Note: CCSSE survey items included in benchmarks are listed at the end of this presentation 1. Active and Collaborative Learning Students learn more when.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TJC, Institutional Effectiveness And You. Definition Institutional Effectiveness is an ongoing, comprehensive, and institutionally integrated system,
Advertisements

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparisons of the survey results for UPRM Office of Institutional Research and Planning University of Puerto.
2003 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) SVC Office of Institutional Research Dr. Maureen Pettitt, Director Leslie Croot, M.S., Analyst.
Using the 2005 National Survey of Student Engagement in Student Affairs Indiana State University.
You will be familiar with the five NSSE benchmarks and the survey items that make up each benchmark. You will be familiar with the comparison groups.
DATA UPDATES FACULTY PRESENTATION September 2009.
Gallaudet University Results on National Survey of Student Engagement Office of Institutional Research August, 2007.
Student Engagement In Good Educational Practices Findings From the 2004 and 2007 National Surveys of Student Engagement Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
Engagement By Design: Focus on Developmental Education Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2004 Findings.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 32%  First Year: 30%  Seniors: 33%  GGC  Overall: 28%  First Year: 26% (381)  Seniors: 38% (120)
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
NSSE When?Spring, 2008 Who?Freshmen and Seniors random sample How?Electronic and Snail mail follow up Respondents?30% response rate 26% freshmen.
Executive Summary 2009 Findings November 16, 2009.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
National Survey of Student Engagement University of Minnesota, Morris NSSE 2004.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
Faculty Said/Students Said Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenters: LaSylvia Pugh & Pamela G. Senegal – February 17, 2006.
1 This CCSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
St. Petersburg College CCSSE 2011 Findings Board of Trustees Meeting.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE 2014.
The Students Said… (pt.2) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenter: LaSylvia Pugh – August 29, 2006.
Faculty Said/Student Said 2008 Update (First Look) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings LaSylvia Pugh – February 16, 2009.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
Corning CC and CCSSE: What We Experienced and How We Handled It Maren N. Hess Director of Institutional Research AIRPO Winter Conference Syracuse – January.
Student Engagement at Northeastern Illinois Analysis and Use of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2009.
CCSSE 2013 Findings for Cuesta College San Luis Obispo County Community College District.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Vancouver.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
APSU 2009 National Survey of Student Engagement Patricia Mulkeen Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
March 3, TAIR, Waco, TX Now You See Them, Now You Don’t! The Role of Part-Time Students and Faculty in Student Engagement.
Maryland Consortium Findings from the 2006 CCSSE Survey.
ENHANCING STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IWU DR. MARY ANN SEARLE VICE PRESIDENT FOR ENROLLMENT & STUDENT AFFAIRS.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
CCSSE 2010: SVC Benchmark Data Note: Benchmark survey items are listed in the Appendix (slides 9-14)
National Survey of Student Engagement 2007 Results for Students in Graduate and Professional Studies.
1 This CCFSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCFSSE/CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
2009 Pitt Community College CCSSE Results September 21, 2009 Report to the Campus College CCSSE Results Pitt Community College Dr. Brian Miller, Assistant.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice Summary Report Background: The Community College Survey.
David Torres Dean, Institutional Research Riverside Community College District.
Looking Inside The “Oakland Experience” Another way to look at NSSE Data April 20, 2009.
SASSE South African Survey of Student Engagement Studente Ontwikkeling en Sukses Student Development and Success UNIVERSITEIT VAN DIE VRYSTAAT UNIVERSITY.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate February 28, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
Student Engagement and Academic Performance: Identifying Effective Practices to Improve Student Success Shuqi Wu Leeward Community College Hawaii Strategy.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparison on the survey results at UPRM with peers Office of Institutional Research and Planning University.
Jennifer Ballard George Kuh September 19, Overview  NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement  Select Linfield results:  NSSE 2011  Brief explanation.
NSSE Working Student Study Assessment Day Presentation Office of Assessment Fitchburg State College.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate January 10, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
1 NSSE Results Fort Lewis College (2010) Richard A. Miller Exec. Dir – OIRPA.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, April 2010.
Today’s Topic Student Satisfaction and Engagement Hosted by IEPR.
CCSSE 2014 Findings Southern Crescent Technical College.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, September 2009.
Del Mar College Utilizing the Results of the 2007 Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness 1 The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
Learning Communities at Ventura College. What are learning communities? Interdisciplinary learning Importance of sense of community for learning Student.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
2007 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Most & Least Frequent Activities.
The University of Texas-Pan American
Jackson College CCSSE & CCFSSE Findings Community College Survey of Student Engagement Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Administered:
Student Engagement at Orange Coast College
The University of Texas-Pan American
North Seattle College All College Meeting
Director, Institutional Research
The Heart of Student Success
Faculty In-Service Week
CCSSE 2015 Findings for OSU Institute of Technology
Presentation transcript:

Note: CCSSE survey items included in benchmarks are listed at the end of this presentation 1. Active and Collaborative Learning Students learn more when they are actively involved in their education and have opportunities to think about and apply what they are learning in different settings. Through collaborating with others to solve problems or master challenging content, students develop valuable skills that prepare them to deal with real-life situations and problems.

2. Student Effort Students’ own behaviors contribute significantly to their learning and the likelihood that they will successfully attain their educational goals. 3. Academic Challenge Challenging intellectual and creative work is central to student learning and collegiate quality. These survey items address the nature and amount of assigned academic work, the complexity of cognitive tasks presented to students, and the rigor of examinations used to evaluate student performance.

4. Student-Faculty Interaction In general, the more contact students have with their teachers, the more likely they are to learn effectively and to persist toward achievement of their educational goals. Through such interactions, faculty members become role models, mentors, and guides for continuous, lifelong learning. 5. Support for Learners Students perform better and are more satisfied when colleges provide important support services, cultivate positive relationships among groups on campus, and demonstrate commitment to student success.

SVC CCSSE Benchmarks: 2007, 2010 & 2012

2012 Benchmarks: SVC Compared to Similar-Sized (Medium) Colleges and All Colleges in the 2012 Cohort

2012 Benchmarks: SVC Compared to Northwest Consortium and ATD Colleges

2012Benchmarks: SVC All, Full- & Part-time Students

2012 Benchmarks – SVC Full- & Part-time Students Compared to Medium Colleges

1. CCSSE utilizes a three-year cohort (2010 through 2012) of participating colleges in all of its data analyses, including the computation of benchmark scores. The 2012 CCSSE Cohort includes 710 institutions; 187 are classified as medium colleges 2. Approximate number of participants included in the data analysis by category: ◦ Skagit = 785 ◦ Northwest Consortium Colleges = 13,300 (BTC, BBCC, CPTC, Edmonds, EvCC, GHCC, GRCC, LWIT, LCC, Okanogan, RTC, Shoreline, SPSCC, TCC, WVC, WCC) ◦ Medium Colleges = 451,000 ◦ ATD Colleges = 106,000.

During the current school year, how often have you:  Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions  Made a class presentation  Worked with other students on projects during class  Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments  Tutored or taught other students (paid or voluntary)  Participated in a community-based project as a part of a regular course  Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class (students, family members, co-workers, etc.)

During the current school year, how often have you:  Prepared two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before turning it in  Worked on a paper or project that required integrating ideas or information from various sources  Come to class without completing readings or assignments  Used peer or other tutoring services  Used skill labs  Used a computer lab During the current school year:  How many books did you read on your own (not assigned) for personal enjoyment or academic enrichment  How many hours did you spend in a typical week preparing for class (studying, reading, writing, rehearsing, or other activities related to your program)

During the current school year, how often have you:  Worked harder than you thought you could to meet an instructor’s standards or expectations How much does your coursework at this college emphasize:  Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory  Synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, or experiences in new ways  Making judgments about the value or soundness of information, arguments, or methods  Applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations  Using information you have read or heard to perform a new skill During the current school year:  How many assigned textbooks, manuals, books, or book-length packs of course readings did you read  How many papers or reports of any length did you write  To what extent have your examinations challenged you to do your best work How much does this college emphasize:  Encouraging you to spend significant amounts of time studying

 During the current school year, how often have you:  Used to communicate with an instructor  Discussed grades or assignments with an instructor  Talked about career plans with an instructor or advisor  Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with instructors outside of class  Received prompt feedback (written or oral) from instructors on your performance  Worked with instructors on activities other than coursework

How much does this college emphasize:  Providing the support you need to help you succeed at this college  Encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds  Helping you cope with your nonacademic responsibilities (work, family, etc.)  Providing the support you need to thrive socially  Providing the financial support you need to afford your education During the current school year, how often have you:  Used academic advising/planning services  Used career counseling services