Goal Achievement after Utilizing an Anti-PCSK9 Antibody in Statin-Intolerant Subjects (GAUSS): Results from a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lipid-altering Efficacy and Safety Profile of Co-administered Extended Release Niacin/Laropiprant and Simvastatin in Patients With Dyslipidemia Gilbert.
Advertisements

HPS2-THRIVE: Treatment of HDL to Reduce the Incidence of Vascular Events Jane Armitage on behalf of the THRIVE Collaborative Group Financial Disclosure:
Robert K Huff PharmD. Candidate May Objectives The study was designed to examine 3 main aspects Biochemical effects Safety Tolerability Evacetrapib.
Prescribing Information is available at the end of this presentation NHS Surrey Lipid Guidelines Dr Adam Jacques Ashford & St.
TNT: Study Design Treating to New Targets 2 5 years 10,001 Patients Clinically evident CHD LDL-C 130  250 mg/dL following up to 8-week washout and 8-week.
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of a Monoclonal Antibody to PCSK9, SAR236553/REGN727, in Patients with.
The LAPLACE-2 Trial: A Phase 3, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo and Ezetimibe Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy.
Simvastatin Increases HDL-C and Apolipoprotein A-1 Levels Significantly More Than Atorvastatin John P. Kastelein, Evan A. Stein, Michael A. Davidson, John.
Treating to New Targets Study TNT Trial Presented at The American College of Cardiology Scientific Sessions 2005 Presented by Dr. John C. LaRosa.
An Academic Research Organization of Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School LAPLACE-TIMI 57 Primary Results A Double-blind, Randomized,
Randomized Comparison of the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Long-term Administration of AMG 145: 52-Week Results From the OSLER Study Michael J.
March 29, 2014, Featured Clinical Research Session 400
CE-1 CRESTOR ® Clinical Development Efficacy James W. Blasetto, MD, MPH Senior Director, Clinical Research.
Lipid-Modulating Effects of Evacetrapib, a Novel CETP Inhibitor, Administered as Monotherapy or in Combination with the Most Commonly-Used Statins SJ.
Downloaded from Slide 1 Ezetimibe Coadministered with Atorvastatin in Patients with Hypercholesterolemia and Coronary Heart.
Role of Rosuvastatin in the Treatment of Dyslipidemia
Clinical experience with ezetimibe/simvastatin in a Mediterranean population The SETTLE Study I. Migdalis a, A. Efthimiadis b, St. Pappas c, D. Alexopoulos.
ACCP Cardiology PRN Journal Club
Reduction of LDL-C with PCSK9 Inhibition in Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia Disorder (RUTHERFORD): Results from a Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind,
Efficacy and Safety of Evolocumab (AMG 145) Monotherapy Compared With Ezetimibe and Placebo in Hypercholesterolemic Subjects: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical.
VOYAGER An indiVidual patient data meta- analysis Of statin therapY in At risk Groups: Effects of Rosuvastatin, atorvastatin and simvastatin Please see.
Downloaded from Slide 1 Dual Inhibition of Two Sources of Cholesterol: Absorption and Production in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
Slide 1 EZT 2002-W-6022-SS Ezetimibe Co-administered with Statins: Efficacy and Tolerability Copyright © 2003 MSP Singapore Company, LLC. All rights reserved.
Management of Elevated Cholesterol in the Primary Prevention Group of Adult Japanese (MEGA) Trial MEGA Trial Presented at The American Heart Association.
Praluent® - alirocumab
Comparison of the Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis for Two High Efficacy Statin Regimens with Different HDL Effects: SATURN Study Results SJ Nicholls,
Slide 1 Downloaded from Ezetimibe Factorial Coadministration Studies.
Laura Mucci, Pharm.D. Candidate Mercer University 2012 Preceptor: Dr. Rahimi February 2012.
Incremental Decrease in Clinical Endpoints Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering (IDEAL) Trial IDEAL Trial Presented at The American Heart Association Scientific.
The Prospective Pravastatin Pooling Project L I P I D CARECARE PPP Project Investigators Am J Cardiol 1995; 76:899–905.
Safety and Efficacy of a Monoclonal Antibody to Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Serine Protease, SAR236553/REGN727, in Patients With Primary.
CI-1 CRESTOR ® (rosuvastatin calcium) Tablets Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee Bethesda, Maryland July 9, 2003 C.
OVERALL SURVIVAL Adapted from Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group Lancet 1994;344: % of patients alive Simvastatin (n=2221)
SPARCL Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels trial.
Arterial Biology for the Investigation of the Treatment Effects of Reducing Cholesterol 2 ARBITER-2 Trial Presented at The American Heart Association Scientific.
Statin Induce Myotoxicity
Endocrinologic & Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting
Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study CARDS Dr Sachin Kadoo.
1 ALN-PCSsc, an RNAi Investigational Agent That Inhibits PCSK9 Synthesis With the Potential for Effective Bi-Annual Dosing: Interim Results Kevin Fitzgerald,
Manufacturer: Amgen Inc FDA Approval Date: August 27, 2015
ACC/AHA Guidelines Not the Final or Only Word. Contemporary Guidelines
Ezetimibe Overall Conclusions
Downloaded from Slide 1 Dual Inhibition of Two Sources of Cholesterol: Absorption and Production Results of a Clinical Trial.
Date of download: 5/28/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(24): doi: /j.jacc Figure Legend:
Kendrick Sparks, PGY3 September 17, 2015
Steven E. Nissen MD MACC*
Double-blind, randomized trial in 4,162 patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome
Date of download: 6/29/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: A Test in Context: High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein.
R1. 이정미 / prof. 김우식. INTRODUCTION Reduction in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels has proved to be highly effective in reducing rates of.
Lowering of LDL-c: Novel concepts and novel promises Dr. Evan Stein University of Cincinnati Ohio, USA.
FOURIER Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research With PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects With Elevated Risk
Efficacy and safety of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor alirocumab among high cardiovascular risk patients on maximally tolerated.
Title slide.
European Society of Cardiology 2017 Clinical Trial Update I
Update on the Role of PCSK9 in the Treatment of the High-Risk CVD
Statin Myopathy (AHA/ACC/NHLBI)
SPIRE Program: Studies of PCSK9 Inhibition and the Reduction of Vascular Events Unanticipated attenuation of LDL-c lowering response to humanized PCSK9.
Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)
Lipid Lowering Efficacy of Bococizumab Among 4,449 High Risk Patients
The LAPLACE-2 Trial: A Phase 3, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo and Ezetimibe Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy.
GAUSS-3 Trial design: Patients with objective evidence of intolerance to statin agents were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to either evolocumab 420 mg subcutaneously.
Efficacy of alirocumab in high cardiovascular risk populations with or without heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: Pooled analysis of eight ODYSSEY.
Section 7: Aggressive vs moderate approach to lipid lowering
Screening, Lipid Stabilization, and Placebo Run-in
Major classes of drugs to reduce lipids
The LAPLACE-2 Trial: A Phase 3, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo and Ezetimibe Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy.
The following slides highlight a report on a presentation at the American College of Cardiology 2004, Scientific Sessions, in New Orleans, Louisiana on.
SPIRE Program: Studies of PCSK9 Inhibition and the Reduction of Vascular Events Unanticipated attenuation of LDL-c lowering response to humanized PCSK9.
Putting Your Skills to the Test
Presentation transcript:

