HR- Peer Review: the Belgian experience GOOD GOVERNANCE FOR DEVELOPMENT (GFD) IN ARAB COUNTRIES INITIATIVE GROUP B Regional Meeting of the Working Group.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Short overview of the SCORE project
Advertisements

Human Resource Management Modernisation in OECD Countries: Achievements and Challenges Oscar Huerta Melchor OECD, Administrator Public Governance and Territorial.
Existing tools for cooperation – WG 2 1 Regional Policy Dialogue Capacity building seminars WORKING GROUP MEETINGS HIGH LEVEL SEMINAR SERIES 4 working.
Partnerships: influencing local economic and employment development Brussels, October 9th, 2007 Gabriela Miranda Policy Analyst OECD, LEED Programme.
The EU framework for integration of third-country nationals: a focus on the role of cities and on funding opportunities Martin Schieffer, Immigration and.
EPAA Conference 5 November 2007 Georgette LALIS Enterprise and Industry DG European Commission The international dimension of regulatory acceptance.
Role of National Parliaments
EuropeAid Pre-Assessment and Assessment for Parliamentary Development Promoting domestic accountability: engaging with parliaments EC support to governance.
Impact of the evaluations and follow-up activities M. Assunção, 13 October 2008 EUA Institutional Evaluation Programme, Workshop for Universities: round.
UCSC History. UCSC: A brief history 60s University Placement Committee A lot of field trips/interaction with employers.
From e-Government to e-Governance: The OECD Experience Elizabeth Muller E-Government Project OECD SitExpo February 1004, Casablanca - Morocco.
Evaluating administrative and institutional capacity building
Building up capacity for Roma inclusion at local level Kosice, November 6 th, 2013.
ISO
Jose Braz, ERGEG Conference on Implementing the 3rd Package 11th December 2008 The Agency for the Cooperation of European Energy Regulators.
15 October th INTOSAI KSC Steering Committee Meeting in Cairo.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation Lecture 10 – Maximizing the Use of Evaluation Results.
COORDINATED AUDITS IN AFROSAI-E Presented By Josephine Mukomba.
Integration of Regulatory Impact Assessment into the decision making process in the Czech Republic Aleš Pecka Department of Regulatory Reform and Public.
PRESENTATION The Structured Dialogue. What? A participative process for young people and decision-makers to discuss and elaborate recommendations jointly.
Beirut – 20 April 2011 Citizens as partners: current issues and challenges Charles-Henri Montin Senior Regulatory Adviser Ministère de l’économie et des.
Critical Role of ICT in Parliament Fulfill legislative, oversight, and representative responsibilities Achieve the goals of transparency, openness, accessibility,
© Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. Review of Partnership Working Vale of Glamorgan Council Final Report- July 2008.
This project is co-funded by the European Union "The European Union is made up of 27 Member States who have decided to gradually link together their know-how,
Intersectoral Collaboration An Initiative: Promoting collaboration among the three sectors of the social work profession.
WP2 Legal work Helle PEDERSEN Elisabeth KOHLER (CNRS)
Hungarian Presidency programme and results in the field of Cohesion Policy Zsuzsanna Kondor, National Development Agency, Coordination MA 23 June 2011.
Quality Assurance. Identified Benefits that the Core Skills Programme is expected to Deliver 1.Increased efficiency in the delivery of Core Skills Training.
Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area Tibor Szanto ENQA Rogaska Slatina, 30 November 2007.
POLICY, LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK AND NATIONAL STRATEGY A PAPER PRESENTED BY KENYA LAW REFORM COMMISSION (KLRC) AT LAICO REGENCY IN THE WORKSHOP.
Regional workshop on exchange of experiences between African countries “Better statistical dialogue for better development results” Bamako, June.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU. Quality Assurance José Viegas Ribeiro IGF, Portugal SIGMA.
