Natural Gas STAR Program Overview and Accomplishments Producers and Processors Technology Transfer Workshop Midland, TX July 23, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1Last Update: October, 2011 Overview for Gathering & Processing Companies Reducing Emissions Increasing Efficiency Maximizing Profits U.S. Environmental.
Advertisements

Methane Losses from Compressors Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Technology Transfer Workshop Northern Natural Gas Company, INGAA, CECO, Heath Consultants,
Natural Gas STAR Program. 2 The Natural Gas STAR Program The Natural Gas STAR Program is a flexible, voluntary partnership between EPA and the oil and.
Hydrocarbon Emissions Detection & Remediation Project Josh McDowell Small Business Assistance Coordinator Department of Community Outreach.
EPA’s Climate Leaders Partnership Program Overview.
1 Katy R. Forney Energy Sector Technical Authority Air Permits Section EPA Region 4 PSD and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule 14 th Annual Power Generation.
Reducing Emissions from Compressor Seals Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Transmission Technology Transfer Workshop Duke Energy Gas Transmission Interstate.
Reducing Emissions When Taking Compressors Off-line Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Transmission Technology Transfer Workshop Duke Energy Gas Transmission,
Efficient Pigging of Gathering Lines
1Last Update: October, 2011 Overview for Production Companies Reducing Emissions Increasing Efficiency Maximizing Profits U.S. Environmental Protection.
1Last Updated: October, 2011 Overview for Distribution Companies Reducing Emissions Increasing Efficiency Maximizing Profits U.S. Environmental Protection.
ExxonMobil US Production Co. September 21, 2004 Natural Gas STAR Program Involvement and Experience United States Production Company.
Natural Gas STAR Program Producers Technology Transfer Workshop Sponsors – American Petroleum Institute and ExxonMobil Production Company September 21,
Natural Gas STAR Partner Experiences Northern Natural Gas Company By: Larry “Rick” Loveless Technology Transfer Workshop June 8, 2005 Midland, Texas.
6-8 September 2004 US Approach for Projected Greenhouse Gas Emissions Casey Delhotal Issues in the preparation of GHG projections for the energy, transport,
Natural Gas STAR Program Producers Technology Transfer Workshop Oklahoma City, OK April 20, 2005 epa.gov/gasstar.
Economic Best Management Practices for Small and Medium Sized Producers Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Small and Medium Sized Producer Technology.
Directed Inspection and Maintenance (DI&M) Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Partners Producers Technology Transfer Workshop Devon Energy and EPA’s.
Installing Vapor Recovery Units to Reduce Methane Losses
Replacing High-Bleed Pneumatic Devices Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Small and Medium Sized Producer Technology Transfer Workshop Bill Barrett.
Update on EPA Oil and Gas Activities Greg Green, Outreach and Information Division, OAQPS.
WBCSD/WRI Side Event ; 12 June, 2003—Bonn, Germany Industry Partnerships - From Generic Standards to Sector Specific Tools The Aluminium Sector Story Jerry.
WESTAR Oil & Gas Workshop
Greenhouse Gas Protocol Product & Supply Chain Initiative US Climate Partnership Association 23 June 2010 David Rich World Resources Institute.
Scoping Meeting GHG Accounting Issues Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Natural Gas Gathering & Processing October 25, 2007 Santa Fe, New Mexico.
Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Offshore Technology Transfer Workshop Shell, GCEAG, API, Rice University and EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program June.
Partner Reported Opportunities for Small and Medium Sized Producers Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Small and Medium Sized Producer Technology Transfer.
World Bank Global Gas Flaring Reduction Gas STAR International and GGFR Mutual Goals Roger FERNANDEZ U.S. EPA Natural Gas STAR Team Leader.
Smart Automation Well Venting Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop ExxonMobil Production Company, American Petroleum.
The Climate Registry: The Registry & The Protocol August 2008 Judy Collora, PE Senior Consultant.
August 4, 2011 Heather Ceron US EPA Region 4 1. Greenhouse Gases 2.
Natural Gas STAR and NiSource A Winning Partnership Reducing Emissions Increasing Efficiency Maximizing Profits
Voluntary Programs and Mandated Actions Susan Wickwire Energy Supply & Industry Branch Office of Atmospheric Programs March 23, 2010.
Bill Harnett March 30, 2010 WESTAR Spring Meeting.
Discovering New Opportunities for Reducing Methane Emissions Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop ExxonMobil Production.
Producer Best Management Practices and Opportunities Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop Devon Energy Corporation.
Natural Gas STAR Program Gas Processing Technology Transfer Workshop Oklahoma City, OK April 22, 2005 epa.gov/gasstar.
