Logical Fallacies. Fallacy  What is a fallacy?  “Guile or trickery or a false or mistaken idea” (124).  “Fallacies have the appearance of truth but.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Argumentation.
Advertisements

Understanding Logical Fallacies
Fallacies What are they?. Definition There are over 100 fallacies They are illogical statements that demonstrate erroneous reasoning (sometimes intended-manipulation/
Rhetorical Fallacies. What is Rhetorical Fallacy? Rhetorical fallacy Rhetorical fallacy Is a failure of discussion or argument Is a failure of discussion.
Fallacies Learning Targets: I can identify logical fallacies when they are committed. I can recognize why reasoning is fallacious. I can avoid logical.
Logical Fallacies AKA “How NOT to Win an Argument”
LOGICAL FALLACIES Common Mistakes in Weak Arguments Moore AP Language and Composition.
Rhetorical / Logical Fallacies. What is a Fallacy? An argument must be based on sound reasoning Fallacies are flaws in reasoning that detract from the.
1 Logical Fallacies Intro to Debate and Argumentation: Snell.
 Read the following argument. Examine it closely. Do you think it is logically sound? Why?  [T]he acceptance of abortion does not end with the killing.
 In this task you will see 16 different arguments.  You have to identify which of the 8 common fallacies is being used by the argument.
Age of the Sage Advertising, Inc. “I cannot teach anybody anything; I can only make him think.” Socrates.
VOCABULARY FOR PERSUASION. Ethical: dealing with morals, knowing what is right and wrong Logical: reasonable and makes sense Exaggeration: the act of.
What are fallacies? Deceptive, misleading, or false beliefs
Fallacies (Errors in Logic). What is a Fallacy? A Fallacy is an argument that is flawed by its very nature or structure Be aware of your opponents using.
How to avoid errors in logic
Logical Fallacies.
AP English Language and Composition
INFORMAL FALLACIES. FALLACIES OF RELEVANCE Errors resulting from attempts to appeal to things that are not relevant, i.e., not really connected to or.
PERSUASION. “Everybody Hates Chris”
McGraw-Hill©Stephen E. Lucas 2001 All rights reserved. CHAPTER SIXTEEN Methods of Persuasion.
American Literature Research Paper. » An effort to understand how people attempt to influence others through language and symbolic action » This includes.
Logical Fallacies1 This line of "reasoning" is fallacious because pity does not serve as evidence for a claim Just to get a scholarship does not justify.
LOGICAL FALLACIES By Jennifer Lynn Abernethy. Part I: AVOIDING THE QUESTION.
GOOD MORNING/AFTERNOON Watch this commercial and answer see if you can determine: What is the claim? What is the evidence? Is the evidence solid or not?
Fallacies To error in reason is human; to analyze divine!
Critical Thinking. Critical thinkers use reasons to back up their claims. What is a claim? ◦ A claim is a statement that is either true or false. It must.
Logical Fallacies Guided Notes
Logical Fallacies.
Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
Fallacies of Argument AKA Logical Fallacies.
ASSIGNMENTS Draft 2 due by 5 p.m. today Study logical fallacies for Jeopardy on Wednesday. Pick out your 3-4 member team Keep working on your paper Exam.
Fallacy An error of reasoning based on faulty use of evidence or incorrect interpretation of facts.
Fallacies The quickest ways to lose arguments. Introduction to Logic O Argument: The assertion of a conclusion based on logical premises O Premise: Proposition.
Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
Rhetorical Fallacies Purdue OWL.
LOGICAL FALLACIES. Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc “After this, therefore because of this.”
Lecture Notes © 2008 McGraw Hill Higher Education© 2008 McGraw Hill Higher Education 1 Critical Thinking Chapter 5 Logical Fallacies I Fallacies of Relevance.
Common Logical Fallacies Flawed Arguments. Logical Fallacies… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: – Strengthen your own.
ENG101 Exam 2 Study Guide Exam date: Thursday,
Common Logical Fallacies Flawed Arguments. Logical Fallacies… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: – Strengthen your own.
EVALUATING ARGUMENTS AND BUILDING ARGUMENTS ENGL 121 Howard Community College.
Logical Fallacies.
Rhetorical Fallacies A failure in reasoning that renders an argument invalid. Faulty reasoning, misleading or unsound argument.
A Journey into the Mind Logic and Debate Unit. Week 2: May 23 through May 26 The Fallacies SWBAT: Identify the common fallacies in logic in order to be.
Special Appearance by Logical Fallacies
Rhetorical Devices and Fallacies
Rhetorical Fallacies.
Types of Fallacies Logical Fallacies (errors in reasoning), Emotional Fallacies (replacing logic with emotional manipulation), Rhetorical Fallacies (sidestepping.
In other words, people are lying to you ALL THE TIME…
Logical Fallacies.
Common Logical Fallacies
Propaganda and Logical Fallacies
Logical Fallacies Unit 2.
Errors in reasoning that invalidate the argument
More on Argument.
Common Mistakes in Weak Arguments
Logical Fallacies.
C/Maj Nicholas Schroder
Logical Fallacy Notes Comp. & Rhet. ENG 1010.
Informal Logical Fallacies
Writing the Argumentative Essay
A Guide to Logical Fallacies
More on Argument.
Fallacious Reasoning a.k.a. Fallacy.
UNDERSTANDING THE ELEMENTS OF PERSUASION
Chapter 6 Reasoning Errors
Common Logical Fallacies
Common Mistakes in Weak Arguments
1. Could I receive an A for this class
Presentation transcript:

Logical Fallacies

Fallacy  What is a fallacy?  “Guile or trickery or a false or mistaken idea” (124).  “Fallacies have the appearance of truth but are erroneous” (124).

