Coaching on a Shoestring: Evolution of the Coaching Model in Maryland Elsa Velez Joan Ledvina Parr Charles County Public Schools Baltimore County Public.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Advertisements

Purpose of Instruction
Welcome and Questions?. Agenda: Component 6: Procedures for Record Keeping and Decision Making Plan for roll-out Team Presentations Completion of Workbook.
Establishing an Effective Network of PB4L: School wide Coaches
Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support -SWPBIS- Mitchell L. Yell, Ph.D. University of South Carolina
This product was developed by Florida’s Positive Behavior Support Project through University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health.
Welcome! October VTPBiS Regional Coordinators Meeting.
The Role and Expectations for School-wide PBS Coaches Rob Horner and George Sugai OSEP TA-Center on PBS Pbis.org.
CT PBS Coaches’ Meeting Coaching SWPBS Basics December 9, 2008 Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu, & George Sugai.
MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
VTPBiS Universal School Coordinator Orientation. Agenda Introductions Review Morning and Answer Questions Define Coordinator responsibilities and competencies.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
UNDERSTANDING, PLANNING AND PREPARING FOR THE SCHOOL-WIDE EVALUATION TOOL (SET)
1. PBIS Team: Establishing a Foundation for Collaboration and Operation Establishing a Foundation for Collaboration and Operation – PBIS requires some.
Leadership within SW-PBS: Following the Blueprints for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Going to Scale in Maryland’s Local School Systems
The Role of an Elementary Student Program Support Teacher SPST Building Inclusive Catholic Communities Revised July 2010.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
BUILDING CAPACITY FOR UNIVERSAL PREVENTION THROUGH STATE-NONPROFIT-UNIVERSITY- SCHOOL SYSTEM PARTNERSHIPS Philip J. Leaf, Ph.D. Johns Hopkins University.
New PBIS Coaches Meeting September 2,  Gain knowledge about coaching  Acquire tips for effective coaching  Learn strategies to enhance coaching.
SW-PBS District Administration Team Orientation
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support District Planning Louisiana Positive Behavior Support Project.
Lori Newcomer, Ph.D. University of Missouri - St. Louis Coaching for Capacity and Sustainability.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) Leadership Summit Breakout Sessions March 30, 2009.
Supporting and Evaluating Broad Scale Implementation of Positive Behavior Support Teri Lewis-Palmer University of Oregon.
1 Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Maryland’s State And School System Implementation Strategies, Successes, and Outcomes
Coaches Training Introduction Data Systems and Fidelity.
The Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
How to Teach Students Rules and Expectations for Behavior Under Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBS) Answers to 12 most common questions about.
PBIS Tier 1 Coaches Training
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports in Maryland Susan Barrett
VTPBiS School Coordinator Orientation. Agenda Introductions Review Morning and Answer Questions Define Coordinator responsibilities and competencies Define.
New Coaches Training. Michael Lombardo Director Interagency Facilitation Rainbow Crane Behavior RtI Coordinator
School-wide Facilitator Training September 15, 2010 School-Wide Positive Behavior Support.
Introduction to Coaching School-Wide PBS:RtIB. 2 Agenda PBS:RtIB Brief Overview Coaching Tier 1 Coaching Skills and Activities Resources and Barriers.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support February 24, 2004 Rachel Freeman, University of Kansas Beth Robinett, Topeka 501 (
PBIS Meeting for BCPS Team Leaders and Coaches March 14, 2008 Oregon Ridge.
Monitoring Advanced Tiers Tool (MATT) University of Oregon October, 2012.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) in BCPS Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) in BCPS Margaret Grady Kidder, Coordinator.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Going to Scale in Maryland’s Local School Systems
PBIS Team Training Baltimore County Public Schools Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports SYSTEMS PRACTICES DA T A OUTCOMES July 16, 2008 Secondary.
Starting/Sustaining Universal Team Milt McKenna, Co-Coordinator, PBIS MD Maryland State Department of Education
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: Administrator’s Role Donna Morelli Cynthia Zingler Education Specialists Positive Behavioral.
SW-PBIS Cohort 8 Spring Training March Congratulations – your work has made a difference Cohort 8.
Organizing Your Life as a Coach New Coach Training October 23,
IN NORTH THURSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS KATY LEHMAN PBIS SPECIALIST MAY 22, 2013 PBIS Implementation.
Tier 2/ Tier 3 Planning for Sustainability Rachel Saladis WI PBIS Network/Wi RtI Center Katrina Krych Sun Prairie Area School District.
Organizing Your Life as a Coach October 4, 2007 Coaches Meeting
1 Module L R ole of Coaches Coaches’ Monthly Meeting Add DC Name Here.
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,
PBIS Team: Establishing a Foundation for Collaboration and Operation.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Orientation and Summer Institutes Implementer’s Forum October 2005 Susan Barrett PBIS Maryland.
District Leadership Team Process. Leadership Team Active Coordination FUNCTIONS Implementation support Data-based action plan Coordination Capacity building.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Implementation – Teaming School/AEA Month, 20xx.
+ Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports Lilja Elementary School Respect. Responsibility. Kindness. Engaged Learning.
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: District Coaches’ Meeting Donna Morelli Cynthia Zingler Education Specialists Positive Behavioral.
Positive Behaviour for Success (PBS) Universals Pre-Training Session 2012 Positive Behaviour for Success Illawarra South East Region.
Annie McLaughlin, M.T. Carol Davis, Ed.D. University of Washington
Notes for Trainers (Day Training)
Facilitating A Team Meeting Sharon Conley, Washington County Joey Parr, Baltimore County.
SW-PBIS Cohort 10 Spring Training & Celebration February and March 2016.
Coaching in Maryland Susan Barrett
SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORT: ADDRESSING THE BEHAVIOR OF ALL STUDENTS Benchmarks of Quality KENTUCKY CENTER FOR INSTRUCTIONAL.
VTPBiS Universal School Coordinator Orientation. Agenda Introductions Review Morning and Answer Questions Define Coordinator responsibilities and competencies.
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports District-wide Implementation: Ensuring Success Kentucky Center for Instructional Discipline.
Introduction to Coaching
PBIS Coaching: Making it “Do-able”
Presentation transcript:

