SCAR Feature Type Catalogue

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reference Model Ideas. Geospatial Semantics and Ontology Reference Model Metadata Data Sources Underlying Ontologies Semantic and Ontology Services Ontology.
Advertisements

Status Report XVII. SCAR, Shanghai, July 2002 Steffen Vogt IPG University of Freiburg Status Report XVII. SCAR, Shanghai, July 2002 Steffen Vogt IPG University.
Australian NADC 1st August 2010 Kim Finney (Manager, Australian Antarctic Data Centre & Chief Officer, SCAR Standing Committee on Antarctic Data Management)
Glenn Johnstone / John ManningAGS 2002, Wellington, New Zealand Report on Geodetic Control Database project activities (since XXVII SCAR July 2002)
The New online Scar Map Catalogue Australian Antarctic Data Centre Australian Antarctic Division.
A Roadmap of Open Source components for GI Web Services and Clients A Paul R Cooper MAGIC.
SCAGI Community Projects SCAR map catalogue Total 5850 maps - 26 countries 767 digital maps (722 Australia) UK 801 Argentina 97 Uruguay 2 Poland 1 France.
United Nations Spatial Data Infrastructure Dr Kristin Stock Social Change Online and Centre for Geospatial Science, University of Nottingham.
Page 1 © Crown copyright 2005 Workshop on Metadata Beijing27-29 September Report on Metadata Gil Ross (Met Office UK) WIS Working Group Geneva.
S-100 The IHO Geospatial Standard for Hydrographic Data 1st CHRIS / MSDIWG Meeting IHB, Monaco 4 – 5 February 2008.
Office of Coast Survey IHO S-100 and S st Century Framework Data Structure for Hydrographic and Related Data.
Alexandria Digital Library Project Integration of Knowledge Organization Systems into Digital Library Architectures Linda Hill, Olha Buchel, Greg Janée.
Architectures for Data Access Services Practical considerations for design of discoverable, reusable interoperable data sources.
Design and Development of Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (Areas 1 & 4) College of Engineering University of Tehran.
Activities for ISO/TC series standards in China Jiang Jingtong National Geomatics Center of China
OneGeology-Europe - the first step to the European Geological SDI INSPIRE Conference 2010, Session Thematic Communities: Geology Krakow, June 24 th 2010.
SwissEx WIKI. Motivation for WIKI re-use of measurements –collaborative effort –semantics organization of measurements –temporal and spatial reference.
A Registry for controlled vocabularies at the Library of Congress
Session 1: Introduction to Geospatial Standards Why do we care about standards? Agreement on syntax, information models and interfaces lets us share information.
New ways to geo-reference and classify spatial data in Annex II & III data specifications Clemens Portele interactive instruments GmbH Drafting Team „Data.
ISO Standards: Status, Tools, Implementations, and Training Standards/David Danko.
Managing Data Interoperability with FME Tony Kent Applications Engineer IMGS.
GSSG - GIG Geospatial Information Group Standardizing Antarctica – a challenge for the SCAR Geospatial Information Group Steffen Vogt (IPG University Freiburg.
ASIACOVER Spatial Database Engine Based on GeoNetwork OpenSource Technology.
Oy Metadata Content j of Metadata. Discovery Access Understanding Levels of Metadata joy of Metadata Metadata Standards Why standards Which standards.
ALKIS-ATKIS modelling using ISO standards Workshop “Standards in action” – Lisbon – Clemens Portele interactive instruments GmbH Trierer.
Metadata Understanding the Value and Importance of Proper Data Documentation Exercise 2 Reading a Metadata File Exercise 3 Using the Workbook Exercise.
Workshop Standards in Action, Lisbon
