New York State 2013 Grades 3-8 Common Core Mathematics Rubric and Scoring Site Training.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing constructed response items
Advertisements

FCAT Extended Response
New York State’s Teacher and Principal Evaluation System VOLUME I: NYSED APPR PLAN SUBMISSION “TIPS”
 The EQAO assessment will take place June 11 th and 12 th.  The EQAO assessment based on the Grade 9 expectations of The Ontario Curriculum.  The EQAO.
Time estimate: 2 minutes Introduce the presenters.
Assessment Literacy Series 1 -Module 4- Scoring Keys and Rubrics.
Scoring Open-Ended Literacy Items
Holistic Scoring in Social Studies Curriculum, Instruction, and Instructional Technology Team New York State Education Department Albany, NY 2005.
New York State 2013 Grades 3-8 Common Core Mathematics Rubric and Scoring Turnkey Training.
Data often can be represented by a scatter plot. Lots of the time, we are interested in finding out the rate of change, aka slope, whether it be a decrease.
Warm-up : Copy and answer the following questions: Define a variable and write an equation to model the situation: 1. The total price is the number of.
EngageNY.org Scoring the Regents Examination in Algebra I (Common Core)
KPIs: Definition and Real Examples
New York State 2013 Grades 3-8 Common Core Mathematics Rubric and Scoring Turnkey Training Video 12: Guide Papers for 6 th Grade Three Point Question.
NYS Assessment Information Update Sachem Elementary Teachers K-5
TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER SCHOOL OF PHARMACY KRYSTAL K. HAASE, PHARM.D., FCCP, BCPS ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR BEYOND MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS.
Learning Target Four “ I can plan meaningful success
SCORING. INTRODUCTION & PURPOSE Define what SCORING means for the purpose of these modules Explain how and why you should use well-designed tools, such.
Holistic Scoring: The Grade 8 Intermediate- Level Social Studies Test Curriculum, Instruction, and Instructional Technology Team New York State Education.
Task 4 Mathematics Boot Camp Fall, 2015.
Video 9: 3-Point Holistic Rubric
Mathematics How will Instructional Shifts demanded of the Common Core learning standards support our children when taking state exams? CFN609.
Student Work Example(3 rd grader) – Yakelin Burnau.
1 Focusing on the FCAT Test-Taking Strategies Grades 3-5 Nancy E. Brito, Department of Assessment , PX47521 Information.
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
How to Evaluate Student Papers Fairly and Consistently.
EDU 385 Education Assessment in the Classroom
Protocols for Mathematics Performance Tasks PD Protocol: Preparing for the Performance Task Classroom Protocol: Scaffolding Performance Tasks PD Protocol:
Chronological Order LA. A The student constructs meaning from a wide range of texts.
Critical Issues in Mathematics Education 2013: Assessment of Mathematical Proficiencies in the Age of the Common Core Summary of MSRI Workshop.
ASSESSING STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Using Multiple Measures Prepared by Dean Gilbert, Science Consultant Los Angeles County Office of Education.
Warm-up Review of Sample free- response from A.P. Statistics A scatterplot demonstrates the positive correlation between the number of churches and the.
EQAO Assessments and Rangefinding
New York State 2013 Grades 3-8 Common Core ELA. Instructional Shifts 2 Shift 1 Balancing Informational & Literary Text.
WHAT IS BCR and EC R BCR – basic constructed response ECR – extended constructed response.
Summer Scoring Training Smarter Balanced Mathematics Deborah J. Bryant September 18, 2015.
New York State 2013 Grades 3-8 Common Core Mathematics Rubric and Scoring Turnkey Training Video 7: Guide Papers for 8 th Grade Two Point Question.
Changes to end of Key Stage assessment arrangements. Monday, November 16 th 2015.
1 Focusing on the FCAT Test-Taking Strategies Grades 6-8 Nancy E. Brito, Department of Assessment , PX47521
1 Focusing on the FCAT Test-Taking Strategies Grades 9-11 Nancy E. Brito, Department of Assessment , PX47521
Key Stage 2 SATs Information and Guidance on the Changes and Expectations for 2015/16 A School Presentation to Parents.
Using Multiple Measures ASSESSING STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT.
The New Face of Assessment in the Common Core Wake County Public Schools Common Core Summer Institute August 6, 2013.
Reviewing, Revising and Writing Effective Constructed- Response Mathematics Items 1 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content.
KS2 SATs Presentation to parents 20 th April 2016.
Chapter 6 Assessing Science Learning Updated Spring 2012 – D. Fulton.
An Overview of Georgia Milestones 4 th Grade Parent Involvement.
Characteristics of HSAP Standards based Standards based 62 Multiple Choice items (1 point each for a total of 62 points) 62 Multiple Choice items (1 point.
April 2011 Division of Academics, Performance and Support Office of Assessment High School Testing – Scoring Best Practices May 24, 2011 CFN 201.
New York State 2013 Grades 3-8 Common Core Mathematics Rubric and Scoring Turnkey Training Video 5: Guide Papers for 6 th Grade Two Point Question.
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
An Overview of the EQuIP Rubric for Lessons & Units
Taking the TEAM Approach: Writing with a Purpose
Internal assessment criteria
Task 4 Mathematics Boot Camp Fall, 2016.
SATs Information Evening
Video 3: Scoring Policies and
Video 4: 2-Point Holistic Rubric
Video 1: Instructional Shifts
Video 2: Holistic Scoring
Video 8: Practice Papers for
An Overview of the EQuIP Rubric for Lessons & Units
Video 6: Practice Papers for
Video 11: Practice Papers for 4th Grade
Creating Open-Ended Questions
Video 13: Guide Papers for 6th Grade
Scoring On-Demand Writing
NEA and AFT Item Review Boot Camp Working Session: Mathematics
Creating Open-Ended Questions ERPD October 31, 2012
What is a Performance Task
Presentation transcript:

