Computer Practical: Numerical Gasdynamics Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability Group 6 Comparison of Results with Different Grid Points 2 nd Order Roe Naseem.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Joint Mathematics Meetings Hynes Convention Center, Boston, MA
Advertisements

1 Linné Flow Centre KTH Mechanics Streak breakdown in bypass transition Dan Henningson Department of Mechanics, KTH Collaborators: Philipp Schlatter, KTH.
Dynamics and Statistics of Quantum Turbulence at Low Temperatures
University of Western Ontario
Upscaling and effective properties in saturated zone transport Wolfgang Kinzelbach IHW, ETH Zürich.
RANS predictions of a cavitating tip vortex 8th International Symposium on Cavitation Tuomas Sipilä*, Timo Siikonen** *VTT Technical Research Centre of.
MUTAC Review April 6-7, 2009, FNAL, Batavia, IL Mercury Jet Target Simulations Roman Samulyak, Wurigen Bo Applied Mathematics Department, Stony Brook University.
Turbulence of Gravity Waves in Laboratory Experiments S Lukaschuk 1, P Denissenko 1, S Nazarenko 2 1 Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, University of Hull 2 Mathematics.
Motivation The physics of inertial confinement fusion (ICF) combine hydrodynamics, plasma physics and radiation. One of the important hydrodynamic processes.
Nonlinear Evolution of Whistler Turbulence W.A. Scales, J.J. Wang, and O. Chang Center of Space Science and Engineering Research Virginia Tech L. Rudakov,
Inertial Confinement Fusion Related Experimental Investigation of a Twice-Shocked Spherical Density Inhomogeneity. Nick Haehn, Chris Weber, Jason Oakley,
/08/2002SMARTER meeting 1 Solution of 2D Navier-Stokes equations in velocity-vorticity formulation using FD Remo Minero Scientific Computing Group.
Multi-Scale Finite-Volume (MSFV) method for elliptic problems Subsurface flow simulation Mark van Kraaij, CASA Seminar Wednesday 13 April 2005.
Experiments and Computations for Inertial Confinement Fusion-Related Shock-Driven Hydrodynamic Instabilities Bradley Motl, John Niederhaus, Devesh Ranjan,
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Neutrino Factory / Muon Collider Targetry Meeting May 1 - 2, Oxford, GB Target Simulations Roman.
Computational Investigations of Gravity and Turbidity Currents Eckart Meiburg UC Santa Barbara Motivation Governing equations / computational approach.
COMPRESSIBLE TURBULENCE AND INTERFACIAL INSTABILITIES Sreenivas Varadan, Pooya Movahed, Prof. Eric Johnsen Department of Mechanical Engineering, University.
Temperature Gradient Limits for Liquid-Protected Divertors S. I. Abdel-Khalik, S. Shin, and M. Yoda ARIES Meeting (June 2004) G. W. Woodruff School of.
Computations of Fluid Dynamics using the Interface Tracking Method Zhiliang Xu Department of Mathematics University of Notre.
Detection of Emerging Sunspot Regions in the Solar Interior Stathis Ilonidis, Junwei Zhao, and Alexander Kosovichev Stanford University LoHCo Workshop.
Pascucci-1 Utah April 2008 Understanding the Dynamics of Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities arise in fusion, super-novae, and.
A TWO-FLUID NUMERICAL MODEL OF THE LIMPET OWC CG Mingham, L Qian, DM Causon and DM Ingram Centre for Mathematical Modelling and Flow Analysis Manchester.
© British Crown Copyright 2007/MOD Numerical Simulation Using High-Resolution Methods A. D. Weatherhead, AWE D. Drikakis, Cranfield University.
Zhaorui Li and Farhad Jaberi Department of Mechanical Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan Large-Scale Simulations of High Speed.
University of Veszprém Department of Image Processing and Neurocomputing Emulated Digital CNN-UM Implementation of a 3-dimensional Ocean Model on FPGAs.
Stratified Magnetohydrodynamics Accelerated Using GPUs:SMAUG.
The Faculty of the Division of Graduate Studies
Generation of Nonuniform Vorticity at Interface and Its Linear and Nonlinear Growth (Richtmyer-Meshkov and RM-like Instabilities) K. Nishihara, S. Abarzhi,
Numerical Investigation of Internal Wave-Vortex Interactions Tyler D. Blackhurst and J.C. Vanderhoff Department of Mechanical Engineering Brigham Young.
Investigations of the Richtmyer-Meshkov and Rayleigh-Taylor Instabilities Riccardo Bonazza Associate Professor Mark Anderson Associate Scientist Jason.
Unsteady hemodynamic simulation of cerebral aneurysms А.А.Cherevko, А.P.Chupakhin, А.А.Yanchenko ( IGiL SB RAS, NSU)