The Climate Leaders Partnership January 8, 2007 Leslie Cordes Chief, Energy Supply and Industry Branch Climate Protection Partnerships Division Environmental.
API Climate Challenge Program Bob Greco, API Natural Gas STAR Workshop June 19, 2003.
Best Operating Practices for Reducing Emissions From Natural Gas STAR Partners Murphy Exploration & Production, Gulf Coast Environmental Affairs Group,
1 EPA’s Climate Change Strategy Robert J. Meyers Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator U.S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation December 3, 2007.
Implementing AB 32: California’s Approach to Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions National Association of Clean Air Agencies Spring Membership Meeting May.
Massachusetts Greenhouse Gas Reporting Regulation 310 CMR 7.71 Stacy DeGabriele & Will Space MassDEP Climate Strategies December 10 th and 11 th, 2009.
Installing Plunger Lift in Gas Wells Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR from Natural Gas STAR Exploration & Production, Gulf Coast Environmental Affairs.
Convert Gas Pneumatic Controls to Instrument Air Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Partners EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program, Pioneer Natural Resources.
Update on EPA Oil and Gas Activities
The Basics of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories Mary Sotos World Resources Institute VEPGA Annual Meeting April 23, 2010.
Reducing Emissions from Compressor Rod Packing Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop Devon Energy Corporation and.
Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Offshore Technology Transfer Workshop Shell, GCEAG, API, Rice University and EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program June.
Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative: A Carbon Market for the Northeast American Bar Association National Teleconference January 26, 2006 Franz Litz New.
Producer Partner Reported Opportunities Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop ExxonMobil Production Company, American.
James Goldstene California Air Resources Board AB 32: The Global Warming Solutions Act of th LEA/CIWMB Partnership Conference October 16, 2007.
Replacing High-Bleed Pneumatic Devices Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Partners NiSource and EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program June 3, 2003.
Best Operating Practices for Reducing Emissions F rom Natural Gas STAR Partners EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program, Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc., and.
Best Operating Practices For Reducing Emissions From Natural Gas STAR Partners NiSource and EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program June 3, 2003.
Production Sector Workshop Introduction to Online Tools Presented by: Heather Wright ERG June 19, 2003 Natural Gas STAR Technology Transfer Workshop New.
Natural Gas STAR Program epa.gov/gasstar. The Natural Gas STAR Program The Natural Gas STAR Program is a flexible, voluntary partnership between EPA and.
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE REGULATION FOR THE MANDATORY REPORTING OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS California Air Resources Board California Air Resources Board.
Overview of The Climate Registry San Diego April 18, 2007 Joel Levin Vice President.
Solar Power Applications
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Natural Gas STAR Program
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Natural Gas STAR Program
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Natural Gas STAR Program
Reduce Distribution System Pressure
Methane Emission Standards for Crude Oil and Natural Gas Facilities
Understanding Updates to the EPA Inventory of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Natural Gas Systems Richard Meyer Managing Director, Energy Analysis August.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory
Voluntary SF6 Emission Reduction Partnership: Recent Achievements and Planned Activities Volha Roshchanka 14 November, 2018.
Understanding Updates to the EPA Inventory of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Natural Gas Systems Gina DeFrancesco Clean Energy Analyst | May 2019.
Overview of The Climate Registry
Presentation transcript:

Natural Gas STAR Program Overview and Accomplishments Producers and Processors Technology Transfer Workshop Midland, TX July 23, 2008

2 Agenda Background Natural Gas STAR Program Overview & Highlights Program Resources and Tools Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rulemaking

3 Background

4 Current U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Estimates U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions All Sources U.S. Methane Emissions by Sector Oil and gas systems are the largest man-made source of methane emissions (24%) Methane emissions from Oil and gas systems make up 2% of total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions 2 % Source: EPA. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks 1990 – April, 2008.