Goal Achievement after Utilizing an Anti-PCSK9 Antibody in Statin-Intolerant Subjects (GAUSS): Results from a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evan A. Stein1, David Sullivan2, Anders G. Olsson3, Rob Scott4, Jae B. Kim4, Allen Xue4, Thomas Liu4, Scott M. Wasserman4  1Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA; 2Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; 3Stockholm Heart Center, Stockholm, Sweden; 4Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA  November 5, 2012, Session LBCT.04 American Heart Association Scientific Sessions, Los Angeles, CA

Presenter Disclosure Information Evan A. Stein Financial Disclosure This study was funded by Amgen Inc. E.A. Stein has received consulting fees from Amgen, Adnexus Therapeutics, BMS, Genentech, Regeneron and Sanofi related to PCSK9 inhibitors, and his institution has received research funding for PCSK9 trials from Amgen, BMS, Genentech, Sanofi, and Regeneron. D. Sullivan has received funding for research, educational programs, or travel support from, and/or has served on an advisory board for Amgen, Abbott Products, AstraZeneca, Merck, Sharp and Dohme, Sanofi Aventis, Pfizer Australia, and Roche. A. G. Olsson has received research support and/or consulting fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Karobio, MSD, Pfizer, and Roche. R. Scott, J.B. Kim, A. Xue, T. Liu, and S.M. Wasserman are employees of Amgen Inc. and have received Amgen stock/stock options. The authors acknowledge the editorial support of Meera Kodukulla, Amgen Inc., and Sue Hudson, on behalf of Amgen Inc. Unlabeled/unapproved uses disclosure Use of AMG 145 in patients with hyperlipidemia is investigational.

