Chapter 3 Fundamentals: Maps as Outcomes of Processes By: Mindy Syfert
Processes and Patterns Maps are considered as outcomes of processes A map is “one of the possible patterns that might have been generated by a hypothesized process.” Spatial patterns are potential realizations
Processes and the Patterns They Make Deterministic Processes Often mathematical The spatial pattern produces the same outcome at each location EX. z= 2x + 3y Stochastic Processes Random element included to make the process unpredictable Thus, many different patterns can result
Stochastic Process Independent Random Process (IRP) / Complete Spatial Randomness (CSR) When points are randomly placed so that each location has equal probability of receiving a point and the positioning of any point is independent of the positioning of any other points Ex: Using the dice to place points in a grid. This spatial process described mathematically: P(k,n,x)= (n k) (1/x)^k (x-1/x)^n-k This is a binomial expression and is not very practiced, but Poisson distribution can be a good approximate
Two Ways Real Processes Differ From IRP/CSR First-Order effect –variations in the density of a process across space Ex: some oak species prefer soil derived from limestone and are clustered in this area more than in a neighboring soil derived from mudstone Second-Order effect- interaction between locations Ex: Woolly Adelgid infesting and killing Eastern Hemlocks- nearby trees are infested before ones further away
Distinct Aspects of Spatial Patterns First-order and second-order effects shift a process from being stationary to changing over space Weakness: close to impossible to distinguish from variation in the environment or interaction between point events by the analysis of spatial data
More processes Anisotropic – directional effects in spatial variation of data Ex: Again, Woolly Adelgid infestation on Eastern Hemlocks- the infestation rate is directional from southern US to northern US Isotropic- NO directional effects in spatial variation of data Ex: If the Woolly Adelgid infestation had no direction, the infestation rate would simply spread outward
Stochastic Processes in lines More difficult to figure out the frequencies of path lengths for IRP than for point patterns Reasons for this: Points patterns are discrete with equal probability and path lengths have a continuous probability density function Path lengths depend on the shape of where they are crossing Statistician pay little attention to path-generating processes However, IRP for path lengths are useful for line direction Ex. geologists looking at orientations of the particles to indicate processes- for instance, sand dunes
Key ideas 1. Any map can be regarded as the outcome of a spatial process 2. Although spatial processes can be deterministic (one outcome) we often think in stochastic processes, which include random elements (many different patterns). 3. IRP idea can be applied to all entity types (point, line, area and field) 4. IRP/CSR allows mathematics to be used for long-run average outcomes of spatial processes
Questions What makes the stochastic process different from the deterministic process? Define IRP/CSR when dealing with a point pattern. Explain the difference between first-order and second-order effects.