Knowledge Belief and Truth By Prof.Dr Shadia Abd Elkader Prof.Dr Shadia Abd Elkader.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rationalism and empiricism
Advertisements

The Subject-Matter of Ethics
Justified True Belief Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Empiricism on a priori knowledge
Reliabilism and virtue epistemology
Hume’s Problem of Induction 2 Seminar 2: Philosophy of the Sciences Wednesday, 14 September
Descartes’ rationalism
Theory of knowledge Lesson 2
Today’s Outline Hume’s Problem of Induction Two Kinds of Skepticism
René Descartes ( ) Father of modern rationalism. Reason is the source of knowledge, not experience. All our ideas are innate. God fashioned us.
Chapter 1 Critical Thinking.
Epistemology revision Responses: add a ‘no false lemmas’ condition (J+T+B+N) Responses: replace ‘justified’ with ‘reliably formed’ (R+T+B) (reliabilism)
Charting the Terrain of Knowledge-1
© Michael Lacewing Hume’s scepticism Michael Lacewing
Computer Ethics PHILOSOPHICAL BELIEF SYSTEMS Chapter 1 Computer Ethics PHILOSOPHICAL BELIEF SYSTEMS Chapter 1 Hassan Ismail.
RATIONALISM AND EMPIRICISM: KNOWLEDGE EMPIRICISM Epistemology.
The Problems of Knowledge
The tripartite theory of knowledge
Is there a rational basis for the belief in God..
Immanuel Kant Basic Kantian Terms A POSTERIORI (to come after in time): That which follows upon or depends upon sense experience; a knowledge.
Knowledge empiricism Michael Lacewing
Epistemology: the study of the nature, source, limits, & justification of knowledge Rationalism: we truly know only that of which we are certain. Since.
The Problem of Knowledge. What new information would cause you to be less certain? So when we say “I’m certain that…” what are we saying? 3 things you.
Positivism -v- Pragmatism. MMUBS Mres Epistemology, session 4, slide-1 Positivism -v- Pragmatism Is knowledge composed of a correct.
Lecture 7: Ways of Knowing - Reason. Part 1: What is reasoning? And, how does it lead to knowledge?
Epistemology Revision
Positivism -v- Pragmatism. MMUBS Mres Epistemology, session 4, slide-1 Positivism -v- Pragmatism Is knowledge composed of a correct.
The answer really annoys me for 3 reasons: 1.I think the statement is arrogant. It doesn’t take into account any definitions of God but solely focuses.
Theory of Knowledge - An introduction. Real Headlines: Elvis found working as Plumber in Poland Alien base found on dark side of Moon Alien base mysteriously.
KNOWLEDGE What is it? How does it differ from belief? What is the relationship between knowledge and truth? These are the concerns of epistemology How.
Lecture 2: The nature and value of knowledge. Two kinds of knowledge Both philosophy and common sense draw a distinction between knowing how, and knowing.
© Michael Lacewing Reason and experience Michael Lacewing
The Problem of Knowledge 2 Pages Table of Contents Certainty p – Radical doubt p Radical doubt Relativism p Relativism What should.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
 If I were to ask you to define the words “white and cold” what would you say?  If I were to ask you to describe the word “pain” how would you do it?
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 14 Minds and Bodies #3 (Jackson) By David Kelsey.
Lecture 3: The nature of epistemic justification.
Section 2.3 I, Robot Mind as Software McGraw-Hill © 2013 McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights Reserved.
Epistemology ► Area of Philosophy that deals with questions concerning knowledge ► Philosophy of Knowledge.
© Michael Lacewing Hume and Kant Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Man is a credulous animal, and must believe in something. In the absence of good grounds for belief, he will be satisfied with bad ones. -Bertrand Russell.
Epistemology – Study of Knowledge
© Michael Lacewing Kant on conceptual schemes Michael Lacewing osophy.co.uk.
Critical Thinking. Critical thinkers use reasons to back up their claims. What is a claim? ◦ A claim is a statement that is either true or false. It must.
The Nature of Knowledge
A tree falls in a forest but there is no one to hear it, does it make a sound?
KNOWLEDGE IS A PRIORI AND A POSTERIORI By: Fatima Fuad Azeem.
Knowledge rationalism Michael Lacewing
Philosophy of Mind materialism.
The Nature of Knowledge. Thick Concept When a short definition is not enough, it is called a thick concept word. It can only be understood through experience.
Philosophy and Logic The Process of Correct Reasoning.
Chapter 1 What is Biology? 1.1 Science and the Natural World.
Epistemology (How do you know something?)  How do you know your science textbook is true?  How about your history textbook?  How about what your parents.
THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE The nature of knowledge. Knowledge  What is it?  A “Thick Concept”?  How is it different from belief?
Knowledge LO: To understand the distinction between three different types of knowledge. To learn some basic epistemological distinctions. To understand.
Bertrand Russell ( ) From The Problems of Philosophy (1912)  Truth & Falsehood  Knowledge, Error, & Probable Opinion  The Limits of Philosophical.
Philosophy of Science Lars-Göran Johansson Department of philosophy, Uppsala University
Justified True Belief Understand JTB Know the key definitions
Philosophy of Truth A Mr. C Production.
Philosophy of Mathematics 1: Geometry
Descartes’ proof of the external world
Rationalism.
Chapter 3 Philosophy: Questions and theories
Knowledge by Description
Daniel W. Blackmon Theory of Knowledge Coral Gables Senior High
How can I be sure I know something?
Problems with IDR Before the holidays we discussed two problems with the indirect realist view. If we can’t perceive the external world directly (because.
Michael Lacewing What is knowledge?.
Introduction to Epistemology
Epistemology – The study of knowledge
Presentation transcript:

