REDUCING ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS Regulatory Reformgroup Istanbul 20/11/07.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EXIOPOL Presentation March Presentation of the IP Agenda Introducing EXIOPOL –IP project –Objectives –Implementation plan –Structure.
Advertisements

The Dutch Advisory Board on Administrative Burden (Actal) The Hague March 5, 2008.
Business Impact Assessment. Address 3 topics Why carry out a Business Impact Assessment? What is a Business Impact Assessment? What do we do? The Proposed.
Setting up the RIA System in Turkey Better Regulation Group İstanbul, OECD November 20, 2007.
The Hungarian Budget Review Daniel Bergvall and Ian Hawkesworth Budgeting and Public Expenditures Division.
Romanian Center for European Policies Debating Europe / Providing expertise EU Dragos Dinu Europe 2020 – Romanias challenges September 2010 Dragos Dinu.
European Commission - Directorate General for Agriculture EU rural development policy
Planning and use of funding instruments
Czech approach to Regulatory Impact Assessment Prof. Michal Mejstřík Chairman of Regulatory Impact Assessment Board (RIAB) of the Czech Government Legislative.
The Implementation Structure DG AGRI, October 2005
Role of National Parliaments
1 SG C Smart Regulation: Regulatory Fitness High Level Group on Administrative Burden 17 October 2013 Elizabeth Golberg, Secretariat-General, European.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Commissions proposal for incentives and conditionality in Open Days.
EU-Regional Policy and Cohesion Structural Funds and Accession 1 ANNUAL MEETING OF ISPA PARTNERS 2003 FROM ISPA TO COHESION AND STRUCTURAL FUNDS BRUSSELS,
Regional Workshop Warsaw, January 2006 STATE UNION OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO Basel Protocol on Liability and Compensation Questionnaire No. 2 Ratification.
1. European Commission GHS Implementation Status in the European Community ICCM Dubai UNITAR Side event 4-6 February 2006 Eva Sandberg European Commission.
The Legislative Package on Economic Governance
1 11/21/2014 Policy Coherence in practice A Dutch Approach Aid Alone Is Not Enough to Reduce Global Poverty Romanian Development Camp 18 September 2008.
Brussels, Lessons from NL Independent forecasts and the budgetary process Lessons from the Netherlands by Henk Don former director of CPB (Netherlands.
From Cutting Red Tape to Maximizing Net Benefits Alexander T. Hunt U.S. Office of Management and Budget Challenges on Cutting Red Tape Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
1 DG Enterprise & Industry European Commission Geneva, 18 th March 2008 THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION’S BETTER REGULATION STRATEGY Presentation by Cavan O’Connor.
REGULATORY POLICY AND GOVERNANCE FOR STRENGTHENING COMPETITIVENESS 15 December 2014 University of Economics, Prague Daniel Trnka Regulatory Policy Division,
 There is no such thing as a child-neutral policy  Every policy positively or negatively affects the lives of children  To comply with the CRC, the.
1 DG Enterprise & Industry European Commission E.U. conference of Administrative Burden Reduction Malta, 1 February 2008 Burden Reduction in Support of.
First years of systematic regulatory impact assessment in Estonia – lessons learnt , Tallinn Helena Braun Advisor of Regulatory Impact Assessment.
1 INDICATORS OF REGULATORY QUALITY Project website Claudio M. Radaelli Brussels, 25 January 2005.
Health and Safety Executive Health and Safety Executive Improving the efficiency of the regulatory process Rob Mason Head of Regulatory Policy Chemicals.
The Italian Institutional Design for Administrative Simplification HIGH LEVEL REGIONAL SEMINAR ON “STRATEGIES, TOOLS AND CAPACITIES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE.
Better regulation in Denmark Presentation by Flemming N. Olsen Senior Advisor, Division for Better Regulation Ministry of Finance, Denmark Conference on.
Session 3 - Plenary on implementing Principle 1 on an Explicit Policy on Regulatory Quality, Principle 3 on Regulatory Oversight, and Principle 6 on Reviewing.
Integration of Regulatory Impact Assessment into the decision making process in the Czech Republic Aleš Pecka Department of Regulatory Reform and Public.
