Water Quality Within the Lower Cape Fear River Watersheds, 2012 Matthew McIver, Dr. Michael Mallin, Dr. James Merritt Lower Cape Fear River Program Aquatic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
West Virginia Department of Agriculture Water Quality Monitoring Program 2009 Photo by Paul Morley.
Advertisements

SWAMP Team Members Contact Information Karen Taberski: , Nelia White:
Presented by Melanie Williams. Plan Schedule Water Quality Status Trends Chain of Lakes Basinwide Issues Recommendations & goals Public Review Comments.
Middle Eel River Initiative: A collaborative approach for ecological studies.
THE EFFECTS OF EXTREMELY HIGH DENSITY SEPTIC SYSTEMS ON SURFACE WATER QUALITY IN GWINNETT COUNTY, GEORGIA John Anderson Georgia Perimeter College Lawrence.
TMDL Development Mainstem Monongahela River Watershed May 14, 2014.
TMDL Development Upper Kanawha River Watershed August 18, 2011 WV DEP WV DEP Dave Montali.
Fecal Colform Bacteria Contamination during Rain Events in Sayler’s Creek, Virginia Blake N. Robertson Senior Honors Research Under the Supervision of.
Cold Water Habitat Evaluation Gilbert Creek & Elk Creek June – August 2005 Matthew D. Rasmussen Applied Science Undergraduate UW-Stout Menomonie, WI
Water Quality Tests.
2009 Water Quality Monitoring Report – Fish Creek Vaughn Hauser, B.Sc. Naomi Parker, B.Sc., BIT, CEPIT.
Stream Monitoring in Loudoun County David Ward, Water Resources Engineer Department of Building and Development, Department of Building and Development,
Long-Term Volunteer Lake Monitoring in the Upper Woonasquatucket Watershed Linda Green URI Watershed Watch ,
Shell Creek Watershed Research Group Advisors: Mark Seier and Karen Malmkar Researchers: Audrey Wondercheck, Mark O’Brien, Alisha Dunlap, Caitlin.
H 2 whOa! The Governor’s Institute of Environmental Science & Technology- Water Group.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed, L’Anguille River Watershed, and Bayou Bartholomew Presented.
1 Water Quality: Temperature How is water quality affected by temperature?
Aquatic Ecosystems Determining factors:
Water Quality Monitoring : Galla Creek Bayou Bartholomew L’Anguille River Presented By: The Ecological Conservation Organization.
Water-Quality Monitoring for Environmental Management and Source-Water Protection U.S. Geological Survey New England Water Science Center in cooperation.
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
Water Use. What is the hydrologic cycle? The water cycle Precipitation Evaporation transpiration.
Figure 3. (lower panel) The cumulative flow excess or deficiency – how much each water year’s flow at Atascadero (measured in inches of runoff at Patterson)
Red Lake Watershed District Water Quality Monitoring.
Dr. Matt Helmers Assistant Professor and Extension Agricultural Engineer Dept. of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Iowa State University How is.
Surface Water Standards Triennial Review and Implementation Connie Brower Nikki Remington-Julie Grzyb-Sandra Moore NC Division of Water Quality.
Lower Cape Fear River Estuary Model Progress Report Jim Bowen, UNC Charlotte October 11, 2007 Charlotte, NC (via Centra)
Ken Lake Water Study 6/6/06 Conducted by Chris Sogn, Avanti High School Science Teacher David H., Avanti High School Multi-Talented Student.
WATERSHED PERMITTING IN NORTH CAROLINA NPDES PERMIT NCC BECAME EFFECTIVE JAN 1, 2003 NEUSE RIVER COMPLIANCE ASSOCIATION MORRIS V. BROOKHART, P.E.
PH DO DIP TDP Bethany Remeniuk, Department of Biology, York College of Pennsylvania Is Microcystis aeruginosa an Initiator in a Positive Feedback Cycle.
Shell Creek Watershed Study Advisors – Mark Seier, Suzy Goedeken, & Karen Malmkar Researchers –Katie O’Brien, Jake Kaufman, Mark O’Brien, Aubrey.
1 Factors influencing the dynamics of excessive algal blooms Richard F. Ambrose Environmental Science and Engineering Program Department of Environmental.
Presentation compiled with unvalidated data.. Began in 1991 as a non-profit organization. Purpose: increasing Albertans’ awareness and understanding of.
South Carolina Surface Water Monitoring: Different Designs for Different Objectives Presented by David Chestnut.
Charlotte Harbor Environmental Center Water Quality Canal Sampling Gated access to harbor.
An assessment of water quality in tropical streams located in primary and secondary rainforest By Emily Schultz Supervisor: Cheryl Baduini.
Water Quality Monitoring in the Upper Illinois River Watershed and Upper White River Basin Project Brian E. Haggard University of Arkansas.
Deep River-Portage Burns Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting March 13, 2013.
Pollution and Monitoring
1,4-Dioxane Occurrence in the Haw River and in Pittsboro Drinking Water Catalina Lopez Velandia, Mei Sun, and Detlef Knappe Pittsboro,
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in L’Anguille River Watershed and Deep Bayou Presented by: Dan DeVun, Equilibrium
Figure 2. (upper) The cumulative flow excess or deficiency – how much each water year’s flow (measured in inches of runoff at Foster Park) varied from.
Water Quality Within the Lower Cape Fear River Watersheds, 2014 Matthew McIver, Dr. Michael Mallin, Dr. James Merritt Lower Cape Fear River Program Aquatic.
WHAT’S WRONG WITH THE WATER?. Warm Up 1)What does the word phenomenon mean? 2) How is wind responsible for upwellings (which is the movement of water.
North Creek Water Quality Prepared by Jon Rogers and Carie McCoy.
Variability of molecular assays Quality-control samples were collected and analyzed for cyanobacterial genes. Fourteen field concurrent replicates were.
State Agency Needs for Remote Sensing Data Related to Water Quality By Bob Van Dolah Marine Resources Research Institute South Carolina Department of Natural.
 Salinity: Salinity is the concentration of dissolved salts in the water and is an important element of a  habitat. Aquatic animals are adapted to living.
To be responsible protectors of the environment Falling Creek Reservoir Volunteer Monitoring Data Summary 2003 Falling Creek Reservoir Preservation Society.
Watershed Management Plan Summary of 2014 Activities/Progress Presented by: Matthew Bennett, MS December 2014.
Water Quality Within the Lower Cape Fear River Watersheds, 2014
Annual Membership Meeting Water Quality Report 2010
Arkansas Dept. of Environmental Quality Regulation No
Mulberry River Watershed
Department of Environmental Quality
2014 NC Water Quality Assessment
Help Hangman Creek, the Spokane River and Little Spokane River!
Request Approval of (d) Listing Methodology
North Carolina Surface Water Analysis
Lake Spokane 2012 Nutrient Monitoring Data
Requesting Final Approval of the 2011 Roanoke River Basinwide Water Quality Plan My name is Melanie Williams and I’m here today to request final approval.
303(d) List March 9, 2016 WQC Jeff Manning, DWR
Jacob Piske, Eric Peterson, Bill Perry
Indicators of Water Quality
Total Maximum Daily Loads
DETERMINING STREAM QUALITY
Indicators of Water Quality
Marco island water quality monitoring
Presentation transcript:

Water Quality Within the Lower Cape Fear River Watersheds, 2012 Matthew McIver, Dr. Michael Mallin, Dr. James Merritt Lower Cape Fear River Program Aquatic Ecology Laboratory UNC Wilmington Center for Marine Science January 2014

Lower Cape Fear River Program (LCFRP) Multiparameter water quality monitoring program including physical, chemical and biological analysesMultiparameter water quality monitoring program including physical, chemical and biological analyses 35 stations in Cape Fear, Black and Northeast Cape Fear River watersheds35 stations in Cape Fear, Black and Northeast Cape Fear River watersheds Aquatic Ecology Laboratory (AEL) at the UNCW Center for Marine ScienceAquatic Ecology Laboratory (AEL) at the UNCW Center for Marine Science

North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources (NCDENR) Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Basinwide Water Quality Plan Use support ratings Numerical standard exceeded in < 10% of samples = Supporting Numerical standard exceeded in < 10% of samples = Supporting Numerical standard exceeded in > 10% of samples = Impaired Numerical standard exceeded in > 10% of samples = Impaired Less than 10 samples collected = Not Rated Less than 10 samples collected = Not Rated DO and pH standard exceeded in swamp streams = Not Rated UNCW AEL use support ratings Numerical standard exceeded in < 10% of samples = Rated Good Numerical standard exceeded in 11-25% of samples = Rated Fair Numerical standard exceeded in >25% of samples = Rated Poor

North Carolina State Standards Dissolved Oxygen (DO)5.0 mg/L Swampwater DO4.0 mg/L Chlorophyll a40  g/L Fecal coliform bacteria200 CFU/100 mL (human contact) Enterococcus276 MPN/100 mL (human contact) Turbidity freshwater50 NTU brackish/seawater25 NTU UNCW AEL suggested Standards Nitrate or ammoniumsmall streams200 ug/L blackwater rivers500 ug/L brownwater rivers1,000 ug/L Total Phosphorus500 ug/L

