Address Assignments That Make Sense Indiana GIS Conference February 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GOAL Access and Address Visibility. Trimming Around Driveway Grinding stumps after trees were cut down.
Advertisements

Applicants Rob & Judi McCarthy, SLO County Permit #DRC
Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
It the responsibility of the executive head of your state agency to maintain the property records of those assets under the control of the agency. This.
Agenda Item 3 Charter CPV Board Meeting 26 July 2010.
Building Disaster-Resilient Places STEP FIVE – Prepare, Review, and Approve the Plan.
Social Research Methods
NENA Development Conference | October 2014 | Orlando, Florida GIS Data Model for NG9-1-1 Marc Berryman, ENP Richard Kelly Michelle Manuel Raymond Horner.
1. 2 This tool focuses on the CSBG requirements relating to tripartite board composition and selection and is divided into the following four parts: 1.General.
Part II Objectives F Describe how policies and procedures are used F Identify different types of P & P F Describe the purpose and components of a Policy.
INCORPORATING E911 ADDRESSING INTO COUNTY GIS Des Moines County GIS and E911 Matt Warner GIS Coordinator Des Moines County GIS Commission.
1 Overview of Fulton County GIS Address Model Carl Anderson Fulton County GIS.
Public Meeting Agenda – September 13, 2007 Provide an Update on the Committee’s Work Discuss Emerging Vision for Redevelopment of Town-owned Property.
Adding an Address To avoid adding duplicate addresses, Always use Find first. If you cannot find an address then add it. A warning should display if an.
VIRGINIA PUBLIC-PRIVATE EDUCATION FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCURE ACT OF 2002 (PPEA) Augusta County Board of Supervisors Wednesday, January 6, 2009.
Bulletin Guidance and Resources. BUL Format Provides a table of contents Organizes School Site Council (SSC), Compensatory Education Advisory.
The City of Fargo Master Address File Project. Discovering what the heck is out there? The City of Fargo is currently developing a comprehensive, standardized,
Open Space Residential Development Bylaw Town of Rehoboth.
BCC Public Hearing for consideration of an Agreement to Offer Donation of Real Property -and- a Solid Waste Management Permit Renewal APPLICANT: Hubbard.
Alachua County Board of County Commissioners May 12, 2015.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Environmental Streamlining Taskforce Meeting July 20, 2011.
Planning Processes/Permits “From Pre-application meeting to Board of Aldermen Approval.” “From Pre-application meeting to Board of Aldermen Approval.”
IRSDA Conference What Do the Amendments to Indiana Code Section Mean to You? Kristina Kern Wheeler, General Counsel Ja-Deen L. Johnson, Consumer.
Presentation to the Oversight Board Santa Clara County Auditor-Controller 1.
[Milwaukee County Enterprise GIS Migration Project] presented by: Kevin White, GIS Supervisor – Milwaukee County Scott Stocking, Systems Analyst – GeoAnalytics.
Public Hearing Modifications to the Gated Community Ordinance Board of County Commissioners Presented by the Orange County Public Works Department February.
Planning and Integrating Curriculum: Unit 4, Key Topic 1http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING December 2, 2008.
ROAD ADOPTION PROCESS TOPIC GROUP OVERVIEW OF HCC ROAD ADOPTION PROCESS DAVID HUMBY 24 TH & 25 TH FEBRUARY 2010.
Amendments to Orange County Code Chapter 9 (Building & Construction Regulations) Orange County BCC June 16, 2015.
Updates to Title 8. Anticipated Timeline… July - December 2013 Ideas Compiled Research and Drafting January 2014 Planning Commission Worksession Review.
From Master Address List To GIS Enabled Data Warehouse.
Environmental Management System Definitions
How Accurate is your Address Data? Kentucky Geospatial Audit for Matt Wagoner, CFM GIS Manager James Morse, GIS Project Manager Stantec Consulting.
Auditing GIS Data Proving What You Have Indiana GIS Conference February 2010.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING June 8, 2010.
Local Powers for Land Use Regulation. Local Land Use Powers Land use regulation is considered a residual power –In most circumstances, that is… –Power.
Address Management in a Collaborative Environment Presented to IGIC Bloomington, IN May 9, 2012 Michael Smith, GISP Town of Fishers.
The B.O.R. Process and The School District JILL THOMPSON, ATHENS COUNTY AUDITOR BOB DRAIN, TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC LISA ELIASON, ATHENS CITY LAW DIRECTOR.
Cost Allocation Prepared by: Colleen B. Mendel, Executive Director & Chris Watkins, Management Specialist WKU 2009 FSS Fiscal Conference.
Outline  Board Direction  Tasks Completed  Recommendation.
School Site Council (SSC) Essentials in brief An overview of SSC roles and responsibilities Prepared and Presented by Wanda Chang Shironaka San Juan Unified.
Exhibits D, F, and G Bao Nguyen Utilities Regulation Engineer Safety & Engineering Section
Michael Gurley / John Murner Oregon Office of Emergency Management October 14, 2015 GIS DATA PREPARATION.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master subtitle style Intrado © 2005 V9-1-1 Building a Foundation Matt Wilson 1/1/2006.
Repeal and Replace the Boundary Adjustment Act with the Urban Reserve Act.
County Facilities Impact Fee Exemption Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing April 7, 2009 Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing April 7,
® 1 COR Database Preparation WEBINAR March 19, 2009.
Community Development Department APPLICATION 2922 VARIANCE TO REDUCE LANDSCAPE BUFFER.
Code Officials and the Code Process.  Concentrates on the code process as a whole.  Different type of code officials  Various steps that are taken.
Change Orders, Extras and Claims Presented by Geoffrey Cantello, City of Ottawa.
Deliberation The Work of Making Choices Requires individuals and groups to grapple with values and the tensions among those values 1.
Surplus City Property – Request for Proposals Administration & Finance Committee February 1, 2012.
Public Hearing Seattle Ridge Preliminary Plat/ Planned Area Development PP December 18, 2013.
Risk Management in Planning & Zoning Decisions Paul M. LeBlanc, AICP President, LSL Planning, Inc.
Bylaw Enforcement: Best Practices Guide for Local Governments Presentation to Southern Interior Local Government Association Conference, Kelowna, BC April.
Applicant: Robert Ganem Addresses: 7304 & 7312 Black Oak Lane Planning Commission Meeting – August 21, 2015.
TUGIS March 15, 2016 Next Generation 911 Data Management TUGIS 2016.
USC Student Housing Off Campus USC Housing Off Campus USC Student Housing USC Group Housing USC housing
Planning and Zoning Division Jefferson County RZ Sevens Residential Memory Care ODP Case Manager: Russell D Clark.
Animal Care Facilities
WPVAR (Greenview HOA) Washoe County Board of Adjustment August 3, 2017.
Butte County Board of Supervisors December 6, 2016
What is Policy? Julie M. Slavens Indiana School Boards Association
Emergency Service Boundaries (ESB) Program
Transportation Workshop
THE SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) Certification Process