SHAs Leads Network Meeting Professor Steve Barnett Interim Chief Executive Officer The Academy for Healthcare Science.
World Bank Institute Regional Workshop for Anglophone Africa on Auditing and Financial Accountability Addis Ababa KEY ISSUES IN CREATING AN EFFECTIVE INTERNAL.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
Luc Hendrickx Sofia 20 February 2006 Successful representation of SMEs at EU level - best practices - TAIEX Workshop on Competitive Power © ueapme2006.
PRESENTATION IV Cycle of the Structured Dialogue.
DENEL GROUP 1 Presented by: Patience Mushungwa Group Executive: HR & Transformation Date: 19 March 2010 DENEL PRESENTATION TO PARLIAMENT DENEL GROUP.
Improving Government responsiveness as key to meaningful public participation in decision-making processes: Croatian experience Igor Vidačak Government.
Communication Paper on Smart Regulation COM(2010) 543, 8 October 2010 Presentation by Savia Orphanidou 3 rd November 2010.
MERTON LOCAL INVOLVEMENT NETWORK MEETING 27 March 2008 Richard Poxton Centre for Public Scrutiny National Team.
Land Governance and Security of Tenure in Developing Countries White paper of the French Development cooperation LAND POLICIES AND MDGS IN RESPONSE TO.
The Commission's Impact Assessment system 18 September 2014 María Dolores Montesinos Impact Assessment unit Secretariat General 1.
Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices Working Group on Audit Manuals and Methods March 2006 Vilnius (Lithuania) Hungarian Experiences.
Safety Management System Implementation Michael Niels Thorsen Moscow 15 September 2005.
Evaluation Unit EuropeAid Martyn Pennington Head of Evaluation Unit- Devco B2 Workshop on Lessons Learned from International Joint Evaluations French Ministry.
The 2006 Asian Roundtable on Corporate Governance The Asia Network on Corporate Governance of SOEs John Lim President, Singapore Institute of Directors.
Ensuring Participation in Legislative Processes: European Principles and Practical Considerations Katerina Hadzi-Miceva European Center for Not-for-Profit.
Session: 9.3_BE Leadership development in the Federal Public Service Finance How to develop leadership skills and create employee involvement in organizational.
Quality assurance in Danish VET Ljubljana 19th November 2015 Hans Joergen Knudsen, NCE.
Catholic Charities Performance and Quality Improvement (PQI)
INTEGRATED STRATEGIC PLANNING PROCESS (ISPP) 10 year planning outlook10 year planning outlook Monia Lahaie, DCFO and Director General Finance at Statistics.
1 The Russian Corporate Governance Roundtable Fianna Jesover Corporate Affairs Division OECD Discussion on Implementing and Enforcing Corporate Governance.
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
A Framework for Assessing Needs Across Multiple States, Stakeholders, and Topic Areas Stephanie Wilkerson & Mary Styers REL Appalachia American Evaluation.
Internal Audit Section. Authorized in Section , Florida Statutes Section , Florida Statutes (F.S.), authorizes the Inspector General to review.
WORKSHOP ON ACCREDITATION OF BODIES CERTIFYING MEDICAL DEVICES INT MARKET TOPIC 6 CH 5 ISO MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY Philippe Bauwin Medical.
Creating Positive Culture through Leadership (Recovery Orientation) Jennifer Black.
Managing Talent – Maximizing Your Employee’s Potential 3 rd SACCO LEADERS’ FORUM Monique DunbarLorri Lochrie Communicating Arts Credit UnionCentral 1 Credit.
THE GLOBAL NUCLEAR SAFETY AND SECURITY NETWORK-GNSSN Lingquan Guo Safety Knowledge Networks Safety And Security Coordination Section Department of Nuclear.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
Framework Policy on Continuing Care in First Nations Communities of Quebec Conference on clients with decreasing independence May 10, 2017.
STRESS TESTS and TAIWAN PEER REVIEW PROCESS
BUYING QUALITY PRIVATE SECURITY SERVICES
Statutory participatory mechanisms
EPAN – Lisbon ad hoc group Welcome - Agenda Introduction
Consultation & Participation
Giles Denham Director of Strategic Relationships
Ad hoc Group of Experts on Better Regulation
Project leader: Richard Morton Lead Editor: Jalal Benhayoun
Presentation transcript:

HR- Peer Review: the Belgian experience GOOD GOVERNANCE FOR DEVELOPMENT (GFD) IN ARAB COUNTRIES INITIATIVE GROUP B Regional Meeting of the Working Group on Integrity and Civil Service 04 APRIL 2008 Philippe VERMEULEN, Advisor general, Federal Public Service on Personnel & Organisation

End 2005: proposition by the OECD + estimate of the costs March 2006: –Agreement/contract between OECD & CEO (Chairman of the Board of Directors) of the FPS P&0 & representatives Belgian federated entities –Drawing up & consensus on the Terms of reference Taking into account some major challenges: –Complex structure of the Federal State –Volume on documentation –Different culture & views on HR & public management –Reputation of the OECD (80s & 90s) –Ensuring political commitment on federal level, quid on regional & community level? 1. Getting started: a well considered process

Responding to core questions: –Goal of the Peer Review? –Added value, now & for the future? Consensus on definitions Organizing workshops between the international experts and the respondents + interviews social partners & other stakeholders (May & September 2006) Looking for & using already available data and/or ongoing surveys to limit the burden on the administrations Draft paper (November 2006 & February 2007) Final approval (June 2007) 1. Getting started: a well considered process (cont.)

2. Dos & donts Clear contract between OECD & partner country –(senior) Experts –Timing –Cost –Outcome Guidelines –Good practices instead of best practices –No universal truth –Client defines which areas are audited –Goal= Not another survey Define challenges promote structurized cross-section dialogue & exchange views Permanent feedback & only finished + published when government(s) agree(s)

3. Added value Methodological: –Interaction between both auditors and audited parties on a well defined consensual terms of reference –in which the autonomy of the auditors is crucial –the audited parties dont find themselves in a conceptual or spoon-fed ideologically correct framework, –but are encouraged to give their points of view, clarifications or amendments as they see fit. –Its then up to the experts to analyze the data and to give their expert opinion, always taking care to give sufficient feedback and being prepared to accept any reasonable arguments to rectify their opinions

3. Added value (contd) A forum for dialogue: –ensuring freedom of opinion, putting hard facts on the table and keeping the possibility open to react in respect for everyones goals and reasons –Not only between the auditors and the audited parties, but also between the different central levels within the Belgian Federation whose common and ultimate objective it is to serve the citizen in the best way they can. –also between different viewpoints on conceptual or practical approaches for common challenges

3. Added value (contd) enables data mining which is interesting for Belgium as well as for other OECD- Member Countries and Observers. Furthermore, it allows benchmarking between different central levels in the Belgian Federation, and with other countries if they apply the same methodology. strengthens cross-entity collaboration on matters of HR-policy Communication between all actors continues by setting up a cross-entity extranet RELEX on OECD-documents and activities with the goal to reflect the opinions of the different entities in the viewpoints & communications of the Belgian delegation to the OECD on public governance matters;

4. Impact data was a topic for broad discussion between employers organisations & unions Report was discussed at senior civil level in the different entities basis for negociations when forming new federal government has finally influenced policy objectives for the new government due to the fact that quite some recommendations & remarks were followed or taken into account : –The HR-policy:integrity, training possibilities, motivation, result-oriented & user or client-driven; –Customer satisfaction as well as civil servant satisfaction;

4. Impact (cntd) –The regulatory simplification of the personnel statute within the goal to adapt HR- conditions to enhance modern career management & development ; –Priority is given to statutory employment, but possibilities to develop career possibilities & equal working conditions for civil servants recruited on contract basis will be examined as well as the possibility to contract interim personnel; –Developing an effective performance management; –Creating a real management contract between the political level and the administration based on concrete goals, adaptable to the stakeholders needs and objectives where the Chairpersons of each Federal Public Service receive large, real autonomy to develop their HR-policy and to use their budget where a priori, ex ante controls are to be replaced by random a posterior, ex post controls; –New citizens participation methods are to be examined in order to enhance involvement in policy making & assessment –A electronic Single Point of Contact (SPOC) is to developed ensuring the equal access to public information for those who dont benefit from the internet revolution;