An Experiment on Spatial Data Exchange May 22, 2002 SAIJO, Yuuki (Geographical Survey Institute Japan) ISO/TC211 Workshop on Standards.
Classification and the Metadata Registry Judith Newton NIST IRS XML Stakeholders/ XML Working Group May 18, 2004.
1 The NERC DataGrid DataGrid The NERC DataGrid DataGrid AHM 2003 – 2 Sept, 2003 e-Science Centre Metadata of the NERC DataGrid Kevin O’Neill CCLRC e-Science.
Nancy Lawler U.S. Department of Defense ISO/IEC Part 2: Classification Schemes Metadata Registries — Part 2: Classification Schemes The revision.
Metadata and Geographical Information Systems Adrian Moss KINDS project, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK
A Temporal Quiz ” I’m the beginning of the end. You see me twice in a week, but not in a day. Once in a year, but twice in a decade. What am I ?”
Page 1 LAITS Laboratory for Advanced Information Technology and Standards ISO & Status Liping Di Laboratory for Advanced Information Technology.
1 Schema Registries Steven Hughes, Lou Reich, Dan Crichton NASA 21 October 2015.
Linking research & learning technologies through standards 1 Lyle Winton lylejw AT unimelb.edu.au.
Rupa Tiwari, CSci5980 Fall  Course Material Classification  GIS Encyclopedia Articles  Classification Diagram  Course – Encyclopedia Mapping.
XIth International Congress for Mathematical Geology - September 3-8, 2006 – Liège, Belgium Contribution of GeoScienceML to the INSPIRE data harmonisation.
Metadata – use data discovery e.g. a library catalog data assessment determine the fitness-for-purpose of a data set data retrieval e.g., format.
GIS data sources; catalogs of data and services. USGS: National Mapping.
The data standards soup … Is the most exciting topic you can dream of.
SCORM Course Meta-data 3 major components: Content Aggregation Meta-data –context specific data describing the packaged course SCO Meta-data –context independent.
RSISIPL1 SERVICE ORIENTED ARCHITECTURE (SOA) By Pavan By Pavan.
19-October th FIG Regional Conference, Hanoi Developing Vietnam’s Cadastral Data Standards based on ISO
ESDI Workshop on Conceptual Schema Languages and Tools
WIGOS Data model – standards introduction.
Slide 1 SDTSSDTS FGDC CWG SDTS Revision Project ANSI INCITS L1 Project to Update SDTS FGDC CWG September 2, 2003.
Public Access and Spatial Metadata Values: Semantic Network Services Response to EU Directives Maria Rüther Federal Environment Agency,
NESC Worshop – 07 September 2005 Development of a Marine Metadata Standard Greg Reed Executive Officer Australian Ocean Data Centre Joint Facility.
GeoSciML meeting April 24th-28th 2006 INSPIRE Drafting teams.
MSG Reuse Catalog T.W. van den Berg 7 April 2010.
Part of the Cronos Group 4C/kZen 4 th EcoTerm meeting, Vienna, April 18, 2007 Jef Vanbockryck Research & Development “Risk Assessment ontologies and data.
EbRIM Profile of CS/W 17-JUL-2007 Presented by: Panagiotis (Peter) A. Vretanos, CubeWerx Inc.
Introduction to Metadata March 2016 What is Metadata?
IPDA Architecture Project International Planetary Data Alliance IPDA Architecture Project Report.
Geospatial metadata Prof. Wenwen Li School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning 5644 Coor Hall
IPDA Registry Definitions Project Dan Crichton Pedro Osuna Alain Sarkissian.
OGP Seabed Survey Data Model (SSDM)
GeoNetwork OpenSource: Geographic data sharing for everyone
Ontology based Collection Discovery
Wsdl.
The Re3gistry software and the INSPIRE Registry
Application of Dublin Core and XML/RDF standards in the KIKERES
Session 2: Metadata and Catalogues
IHO PORTRAYAL REGISTRY
Proposal of a Geographic Metadata Profile for WISE
Taxonomy of public services
Australian and New Zealand Metadata Working Group
WISE and INSPIRE By Albrecht Wirthmann, GISCO, Eurostat
Presentation transcript:

SCAR Feature Type Catalogue Henk Brolsma / Ursula Ryan – Australian Antarctic Division Steffen Vogt – University Freiburg - Germany

Chronology Tokyo 2000 - XXVI SCAR Siena 2001 – Project Coordinators Hobart 2002 – Australia / Germany Shanghai 2002 – XXVII SCAR At the Tokyo meeting in 2000 it was agreed that one of WG-GGIs goals was: To develop a SCAR standard Spatial Data Model for use in SCAR and national GIS databases. The Project leader was Australia with collaborators UK, Germany and Chile. At the Sienna meeting in 2001, a draft was presented and accepted by the SCAR committee members for consideration. SCAR funding was sought for Steffen Vogt to travel to Australia to assist in the development and editing of the draft model. Steffen has been in Hobart for three weeks working on the development with Ursula and Henk The name of the Catalogue will be the “Feature Type Catalogue” as this name is compliant with ISO standards.

AIMS Project Scope of the model Review ISO standards Produce and distribute draft Publish as SCAR standard The project aims were to: 1. determine the scope of the model (content and application of the SDM) and incorporate map symbology into the data dictionary 2.Review ISO TC211 and other relevant standards 3.Produce and distribute a draft SDM for comment 4.Publish as a SCAR standard

Feature Type Catalogue Definition A feature catalogue is a catalogue containing definitions and descriptions of the feature types, feature attributes and feature associations occurring in one or more sets of geographic data, together with any feature operations that may be applied - ISO 19110 DEFINITION – ISO 19110 – Feature Cataloguing Methodology A feature catalogue is a catalogue containing definitions and descriptions of the feature types, feature attributes and feature associations occurring in one or more sets of geographic data, together with any feature operations that may be applied - ISO 19110 In developing the Feature Type Catalogue, it became obvious that the Structure of the catalogue and Definitions of Features would be critical elements as they determine the ability to share data from various data sources. They also dictate how symbology maybe created.

STANDARDS ISO Standards 19110 Feature cataloguing 19111 Spatial referencing by coordinates 19112 Spatial referencing by geographic identifiers 19113 Quality principles 19114 Quality Evaluation ISO standards There are approximately 35 ISO standards relating to metadata, data quality, spatial schemas, spatial referencing, web map server interfaces and registration of . The ISO standards that we have taken into consideration in developing the Feature Type catalogue are: 19110 Feature cataloguing 19111 Spatial referencing by coordinate 19112 Spatial referencing by geographic identifiers 19113 Quality principles 19114 Quality Evaluation

Definitions Definitions Structure Symbology Definitions If data is to be shared then we must first agree on the definitions of features. If features have different definitions then it is like trying to compare apples and pears. Definitions must be derived from internationally accepted sources such as the GEMET and GCMD thesaurus. GEMET - A thesaurus developed by the European Commission. GEMET is the General Multilingual Environmental Thesaurus (GEMET) that has been created by merging different national and international thesauri. UNEP is also using this thesaurus. The thesaurus is multilingual and would be very useful for this group to use – languages used are American, English, Bulgarian, Danish, Finish, German, Netherlands, Norwegian, Sweden, Russian, French, Greek, Italian, Portuguese, Spain, Hungary, Slovakia, American. SCAR features All features will be coded so that it would not be difficult to translate from western languages to eastern languages. Codes will not be structured in any way, they will be used purely as unique identifiers and will be assigned by the computer. Structure The Feature Type catalogue is object oriented with a flat structure. This structure allows the information to more readily shared with other data sources. When considering scientific data such as vegetation and invertebrates we have to take into consideration how the data is described in the SCAR Biodiversity data base – GGI must describe the data in the same way as it is described in that database. For example we have used generic terms to describe the vegetation – vegetation type or plant species. Birds In the case of Birds – flying birds or penquins. Symbology It is important at this stage in the development of the FTC to ensure that we attach to the features the correct and necessary attribute information so that these can be used to develop the symbology for use in digital and hard copy maps. Provided the feature definition and its attributes are correct the FTC can be used to search for features and symbols assigned to them for depicting at various scales. Janet Thomson from BAS has done a great deal of work on symbology and the definitions of features. This work will be incorporated into the Feature Type Catalogue in the next stage of development.

Quality ISO 19113 Quality principles ISO 19114 Quality evaluation Purpose describing quality Quality Attributes Quality Attributes To comply with ISO standards it is essential that attributes which describe the quality of the data in the Feature Type Catalogue be included in the data description. ISO standard 19113 on quality principles states: “Geographic datasets are increasingly being shared, interchanged and used for purposes other than their producers’ intended ones. Information about the quality of available geographic datasets is vital to the process of selecting a dataset in that the value of data is directly related to its quality.” “The purpose of describing the quality of geographic data is to facilitate the selection of the geographic dataset best suited to application needs or requirements. Complete descriptions of the quality of a dataset will encourage the sharing, interchange and use of appropriate geographic datasets..” 19114 “For the purpose of evaluating the quality of a dataset, clearly defined procedures must be used in a consistent manner. This enables data producers to express how well their product meets the criteria set forth in its product specification and data users to establish the extent to which a dataset meets their needs.” The quality evaluation procedure described in this International Standard (19114) when applied in accordance with ISO 19113, provides a consistent and standard manner to determine and report a dataset’s quality information” This International Standard also establishes a framework for evaluating and reporting data quality results either as part of data quality metadata only or also as a quality evaluation report” Purpose From ISO standards 19113 and 19114 the purpose of describing the data quality becomes quiet obvious – use of data, evaluating data, sharing data etc.,