Cape Fear River Watershed 8 Digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) BRN, HAM, NC11, LVC2, AC, DP, IC, NAV, HB, BRR, M61, M54, M35, M23, M18 Cape Fear River, Harrison Ck, Turnbull Ck, Brown Ck, White Lake, Livingston Ck, Town Ck, Cape Fear River Estuary Elizabethtown, White Lake, Tar Heel, East Arcadia, Dublin, White Lake, Wilmington, Navassa, Belville, Southport

NCDENR DWQ 2005 Basinwide Water Quality Plan NPDES Dischargers: MGD Registered swine operations = 57 Total Area = 985 mi 2 Stream Miles = 586 Impaired for Fish Consumption in all waters (Hg) Impaired in Estuary for DO – TMDL suggested

BRN - representative of shallow creeks NC11 - main stem of Cape Fear River HB – Upper Estuary M23 – Lower Estuary

Black River Watershed 8 Digit HUC RC, LCO, GCO, SR, B210, COL, BBT South River, Little Black River, Big Ck, South River, Little Black River, Big Ck, Black River, Six Runs Ck, Great Coharie Ck, Little Coharie Ck, Black River, Colly Ck, Moores Ck, Singletary Lake Angier, Benson, Coats, Dunn, Roseboro, Erwin, Garland, Clinton, Harrels, Magnolia, Newton Grove, Roseboro, Turkey, Warsaw, Atkinson

NCDENR DWQ 2005 Basinwide Water Quality Plan NPDES Dischargers: 7.7 MGD Registered swine operations = 497 Total Area = 1,577 mi 2 Stream Miles = 1,039 Impaired for Fish Consumption in all waters

South River Great Coharie Creek Colly Creek Black River at 210

Northeast Cape Fear River Watershed 8 Digit HUC NC403, SAR, GS, PB, LRC, ROC, ANC, BCRR, BC117, NCF117, NCF6, SC-CH NE Cape Fear River, Matthews Ck, NE Cape Fear River, Matthews Ck, NE Cape Fear River, Rockfish Ck, Muddy Ck, Limestone Ck, Smith Ck, Burgaw Ck, Burnt Mill Ck Mt. Olive, Beulaville, Chinquapin, Faison, Greenevers, Harrells, Kenansville, Pink Hill, Rose Hill, Teachey, Wallace, Burgaw, Watha, St. Helen, Wilmington

NCDENR DWQ 2005 Basinwide Water Quality Plan NPDES Dischargers: 15.1 MGD Registered swine operations = 576 Total Area = 1,743 mi 2 Stream Miles = 1,102 Impaired for Fish Consumption in all waters Impaired for Low Dissolved Oxygen in Goshen Swamp, Muddy Ck, portions on NE River, Burnt Mill Ck

NC403 Rockfish Creek Panther Branch N117

2012 Water Quality Ratings for the Cape Fear River Watershed Stations

2012 Water Quality Ratings for the NE Cape Fear River Watershed Stations

2012 Water Quality Ratings for the Black River Watershed Stations

The following analyses include Lower Cape Fear River Program data for the period

Dissolved Oxygen ratings for the Cape Fear River

Fecal Coliform Bacteria ratings for the Cape Fear River

Dissolved Oxygen ratings for the NE Cape Fear River

Fecal Coliform ratings for the NE Cape Fear River

Total Phosphorus ratings for the NE Cape Fear River

Dissolved Oxygen ratings for the Black River

Fecal Coliform Bacteria ratings for the Black River

Total Phosphorus ratings for the Black River

2012 Chlorophyll a vs BOD Concentrations Both surface film samples and sub-surface (10 cm deep) bottle grabs yielded strong statistical relationships between the two parameters. Decaying phytoplankton blooms provide a highly digestible BOD source to river bacteria. The Cape Fear is under a TMDL for low dissolved oxygen, and these new blooms have not been considered in prior modeling efforts.

Conditions for the Blooms These blooms have occurred June through September from 2009 through 2012; Water temperatures have ranged from 25.6 – 32.2 o C at NC11 Strictly a freshwater phenomenon, although in 2012 portions of the blooms were reported by biologists to be seen in the downtown dock areas in Wilmington, an oligohaline area Reduced river discharge appears to enhance bloom formation. Average river discharge at Lock and Dam #1 from May – September 1995 – 2010 was approximately 3,580 CFS. Average discharge for those “warm season” months in 2009 was 1,898 CFS; for 2010 it was 1,769 CFS, and for 2011 it was 1,210 CFS; i.e. low flow conditions increase the chance for bloom formation. In August 2012 heavy rains in the Piedmont increased river discharge and appeared to flush out the major July blooms. First publication is now out: Isaacs, J.D., W.K. Strangman, M.A. Mallin, M.R. McIver, and J.L.C. Wright Microcystins and two new micropeptin cyanopeptides produced by unprecedented Microcystis aeruginosa blooms in North Carolina’s Cape Fear River. Harmful Algae.31:82-86.