Results and cost of a population-based biennial faecal occult blood colorectal cancer screening program Bernard DENIS, Philippe PERRIN, Jean François VIES,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A guaiac- based faecal occult blood colorectal cancer screening program involving general practitioners is feasible and cost-effective for mass population.
Advertisements

Organized colorectal cancer screening program with FOBT: participation and diagnostic yield deteriorate with time Results – yield Aim To assess the short.
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance FDA Advisory Committee March, 2002 David Lieberman MD Chief, Division of Gastroenterology Oregon Health Sciences.
Treatment of large and giant colorectal polyps in the real world Stéphanie HUSSON, Guy VENTRE, Frédéric VAGNE, Jean François VIES, Marjorie MUSSO, Jean.
Spotlight on Colorectal Cancer Screening 1 1. Home Screening for Colon Cancer
Assessment of pathologic interpretation of colorectal polyps by general pathologists in community practice Bernard DENIS, Carol PETERS, Catherine CHAPELAIN,
Screening for Colorectal Cancer Cancer Symposium: Measuring the Benefits of Screening and Treatment October 2007.
Recruitment to Trials. Background Recruitment of participants is a VERY important issue. The general consensus is that most trials under recuit.
COLONOSCOPY VERSUS FECAL IMMUNOCHEMICAL TESTING IN COLORECTAL-CANCER SCREENING The New England Journal of Medicine february 23, 2012.
Is upper endoscopy indicated in persons with a positive FOBT and a negative colonoscopy in a population-based colorectal cancer screening program ? Bernard.
Adverse effects of colorectal cancer screening with fecal occult blood test: a population-based organized program Results – serious adverse effects Adverse.
Colorectal cancer: How do we approach health disparities? Marta L. Davila, MD, FASGE University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Colorectal Cancer Screening John Pelzel MD Sleepy Eye Medical Center.
Integrated Cancer Screening Colorectal Cancer Screening.
Sharp L, Tilson L, Whyte S, Ó Céilleachair A
Bowel Screening in Scotland – Current Challenges and Possible Solutions Prof. Bob Steele Ninewells Hospital, University of Dundee.
Turning Data into Action for Colorectal Cancer November 17, 2014 Jessica Shaffer, Director, Maine CDC Colorectal Cancer Control Program
Ethical issues and cancer screening. Efficacy The extent to which a specific intervention, procedure, regimen, or service produces a beneficial result.
Stage-specific survival of screen-detected versus clinically diagnosed colorectal cancer - evidence from the FOBT screening trials- Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar.
AIMGP Seminar Series January 2004 Joo-Meng Soh Edited by Gloria Rambaldini CANCER SCREENING PART II.
Colorectal cancer screening by primary care physicians: a prospective chart audit Bernard DENIS, Guillaume SCHON, Marcel RUETSCH, Jean Christian GRALL,
TREATMENT OF LARGE AND GIANT COLORECTAL POLYPS IN THE REAL WORLD UEGW, PARIS, 2007 Association pour le Dépistage du Cancer colorectal dans le Haut-Rhin.
FIRST TWO AND HALF YEAR OF NATIONAL SCREENING PROGRAM FOR COLORECTAL CANCERS IN REPUBLIC CROATIA Miroslava Katicic 1, Milan Kujundzic 2, Davor Stimac 3,
Gender differences in colorectal cancer screening, attitudes and information preferences Joan M. Griffin, PhD Greta Friedemann-Sánchez, PhD Diana Burgess,
Colorectal Screening NZ Bowel Screening Pilot. WHO Screening criteria  Impt Health condition  Identifiable Latent or early stage  Understand natural.
Basic statistics 11/09/13.
COMPARING YIELD AND COST OF FOBT AND FS IN AN AVERAGE RISK POPULATION: RESULTS AFTER 2 SCREENING ROUNDS N.Segnan MD, Ms Epi Center for Cancer Prevention.
Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Surveillance: Introduction and Overview Carrie Klabunde, Ph.D. IBSN Biennial Meeting Ottawa, Canada May 11-12, 2006.
INCIDENCE AND SURVIVAL TRENDS OF COLORECTAL CANCER FROM 2002 TO 2011 BE Ansa; E Alema-Mensah; MD Claridy; JQ Sheats; B Fontenot, and SA Smith Georgia Regents.
Population Screening for Colorectal Cancer - update of evidences
An Evidence Based Approach to Colorectal Cancer Screening J. C. Ryan, M.D. Associate Professor of Medicine UCSF and SF VAMC 9/22/2014.
Colorectal cancer screening with the addition of flexible sigmoidoscopy to guaiac-based fecal occult blood testing: a population-based controlled trial.
Public State Initiatives in Colorectal Screening: The Colorado Experience Tim Byers MD MPH University of Colorado School of Medicine
Pre-notification increases uptake in colorectal cancer screening: a randomised controlled trial Gillian Libby, Jane Bray, Jennifer Champion, Linda Brownlee,
PREPARED BY Colorectal Cancer Programme Screening for Colorectal Cancer A/P Susan Parry, Gastroenterologist, CD MOH Bowel Cancer Programme.
Brian Cox Research Associate Professor: Cancer epidemiology and screening University of Otago Hugh Adam Cancer Epidemiology Unit Department of Preventive.
Robert E. Schoen, MD MPH Associate Professor of Medicine and Epidemiology Division of Gastroenterology University of Pittsburgh Organizing Colorectal Cancer.
People lives communities Access to bowel screening services.
Incorporating Multiple Evidence Sources for the Assessment of Breast Cancer Policies and Practices J. Jackson-Thompson, Gentry White, Missouri Cancer Registry,
Modeling Efforts to Inform Countries’ Screening Decisions Ann Graham Zauber, Iris Vogelaar, Marjolein van Ballegooijen, Deb Schrag, Rob Boer, Dik Habbema,
Assessing Colorectal Cancer Screening in Appalachia PA William Curry, MD, MS Mark Dignan, PhD Gene Lengerich, VMD Alan Adelman, MD, MS.
1 An Overview of Colorectal Cancer in Delaware Delaware Health Care Commission November 3, 2011.
Yield of colonoscopy for advanced neoplasia in a population-based setting Bernard DENIS, Jacques PICOT, Jean François VIES, Marjorie MUSSO, Paul François.
NHSBCSP - guidelines Phil Quirke. Why guidelines To meet the needs of the programme To improve outcomes To increase the knowledge base and evolve pathology.
Do all colorectal polyps require pathological examination? Aim To assess whether it is possible to omit the pathological examination of some polyps without.
BC Cancer Agency CARE & RESEARCH Breast Cancer Mortality After Screening Mammography in British Columbia Women Andrew J. Coldman, Ph.D. Norm Phillips,
Colorectal Cancer Screening Implementation of a public health programme An Expert Group on Colorectal Cancer Screening Cancer Society of Finland, Finnish.
D EPARTMENT of F AMILY M EDICINE Colorectal Cancer Screening: Update on Guidelines and Projects Barcey T. Levy, PhD, MD Professor, Department of Family.
First results of a pilot population-based faecal occult blood colorectal cancer screening program B. DENIS, P. PERRIN, J.F. EBELIN, P. WEBER, E. KALTENBACH,
Insert name of presentation on Master Slide Bowel Screening in Welsh Prisons Hayley Heard Head of Programme.
March 2010 Having a Bowel Test Professional Pack.
Cancer prevention and early detection
What does the data tell us? Colorectal CANCER IN NEVADA
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines
The Burden of Colorectal Cancer in Arkansas
More Ontarians need to be screened for colorectal cancer (Sept. 2012)
Bowel cancer screening update GP education event 28 Nov 2017
Evidence of a Program's Effectiveness in Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in Federally Qualified Health Centers Robert L. Stephens, PhD, MPH1;
Trends in Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Maryland Residents Age 65 and Older Maryland Cancer Survey, Presented by: Carolyn Poppell, MS University.