Background: LDL-C Reduction in Statin-Intolerant Patients Statins are currently the most effective agents for reducing LDL-C and cardiovascular risk,1 but 10% to 20% of patients cannot tolerate statins, or higher doses of statins, that are required to achieve recommended LDL-C goals, due primarily to muscle-related side effects.2 Ezetimibe is the most frequently used statin alternative, lowering LDL-C 18%, but even low-risk patients are unlikely to achieve LDL-C goals with ezetimibe alone, or in combination with low-dose statin.3 Statin-intolerant patients, especially those at high cardiovascular risk, need more effective and well tolerated therapies to lower LDL-C. Baigent C, et al/ Lancet. 2005;366:1267-1278. Bruckert E, et al. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2005;19:403-414. Ballantyne CM, et al. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99(5):673-680.

Background: PCKS9 Inhibition and AMG 145 Plasma proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) plays a pivotal role in cellular cholesterol homeostasis, by binding to, and mediating the recycling of LDL receptors.1 AMG 145 is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds to PCSK9 in the circulation and blocks its interaction with LDL-Rs, increasing their recycling and removal of LDL-C. In phase 1 studies, AMG 145 was well tolerated and reduced LDL-C up to 64% in healthy subjects and up to 81% in subjects with hypercholesterolemia.2 Benjannet S, et al. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:40965-40978. 2. Dias C. et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(19) Published Online First Oct 17, 2012

GAUSS Background Goal Achievement after Utilizing an Anti-PCSK9 Antibody in Statin-Intolerant Subjects Global, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Study Study objective: Evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of AMG 145 compared to ezetimibe in a difficult-to-treat and growing population: patients at cardiovascular risk who are unable to tolerate effective doses of statins due to muscle-related side effects.

GAUSS: Study Design & Entry Criteria Screening and Placebo Run-in Period Randomization 1:1:1:1:1 280 mg AMG 145 SC Q4W EOS 350 mg AMG 145 SC Q4W Primary endpoint: Percentage change in LDL-C, by ultracentrifugation, from baseline at 12 weeks 420 mg AMG 145 SC Q4W 420 mg AMG 145 SC Q4W and ezetimibe 10 mg Placebo SC Q4W and and ezetimibe 10 mg Max. 6 weeks Statin-intolerant definition Not at NCEP goal having tried at least 1 statin Unable to tolerate any dose or an increased statin dose above daily starting dose (eg, atorvastatin <70 mg/week) due to intolerable myopathy Symptoms resolved when the statin dose was decreased or discontinued Visits: Day 1 Week 2 Week 4 Week 8 Week 12 Q4W: IP Administration (AMG 145 or placebo) Population Adults (18 – 75 years) with LDL-C above goals per NCEP risk level Statin-intolerance due to muscle-related side effects NCEP, National Cholesterol Education Program