Simple, Effective, Transparent Regulation: Best Practices in OECD countries Cesar Cordova-Novion Deputy Head of Programme Regulatory Reform, OECD.
BETTER REGULATION IN CYPRUS Andreas Charalambous Director of Economic Studies and EU Affairs Ministry of Finance 2 nd April 2012.
Adviser, Ministry for State Reform, Lebanon
1 DG Enterprise & Industry European Commission Administrative Burden Reduction and Impact Assessment Presentation by Cavan O’Connor Close European Commission.
The SCM – main issues, advantages and challenges of quantification of administrative costs Daniel Trnka Regulatory Policy Division, Directorate for Public.
1 SG C Regulatory Fitness and Performance Programme (REFIT) September 2014.
Building Sustainable Inspection Reforms Jordan Coordination Model Wafa’a M. Aranki June 2014 Amman – Jordan.
Communication Paper on Smart Regulation COM(2010) 543, 8 October 2010 Presentation by Savia Orphanidou 3 rd November 2010.
1 DG Enterprise & Industry European Commission Conference on Better Regulation: Practical Steps Forward Reykjavík 6 June 2006 OVERVIEW OF THE BETTER REGULATION.
The Commission's Impact Assessment system 18 September 2014 María Dolores Montesinos Impact Assessment unit Secretariat General 1.
The Splendours and Miseries of Regulatory Impact Assessment in the Czech Republic Daniel Trnka Regulatory Policy Division, Directorate for Public Governance.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Strategy for Better Regulation in Romania Expert - Florin.
Reducing regulatory burdens in the Netherlands - using the SCM- Jeroen Nijland / Jerusalem, June 28th, 2011.
Better Regulation for Better Results Presentation to the Social partners 15 July 2015.
1 Administrative simplification in the Netherlands - Main findings by the OECD and World Bank Group “Challenges of cutting red tape” Rotterdam, 1 March.
Better Regulation Executive Making regulation work for everyone Karen Hill Better Regulation Executive 01 March 2007 From Enforcement to Compliance: Delivering.
Ministry of Economic Affairs | 11 April 2013 Stefan Koreneef and Dimitri Verhoeven Ministry of Economic Affairs Directorate-General for Enterprise and.
Regulation Inside Government: Approach and lessons learned Punita Goodfellow, Better Regulation Executive, Cabinet Office, UK.
TEN-T Executive Agency and Project Management Anna LIVIERATOU-TOLL TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Programme and Policy Coordinator European Economic and.
Ministry of Trade and Industry A tool for regulatory transparency Case: Balanced gender representation on company boards Regional Capacity-Building Seminar.
An overview of OECD Strategies for Improving Regulatory Performance Regulatory Reform and Building Governance Capacities – New Delhi 3 December 2009 Mr.
Better regulation in the Commission Jonathon Stoodley Head of Unit C.1 Evaluation, Regulatory Fitness and Performance Secretariat General of the European.
REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AGENCY Eighth Regional Public Procurement Forum May, 22-25, 2012 Tirana
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 6 – Company Law Bilateral screening:
Better Regulation – practices
Regulatory Impact Assessment in Poland
Session 3 General RIA Training 6–8 July 2009 EuropeAid/125317/D/SER/TR
The Splendours and Miseries of Regulatory reform in the Czech Republic
Presidency Priorities of the Czech Republic in Better Regulation
Regulatory Strategies and Solutions Group, LLC
Developing Regulatory Impact Assessment In Azerbaijan
Cesar Cordova-Novion Deputy Head of Programme Regulatory Reform, OECD
Regulatory Burdens for Businesses
The Group of Directors and Experts of Better Regulation (DBR)
Preparations for post-2020 Impact Assessment European Commission Directorate General for Regional and Urban Policy Unit DGA Policy.
Germany Thomas Nehring Better regulation unit Federal Chancellery.
REGULATORY POLICY AND GOVERNANCE FOR STRENGTHENING COMPETITIVENESS
Administrative Burdens for Citizens
Ad hoc Group of Experts on Better Regulation
Presentation transcript:

REDUCING ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS Regulatory Reformgroup Istanbul 20/11/07