Common indicators related to organization and invitation
Bronx Community Health Dashboard: Colorectal Cancer Created: 12/22/2017 Last Updated: 01/19/2018 See last slide for more information about.
SAMPLE – Preliminary Results
Bowel Screening in Wales
Ruggli M.1), Stebler D.1), Besancon L.1), Vaucher F.1)
Reporting in CRC screening
Citation: Cancer Care Ontario
BOWEL CANCER SCREENING IN LEWISHAM
Presentation transcript:

Results and cost of a population-based biennial faecal occult blood colorectal cancer screening program Bernard DENIS, Philippe PERRIN, Jean François VIES, Jean Paul MILLELIRI, Frédéric VAGNE, Guy VENTRE, Jean Marc BOYAVAL, Fernand PLANCHON Results according to age Despite strong evidence that screening reduces both colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality and incidence, CRC screening tests remain underutilized. Aim: To report the results and cost of a population-based biennial faecal occult blood (FOBT) CRC screening program in the French area of Haut- Rhin ( inhabitants), an area with one of the highest CRC incidence in Europe. Methods: All 188,438 residents aged years were invited by mail for a CRC screening using a non rehydrated FOBT (Hemoccult II). FOBTs were first provided by the GPs and then directly mailed to persons who didn’t comply after 2 invitations. The processing of FOBTs was centralized. Results: 87,790 people (46.6%) completed a FOBT and 18,995 (10.1%) were excluded for recent CRC screening, high risk of CRC or concurrent severe disease, so that adjusted participation rate was 51.8%. Participation was higher in women (54.2%) than in men (49.4%)(p<0.001) and ranged from 45.4% to 59.8% according to districts. Participation was lower below 60 years (47.5%) than after (56.6%). FOBT positivity rate was 3.3%, higher in men (3.9%) than in women (2.8%)(p<0.001). To date 2,408 colonoscopies were performed. The positive predictive value was 10% for CRC (women 7.2%, men 12.5%), 20.8% for advanced adenomas (women 13.4%, men 26.9%) and 42.2% for neoplasia (women 30.6%, men 51.8%). Detection rates for neoplasia and CRC were 11.6 and 2.8 per 1,000 people screened. 27.2% of CRC were in situ, 50% of invasive CRC were stage I and 23.4% stage II. The rate of proximal advanced neoplasia increased with age (16.5% below 65 years, 25.4% after) but didn’t differ with gender. Flexible sigmoidoscopy alone would have missed 21.4% of people with advanced neoplasia, without significant difference according to age and gender. The overall cost of this biennial screening program (without the fees related to colonoscopies) was $2.7 million: fixed cost was $1.88 million ($5 per year per eligible person) and variable cost $0.82 million ($4 per screened person). The cost per screened person was $30 and the cost to find an early-stage neoplasia (advanced adenoma or in situ CRC or stage I CRC) was $4,300. Conclusion: Participation and diagnostic yield of randomised controlled trials of FOBT screening are reproducible at a reasonable cost in the real world through an organized population-based program involving GPs. Efforts should be made to enhance the participation of men and people below 60 years. Despite strong evidence that screening reduces both colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality and incidence, CRC screening tests remain underutilized Aim to report the results and cost of a population-based biennial faecal occult blood (FOBT) CRC screening program - French area of Haut-Rhin (0.71 million inhabitants) one of the highest CRC incidence in Europe - Residents aged years were invited twice by mail to visit their GP for a CRC screening. The recall letter included a reply coupon which could be used to specify reasons for non participation. 