GAUSS: Baseline Characteristics AMG 145 Q4W AMG 145 420 mg + Ezetimibe N = 30 Placebo + Ezetimibe N = 32 280 mg 350 mg N = 31 420 mg Sex, female, n (%) 18 (56) 21 (68) 20 (63) 23 (77) Age, years, mean (SD) 62 (10) 62 (9) 60 (9) 62 (7) LDL-C, mg/dL , mean (SD)* 195 (48) 190 (48) 204 (60) 194 (60) 183 (36) Free PCSK9, ng/mL, mean (SD) 383 (98) 396 (129) 372 (87) 379 (111) 390 (91) NCEP high-risk, n (%) 14 (44) 12 (39) 11 (34) 10 (33) 15 (47) Coronary artery disease, n (%) 3 (9) 5 (16) 6 (20) 10 (31) Statins failed (muscle-related events) ≥ 1, n (%) 32 (100) 31 (100) 30 (100) ≥ 2, n (%) 28 (53) 24 (77) 23 (72) 21 (70) 25 (78) ≥ 3, n (%) 11 (35) 12 (38) Worst statin-related events, any statin Myalgia, n (%) 31 (97) 30 (97) 29 (91) 29 (97) Myositis, n (%) 3 (10) 2 (6) 2 (7) 4 (13) Rhabdomyolysis, n (%) 0 (0.0) 1 (3) 0 (0) Statin use at baseline Any statin, No. % 5 (15.6) 5 (16.1) 4 (13.3) 6 (18.8) 25 (15.9) Atorvastatin, No. (%) 0 (0.0) 1 (3.3) 1 (3.1) 2 (1.3) Atorvastatin mean dose, range, mg/daya 0.0 (0.0) 10.0 (10.0-10.0) 5.0 (5.0-5.0) 7.5 (5.0-10.0) Fluvastatin, No. (%) 1 (3.2) 1 (0.6) Fluvastatin mean dose, range, mg/daya 40.0 (40.0-40.0) 40.0 (40.0-40.0) Lovastatin, No. (%) Lovastatin mean dose, range, mg/daya 0.0 (0.0-0.0) 20.0 (20.0-20.0) 20.0 (20.0-20.0) Pravastatin, No. (%) 2 (6.3) 3 (1.9) Pravastatin mean dose, range, mg/daya 10.0 (10.0-10.0 Rosuvastatin, No. (%) 3 (9.7) 2 (6.7) 3 (9.4) 11 (7.0) Rosuvastatin mean dose, range, mg/daya 1.8 (1.1-2.5) 5.0 (5.0-5.0) 1.3 (1.3-1.3) 2.0 (1.4-2.5) 2.0 (1.3-2.5) 2.5 (1.1-5.0) Simvastatin, No. (%) 7 (4.5) Simvastatin mean dose, range, mg/daya 16.7 (10.0-20.0) 15.0 (10.0-20.0) 16.7 (10.0-20.0) Bile-acid sequestrants, No. (%) Omega-3 fish oil supplements, No. (%) Other, No. (%) 5 (3.2) * LDL-C measured by ultracentrifugation. SD, standard deviation; NCEP, National Cholesterol Education Program

GAUSS: % Change in LDL-C, by UC, from Baseline at Week 12 LDL-C values at baseline and week 12 were measured using preparative ultracentrifugation. Q4W, every 4 weeks; QD, daily; SE, standard error

GAUSS: % Change from Baseline in Calculated LDL-C* At All Visits * Calculated LDL-C values. Q4W, every 4 weeks; QD, daily, CI, confidence intervals

GAUSS: Achievement of LDL-C* Goal < 100 mg/dL at Week 12 *LDL-C values at baseline and week 12 were measured using preparative ultracentrifugation.

GAUSS: Achievement of LDL-C* Goal < 70 mg/dL at Week 12 *LDL-C values at baseline and week 12 were measured using preparative ultracentrifugation.

GAUSS: Effect of AMG 145 on Other Lipid Parameters Compared to Placebo at Week 12 P < 0.001 versus placebo + ezetimibe for all parameters SE, standard error