Component Model Organisations And People Data Repository Applications Interface Applications Search Species Taxonomy Interface Data Repository Observables Dictionary Search Ontologies Register (using keywords) This shows the actual “components” of a SCAR distributed data network. Existing example components of the SCAR data network include: Antarctic Digital Database, RiSCC Biodiversity Database, KGIS database, Antarctic Masterdirectory (the SCAR Metadata Catalogue), SCAR Composite Gazetteer, SCAR Map Catalogue, etc. A variety of applications rely on the interoperability of these components. A simple example would be retrieving penguin census data using a search based on the name of the penguin colony. This involves the gazetteer, a spatial database (such as ADD or KGIS) and the RiSCC Biodiversity Database. A more complex application is the Cybercartographic Project of Antarctica Project. A crucial component in the data network is the Feature Type Catalogue. Key thing is that the Feature Type Catalogue is itself a living service, used to classify data and access services, but also within applications to locate services. Definition Ontology: An ontology formally defines a common set of terms that are used to describe and represent a domain. Ontologies can be used by automated tools to power advanced services such as more accurate Web search, intelligent software agents and knowledge management. Feature Type Catalogue Services Catalogue Symbology Metadata Catalogue Map Catalogue Keywords Catalogs

Data Model: Services This graph shows that SCAR Map Catalogue, the Antarctic Masterdirectory, the SCAR gazetteer can all be regarded as online sevices. The relationships from top down are basically specialisations. Note the two cases of multiple inheritance: Gazetteer and Feature Type Catalog. Ontology services support polyhierarchical browsing, an key feature to more intelligent applications. The Feature Type Catalogue is not just a vocabulary – because Feature Types have complex structures defined (attributes, operations and relationships), thus the Feature Type Catalogue can be used as catalaogue service and as an ontology service as well.

Data Model : Feature Types Example Feature The SCAR Feature is derived from the ISO Feature. This ensures ISO compliance. Each feature has attributes, a pointer to metadata (incl. data quality), and one or more geometries. The geometry includes the spatial reference. Definitions: Geographic Features real world phenomena with a location relative to the earth about which data are collected, maintained, and disseminated Feature instance a discrete phenomenon that is associated with its geographic and temporal coordinates (Scott’s hut) Feature type classes of feature instances with common properties (a hut) Feature Type Definitions

Building (attribute:type=“Hut”, beds=3) Strong or Weak Typing Is a feature best described as: GeneralFeature (attribute:type=“Hut”) Or Building (attribute:type=“Hut”, beds=3) Hut (beds=3) 3 Bed Hut “Granularity” depends on usage requirements The granularity is driven by user requirements and data management requirements.

Feature Type Catalogue Code: unique - arbitrarily assigned - simple idenfication - facilitates documentation of changes Definition: - should be applicable to Antarctic applications should be commonly accepted - preferably already established in the respective community External Definition Sources - GEMET (multilingual, UNEP) - other SCAR projects - IHO ... Name: - unique Feature Attributes can by - mandatory, - conditional (mandatory if applicable) optional general Attributes include - geometry (incl. the spatial reference system) pointer to metadata (incl. data quality) pointer to SCAR Gazetteer

+ Symbology Portrayal a function of Feature Type … + attributes E.g. Building (function=Hospital) Feature Type Catalogue used to classify entries in symbol libraries Symbol sets shared + Portrayal (symbology) is linked to the Feature Type Catalogue, but can be regarded as a catalogue service in its own right. With this approach symbol sets can be shared across the web (OGC uses Styled Layer Descriptor XML or GML->SVG stylesheets)

Advantages ISO compliant Common and consistent semantics Features have common structure Easy to link to portrayal schemes (symbology) Easy to create GML schema Feature Type Catalogue can be used as a classification vocabulary Fits into the bigger picture of distributed data networks

SCAR Spatial Data Model it’s a dynamic document model@aad.gov.au http://www-aadc.aad.gov.au/gis/model/ The SCAR Feature Type Catalogue is a dynamic document and continually evolving. Comments should be directed to model@aad.gov.au.