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review January 14-15, 2003, FNAL Target Simulations Roman Samulyak Center for Data Intensive.
0 APS-Sherwood Texas 2006-April Study of nonlinear kinetic effects in Stimulated Raman Scattering using semi- Lagrangian Vlasov codes Alain Ghizzo.
August 14 th, 2012 Comparison of compressible explicit density-based and implicit pressure-based CFD methods for the simulation of cavitating flows Romuald.
Modelling Tsunami Waves using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) R.A. DALRYMPLE and B.D. ROGERS Department of Civil Engineering, Johns Hopkins University.
Neutrino Factory / Muon Collider Target Meeting Numerical Simulations for Jet-Proton Interaction Wurigen Bo, Roman Samulyak Department of Applied Mathematics.
Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Solving Euler Equations Andrey Andreyev Advisor: James Baeder Mid.
Numerical simulations of thermal counterflow in the presence of solid boundaries Andrew Baggaley Jason Laurie Weizmann Institute Sylvain Laizet Imperial.
Internal Tide Generation Over a Continental Shelf Summer 2008 internship Gaёlle Faivre Flavien Gouillon, Alexandra Bozec Pr. Eric P. Chassignet.
© Saab AB Transonic store separation studies on the SAAB Gripen aircraft using CFD Ingemar Persson and Anders Lindberg Stockholm,
Jacob Cohen 1, Ilia Shukhman 2 Michael Karp 1 and Jimmy Philip 1 1. Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Technion, Haifa, Israel 2. Institute of Solar-Terrestrial.
12th European Turbulence Conference Linear generation of multiple time scales by three-dimensional unstable perturbations S. Scarsoglio #, D.Tordella #
IMPORTANCE OF FAST MEASUREMENTS OF SOLAR WIND PARAMETERS AT THE IP SHOCK FRONT Moscow, February 6-10, 2012 Z. Němeček, J. Šafránková, L. Přech, O. Goncharov,
W.C. Wan et. al., “Observation of single-mode, Kelvin-Helmholtz instability in a super-sonic flow," Physical Review Letters, (Volume 115, Issue 14, Pages.
Remarks on the TAU grid adaptation Thomas Gerhold.
Numerical study of flow instability between two cylinders in 2D case V. V. Denisenko Institute for Aided Design RAS.
Chapter 3. Instability of the free plane and near – wall plane jet
1 A unified description of ripples and dunes in rivers 5 m Douglas Jerolmack, Geophysics, MIT; With David Mohrig and Brandon McElroy.
Thomas Lund NorthWest Research Associates Boulder, CO Boulder Fluids Seminar 14 October, 2014.
1 Rayleigh-Taylor Instability Collaborators: Vasily Zhakhovskii, M. Horikoshi, K. Nishihara, Sergei Anisimov.
Targetry Simulation with Front Tracking And Embedded Boundary Method Jian Du SUNY at Stony Brook Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration UCLA.
V.M. Sliusar, V.I. Zhdanov Astronomical Observatory, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv Observatorna str., 3, Kiev Ukraine
Simulation Of Buoyancy Driven Flows Inside Heated Cavities Using LES And URANS Approaches School Of M.A.C.E. The University Of Manchester. Presented by:
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review April , 2004, BNL Target Simulations Roman Samulyak in collaboration with Y.
Center for Extended MHD Modeling (PI: S. Jardin, PPPL) –Two extensively developed fully 3-D nonlinear MHD codes, NIMROD and M3D formed the basis for further.
An experimental study of bypass transition in plane Couette flow S. AMALFI, F. LAADHARI & J. F. SCOTT Laboratoire de Mécanique des Fluides et d’Acoustique.
Tony Arts Carlo Benocci Patrick Rambaud
Investigation of supersonic and hypersonic laminar shock/boundary-layer interactions R.O. Bura, Y.F.Yao, G.T. Roberts and N.D. Sandham School of Engineering.
IGNITION OF ALUMINUM PARTICLE CLOUDS BEHIND REFLECTED SHOCK WAVES Kaushik Balakrishnan 1, Allen L. Kuhl 2, John B. Bell 1, Vincent E. Beckner 1 1 Lawrence.
The Tilted Rocket Rig: A Rayleigh–Taylor Test Case for RANS Models1
WHAT CONTROLS BAR MIGRATION IN TIDAL CHANNELS?
Advances in BUB3D-OM Development
ივანე ჯავახიშვილის სახელობის
CI2 – Inviscid Strong Vortex-Shock Wave Interaction
AIAA OBSERVATIONS ON CFD SIMULATION UNCERTAINITIES
AIAA OBSERVATIONS ON CFD SIMULATION UNCERTAINTIES
SOME ISSUES CONCERNING THE CFD MODELLING OF CONFINED HYDROGEN RELEASES
Errors in Numerical Solutions of Shock Physics Problems
High Accuracy Schemes for Inviscid Traffic Models
Presentation transcript:

Computer Practical: Numerical Gasdynamics Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability Group 6 Comparison of Results with Different Grid Points 2 nd Order Roe Naseem Uddin Lucy Gray

Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability –Introduction –Results –Conclusions –Questions?

Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability Introduction: Definition “The Richtmyer-Meshkov instability arises when a shock wave interacts with an interface separating two different fluids.” –Theoretically Predicted: Richtmyer 1960 –Experimentally observed: Meshkov 1969 –Simulation:Good test case for: – CFD validation. –Investigation into effects of differing parameters on results, e.g, grid size, time step size, flux functions… etc…

Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability Introduction: Basic configuration –Two fluids initially at rest with differing properties, e.g. different densities –Separated by interface with an initial perturbation –Normal shock wave ( travelling from top to bottom from Fluid 1 into Fluid 2) From: M. Brouillette, The Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 34, (2002) interfaceshock

Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability Introduction:Development a)Initial configuration b)Linear growth with time – crests and troughs are symmetric c)Start of nonlinear evolution – asymmetric spike and bubble development d)Roll-up of spike e)Emergence of small-scales and turbulent mixing From: M. Brouillette, The Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 34, (2002)

Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability Simulation: Euler 2D code –MUSCL Technique –2 nd Order in space & time –Temporal evolution & spatial reconstruction –Eulerian remapping & slope limiting (minmod)

Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability Results: Computing Time Grid size:coarsefineRatio (fine:coarse) 300 x x 3964 Computing Time: sec sec8.4 CPU time:2 808 sec sec Intel Pentium single processor 512 MB Ram, 1.6 GHz 6

Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability Structure details – Generated Vortices Coarse grid simulation The vortex structures are due to baroclinic vorticity at the interface. 0 time step 20 time steps 60 time steps 100 time steps

Vortices are only clear with fine grids Secondary vortex Mushroom shaped vortex

Two pairs of counter rotating vortices in the Mushrom-shaped structure. As time increases two more counter rotating structures appear. Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability Structure details Generated Vortices Fine Grid Simulation

Structure details – mesh comparison Fine Coarse 0 time step 20 time steps 40 time steps

Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability Conclusion: Structure details –Limited spatial resolution  failure to resolve smaller scales Further Work: –Effects of flux function on structures –Expansion to 3D –Expectation of different structures

Thank you for your attention. Further questions?