Knowledge Belief and Truth By Prof.Dr Shadia Abd Elkader Prof.Dr Shadia Abd Elkader

Knowledge Epistemology– the area of philosophy that deals with questions concerning knowledge and that considers various theories of knowledgethe area of philosophy that deals with questions concerning knowledge and that considers various theories of knowledge

Types of knowledge Knowledge acquaintanceKnowledge acquaintance Competence knowledgeCompetence knowledge Propositional knowledgePropositional knowledge

Acquaintance Knowledge Acquaintance Knowledge This is a kind of one has of people, places, or things, by virtue of having direct experience with them; in other words, by being "acquainted" with them. This knowledge need not be expressible in sentences. This is a kind of one has of people, places, or things, by virtue of having direct experience with them; in other words, by being "acquainted" with them. This knowledge need not be expressible in sentences.

Examples: Examples: I know my son. I know car. I know my son. I know car.

Knowledge Competence Knowledge Competence This is the kind of knowledge you have when you can do something without necessarily being able to explain how you do it. It is a kind of skill or ability. This is the kind of knowledge you have when you can do something without necessarily being able to explain how you do it. It is a kind of skill or ability.

Example: I know how to ride a bike, even though I cannot explain to anyone else exactly what I am doing (e.g., precisely how I push my feet on the pedals, when I make the very slight corrections to my steering, how I manage to coordinate it all so that I ride in a straight line, etc.) Example: I know how to ride a bike, even though I cannot explain to anyone else exactly what I am doing (e.g., precisely how I push my feet on the pedals, when I make the very slight corrections to my steering, how I manage to coordinate it all so that I ride in a straight line, etc.)

Knowledge Propositional Knowledge Propositional This is knowledge that "such-and- such" is the case. This is the kind of knowledge one has of information and facts. Unlike other kinds of knowledge, it is always specifiable. If I know that humans have walked on the moon, then I can say what it is that I know. In fact, I just did. This is knowledge that "such-and- such" is the case. This is the kind of knowledge one has of information and facts. Unlike other kinds of knowledge, it is always specifiable. If I know that humans have walked on the moon, then I can say what it is that I know. In fact, I just did.

Examples I know that 2+2=4, that my daughter ’ s name is Savannah, and that I graduated from the University of North Carolina. Examples I know that 2+2=4, that my daughter ’ s name is Savannah, and that I graduated from the University of North Carolina.

Knowledge justified as true belief Person S knows that statement p is true if and only if Person S knows that statement p is true if and only if S believes that p is true. S believes that p is true. P is true. P is true. S is sufficiently justified in believing that p is true. S is sufficiently justified in believing that p is true..

As philosophers we should ask "why?" about each of these three conditions. As philosophers we should ask "why?" about each of these three conditions.

