Seminar Reykjavik September 2005 1 European Collaboration Practical experiences of running a project with DG SANCO funding Meeting Public Health Institute.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Education Reform Initiative of South Eastern Europe-an instrument for regional cooperation Towards a European Qualification Framework for Lifelong.
Advertisements

Financing of OAS Activities Sources of cooperation Cooperation modalities Cooperation actors Specific Funds management models and resources mobilization.
The Managing Authority –Keystone of the Control System
EuropeAid PARTICIPATORY SESSION 2: Managing contract/Managing project… Question 1 : What do you think are the expectations and concerns of the EC task.
Report on Inclusive Growth Pillar work
1 NECOBELAC Project WORK PACKAGE 3 Cross-national advocacy infrastructure.
HIV in Europe Stockholm, 3.November 2009 Communication on combating HIV/AIDS in the EU and the neighbourhood - strategy and second action plan ( )
1-1 PRESENTER The Role of the Framework 7 Advisor Your Name Your Websites Websites
Cyprus Project Management Society
Identification of critical success factors for implementing NLLS, through collaboration and exchange of expertise IDENTIFY LLP-2008-RO-KA1-KA1NLLS.
EU Wetland conservation policy. Communication on the Wise Use and Conservation of Wetlands (1995) => first European document dedicated exclusively.
Towards an Inclusive Migration Health Framework: A Large Urban Perspective by Dr. Sheela Basrur Medical Officer of Health Toronto Public Health.
Welcome to the TC Rainbow Show Brasov, 20 October 2005 European YOUTH Programme.
The implementation of the rural development policy and its impacts on innovation and modernisation of rural economy Christian Vincentini, European Commission.
SOCRATES II Second Phase of the Community action programme in the field of education “SOCRATES” 1.
INTERIM MEETING/ VIENNA NEXT STEPS in the PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION.
Ministry of Education and Religious Affairs General Secretariat for Research and Technology EEA Financial Mechanism Research within Priority.
European Public Health Alliance Agnese Knabe Project coordinator European Public Health Alliance Civic Alliance – Latvia “Strengthening the networking.
1 ENISA’s contribution to the development of Network and Information Security within the Community By Andrea PIROTTI Executive Director ENISA Cyprus, 28.
Overview of ERF, EIF & RF AP th August 2013 Amanda Borg Funds and Programmes Division, MEAIM General Programme Solidarity & Management of Migration.
Information and support for running European projects.
Identify the institutions which have a stake in the
GOVERNMENT OF ROMANIA MINISTRY OF PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGING AUTHORITY FOR COMMUNITY SUPPORT FRAMEWORK Evaluation Central Unit Development of the Evaluation.
Operational and Financial aspects Part 1 Gilles GERVAIS and Misia COGHLAN Project Advisors Brussels, 23rd January 2012.
INTERIM MEETING/ VIENNA PART 1 THE STATUS of the PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION.
A to Z on Funding Programmes - EU & Council of Europe.
Washington D.C., USA, July 2012www.aids2012.org The HIV/AIDS Civil Society Forum and Think Tank: from policy to action Anna Zakowicz HIV/AIDS Civil.
APPLICATION FORM OF ROBINWOOD SUBPROJECT SECOND STEP 1. The short listed Local Beneficiaries work together to create international partnerships and prepare.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Innovation and the Structural Funds, Antwerp, 16 January 2007 Veronica Gaffey Innovative Actions Unit.
Toolkit for Mainstreaming HIV and AIDS in the Education Sector Guidelines for Development Cooperation Agencies.
Strengthening global awareness in the local communities - Kolping 2020 Strategy.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
Joanna Fiedler Enlargement and Neighbouring Countries Unit DG Environment European Commission REReP → RENA Vision of the European Commission PEIP Regional.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion The new architecture for cohesion policy post-2013 High-Level Meeting on the.
1 Women Entrepreneurs in Rural Tourism Evaluation Indicators Bristol, November 2010 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010.
Regulatory requirements in the current programming period Funchal, 18 November 2010.
European Commission Introduction to the Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity PROGRESS
Leonardo da Vinci Partnerships: an opportunity to work together Italian National Agency for LLP - Leonardo da Vinci Sectoral Programme.
EDPQS in 10 minutes: Overview of European Drug Prevention Quality Standards (EDPQS) With financial support from the Drug Prevention and Information Programme.
April_2010 Partnering initiatives at country level Proposed partnering process to build a national stop tuberculosis (TB) partnership.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
DG Education et Culture Socrates - Comenius 1 Europe and education School education.
Evaluation of EC aid delivery through Civil society organisations Major findings and concerns relating to EC-NGO funding relationship and questions to.
DETERMINE Working document # 4 'Economic arguments for addressing social determinants of health inequalities' December 2009 Owen Metcalfe & Teresa Lavin.
HTA Benefits and Risks Dr Bernard Merkel European Commission.
1 DEWG meeting October 2009 Human Resource Development for TB Control (HRD-TB) Sub Group within the DEWG of the Stop TB Partnership. Wanda Walton.
1 Improving public health in the European Union Clive Needle EuroHealthNet.
WHO EURO In Country Coordination and Strengthening National Interagency Coordinating Committees.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
YOUTH Programme TC Rainbow by JINT vzw. WHY YOUTH ?  Stimulate the mobility of young people  Active participation in the development of Europe and of.
Observatories for the Health Workforce in Africa VIII REGIONAL MEETING OF THE OBSERVATORIES OF HUMAN RESOURCES FOR HEALTH IN THE AMERICAS LIMA, PERU
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Ministry of Education, Research and Religious Affairs General Secretariat for Research and Technology EEA Financial Mechanism GR07 Research within.
Lifelong Learning Programme Call for Proposals Learning partnerships Agence Education Formation - Europe FROM THE FIRST IDEA… TO THE REAL.
Information Overview SF: Planning & Programming Workshops for EC Delegation Patrick Colgan & Ján Krištín PROGRAMMING PROCEDURES in Support of Regional.
Christine Winkelmann This work is part of the Joint Action on Improving Quality in HIV Prevention (Quality Action), which has received funding from the.
04/2007 THE EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT POLICY & ITS INSTRUMENTS OF IMPLEMENTATION Preparation & Draft of environmental projects THE EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT POLICY.
Technical Assistance Office TCP Projects 2005 Contractual and Financial Management Administrative and Financial Handbook Prepared by IA, 14/12/2001 SOCRATES.
DG Justice and Consumers Project Management Some points of attention JUST/2014/JCOO/AG/CRIM and JUST/2014/JCOO/AG/CIVI Kick-off meeting 26 January2016.
European Public Health Alliance Advocating for Better Health in the EU Lara Garrido-Herrero (ANME General Assembly) Frankfurt, 11 November 2006.
Outreach strategies for inactive youth Inter-instituional Policy dialogue on the Youth Guarantee.
Ecdc.europa.eu YOUTH IN ACTION Marzia Conte DG EAC, Youth in Action Unit Brussels, 5 December 2008.
European network for Health Technology Assessment | JA | EUnetHTA European network for Health Technology Assessment THL Info.
Central American Certificate Course: HIV Monitoring and Evaluation for HIV/AIDS Policy and Program Management BZ ES GT NI PA CR February 3 rd to 9 th.
"The role of Rural Networks as effective tools to promote rural development" TAIEX/Local Administration Facility Seminar on Rural Development Brussels,
June 24, 2016 UNAIDS Partnerships- Strategies, structures and social relationships Sally Smith Partnership Adviser.
A&M Workplan Objectives
Knowledge Translation
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Structural Funds: Investing in Roma
Presentation transcript:

Seminar Reykjavik September European Collaboration Practical experiences of running a project with DG SANCO funding Meeting Public Health Institute of Iceland 23 September 2005 Georg Bröring Senior advisor NIGZ, AIDS & Mobility Europe

Seminar Reykjavik September Introduction Three elements of the presentation –Funding procedures Framework of funding How to apply How to manage the contract –Networking at the European level Being involved in networks Running a network Collaboration with other networks –Structure of AIDS & Mobility Europe History National Focal Points Financing the project A&M working plan (if requested)

Seminar Reykjavik September Funding procedures Framework: Decision by European Parliament –Programme of Community action in the field of public health ( ) –Workplan – /programme_en.htm Policy context (e.g. in 2004): focus on –Inequality –Enlargement –Best practice promotion –Capacity and skills building –EU CDC –Continuity of support for key networks

Seminar Reykjavik September Funding procedures How to apply? –Develop a draft plan According to EU priorities According to (epidemiological) evidence –Establish European added-value –Find partners (or confirm existing ones) –Formalise (in draft form) collaboration –Submit application –Negotiate, if necessary

Seminar Reykjavik September Funding procedures The Application form Part I: The story –Two page summary! –Aims & objectives –Tasks & time table –Deliverables, expected results –Community-added value –Consistency with EU work plan –Dissemination of results –Effectiveness of partnerships –Consistency of funding plan –Loads of appendices

Seminar Reykjavik September Funding procedures The Application form Part II: The money –The Budget Fees (salaries etc.0 Travel and subsistence Miscellaneous services Administration Unexpected costs –Balance of EU and other funding –Negotiate, if necessary

Seminar Reykjavik September Funding procedures Factors of success? –Evidence & data –Geography –Contacts –Quality of results –Good management –Visibility of EU –Politics –You never know…

Seminar Reykjavik September Funding procedures Managing the contract –In general max 60 % co-funding by EU –In general quite clear contracts But procedures may change during the project period Clarity/detailed budget may lead to limitations There is (little) space for negotiation –Make sub-contracting agreements –Interim (financial) reporting –Final (financial) report / audit –Pre-, Interim, Final payment