Coaching on a Shoestring: Evolution of the Coaching Model in Maryland Elsa Velez Joan Ledvina Parr Charles County Public Schools Baltimore County Public Schools Virginia Dolan Susan Barrett Anne Arundel County Public Schools Sheppard Pratt Health System International Conference on Positive Behavior Support Boston, MA. March 8, 2007

Outcomes Gain knowledge about coaching Acquire tips for effective coaching Learn strategies to enhance coaching efficiency Coaching in Maryland: Building a Plane in Flight

Pennsylvania Delaware D.C. Virginia West Virginia

Maryland PBIS Partnership and Collaboration

History of PBIS in Maryland 1998 Collaboration: MSDE and Sheppard Pratt Health System 1999 Tough Kids Tough Times Forum 15 schools trained statewide Upon follow up it was learned very few of these schools felt successful implementing PBIS Train and Hope model vs. Supportive Consultation Model

History of PBIS in Maryland and Schools Trained in PBIS Maryland Summer Institute in 2000, 20 schools trained in 2001, 30 schools trained Project Target and Johns Hopkins University join the collaboration with MSDE and SEPH, 2002

History of PBIS in Maryland and Schools Trained in PBIS Maryland Summer Institute in 2002, 54 schools trained in 2003, 60 schools trained in 2004, 85 schools trained in 2005, 94 schools trained in 2006, 118 schools trained

Number of Maryland School Teams and Behavior Support Coaches Trained by Year

Number of Maryland School Teams Trained and Number Remaining Active

Percentage of PBIS Schools Trained and Remaining Active No coaches 1999 Coaches limited training 2000 and 2001 Coaches—Structured Training beginning 2002

Who are the Maryland Coaches? Employee of the school system Preferably are school psychologists, social workers, counselors, administrators, behavior interventionists, special education resource teacher, etc. May be school based or itinerant

What are the Responsibilities of a Coach? Consistently attend PBIS team meetings Assist team with data-based decision-making, planning, and implementation Attend Regional/State Coaches meetings/trainings Send information to PBIS State/District Coordinator (e.g., checklists, action plans, etc.) Assist with dissemination activities (e.g., presentations, case studies, articles, etc.)