5 Oil and Gas Industry Methane Emissions: U.S. & International U.S. contributes 11% of worldwide methane emissions from oil and gas systems Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks 1990 – 2006, USEPA, April, 2008 Global Anthropogenic Non-CO 2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions: 1990 – 2020, USEPA, June 2006 Bcf

6 U.S. Oil & Natural Gas Opportunities: Why Gas STAR? 323 Bcf of methane emissions per year amounts to: $2.26B worth of gas lost (at $7/Mcf) CO2 emissions from the electricity use of 17.3 million homes for one year Annual greenhouse gas emissions from 23.9 million passenger vehicles U.S. oil and gas industry has an opportunity to cost- effectively reduce methane emissions resulting in: Increased operational efficiency Increased profits Increased domestic gas supply Improved safety Improved environmental performance Better public relations

7 Overview & Program Highlights

8 Natural Gas STAR Program The Natural Gas STAR Program is a flexible, voluntary partnership between EPA and the oil and natural gas industry designed to cost-effectively reduce methane emissions from natural gas operations. Over 120 Program Partners across four sectors Nine International Partners 19 Endorser Associations

9 Participation Matters Don’t just check the box: expand on your existing and future efforts to identify and implement new ways to reduce gas losses, save money, and make an impact on the environment Implement robust methods for quantifying leaks and vented emissions: this will only increase in importance over time Report successes to Gas STAR: which is currently the main knowledge base for the industry’s efforts to reduce methane emissions The Natural Gas STAR Program only works if our Partners participate. Participation means:

Another Successful Year for Methane Emission Reductions Gas STAR Partners reduced methane emissions by 86 Bcf in Bcf in cumulative reductions since

11 Units in teragrams of CO 2 equivalent (TgCO 2 E) Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks 1990 – 2006, USEPA, April, 2008 Total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions (left axis) U.S. oil & natural gas sector methane Emissions (right axis) Natural Gas STAR Partner Accomplishments (1990 – 2006) U.S. Oil & Natural Gas sector methane emissions are 10% under the 1990 level emissions

12 Natural Gas STAR International Natural Gas STAR International launched September 26, 2006 now has nine partners

13 Program Resources and Tools

14 Key Components Guidance on new technologies & practices Technical documents on over 80 cost-effective technologies and practices Free Technology Transfer workshops One-on-one technical assistance to identify and prioritize cost-effective methane emission reduction opportunities Annual record of Partner voluntary actions and methane savings Technical Information Annual Reports Project Demonstrations Workshops

What is Cost Effective? 87% 77% 47% Percentage of over 80 Gas STAR Recommended Technologies and practices at each payback level The simple payback is the number of years it takes to pay back the capital cost of a project (based on $3/Mcf) 1% Payback within 10 years Payback within 3 years Payback within 12 months Immediate payback Answer: Depends on company specific circumstances.

