating the science Choosing measures for population- based data

CRITQUE OF A SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE: OBJECTIVE Participants demonstrate Knowledge of critical study methods that affect the validity of inference The link of study objectives and rationale to study results and conclusion Objective evaluation of strengths and weaknesses of study

FOCI OF THE CRITIQUE Study Objectives and Rationale Study methods -Study design -Sample: who, where, when, how many -Variable Measures

FOCI OF CRITIQUE Study Results -Text consistent with data in tables -Consistent with study methods Study Conclusions -Consistent with objectives -Consistent with findings

EXAMPLES OF STUDIES Study Design Case Control Study of Stillbirths -Stillbirths of all birth weights -Controls: Live births > 2500 grams Sister pairs -Teenage mothers -Mothers in their early 20’s

EXAMPLES OF STUDIES Sample Restrictions Require repeated interviews during pregnancy of high-risk women; very low follow-up -Sample bias versus recall bias Reduce sample by half because of data on gestational age -Sample bias versus measurement bias

EXAMPLES OF STUDIES Timing of measurement of risk factors: hematocrit at delivery Poorly constructed measures of underlying concept: racism Analysis determines results: Longitudinal data on repeated births Text misrepresents data in tables: data sources for measuring drug use

SYNTHESIZING THE LITERATURE: OBJECTIVES Students learn: How to conduct a literature search How to determine the most appropriate criteria for inclusions of studies in a review To succinctly, but comprehensively describe studies Evaluate the evidence Make conclusions about the intervention

LECTURE POINTS Important aspects of study methods Content of a study description Information for doing a search Criteria for selection of studies Selecting the studies to highlight Synthesizing/compiling the evidence

ASSIGNMENTS Topic and selection of studies -Criteria for selecting studies -List of studies Paper presenting the evidence -Description of the intervention -Description of studies and critique -Conclusions about the evidence

EVALUATING LITERATURE FOR POLICY OR PRACTICE OBJECTIVE: Students will show: Ability to evaluate the evidence Ability to determine limits of inferences Ability to translate study findings for programs, practice, and policy

ARTICLE SELECTION Gold standard design? Sample exclusions Appropriate age range? Secondary prevention Clinical interpretations:To whom should the results be applied? Controversial politically

DEBATING THE SCIENCE OBJECTIVES: Students will show: Understanding of the science underlying the debate A balance of the strengths and weaknesses of the science Knowledge of the reasons for policy recommendations

UNIVERSAL BREAST CANCER SCREENING: WOMEN Debate: Pro and Con Hinges on interpretation of studies Requires additional population data Regardless of position, must present in writing both sites; requiring a synthesis of the literature.

BIRTH CERTIFICATE ANALYSIS: OBJECTIVES Student will show: Knowledge of the vital statistics system and its uses Knowledge of data for surveillance and research Knowledge of the constraints in collecting population-based data Knowledge of measurement of items on the certificate

APPROACH TO PAPER Geopolitical area VS System in that area Content of current certificate Recommendations for changes -System of data acquisition -Format of form -Content/measurement of items

TESTING PREPARATION TO UNDERTAKE RESEARCH Take-home exam: Objective: To test student’s ability to: Critically analyze research in their area of interest Synthesize and integrate both concepts and methods learned in course work

Exam: Using 1-2 Research Articles Focus of questions about articles: Conceptual basis of the research -Conceptual framework -Variables and their conceptualization Study methods -Study design -Sampling plan -Statistical analysis

DrPH versus PhD Students DrPH students: -Program, policy or practice implications of the study PhD students: -Research implications of the study