GAUSS: Safety and Tolerability Adverse Events, Patient Incidence, n (%) AMG 145 AMG 145 420 mg + Ezetimibe 10 mg N = 30 Placebo + Ezetimibe 10 mg N = 32 280 mg N = 32 350 mg N = 31 420 mg N = 32 Treatment-emergent AEs 22 (68.8) 15 (48.4) 18 (56.3) 20 (66.7) 19 (59.4) Serious AEs* 2 (6.3) 1 (3.2) 1 (3.1) 0 (0.0) Deaths Treatment-related AEs 8 (25.0) 3 (9.7) 6 (18.8) 5 (16.7) 7 (21.9) Muscle-related AEs Myalgia 5 (15.6) 6 (20.0) Muscle fatigue Muscle spasms 2 (6.5) 3 (9.4) AEs leading to discontinuation 1 (3.3) Other most commonly reported AEs Nasopharyngitis 3 (10.0) Nausea Fatigue 4 (12.5) Acute pancreatitis 66-year-old Asian male; AMG 145 280 mg dose group Medical history included hypercholesterolemia, "DDD C/S", right shoulder tendonitis, prostatitis, duodenal ulcer, allergic rhinitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, non-cardiac chest pain, left testicle cyst and decreased hearing Concomitant medications: ezetimibe, metformin, ramipril, rabeprozole sodium Diagnosis: 18 days after first AMG 145 dose Amylase level, 476 U/L (elevated) Resolution: 11 days later; AMG 145 treatment was continued Coronary artery disease worsening 59-year-old Caucasian male, AMG 145 420 mg dose group Medical history included hypercholesterolemia, coronary artery disease, benign prostatic hyperplasia, myocardial infarction (2002, 2007), stent placement, 5-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting (2002), bilateral inguinal hernia, 3 cm aortic aneurysm, bilateral knee meniscus tear, appendicitis, appendectomy, pneumonia, transient ischemic attack, chest pain, type II diabetes mellitus, gout, anxiety, hypertension, dizziness, stomach ulcer, abdomen obese, allergy to clopidogrel and tetanus, myalgia with atorvastatin, lovastatin, rosuvastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin. Concomitant medications: simvastain, aspirin, metoprolol succinate, alprazolam, morniflumate, lisinopril, multivitamins and nitroglycerin Diagnosis: 15 days after first AMG 145 dose, as part of a scheduled angiogram Resolution: Same-day percutaneous intervention with stent placement and treatment with prasugrel hydrochloride; AMG 145 treatment was continued * Four serious adverse events were reported for AMG 145: acute pancreatitis, coronary artery disease, hip fracture, and syncope. None were considered treatment related. AE: Adverse event. Some patients experienced more than 1 AE.

GAUSS: CK Elevations Two patients with CK elevations > 10 x ULN: CK Elevations at Any Post-Baseline Visit AMG 145 AMG 145 420 mg + Ezetimibe 10 mg N = 30 Placebo + Ezetimibe 10 mg N = 32 280 mg N = 32 350 mg N = 31 420 mg N = 32 > 5 × ULN, n (%) 0 (0.0) 2 (6.5) 1 (3.1) > 10 × ULN, n (%) Two patients with CK elevations > 10 x ULN: One patient (AMG 145, 350 mg) had an isolated CK elevation of 2773 U/L at week 4 the day after an intense weight-lifting workout. Resolved spontaneously without treatment interruption by the next study visit Adjudicated not to be a muscle-related event by the Clinical Events Committee One patient (AMG 145, 350 mg) had an isolated CK elevation of 2030 U/L accompanied by generalized muscular pain at week 2, following strenuous exercise. Rosuvastatin and AMG 145 were discontinued, and subsequent CK values were normal. Muscle biopsy showed a normal pattern. Adjudicated positively as a myopathy event Hip (femoral neck) fracture 73-year-old Caucasian female, AMG 145 280 mg dose group Medical history included hypercholesterolemia, decreased bone density, chronic urinary tract infection, depression and rheumatoid arthritis Concomitant medications: cefalexin, calcium carbonate, citalopram hydrobromide, and vitamin B complex Diagnosis: Patient fell and was diagnosed 3 days after previous AMG 145 dose Resolution: Prosthetic unipolar hemiarthroplasty 1 day after event; AMG 145 treatment was continued Syncope 75-year-old Caucasian female, AMG 145 350 mg dose group Medical history included medical history included hypercholesterolemia, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, anemia, hypertension, sinus bradycardia previous to an artificial pacemaker insertion, hysterectomy, parathyroid surgery with unspecified complications, renal artery stenosis and subsequent renal artery stent placement, allergy to penicillin, hydralazineand verapamil. Known history of syncopal events (2 years and 6 months previous) Concomitant medications: estrogen, metoprolol, calcitriol, calcium and magnesium supplement, aspirin and multivitamins Diagnosis: 2 months after first dose of AMG 145. Lost consciousness while cleaning house after bending to pick up a pillow; remained unconscious for 20 minutes, hospitalized for 3 days for further evaluation. Etiology unclear; may have been cardiovascular. Resolution: Same day; AMG 145 treatment was continued CK: creatine kinase

