1 2014 Institutional Effectiveness & Student Success Scorecard Update on Institutional Effectiveness Process & Report on Student Success Scorecard Prepared.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Reflections on How to Improve Students’ Learning at KFUPM Dr. Hocine Bahlouli Physics Department.
Advertisements

STUDENT EQUITY PLAN PROGRESS PRESENTATION TO BOARD FEBRUARY 28, 2012.
Professional Development Day Fall 2014 R. Brown, V. Martinez, K. Moberg, A. Ratto.
 Student Success: What Is It, and How Can We Measure It? Kim Harrell, Folsom Lake College Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College David Morse, ASCCC Executive.
An initiative of the Research & Planning Group for California Community Colleges Assessing Institutional Effectiveness An RP Group initiative funded by.
The Future of Higher Education in Texas
Success for All: Student Equity and the New Student Success and Support Program Strengthening Student Success Conference October 9, 2013.
Academic Attainment in California Community Colleges: Racial And Ethnic Disparities in the ARCC 2.0/Scorecard Metrics Tom Leigh Alice van Ommeren.
ARCC /08 Reporting Period Prepared by: Office of Institutional Research & Planning February 2010.
November 13, 2013 Contra Costa Community College District Board Review Achievement Gap Report & College Scorecards.
Achieving the Dream Dr. Jan Lyddon October What is Achieving the Dream?
OPENING DAY 2012 THE “ONE MORE” CAMPAIGN. BACKGROUND Goal 1: Increasing student success and academic excellence through student-centered instruction,
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges (ARCC) Presentation to the Mt. San Jacinto College Board of Trustees Thursday – Oct. 9, 2008 Dr. Dennis.
San Luis Obispo Community College District Cuesta College Institutional Effectiveness Outcomes/Student Success Scorecard Report SLOCCCD Board of Trustees.
Media Services North Campus Feb 2001 Miami-Dade Community College Enrollment Management Media Services North Campus Feb 2001 Presentation to The Board.
Student Performance Profile Study: An Examination of Success and Equity Matt Wetstein, Interim Vice President of Instruction Office of Planning, Research,
The Student Success Scorecard Dr. Matt Wetstein Interim Vice President of Instruction April 16,
Stephanie Curry-Reedley College James Todd- ASCCC Area A Representative.
Cuesta College ARCC Data Report to the San Luis Obispo Community College District Board of Trustees May 5, 2010.
REPORT TO THE SAN LUIS OBISPO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES MARCH 7, 2012 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT INSTITUTIONAL.
Student Equity in California Community Colleges Dr. Craig Hayward, Director Lisa Nguyen, Senior Research and Planning Analyst Irvine Valley College.
Revisiting Foothill’s Vision, Values and Institutional Goals Wednesday, February 5, 2014 PaRC Meeting E. Kuo.
2014 Student Success Scorecard PaRC Presentation May 7, 2014 E. Kuo FH IR&P *Formerly known as the Accountability Reporting for Community Colleges (ARCC)
Student Success Scorecard PaRC Presentation April 17, 2013 FOOTHILL COLLEGE E. Kuo FH IR&P *Formerly known as the Accountability Reporting for Community.
Implementing an Ability Based Education System Colleen Keyes Dean of Academic Affairs Dr. David England Director of Institutional Effectiveness.
Key Components of the Planning Model at De Anza College: An Update to the Educational Master Plan Presented to Academic Senate May 23, 2011.
Student Success Scorecard De Anza College 2015 Mallory Newell Office of Research and Planning.
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Student Success  What is it?  How can we assess it?  Whose responsibility is it?  What role do you play?
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
PRESENTER: Deb Sullivan Ford. AVC2CSU is a proposed comprehensive cohort pathway program intended to allow students pursuing select AS-T and AA-T degrees.
Mallory Newell Office of Institutional Research and Planning
The Future of Higher Education in Texas Dr. Larry R. Faulkner Vice-Chair, Higher Education Strategic Planning Committee Presentation to Texas Higher Education.
IS GCC MEETING ITS MISSION AND GOALS? MASTER PLANNING COMMITTEE (TEAM A) MAY 8, 2015.
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Board of Trustees Retreat December 9, 2015 Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning & Grants Success Indicators and Key College Profile Data 2015.
Board of Trustees Retreat May 10, 2013 Dr. Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning & Grants.
Glendale Community College: Statewide Accountability Reporting Edward Karpp Associate Dean, Institutional Research & Planning January 24, 2008.
Los Angeles Valley College April 21, QUESTION 3: NEW GOALS & OBJECTIVES REFLECTING COLLEGE BASIC SKILLS INITIATIVE “ACTION PLANS”
Palomar College Presentation to Palomar College Board of Trustees March 11, 2008.
Cal Poly Pomona University Strategic Plan 2011 ‐ 2015 Partial Assessment of Progress Presented to the University Strategic Planning Committee (USPC) 12/4/2014.
Trends for Planning Team A Meeting - October 10, 2012.
Glendale Community College: Statewide Accountability Reporting 2010 Data Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning, and Grants November 15, 2010.
Glendale Community College: Statewide Accountability Reporting 2009 Data Edward Karpp Associate Dean, Institutional Research & Planning December 21, 2009.
Student Success Scorecard: 2016 Report
Student Success Scorecard and Institution-Set Standards 2014
Student Success Scorecard 2017
Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning, and Grants November 15, 2010
Student Success Scorecard Spring 2016
Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning, and Grants November 19, 2012
2016 Taft College Student Success Scorecard
D Adapted from: Kaplan & Norton The YCCD District Mission, Vision, Values & Goals are Foundational to College Planning. All College EMP work aligns.
Integrated Plan Proposed Goals
President’s Strategic Plan Mid-Year Progress Report
“Nuts and Bolts” of the Student Centered Funding Formula
2017 Taft College Student Success Scorecard
SOCCCD Board of Trustees’ Meeting
Student Success Scorecard & Other Institutional Effectiveness Metrics
Dr. Brian Lofman, Dean April 18, 2017 Student Success Scorecard 2017:
Institutional Effectiveness Partnership Initiative: Indicators Workshop
Dr. Brian Lofman, Dean April 18, 2017 Student Success Scorecard 2017:
Presentation to the Mt. San Jacinto College Board of Trustees
Strategies Increasing Student Retention & Success
Berkeley City College, Faculty, Administrators, and Staff
Student Success Metrics
Student Success Metrics
Enrollment Management Committee
Vision for Success Local Goal Setting April 2019.
Glendale Community College: Statewide Accountability Reporting
Presentation transcript:

Institutional Effectiveness & Student Success Scorecard Update on Institutional Effectiveness Process & Report on Student Success Scorecard Prepared by the Office Of Institutional Research May 2014 Presented to the Board of Trustees by: Dr. Hannah Lawler, Dean, Institutional Research Teresita Rodriguez, Vice President, Enrollment Development

SMC Office of Institutional Research Institutional Effectiveness Definition Institutional Effectiveness is the systematic and continuous process of measuring the extent to which a college achieves its mission, as expressed through the goals and strategic objectives developed in an educational master plan 2 Dashboards Institutional Priorities Innovative & Responsive Academic Supportive Learning Stable Fiscal Sustainable Physical Supportive Collegial

SMC Office of Institutional Research Institutional Effectiveness Cycle/Process 3 Step 1: Organize Data Develop IE key indicators (KI) Select KIs for Institutional Priorities Dashboard and draft targets Identify KIs needing further inquiry Step 2: Dig into Data Conduct follow-up studies Step 3: Develop Action Plan Identify areas for intervention and develop strategies for improvement Step 4: Act Implement strategies Step 5: Assess Action Plan Assess effectiveness of implemented strategies Annually: Key Indicators will be updated with the most recent annual data and a report of the progress of the Institutional Effectiveness process will be reported to the Board of Trustees

SMC Office of Institutional Research Update for Year 3 ( ) Addition of 8 new key indicators Changes in methodology for 3 key indicators Elimination of 2 key indicators Findings from Student Equity Interviews Impact of Student Behaviors Study 4

SMC Office of Institutional Research Institution-Set Standards v. Target Goals 5 Institution-set standards: standards reflecting satisfaction performance of student learning and achievement. Target goals: a measurable outcome expressed either as a quantifiable value (for example, a target of 75%) or a trend (for example, year-over-year decrease), when achieved, will meaningfully move the needle on institutional effectiveness by

SMC Office of Institutional Research Institutional Priorities - Standards KI Institution- set std. Persistence 73.2%76.2%78.1%73.2%71.8% Transfer 49.5%51.9%47.0%47.4%47.0% Basic Skills Improve 69.3%71.5% 71.9%66.7% Basic Skills Transition 35.9%34.4%36.5%37.1%33.5% CTE Completion 46.5%45.8%45.9%42.0%43.8% Equity – Completion 23.2%25.2%25.1%23.3%<=25.7% Equity - Transfer 24.6%24.1%24.4%24.5%<=25.5% 6