New York State 2013 Grades 3-8 Common Core Mathematics Rubric and Scoring Site Training

Housekeeping and Logistics Site specific information: breaks, lunch arrangements, restrooms Review role of table/room facilitators Review that hotline calls need to go through site coordinators (coordinators may have trainer or facilitator call but need to be informed of call and content) Process for site Expectations for work until the job is completed Parking Lot for comments/questions 2

Reflection of the Shifts in the Test Questions When we compare the tests from the past with the present, we see that: Questions from previous tests were simpler, one or two steps, or were heavily scaffolded. The new questions will requires multiple steps involving the interpretation of operations. Questions from the past were heavy on pure fluency in isolation. The new questions require conceptual understanding and fluency in order to complete test questions. Questions from past tests isolated the math. The new problems are in a real world problem context. Questions of old relied more on the rote use of a standard algorithm for finding answers to problems. The new questions require students to do things like decompose numbers and/or shapes, apply properties of numbers, and with the information given in the problem reach an answer. Relying solely on algorithms will not be sufficient. 3

The New Math 2- and 3-point Holistic Rubrics and Scoring Policies 4

Our Goals Define holistic scoring and how it differs from typical grading. Review the rubrics/scoring policies and sample student responses in detail: – 2-point holistic rubric – 3-point holistic rubric – Scoring policies – Review approved guide responses Practice scoring student examples. 5

Holistic Scoring 6

Holistic scoring assigns a single, overall test score for a response as a whole. The single score reflects the level of understanding the student demonstrates in the response. To score holistically, you must look at the entire response, rather than evaluating the parts or individual attributes separately. A response may have some attributes of adjacent score points, but you must assign the score that best describes the response as a whole – the “best fit” score. 7

Holistic Scoring (Continued) When scoring holistically: Read thoroughly to assess the level of understanding demonstrated. Assign the score that best reflects the level of understanding the response demonstrates. Keep in mind that some errors may detract from the level of understanding demonstrated and other errors may not detract. Compare each response to the rubric and training papers. 8

Scoring versus Grading Scoring a state test is quite different from grading classroom papers. Scoring – A response is assessed based on the demonstrated level of understanding and how it compares to the rubric and training papers. Grading – Individual errors are totaled to determine the grade assigned. 9

Scoring versus Grading (Continued) Remember: You are scoring, not grading. Set aside your own grading practices while scoring. Determine scores based only on the work in the student booklet, using state standards—not classroom standards—to score responses accurately, fairly, and consistently. 10

Guarding Against Scoring Biases Appearance of response The quality of the handwriting, the use of cursive or printing, margins, editing marks, cross-outs, and overall neatness are not part of the scoring criteria. 11 Response Length Many factors can contribute to how long or short a response appears to be, including size and style of the handwriting, spacing, or placement on the page. As you score, follow the standards of the guide papers and rubric rather than being influenced by the length of the response. If the response fulfills the requirements defined by the guide for a specific score point, it should receive that score.