Common Rhetorical Fallacies  “When writers have trouble making convincing ‘honest’ arguments with the facts that they have in hand, they resort to using rhetorical fallacies…you shouldn’t resort to these tactics” (124.)

Why should you know this?  “You should be able to recognize the use of these common fallacies in the reasoning of others; this will help you substantially on test day” (124).

Ad Hominem  In Latin, “to the man”  Attacking the person, not the argument

Ad Hominem example:  Of course that writer supports gun control; she’s a Democrat!

Argument from authority  “To agree based on who is speaking or supporting.”

Argument from authority example:  It is absurd to believe that professional baseball players have used steroids because the most famous slugger of our time has repeatedly asserted that such a claim is false.

Appeal to ignorance  Must be true because it has not been proven false

Appeal to ignorance example:  No one can prove that the Loch Ness monster does not exist; therefore, the Loch Ness monster exists.

Begging the question  “A fallacious form of argument in which someone assumes that parts (or all) of what the person claims to be proving are proven facts” (125).

Begging the question example  You can’t give me a “C”; I’m an “A” student.  The Loch Ness monster spoke to me in my dreams, so it must exist.

Hasty Generalization  When a writer deliberately leads the reader to a conclusion by providing insufficient, selective evidence.

Hasty Generalization example:  Ping-pong is an extremely dangerous sport; last year, my friend got hit in the eye with a ping-pong ball and almost lost his vision in that eye.

Non sequitur  Literally means, “It doesn’t follow.”  “A statement that does not relate logically to what comes before it.”

Non sequitur example:  If you really wanted to earn a 5 on the AP English Language and Composition exam, you wouldn’t spend so much time reading Isabel Allende’s novels.

False Dichotomy  “Consists of a consideration of only the two extremes when there are one or more intermediate possibilities.”

False Dichotomy example:  AP Calculus BC class is impossible; either you get it or you don’t.

Slippery Slope  “Suggest dire consequences from relatively minor causes.”

Slippery Slope example:  If we stop requiring men to wear coats and ties in the dining room, pretty soon they’ll start coming in dressed in beachwear.

Faulty Causality – Post Hoc Ergo Prompter Hoc  “Refers to the (sometimes unintentional) setting up of a cause-and-effect relationship when none exists…one event can happen after another without the first necessarily being the direct cause of the second.”

Faulty Causality example: (Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc)  Violent crime among adolescents has risen in the past decade, and that is the result of increased sales of violent video games.

Straw Man (Person) argument:  “consists of an oversimplification of an opponent’s argument to make it easier to attack.”

Straw Man (Person) argument example:  Students who want to eliminate the school uniform are exhibitionists who want to show off bare midriffs.

Sentimental appeals  “Commonly used tactic”  Appeals to “the hearts or readers so that they forget to use their minds.”

Sentimental appeals example:  The assignment that I gave you last night was much too long, but just think how pleased your parents and I will be when you score a 5 on the AP exam. Think about the pride you’ll feel when tears of joy stream down our faces!

Red Herring  “Attempts to shift attention away from an important issue by introducing an issue that has no logical connection to the discussion at hand.”

Red Herring example:  My opponent talks about the poor quality of military intelligence, but this is a time for decisiveness, not for weakness. We must stick together and present a common front as the other nations look on. If we do not, we could jeopardize our position as a global leader.

Scare Tactics  “Used to frighten readers or listeners into agreeing with the speaker; often, when scare tactics are used, the speaker has no logical argument on which to fall back.

Scare Tactics example:  My opponent talks about the need to explore stem cell research, but this would bring about an end to ethical uses of technology, and before long, scientists will be creating super races—the Nazi dream of an Aryan Nation will ensue.

Bandwagon appeals  “Encourages the listener to agree with a position because everyone else does.”

Bandwagon appeals example:  It’s time for our county to repeal the ban on strip mining—every other county in the state has already done so!

Dogmatism  “Does not allow for discussion because the speaker presumes that his or her beliefs are beyond question; essentially, the ‘logic’ runs thusly: I’m correct b/c I’m correct.”

Dogmatism example:  We are members of the Wombat Party and, as such, know that we are right when we assert that Wombats are the best!

Equivocation  “Telling part of the truth, while deliberately hiding the entire truth; typically, this is similar to lying by omission.”

Equivocation example:  “Does your dog bite?”  “No,” said the manager.  Dog bites Clouseau.  “You told me that your dog does not bite!”  “That’s not my dog.”

Faulty Analogy  “An illogical, misleading comparison between two things.”

Faulty Analogy example:  Why should we invade that country? Let me explain it to you like this. What if you looked out the window and saw $20 in the street? Wouldn’t you go outside and take it?

Check out these websites  Rather comprehensive list, explanations, and examples  es/ es/ A good list with explanations  I couldn’t access this website, but it sounds good!