Part II Objectives Describe how policies and procedures are used
Presentation transcript:

Address Assignments That Make Sense Indiana GIS Conference February 2010

Overview Where to start Existing Processes Getting it to match and work together

Getting Started What is in place that guides or governs how streets are named and addresses assigned? –Departmental procedure? –Ordinance/Law/Code? –Word of mouth? How does this compare with the various national standards such as NENA?

Getting Started The best thing to have is an ordinance that clearly outlines the process from A-Z and clearly defines who does what. –In some jurisdictions addressing regulation is on a county basis –In some jurisdictions address regulation is on a State wide basis –In some jurisdictions addressing regulation is different in each city and township –In some jurisdictions, address just happens

Guiding Documents Define the following issues: –In General Authority Jurisdiction Definitions Administration –New Road Names –Renaming of Roads –Addressing –Enforcement

Examples New Road Names –No new public or private roads shall be named without review and recommendation of the Program Administrator and approval by the Board of Commissioners.

Examples New Road Names –The name of any new road, whether it is public or private, shall not duplicate or be phonetically similar to any other road name already named by this Ordinance. Directional cannot be part of any street or road name (for example, Westover Road or Fossil Creek Drive North are not acceptable). Alternate spelling, homonyms (dear and deer) and corporate or trade names are not acceptable. All road names must use the common spelling as found in a standard dictionary.