Guarding Against Scoring Biases (Continued) Response Organization Some responses will seem haphazardly or illogically organized. For many of these responses, however, the necessary work is present and can be followed. Your responsibility is to carefully examine such responses to determine whether the necessary steps and information are included. Alternate Approaches Students may use unique or unusual–yet acceptable–methods to solve mathematical problems. They may use methods not covered in training materials or not familiar to you as a scorer. Be sure to objectively evaluate all approaches based on the scoring standards, and ask your table leader if you have questions. 12

Short-response (2-point) Rubric and Scoring Policies 13

14 Mathematics 2-point Holistic Rubric Score PointDescription 2 PointsA two-point response answers the question correctly. This response  demonstrates a thorough understanding of the mathematical concepts but may contain errors that do not detract from the demonstration of understanding  indicates that the student has completed the task correctly, using mathematically sound procedures 1 PointA one-point response is only partially correct. This response  indicates that the student has demonstrated only a partial understanding of the mathematical concepts and/or procedures in the task  correctly addresses some elements of the task  may contain an incorrect solution but applies a mathematically appropriate process  may contain correct numerical answer(s) but required work is not provided 0 PointsA zero-point response is incorrect, irrelevant, incoherent, or contains a correct response arrived using an obviously incorrect procedure. Although some parts may contain correct mathematical procedures, holistically they are not sufficient to demonstrate even a limited understanding of the mathematical concepts embodied in the task. 14

15 Mathematics 2-point Holistic Rubric (Continued) Score PointDescription 2 PointsA two-point response answers the question correctly. This response  demonstrates a thorough understanding of the mathematical concepts but may contain errors that do not detract from the demonstration of understanding  indicates that the student has completed the task correctly, using mathematically sound procedures 15

16 Mathematics 2-point Holistic Rubric (Continued) Score PointDescription 1 PointA one-point response is only partially correct. This response  indicates that the student has demonstrated only a partial understanding of the mathematical concepts and/or procedures in the task  correctly addresses some elements of the task  may contain an incorrect solution but applies a mathematically appropriate process  may contain correct numerical answer(s) but required work is not provided 16

17 Mathematics 2-point Holistic Rubric (Continued) Score PointDescription 0 PointsA zero-point response is incorrect, irrelevant, incoherent, or contains a correct response arrived using an obviously incorrect procedure. Although some parts may contain correct mathematical procedures, holistically they are not sufficient to demonstrate even a limited understanding of the mathematical concepts embodied in the task. 17

18 2- and 3-point Mathematics Scoring Policies Below are the policies to be followed while scoring the mathematics tests for all grades: 1. If a student does the work in other than a designated “Show your work” area, that work should still be scored. (Additional paper is an allowable accommodation for a student with disabilities if indicated on the student’s Individualized Education Program or Section 504 Accommodation Plan.) 2. If the question requires students to show their work, and the student shows appropriate work and clearly identifies a correct answer but fails to write that answer in the answer blank, the student should still receive full credit. 3. If the question requires students to show their work, and the student shows appropriate work and arrives at the correct answer but writes an incorrect answer in the answer blank, the student should not receive full credit. 4. In questions that provide ruled lines for students to write an explanation of their work, mathematical work shown elsewhere on the page should be considered and scored. 5. If the student provides one legible response (and one response only), teachers should score the response, even if it has been crossed out. 18

19 2- and 3-point Mathematics Scoring Policies (Continued) 6. If the student has written more than one response but has crossed some out, teachers should score only the response that has not been crossed out. 7. Trial-and-error responses are not subject to Scoring Policy #6 above, since crossing out is part of the trial-and-error process. 8. If a response shows repeated occurrences of the same conceptual error within a question, the student should not be penalized more than once. 9. In questions that require students to provide bar graphs: In Grades 3 and 4 only, touching bars are acceptable. In Grades 3 and 4 only, space between bars does not need to be uniform. In all grades, widths of the bars must be consistent. In all grades, bars must be aligned with their labels. In all grades, scales must begin at zero (0), but the 0 does not need to be written. 19