GAUSS: Conclusions Patients with statin-intolerance achieved reductions in LDL-C with AMG 145 in the order of those found with the highest statin doses of the most efficacious statins. 61% of patients who received AMG 145 420 mg achieved an LDL-C goal of < 100 mg/dL; up to 29% reached LDL-C < 70 mg/dL. When combined with ezetimibe, AMG 145 yielded LDL-C <100 mg/dl and <70 mg/dL in 90% and 62% of patients, respectively. Improvements were observed in other lipid and lipoprotein parameters, including Lp(a). AMG 145, with or without ezetimibe, was well tolerated in this study. Myalgia was the most common treatment-emergent AE, occurring in 7 patients on AMG 145. Complaints of fatigue, muscle fatigue, or muscle spasm were  reported in < 5% of patients on AMG 145 with or without ezetimibe, and no liver function abnormalities were observed.

Backup Slides

GAUSS: % Change in LDL-C, by UC, from Baseline at Week 12 LDL-C values at baseline and week 12 were measured using preparative ultracentrifugation. Q4W, every 4 weeks; QD, daily; CI, confidence intervals; UC, ultracentrifugation

GAUSS: % Change from Baseline in Calculated LDL-C* At All Visits * Calculated LDL-C values. Q4W, every 4 weeks; QD, daily, CI, confidence intervals

GAUSS: Effect of AMG 145 on Other Lipid Parameters Compared to Placebo at Week 12 AMG 145 increased HDL-C modestly, from 6% (95% CI ‑1% to 12%) to 12% (95% CI 4% to 20%), compared with 1% (95% CI -8% to 6%) with placebo/ezetimibe. The difference in the effect on HDL-C between AMG 145/ezetimibe and placebo/ezetimibe was statistically significant (P < .001). Similar, but more robust, increases were seen in ApoA1, with all groups treated with AMG 145 showing statistically significantly greater responses than those treated with placebo/ezetimibe (P < .05 or P < .01). P < 0.001 versus placebo + ezetimibe for all parameters CI, confidence intervals

Patients Using Lipid-Regulating Medications Lipid-regulating medication use AMG 145 280 – 420 mg N = 95 AMG 145 420 mg + Ezetimibe N = 30 Placebo + Ezetimibe N = 32 Any statin, n (%) 15 (16) 4 (13) 6 (19) Atorvastatin, n (%) 0 (0) 1 (3) Average dose, mg/day 10 5 Fluvastatin, n (%) 1 (1) 40 Lovastatin, n (%) 20 Pravastatin, n (%) 3 (3) Rosuvastatin, n (%) 6 (6) 2 (7) 3 (9) 3 2 Simvastatin, n (%) 5 (5) 2 (6) 16 15 Bile-acid sequestrants, n (%) Omega-3 fish oil supplements, n (%) Average daily dose calculation for each statin includes only patients taking the statin.

GAUSS: Effect of AMG 145 on Other Lipid Parameters Compared to Placebo at Week 12 Treatment Difference Versus Placebo + Ezetimibe, mean (SE) AMG 145 AMG 145 420 mg + Ezetimibe 10 mg N = 30 280 mg N = 32 350 mg N = 31 420 mg N = 32 Total cholesterol, % -19.1 (3.1)* -19.8 (3.1)* -27.0 (3.1)* -33.1 (2.4)* Non-HDL-C, % -24.9 (3.7)* -26.7 (3.7)* -33.6 (3.7)* -45.0 (2.9)* Total cholesterol/HDL-C ratio, % -22.4 (3.3)* -23.9 (3.3)* -31.0 (3.3)* -37.9 (2.9)* VLDL-C, % -14.4 (10.9) -15.6 (11.1) -1.8 (11.0) -25.0 (10.4)‡ ApoB, % -21.4 (3.5)* -22.1 (3.5)* -29.9 (3.5)* -38.2 (2.8)* ApoA1, % 7.4 (2.9)‡ 8.3 (2.9)† 8.9 (2.9)† 8.7 (2.7)† ApoB/ApoA1 ratio, % -25.1 (3.3)* -26.8 (3.3)* -34.1 (3.3)* -41.3 (2.9)* Lp(a) , % -18.0 (4.7)* -12.4 (4.8)‡ -15.7 (4.7)† -21.7 (4.9)* Free PCSK9, ng/mL -173.3 (20.8)* -168.3 (20.8)* -157.5 (20.8)* -211.8 (19.5)* *P<0.001; †P<0.01; ‡ P<0.05