Examples New Road Names –Private roads, which require naming to facilitate postal delivery and emergency response, shall be recognized by the county at the request of the Program Administrator or citizens owning property adjacent to the road. Such a road must serve at least three (3) households.

Examples Addressing –Addressing Interval: Structure numbers shall be assigned consecutively so that a new address is created every 25 linear feet. Addresses will be assigned at the point of access (driveway) or to a structure point along the front of the structure. If the driveway enters from the side or rear of the property, the structure shall be addressed on the road that it fronts at the approximate middle of the structure.

Examples Addressing –Even and odd numbering. Even numbered addresses shall be assigned to the left in the direction of increase and odd-numbered addresses shall be assigned to the right in the direction of the increase.

Procedures Standards and procedures are a decision of the local government authority –Look at the various options and experience –Talk to other jurisdictions and see if there is anything they would change and why –Craft a procedure that works for your community

Fitting Pieces Together How does address assignment fit with other areas of government and service provision? –MSAG – Master Street Address Guide Currently drives the delivery of calls to the correct PSAP Addressing – GIS – MSAG must correctly relate to each other

Fitting Pieces Together Who needs notification of new or changed addresses? –Post Office –Utilities –Schools –Assessor/Property Valuation Offices How is notification made and by whom? –Clear process needs to be part of the framework

Conclusion 1 If you do not have a framework to use and you do not know how that framework functions, odds are that addresses you assign won’t make sense.

GIS Influence Geocoding processes in GIS platforms operate on a premise of evenly distributed addresses within a range on the centerline. –Assigning addresses that fit within this process should be strongly considered

The gold lines between the points and centerlines is the optimum geocoding solution. The reddish lines between the points and centerlines are the actual results based on the given ranges.

What fits to what Addresses must fit within the GIS ranges GIS ranges must fit within the MSAG ranges Address |  GIS Range  | |  MSAG Range  |

Applying the Rules New development Sell off of existing property Discovered outliers & other problems

New Developments Look at pre-existing addresses in the surrounding area Address at the development as a whole –Pay special attention to looping streets –Understand how the development will be built –“Lock in” the street names as part of the process for the preliminary plan –Review the overall plan when each section “goes to record” for possible adjustments

Example

Sell Off of Existing Property Look at the pre-existing addresses in the surrounding area What is the “best fit” with respect to the surrounding area and the addressing framework? –May be as simple as measuring and assigning the number –May be complicated to “crowbar” the new address into the existing numbers

Example 4 sell offs needing addresses Existing addresses not based on “mileage” measurement How do you get the best fit?

Example Distance between 1116 and 1320 is 841’ yields 204 possible addresses

Example Distance between 1116 and the 4 new addresses is –180’ = 21% –286’ = 34% –493’ = 58% –673’ = 80%

Example The total possible addresses is 204 –21% of 204 = 42 –34% of 204 = 69 –58% of 204 = 118 –80% of 204 = 163 Add these numbers to 1116 and allow for parity yields workable addresses

Example Using the process described and allowing for parity produces these addresses Reasonable addresses within the existing addresses

The Test Do the addresses fit within the “Rules” or addressing framework? – Yes Do the addresses fit within the GIS ranges? – Yes Do the addresses fit within the MSAG ranges? – Yes Can the addresses be confused? – No Can I live with them? – Yes

Example

Discovered Outliers & Other Problems Look at the surrounding addresses What is the “best fit” with respect to the surrounding area and the addressing framework? –Re-addressing Seldom easy to get the outlier to accept Re-address as few as possible

Best Practices Documented rules and framework –Who does what, when, where and how Consistently applied –Applies to everyone with very rare exceptions Response experience review/input –Get a review or input from the people that are going to be looking for these addresses – PD, FD and/or EMS

Best Practices GIS and involvement in the early stages of development planning. –It is much easier to negotiate a change in a development when its on paper before approval than when its being built.

Questions? James Morse GIS Project Manager Stantec Consulting Services Inc Nelson Miller Parkway Louisville, Kentucky Ph: (502) Fx: (502) stantec.com