20 2- and 3-point Mathematics Scoring Policies (Continued) 10. In questions requiring number sentences, the number sentences must be written horizontally. 11. In pictographs, the student is permitted to use a symbol other than the one in the key, provided that the symbol is used consistently in the pictograph; the student does not need to change the symbol in the key. The student may not, however, use multiple symbols within the chart, nor may the student change the value of the symbol in the key. 12. If students are not directed to show work, any work shown will not be scored. This applies to items that do not ask for any work and items that ask for work for one part and do not ask for work in another part. 20

Q&A 21

Short-response (2-point) Sample Question Guide Set 22

Q&A 23

Extended-response (3-point) Rubric 24

25 Mathematics 3-point Holistic Rubric Score PointDescription 3 Points A three-point response answers the question correctly. This response  demonstrates a thorough understanding of the mathematical concepts but may contain errors that do not detract from the demonstration of understanding  indicates that the student has completed the task correctly, using mathematically sound procedures 2 Points A two-point response is partially correct. This response  demonstrates partial understanding of the mathematical concepts and/or procedures embodied in the task  addresses most aspects of the task, using mathematically sound procedures  may contain an incorrect solution but provides complete procedures, reasoning, and/or explanations  may reflect some misunderstanding of the underlying mathematical concepts and/or procedures 1 Point A one-point response is incomplete and exhibits many flaws but is not completely incorrect. This response  demonstrates only a limited understanding of the mathematical concepts and/or procedures embodied in the task  may address some elements of the task correctly but reaches an inadequate solution and/or provides reasoning that is faulty or incomplete  exhibits multiple flaws related to misunderstanding of important aspects of the task, misuse of mathematical procedures, or faulty mathematical reasoning  reflects a lack of essential understanding of the underlying mathematical concepts  may contain correct numerical answer(s) but required work is not provided 0 Points A zero-point response is incorrect, irrelevant, incoherent, or contains a correct response arrived at using an obviously incorrect procedure. Although some parts may contain correct mathematical procedures, holistically they are not sufficient to demonstrate even a limited understanding of the mathematical concepts embodied in the task. 25

26 Mathematics 3-point Holistic Rubric (Continued) Score PointDescription 3 Points A three-point response answers the question correctly. This response  demonstrates a thorough understanding of the mathematical concepts but may contain errors that do not detract from the demonstration of understanding  indicates that the student has completed the task correctly, using mathematically sound procedures 26

27 Mathematics 3-point Holistic Rubric (Continued) Score PointDescription 2 Points A two-point response is partially correct. This response  demonstrates partial understanding of the mathematical concepts and/or procedures embodied in the task  addresses most aspects of the task, using mathematically sound procedures  may contain an incorrect solution but provides complete procedures, reasoning, and/or explanations  may reflect some misunderstanding of the underlying mathematical concepts and/or procedures 27

28 Mathematics 3-point Holistic Rubric (Continued) Score PointDescription 1 Point A one-point response is incomplete and exhibits many flaws but is not completely incorrect. This response  demonstrates only a limited understanding of the mathematical concepts and/or procedures embodied in the task  may address some elements of the task correctly but reaches an inadequate solution and/or provides reasoning that is faulty or incomplete  exhibits multiple flaws related to misunderstanding of important aspects of the task, misuse of mathematical procedures, or faulty mathematical reasoning  reflects a lack of essential understanding of the underlying mathematical concepts  may contain correct numerical answer(s) but required work is not provided 28

29 Mathematics 3-point Holistic Rubric (Continued) Score PointDescription 0 Points A zero-point response is incorrect, irrelevant, incoherent, or contains a correct response arrived at using an obviously incorrect procedure. Although some parts may contain correct mathematical procedures, holistically they are not sufficient to demonstrate even a limited understanding of the mathematical concepts embodied in the task. 29

Q&A 30

Extended-response (3-point) Sample Question Guide Set 31

Q&A 32

Summary Holistic scoring 2-point and 3-point holistic rubrics and scoring policies Practice scoring two 2-point and two 3-point student responses Training example 33

Resources For questions related to assessment: – your question to: – Check for additional information at the following website For questions related to APPR – your question to: Additional information regarding the common core shifts can be found at the following website: –