SMC Office of Institutional Research 7 Key Indicator /16 Target Goal In progress- needs attention In progress – on target Target achieved Persistence73.2%75% X Transfer Rate47.4% Remain Steady X Basic Skills Improve 71.9%73% X Basic Skills Transition 37.1%39% X CTE Completion42.0%47% X Equity - Completion 23.3%Decrease X Equity - Transfer24.5%Decrease X Institutional Priorities - Target Goals

SMC Office of Institutional Research Semesters to Associate Degree Completion 8

SMC Office of Institutional Research Key Findings SMC did not meet the institution-set standard for the CTE Completion indicator SMC exceeds the target on one of the indicators Equity Gap – Completion Rate SMC meets the target on two of the indicators Transfer Rate, Equity Gap – Transfer Rate SMC performs below the target on four of the indicators… CTE Completion, Persistence Rate, Basic Skills Improvement, Basic Skills Transition …However, SMC demonstrates improvement on two of them Basic Skills Improvement, Basic Skills Transition 9

SMC Office of Institutional Research Basic Skills Strategies ENGL 20, ENGL 85 MATH 85, MATH 49 (coming Fall 2014) Baltimore Model (ENGL 1 + non-credit support course) Accelerated Courses Summer Jams First Year Experience (FYE) Programs Prep 2 Test Assessment App Preparation for Assessment Test 10

SMC Office of Institutional Research Student Equity Interviews Interview with 17 African American and Latino students in Spring and Fall of 2013 (not generalizable to population) Themes from interviews with students: 1.Interviewees feel welcome at SMC. 2.Proactive and early advising is critical for students’ progress towards their goals. 3.Interviewees entered college without the essential college success skills and struggled to adjust to college life. However, the Counseling 20 course helped teach skills and build confidence in many students. 4.Supportive friends and family members play an important role in guiding and motivating the interviewees in college. 11

SMC Office of Institutional Research Student Equity Interviews (cont.) 5.Interviewees prefer to study alone in the library, typically in between or immediately after class 6.Interviewees value campus clubs and activities but are not actively involved in them. 7.Math is the biggest barrier for the interviewees. 8.Information becomes actionable for interviewees when reinforced by human contact. 9.The most successful interviewees have relationships with a faculty/staff member on campus. 10.According to the interviewees, good teachers are student-centered, promote student-to-student interactions, provide timely feedback, and connect students to resources 12

SMC Office of Institutional Research Impact of Student Behaviors Study Outcomes Student Behaviors Background Characteristics Gender Ethnicity Age Residence Low Income First gen BA+ attainment of zip code Ed goal Unit load Engl/math skill Orientat/assess Major Welcome Center # counseling visits Special prog Tutoring/SI GPA Probation Persisted to term Enrolled Engl/ESL/math # yrs since HS # course repeats Persistence Transfer Basic skills course improvement Basic skills transition to degree course CTE completion 13

SMC Office of Institutional Research Student Success Scorecard 14 Removed 3 metrics (voc and basic skills course success, basic skills progress) 800 page PDF Peer groups Self-assessment Remains 4 metrics (completion, persistence, 30 units, CDCP) – with methodology changes Requirement to report to Board of Trustees Added Web-based interface 2 metrics (CTE & remedial progress) Disaggregated data Measured against self Addition of student- counseling ratio Built upon existing ARCC framework

SMC Office of Institutional Research Student Success Scorecard Background Major limitation: excludes students without valid social security numbers (SSNs). Santa Monica College (SMC) enrolls a large proportion of students without valid SSNs In fall 2013, 14% of the student population did not report a valid SSN. Aligns with areas being measured by Institutional Effectiveness Dashboards 15

SMC Office of Institutional Research SMC Scorecard Cohort Year Metric Statewide Completion 62.9%56.3%53.3%52.5%47.7%48.1% Persistence 71.6%66.6%67.5%68.7%71.7%70.5% 30 Units 71.0%66.1%67.0%68.5%67.5%66.5% Remedial Progress - Math 33.2%29.9%28.2%29.2%28.8%30.6% Remedial Progress - English 48.2%42.5%42.6%43.7%42.8%43.7% Remedial Progress - ESL 64.6%60.7%61.7%62.1%58.7%27.1% CTE 58.0%52.6%53.2%51.7%49.4%53.9% CDCP NA 7.2%7.5%NA 16

SMC Office of Institutional Research Key Findings Five-year decreasing trend for the completion, remedial progress, 30 units, and CTE rates. The college demonstrated improvement in the persistence and CDCP rates over the last five and two years, respectively. SMC performed better than the system-wide averages on three of the eight metrics (persistence, 30 units, remedial progress ESL) 17

Questions/Discussion 18