Methane Emission Reduction Technologies & Practices Gas Production & Processing Reduced Emission Well Completions Install Plunger Lifts on Gas Wells Identify, Measure & Fix Leaks in Processing Plants Install Flash Tank Separators on Dehydrators Gas Distribution Identify, Measure & Fix Leaks in Pipelines & Surface Facilities Inject Blowdown Gas into Low Pressure Mains Picture courtesy of American Gas Association Oil Production Install VRUs on Crude Oil Storage Tanks Route Casinghead Gas to VRU or Compressor for Recovery & Use or Sale Gas Transmission Identify, Measure & Fix Leaks in Compressor Stations, Pipelines Use Pipeline Pumpdown Replace High-Bleed Pneumatics

Technology Transfer Workshops Natural Gas STAR will host, with partner organizations, the following Technology Transfer workshops in 2008 For more information, visit Offshore New Orleans, LA May 6, 2008 Production Denver, CO April 29, 2008 All Sectors Huadong, China April 17-18, 2008 All Sectors San Antonio, TX Nov 11-13, 2008 Production Rock Springs, WY May 1, 2008 Production and Processing Midland, TX July 23, 2008 Transmission Charlotte, NC June 25, 2008

18 New Tool: Emission Reduction Calculation Guidance Guidance for quantifying methane emission reductions from recommended technologies and practices

19 Communications Tools/Materials Effort underway to revise and update Gas STAR communications materials and Gas STAR website PowerPoint presentations Program Implementation Guidance Goal: Make the tools and resources more useful and accessible Your feedback is important!

20 Feedback to Partners: Post-Reporting Benchmarking

21 Natural Gas STAR “Partner Challenge” EPA offers assistance quantifying partners’ methane emissions and corresponding emission reduction opportunities Uses customized data Quantifies emission reductions and environmental benefits Details economic and operational benefits of reduction technologies & practices

22 Overview: Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rulemaking

23 GHG Reporting Rulemaking What is the 2008 Omnibus Appropriations Bill (HR 2764)? The 2008 Omnibus Appropriations Bill (HR 2764) was signed into law in December The legislation signed by President Bush authorizes EPA to develop and publish a draft rule to require mandatory reporting of greenhouse gas emissions above appropriate thresholds in all sectors of the economy

24 Appropriations Language and Legal Authority FY2008 Consolidated Appropriations Amendment: “… not less than $3,500,000 shall be provided for activities to develop and publish a draft rule not later than 9 months after the date of enactment of this Act, and a final rule not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, to require mandatory reporting of greenhouse gas emissions above appropriate thresholds in all sectors of the economy…” Legal Authority: Sections 114 and 208 of the CAA allow for data collection and measurement and recordkeeping from stationary or mobile related sources Appropriations language provides EPA with $3.5 million in FY 2008 to develop proposed & final rules

25 Purpose and Scope Objective(s) of the Program – to provide data that will inform and support development of national climate policy Scope of Coverage Define gases- “…to require mandatory reporting of greenhouse gas emissions” CO2, CH4, N2O, HFC, PFC, SF6 Both upstream and downstream sources- “The Agency is further directed to include in its rule reporting of emissions resulting from upstream production and downstream sources…” Upstream: Fuel and Chemical producers/importers (e.g., oil refineries, natural gas processors, HFC producers) Downstream: GHG emitters (e.g., power plants, iron and steel plants, cement manufacturers

26 Purpose and Scope cont. Areas of flexibility: Emissions threshold: “The Administrator shall determine appropriate thresholds of emissions above which reporting is required…” Frequency of Reporting: “…and how frequently reports shall be submitted to EPA” Methods: “The Administrator shall have discretion to use existing reporting requirements….” Build on methods from existing mandatory and voluntary reporting systems Federal reporting programs- e.g., Title IV, Climate Leaders, 1605(b) State Programs- e.g., California, The Climate Registry, RGGI, other state programs Corporate Programs- e.g., WRI/WBCSD Industry Protocols- e.g., API Compendium, CSI Protocol (cement), International Aluminum Institute

27 Timing and Process Proposed rule by September 2008, final rule by June 2009 An ambitious timetable but we will work towards these deadlines EPA welcomes stakeholder input and plans to reach out to stakeholders EPA will involve agency and interagency expertise Have already worked extensively with interagency counterparts on measurement and reporting issues (e.g., US GHG inventory, IPCC guidelines)

28 Contact Information Jerome Blackman Carey Bylin Roger Fernandez Suzie Waltzer