Coaches Have…. Fluency with PBIS systems, practices, and data Knowledge of behavior management strategies Knowledge of PBIS technical assistance, such as data management systems (SWIS) Capacity to train others in PBIS practices and systems (i.e., mentoring) Enthusiasm to sustain school PBIS implementation efforts

Type of Coaching Internal Coach Individuals who are full time staff member of the school they coach External Coach Individuals who are itinerant staff members coaching one of the schools to which they are assigned Individuals who are coaching another school (i.e., not their assigned position)

Considerations of Internal vs. External Coaching School Size Geographic Spread between Schools District Capacity/Investment in Systemic Implementation Personnel Skill Fluency Organizational Structures and Capacity Coaching Coordination

Advantages Internal Coach –Knowledge of staffing, operational procedures, organization, etc. –Established staff relationships –Regular access External Coach –Independent relationship with staff –Outside perspective and examples –Multiple school access

Disadvantages Internal Coach –Conflicting role responsibilities, lines of authority, and supervisory functions –Narrow range of external authority, experience, and examples External Coach –Limited knowledge of staffing, operational procedures, organization, etc. –Limited working relationships –Less frequent access

What Do Coaches Do? Communicate with team (phone calls, s, attend team meetings) Ensure that team has agenda, data, team implementation checklist-Form A, action plan) Ensure team communicates to staff (Marketing) Provide awareness presentations (Marketing) Make connections-school to school, etc. Communicate with local coordinator and point of contact about implementation progress, e.g. forms required and timelines for forms

Roles of the Coach Communicate with team (phone calls, s, attend team meetings) Ensure that team has agenda, data, team implementation checklist-Form A, action plan) Ensure team communicates to staff (Marketing) Provide awareness presentations (Marketing) Make connections-school to school etc Communicate with local coordinator, point of contact- Forms Matrix

“Positive Nag” and Cheerleader Provide frequent, positive communication Find positives in school data Provide edible reinforcers, thank you’s, other kudos Celebrate successes –Cc-ing key people, PR contact, presentations Encourage positive behavior by administrator Maintain coaches’ school binder –Means of documenting efforts and celebrating success Encourage team’s documentation of programming

Empower the Team Leader Meet with Team Leader outside of scheduled meetings –Work “behind the scenes” –Establish rapport, encouragement, guidance Foster the image of the Team Leader –Within Team meetings and School system Encourage independence with website Offer tools from toolkit and other resources

Facilitating vs. Leading FacilitatorTeam Leader Ensures the team meets regularlySets the dates for meetings Offers tools to assist in record keeping, team evaluations, etc. Checks accuracy of records, directs team in evaluation Ensures equal distribution of roles and responsibilities Assumes the role of leader, delegates, assigns tasks Ensures the team is using data for decision making Refers the team to the data during team meetings

Be a Resource for Information and a Liaison Multiple levels –School(s), LSS coordinator, MSDE Attend coaches’ meetings and other training opportunities Collect data for state or LSS Coordinator –Forms Distribute information (“timing is everything”) –Toolkit

Information Resource and Liaison Organizational tips –Notebook System, for example #1: School notebook (products specific to the individual school) #2: Coach’s Toolkit (samples of products such as matrix, lesson plans, parent involvement ideas, classroom strategies, etc.) #3: Technical Information, i.e., samples of forms, coach’s meeting minutes, other references, etc.) –Monthly Form Requirements (timeline for data collection) –Readily-Available Contact Information School’s Team “Group Contact” for Phone contact numbers Websites and links Seek out answers/support as needed

