“All Roads Lead to Rio” 1

 Session 1:  The UN and the Role of Major Groups  Session 2:  Stakeholder Processes and Participation  Session 3:  The Rio+20 Agenda-What It Means 2

 On 24th December 2009 the UN General Assembly adopted a Resolution (A/C.2/64/L.59) agreeing to hold the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (UNCSD) in also referred to as 'Rio+20' or 'Rio 20'. 3

1. Secure renewed political commitment for sustainable development, 2. Assess the progress to date and the remaining gaps in the implementation of the outcomes of the major SD 3. Address new and emerging challenges 4

 a green economy in the context of sustainable development and poverty eradication;  the institutional framework for sustainable development; 5

 Themes are defined, not content  The conference at the highest political level, not yet a summit, but perhaps…?  Operationalize the three elements in sustainable development, central to the UN-track 6

 The Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD)  Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)  Sustainable Consumption and Production (SCP) 7

 That civil society, via the Major Groups shall participate in all meetings and at all levels of the preparatory process including the conference itself, and at all geographical levels, nationally, regionally and globally 8

 One of the major functions of the UN is global standard setting and developing norms, rules, procedures and conventions that govern the global community 9

 One of the major challenges of the UN is the need to implement the standards and to create the global political will to support and abide by these standards 10

 However, the impression is often that many tend to consider UN agreements as obstacles, tools that hinder the free will and spirit of creative forces, jeopardize national sovereignty 11

 Yet most people consider these treaties as tools that help protect and safeguard something that needs to be protected. 12

 The major groups and civil society have been given a role in the process by being referred to in 8 of the 29 paragraphs of the GA resolution calling for the UN CSD in Rio in 2012  At all levels of the process, nationally regionally and globally including at the conference 13

 The concept was coined in 1992 and Chapter 23 in Agenda 21 identifies them;  The 9 major groups is a mechanisms through which civil society and business interact with the UN system, and it is the mechanism that will be used during and at the Rio plus 20 process.  Only UN accredited organisations may qualify as major groups at UN meetings 14

 Women  Children and youth  Indigenous Peoples  Farmers  NGOs, non governmental organisations  Trade unions  Local authorities  Science and technology  Business and industry 15

 The major groups have two overarching functions – a service function and a representative function;  The service function is carried out by an Organising Partner (OP) of the major group  Each of the 9 Major Groups have their OP, appointed by the Bureau of CSD after being screened by the CSD secretariat. 16

 The OP function is not a political one. It serves the constituency of the major group, helps set up meetings, liaises with the UN secretariat, etc;  OPs chair the morning information meeting, where the entire major group community, all civil society present at a UN meeting, can come to be informed of what takes place during the, the state of negotiations, report back from plenaries, etc; 17

 The representative function, where policy is presented to the intergovernmental system, is carried out and decided by each of the present major group’s constituency at any given UN meeting;  Each of the 9 major groups has its own policy meetings daily, separate from the morning information meeting. The policy meeting is where statements are agreed upon, speakers are nominated. These meetings are run by the present constituencies, and not by the OPs 18

Challenges and Opportunities 19

Process is picking up “dynamics”, e.g.  Developed countries have used brakes instead of accelerators; are not entirely prioritising sustainable development  Developed countries upgrading other processes, other than the UN, (Davos, G- 8 etc) 20

 The process working in the shadow of a number of UN “failed” conferences and processes  Thus far, the process lack visions of how the a sustainable world might look in

 Countries have been slow in developing basic positions, EU this summer  Compared to Rio in 1992, there is little time for the preparatory work  Unclear roles between various units of the UN,  Lack of resources from donors and from financial institutions 22

 There is no definition of or direction for the discussion concerning the Green Economy concept  Does not indicate in any way how to strengthen the institutional architecture 23

 Does not deal with or reflect the changing political realities in the world today  Does not recognize unique role of UNEP 24

 G-77 is to a large extent driving the process  Civil society/ major groups have been given an active role 25

 The US has a government from the that is more engaged in the UN system and international governance  The themes are looking for content, and proposals are actively sought and are positively welcome 26

 The condition of developing nations are not the same today as they were in the 1970s  Political blocks are changing, old ones are fragmenting 27

 Is the UN no longer a priority?  Is Davos is more important than Geneva, New York and Nairobi?  Is the global financial crisis a legitimate excuse for not giving priority to sustainable development ? 28

 Is our understanding of the world today, its problems and solutions in reality based on how we saw the world as it was back in the 1970s and we thought all what we did then, actually worked? Are we still using the same mechanisms? 29

 The intergovernmental system in general and the UN in particular offers unprecedented opportunities for people to participate actively in these processes and influence their own fate at home. 30

 End of session one 31