Why Does Knowledge Require Belief? Propositional knowledge is always knowledge that "such-and-such." In order to know that "such-and-such, ” one has to have a representation of "such-and-such" in one ’ s mind. But one must also think that “ such-and- such ” is true, else one might just be considering it or imagining it, rather than knowing it. Propositional knowledge is always knowledge that "such-and-such." In order to know that "such-and-such, ” one has to have a representation of "such-and-such" in one ’ s mind. But one must also think that “ such-and- such ” is true, else one might just be considering it or imagining it, rather than knowing it.

A belief is a representation of some statement in our minds that we think is true A belief is a representation of some statement in our minds that we think is true

Sources of Belief Sources of Belief Perception: "I believe that I see a large dog chasing me." Perception: "I believe that I see a large dog chasing me." Memory: "I believe that a large dog chased me yesterday." Memory: "I believe that a large dog chased me yesterday." Testimony: "I believe that this dog does not usually bite." (Because the owners told me. Testimony: "I believe that this dog does not usually bite." (Because the owners told me. Introspection: "I believe that I am afraid of this large dog that is chasing me." Introspection: "I believe that I am afraid of this large dog that is chasing me." Reason: "I believe that either this large dog will bite me or it will not." Reason: "I believe that either this large dog will bite me or it will not."

Why Does Knowledge Require Truth? Why Does Knowledge Require Truth? The answer here is simply that is what we mean by "knowledge." We may be 100% convinced that p is true, and thus that we know it. The answer here is simply that is what we mean by "knowledge." We may be 100% convinced that p is true, and thus that we know it.

But if it turns out that p is false, then we never did know it, we only thought we did But if it turns out that p is false, then we never did know it, we only thought we did

Why Does Knowledge Require Justification Any old belief we hold could be true just by accident. It could be a lucky guess. And beliefs like that don ’ t count as knowledge. Any old belief we hold could be true just by accident. It could be a lucky guess. And beliefs like that don ’ t count as knowledge.

Why Does Knowledge Require Justification? Why Does Knowledge Require Justification? Consider some analogies: Consider some analogies: A pool or basketball shot made by an unskilled player. A pool or basketball shot made by an unskilled player. Scoring a bulls-eye on the firing range when the gun goes off by accident. Scoring a bulls-eye on the firing range when the gun goes off by accident.

When these things happen, you don ’ t give the people credit for having done something worthy or valuable. Same goes when someone makes a lucky guess. When these things happen, you don ’ t give the people credit for having done something worthy or valuable. Same goes when someone makes a lucky guess.

The Issue of Reason and Experience The Issue of Reason and Experience Analytic statements Analytic statements Synthetic statement Synthetic statement priori knowledge priori knowledge A posteriori knowledge A posteriori knowledge

Analytic Statements Analytic Statements An analytic statement has the following properties: An analytic statement has the following properties: Its truth or falsity is determined solely by the meaning of its terms, and Its truth or falsity is determined solely by the meaning of its terms, and even if it is true, it does not give us any real, factual information about the world. even if it is true, it does not give us any real, factual information about the world. 

A Priori Knowledge A Priori Knowledge A Priori Statement: A statement that can be known independently of any particular experience of the world. It is discoverable by reason (and language) alone. A Priori Statement: A statement that can be known independently of any particular experience of the world. It is discoverable by reason (and language) alone. 2+2 =4 2+2 =4 All pediatricians are doctors. All pediatricians are doctors. A Priori Knowledge: Knowledge of an a priori statement. A Priori Knowledge: Knowledge of an a priori statement.

Synthetic Statements A synthetic statement has the following properties: A synthetic statement has the following properties: Its truth or falsity is not determined solely by the meaning of its terms, and Its truth or falsity is not determined solely by the meaning of its terms, and it does make a factual claim about the way the world is. it does make a factual claim about the way the world is.

Posteriori Knowledge(Empirical) A A A Posteriori Statement: A statement that cannot be known without some experience of the world. it is not discoverable by reason (and language) alone. A Posteriori Statement: A statement that cannot be known without some experience of the world. it is not discoverable by reason (and language) alone. Some swans have white feathers. Some swans have white feathers. Copper conducts electricity better than rubber does. Copper conducts electricity better than rubber does. A Posteriori Knowledge: Knowledge of an a posteriori statement. A Posteriori Knowledge: Knowledge of an a posteriori statement.

Three Epistemological Questions Is it possible to have knowledge at all? Is it possible to have knowledge at all? Does reason provide us with knowledge of the world independently of experience? Does reason provide us with knowledge of the world independently of experience? Does our knowledge represent reality as it really is? Does our knowledge represent reality as it really is?