12 to 15 months after the 1 st invitation, FOBTs were mailed to persons who didn’t complete the test and a last recall letter was sent if necessary 6 weeks later. - Biennial non rehydrated FOBT (Hemoccult II) without dietary restriction. - FOBT analysis was centralized in the Centre d’Examens de Santé of the CPAM in Mulhouse - FOBTs were provided free of charge. Financing was ensured through the French Social Security and the Haut-Rhin Administration (Conseil Général du Haut-Rhin). - Start of the program was spread out according to districts over a year from September 2003 to September Results below are those assessed in April Participation and diagnostic yield of randomized controlled trials of FOBT screening are reproducible at a reasonable cost in the real world through an organized population-based program involving GPs - Efforts should be made to enhance the participation of men and people below 60 years Digestive Disease Week, Los Angeles, 21 May 2006 Results : invitation / exclusion / participation invited population population aged years186,660 exclusions recent CRC screening12,115 (6.5%) high risk of CRC6,109 (3.3%) concurrent severe disease842 (0.5%) total population excluded (10.4%) participation crude participation90,863 (48.7%) adjusted participation90,863 (54.3%) Association pour le Dépistage du Cancer colorectal dans le Haut-Rhin (ADECA 68), 39 avenue de la Liberté, Colmar, FRANCE Abstract Background Results : FOBT / colonoscopy GPs (98.6%) provided FOBTs % of completed FOBTs were provided by GPs % of the FOBTs provided by GPs were completed - mean number of persons having completed a FOBT = 108 / GP (range 0 – 472) menwomenp adjusted participation51.9%56.6%< 0.01 FOBT positivity rate3.9%2.8%< 0.01 PPV for neoplasia52.2%31.0%< 0.01 detection rate for neoplasia17.5‰7.5‰< 0.01 detection rate for cancer4.3‰1.8‰< 0.01 CRC stagen (%) in situ72 (27.0%) invasive195 (73.0%) stage 172 (49.7%) stage 235 (24.1%) stage 329 (20.0%) stage 49 (6.2%) stage unknown50 FOBT: 93,458 tests completed - 3,086 (3.3%) positive - 2,975 (3.2 %) uninterpretable, 2,293 (77.1%) were completed again % of positive FOBT were followed by a colonoscopy FOBT positivity rate3.3% PPV for neoplasia42.6% PPV for cancer10.3% PPV for advanced adenoma21.0% detection rate for neoplasia12.2‰ screened detection rate for cancer2.9‰ screened detection rate for advanced adenoma6.0‰ screened Results : diagnostic yield Results according to gender Methods Results : GP’s involvement adjusted participation % FOBT positivity rate % PPV for neoplasia % detection rate neoplasia ‰ detection rate cancer ‰ Colonoscopy: 2,595 recorded % complete Wintzenheim Thann Dannemarie Masevaux Altkirch Hirsingue Cernay Guebwiller Saint-Amarin Munster Rouffach Soultz Lapoutroie Sainte-Marie-aux-Mines Wittenheim Mulhouse Ferrette Sierentz Huningue Illzach Habsheim Ensisheim Kaysersberg Ribeauville Neuf-Brisach Colmar Andolsheim 46 – 50 % 50 – 54 % 54 – 58 % 58 – 62 % advanced neoplasia location< 65y> 65yp rectum16.9%14.4%NS distal colon66.6%60.2%= 0.03 proximal colon16.5%25.4%< % 17.6% 25.0% Results - Costs advanced neoplasia locationmenwomenp rectum13.6%20.8%< 0.01 distal colon63.8%60.9%NS proximal colon22.6%18.3%NS CRC location A screening strategy with flexible sigmoidoscopy would have missed 21.4% of people with advanced neoplasia, without significant difference according to age and gender. - Overall cost $2.7 million (without the fees related to colonoscopies):. fixed cost $1.88 million ($5 a year per eligible person). variable cost $0.82 million ($4 per screened person) - Cost per screened person: $30 - Cost to find. 1 early-stage neoplasia: $4,300 (advanced adenoma or in situ or stage I CRC). 1 colorectal cancer: $11,200 Conclusions