Institutional Capacitıes

Dutch Approach

Ambition the Netherlands Quantitative target: 25% net How? Systematic measurement Budgetting AB per ministry Involvement of business sector Interministerial coordination and monitoring by Min Fin

Rules of the Game Every Minister has maximum of AB Sum is 75% of 2003 stock Ministers not allowed to exceed the maximum ( budget ) Hence: obligatory compensation & ex-ante calculations Reduction packages

Involvement Stakeholders Independent Advisory Board (ACTAL) Interministerial unit (IPAL) Website for complaints and suggestions Involvement business sector

Dutch AB Approach in a Nutshell SCM makes hidden costs transparant Budgetting creates scarcity Interministerial approach using satellites Involve stakeholders External advisory board

Decision making proces and polıcy actıon

Business Impact Assessment Proposed legislation Desk The Proposed Legislation Desk is operated jointly by the Ministry of Economic Affairs, the Ministry of the Environment (Environmental Assessment) and the Ministry of Justice (Practicability and Enforceability assessment). It oversees and checks the quality of the RIAs. There is a weekly meeting with the representatives of these three Ministries.

Business Impact Assessment Staffing -Within the PLD 6 people work on the BIAs -2006: 205 BIAs were performed. -50% of the BIA showed substantial effects for the business community

Business Impact Assessment Type of regulation we assess In a first instance, the BIA is for proposals for new laws, orders in council and amendments to them If thought necessary a BIA may also be performed on other forms of regulation.

Business Impact Assessment When should an assessment be performed? The BIA must be performed as early as possible, preferably as soon as a basic draft of new legislation has been designed. The outcomes of the assessment are most valuable precisely in the phases in which it is still possible to alter modalities: so you can choose the least burdensome alternative

Business Impact Assessment Proces The initiating ministry is responsible for the quality of the proposed legislation as a whole. It is also responsible for ensuring that the effects and side-effects of the legislation are transparent by means of the performance of the BIA (and/or EA and P&E). The ministry responsible must then submit the IA to the Ministry of Justice for the legislative test of the proposed legislation, accompanied by the explanatory memorandum that includes the outcomes of the assessment(s).

Business Impact Assessment The results of an IA should be included into a separate paragraph in the explanatory memorandum accompanying proposed legislation. This enhances the so needed transparancy.

Business Impact Assessment The Ministry of Justice will forward the BIA and/or EA for review to the Ministry of Economic Affairs or the Ministry the Environment. The Ministry of Justice will review the P&E itself.

Business Impact Assessment The final part of the examination of the proposed legislation - both for the legislative test and for the performed assessments - is a legislative report produced by the Ministry of Justice that states approval or disapproval. This report is sent –together with the proposed legislation – to the Council of Ministers.

Political support

Political commitment SCM methodInfrastructure Incentives Clear targets? Ownership? Stakeholder involvement? How did we get there? Available? Resources? Knowledge? Quality control? Strong coordination? Dept. involvement? Countervailing power?

Dutch AB approach in a nutshell oSCM = hidden costs transparent oBudgetting AB creates scarcity oCompensation required oInterministerial framework oMinisterial satellites oIndependent advisory board oInvolvement stakeholders

Necessary condition: Quantitative SCM method Results: oSense of urgency oDiscipline to reach substantial AB reductions oVisibility macro problem () oVisibility pay-off (GDP) oTransparency micro level (X-rays laws) P x Q 1…12

Brian Huijts Regulatory Reformgroup The Netherlands B.B.W.

Top 10 Dutch AB Legislation LegislationAB (in millions ) in the Netherlands 1. VAT1, Financial accounting1, Product & safety requirements (labelling) 1, Tax on wages/salaries National health service act Employees' insurances Act on conservation of nature Income tax Pricing of products Working conditions500 Total8,400

Europe

Dissemination Full scale application of SCM Developing common EU-methodology OECD Red Tape Scoreboard (road freight sector) SCM-Benchmarking VAT Permits Transport In preparation + Member States + 15 countries

Brussels Commission committed to regulatory reform: Withdrawal pending proposals Simplification Impact assessment Administrative cost measurement