Facilitate Data-Based Decision-Making Use data to measure outcomes SWIS access –Consult with SWIS Facilitator as needed –Obtain “Read-only” passwords and use as needed DRIP (Data Rich, Information Poor) –What is your question? –What data do you need to answer the question? –Can you explain the data? Refer to the “general data-based decision making rules”

Data-Based Decision Making Rules If……Focus on…. >40% of students received 1+ ODR >2.5 ODRs per student School-wide System >60% of referrals come from classroom >50% of ODR come from <10% of classrooms Classroom System >35% of referrals come from non-classroom settings >15% of students referred from non- classroom settings Non-Classroom Systems >10-15 students receive >5 ODRTargeted Group Interventions 10 ODR <10 students continue rate of referrals after receiving targeted group support small # students destabilizing overall functioning of school Individualized Action Team Systems

Staff Development for Coaches One day training for coaches prior to PBIS team training at the Summer Institute State coaches’ meetings three times per year District meetings (monthly, quarterly, or other schedule at the discretion of the district) District meetings for team leaders and coaches for joint training

Coaches’ Professional Development Increase Fluency about…. PBIS critical features Practices, systems, and data Data-based decision making and analysis Classroom behavior management strategies Functional basis of behavior and supports Intervention strategies for identified students

Coaches Self-Assessment Assists in identifying strengths Assists in identifying professional development goals Assesses knowledge across levels of –Data –Practices –Systems Three forms available –Coach –Coach facilitator/trainer or lead coach –Coach coordinator

Coaches Self-Assessment Scoring Self-Assessment: 3 = Fluent/Mastered 2 = Building skills, but not fluent 1 = Still learning

Coaches Self-Assessment: Data Is familiar with multiple data collection systems and their uses –ODRs, SET, surveys, achievement scores Can assist schools to develop other data systems as needed Can teach and support teams use of data to guide decision-making

Coaches Self-Assessment: Practices Knows and can define the essential features of school- wide PBIS Understands features of effective classroom instruction and management Can guide schools in identifying and adopting evidence- based practices Knows strategies to increase appropriate and decrease inappropriate behavior of groups Can provide schools with models and examples of other schools implementing PBIS Understands basic principles of applied behavior analysis (i.e., reinforcement, punishment, stimulus control, etc.)

Coaches Self-Assessment: Systems Can facilitate effective team meetings Can provide effective consultation and technical assistance to school teams Able to effectively communicate within and across schools Can assist schools to establish systems that support staff and increase sustainability of PBIS efforts

Growth of Coaching in Maryland With the expansion of PBIS in Maryland there has come a need to coordinate the implementation of PBIS within the larger districts The larger districts have identified a Coach Facilitator

Role of the Coach Facilitator Coordinate district implementation of PBIS Provide technical assistance to coaches Serve on the Maryland State PBIS Leadership Team Markets PBIS to key stakeholders in their districts Liaison between the state leadership and the district

Successes Contributed to the fidelity of the implementation of PBIS in Maryland Contributed to the expansion of PBIS within each district and across the state Enhanced collegial collaboration and staff development among coaches Widened coaches understanding of a systems approach to implementation

Challenges Supervision of coaches Is it an add-on?: Coaching may or may not be included in the job descriptions, depending on the school system, but merely encouraged PBIS Team Meeting Schedules: interference with coaches’ other job responsibilities

Challenges Ensuring that coaches have fluency in PBIS implementation Good fit between coach and school, especially when using an external model Having enough coaches per school

Questions and Answers

For additional information: National PBIS website Maryland PBIS website School-wide Information System (SWIS) website Elsa Velez, Ph.D., NCSP Joan Ledvina Parr, Ph.D. Virginia L. Dolan, Ed.D., NCSP Susan Barrett