Seminar Reykjavik September Networking at European level Being involved in networks –Advantages Access to information Access to experiences Access to contacts Being aware of new trends Motivating to share expertise Achieve political support International collaboration can be fun and motivate for your work at home

Seminar Reykjavik September Networking at European level Being involved in networks –Obstacles and concerns ‘Transferability’ of experiences –Diversity in Europe limits the use of the same approaches Make the right choices, where to be involved Time investment often under- estimated Measuring output may be difficult

Seminar Reykjavik September Networking at European level Running a network –Advantages Visibility of your organisation Access to expertise and contacts Developing broader (over)view Gaining management experience International collaboration can be fun and motivating for your work at home

Seminar Reykjavik September Networking at European level Running a network –Obstacles and concerns Financial risks –In preparation stage - > pre- investment –In implementation stage - > reliability of partners –In final stage - > financial reporting What if funding stops? –Staff? Project partners? Time investment often under- estimated Bureaucracy

Seminar Reykjavik September Networking at European level Running a network –Tasks of the supervisor Process management –Guide the project from A -> B Define terms of collaboration Develop project culture Motivate partners –Cope with diversity of situations and people Quality control Contacts with funding agencies (Financial) reporting

Seminar Reykjavik September Networking at European level Collaboration with other networks –EuroHealthNet General overview about Europen health issues Insider information Support with agenda setting –Tampep Focussing on migrant prostitution –Correlation Focused on health and social inclusion –Integration project Focused on HIV in Central/Eastern Europe –AIDS Action Europe Focused on NGOs and advocacy

Seminar Reykjavik September Structure of AIDS & Mobility Europe History –Start in 1991 WHO review on ‘Migrants and travellers’ Hosted by National AIDS Commission of the Netherlands (NCAB) –1992: start European funding Pilot projects Creating databases Collaboration with selected European countries on migration issues

Seminar Reykjavik September Structure of AIDS & Mobility Europe 1995: Moving to NIGZ 1996: Creation of NFP network –At the request of European Commission –Changed position in the field 1996: In addition to primary prevention, care aspects became important –Access to care 2004: Broadening –Public Health Programme –Enlargement –Merging ‘AIDS & Mobility’ and ‘AIDS & Youth’

Seminar Reykjavik September Structure of AIDS & Mobility Europe National Focal Points –Formal contacts and contracts with organisations in the ‘old’ EU member states –Currently extended to the new member states Definition –A NFP is a set of functions additional to an existing (unit of a) governmental or non-governmental body. –It supports A&M and the EC in planning effective HIV/AIDS and STD prevention programmes addressing the needs of international mobile groups. –It is a key information and exchange point and will take care of advocacy and networking on a national level.

Seminar Reykjavik September Structure of AIDS & Mobility Europe Objectives of NFPs –To assess needs and problems of the mobile target groups at a national level –To advocate the needs and problems of mobile groups at a national and European level –To support the A&M coordinator in providing the EC and member states with objective, reliable and comparable information at European level concerning target groups –To improve the quality of European Health Promotion Programmes by coordinating their own national network and transmitting the necessary information for developing effective health promotion programmes –To be aware of information, to gain access to this information and to interpret the information and where useful disseminate the information to relevant partners in the network –Capacity development; to strengthen NGOs and CBOs

Seminar Reykjavik September Structure of AIDS & Mobility Europe Tasks of NFPs –Collection and dissemination of information –Organising a national network in which all mobile target groups are represented –Stimulating collaboration with other European networks within the country itself –Stimulating collaboration between member states (NFPs will function as interfaces between the European and the national level) –Country coordination on HIV/AIDS & STDs and mobility issues –Advocacy for themes which should be translated in national and European action plans

Seminar Reykjavik September Structure of AIDS & Mobility Europe Role of NIGZ –Co-ordination of the network Motivating project partners Supervising processes Control quality –Providing communication structures, i.e. website, newsletter etc. –Advice Towards policy makers Towards health workers –Responsible towards main funding agency (European Commission) re. contents and finances –Reporting

Seminar Reykjavik September Structure of AIDS & Mobility Europe Role of the European Commission –Evaluate A&M activities –Translate outcomes of the project into policies –Provide financial and technical support Agreements formulated in document formulated together with A&M partners and confirmed in sub-contracting agreement (agreement between ‘main beneficiary’ and ‘associated beneficiary’)

Seminar Reykjavik September Structure of AIDS & Mobility Europe Challenges –Inclusion of communities NFP structure created distance between A&M and migrant populations –Quality control Few means of sanctions in case of non- compliance –Responding to diversity in Europe More countries, more mobile populations, more issues –Advocacy and agenda setting Decision making processes have become more complex European policy development not easily accessible

Seminar Reykjavik September The European partners