Age of the Sage Advertising, Inc. “I cannot teach anybody anything; I can only make him think.” Socrates.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Argumentation.
Advertisements

Understanding Logical Fallacies
Logic and Logical Fallacies A.P. English Language.
Fallacies What are they?. Definition There are over 100 fallacies They are illogical statements that demonstrate erroneous reasoning (sometimes intended-manipulation/
Logical Fallacies.
Logic and Reasoning Panther Prep North Central High School.
LOGICAL FALLACIES Common Mistakes in Weak Arguments Moore AP Language and Composition.
©2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 16 Thinking and Speaking Critically.
When Claims Go Wrong Recognizing & Avoiding Logical Fallacies Kim Miller Davis.
 Read the following argument. Examine it closely. Do you think it is logically sound? Why?  [T]he acceptance of abortion does not end with the killing.
 In this task you will see 16 different arguments.  You have to identify which of the 8 common fallacies is being used by the argument.
Logical Fallacies.
Logical Fallacies. Syllogism (not a fallacy) A logical argument presented in terms of two statements and a conclusion which must be true if the two statements.
© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. The Art of Critical Reading Mather ● McCarthy 1 Part 4 Reading Critically Chapter 11 Analyzing.
Logical Fallacies.
Eng 111 Dana Frierson Fall Types of Reasoning (Logic) n Deductive u Inferring particular “fact” from general assumptions u General to specific n.
Reason: as a Way of Knowing Richard van de Lagemaat, Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma (Cambridge: CUP, 2005)
INFORMAL FALLACIES. FALLACIES OF RELEVANCE Errors resulting from attempts to appeal to things that are not relevant, i.e., not really connected to or.
PERSUASION. “Everybody Hates Chris”
Informal Reasoning 1/9. Agenda  Introduce Informal Reasoning  Reflect on Informal Reasoning  END GOAL: Is informal reasoning reliable?
Fallacies Of Thinking A fallacy is flawed logic or misguided thinking.
Fallacies To error in reason is human; to analyze divine!
FALLACIES COMMON AND RECURRENT ERRORS IN REASONING
INFORMAL FALLACIES The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to recognize and resist fallacious arguments.
Logic Fallacies Debate Class Production Spain Park High School
Recognizing Fallacies From Various Sources. Fallacy Illogical statements that may sound reasonable or true but are actually deceptive and dishonest.
Logical Fallacies Guided Notes
Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
Definition Review Diversion and Distortion Tactics
Fallacy An error of reasoning based on faulty use of evidence or incorrect interpretation of facts.
Fallacies The quickest ways to lose arguments. Introduction to Logic O Argument: The assertion of a conclusion based on logical premises O Premise: Proposition.
Errors in Reasoning. Fallacies A Fallacy is “any error in reasoning that makes an argument fail to establish its conclusion.” There are two kinds of fallacies.
Argumentum Ad Hominem Attacking the person’s character or personal traits rather than the argument at hand Rejecting a claim based on the person defending.
Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
Logical Fallacies A logical fallacy is an element of an argument that is flawed If spotted one can essentially render an entire line of reasoning invalid.
LOGICAL FALLACIES. Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc “After this, therefore because of this.”
Common Logical Fallacies Flawed Arguments. Logical Fallacies… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: – Strengthen your own.
False Premises and Relevant Detail. Warm Up  In your journal, brainstorm what you think false premises in persuasive writing might be.
EVALUATING ARGUMENTS AND BUILDING ARGUMENTS ENGL 121 Howard Community College.
Ad Hominem (Personal Attack) An attempt to discredit the argument by discrediting the character of the person advancing it.
Rhetorical Fallacies A failure in reasoning that renders an argument invalid. Faulty reasoning, misleading or unsound argument.
Logical Fallacies. Slippery Slope The argument that some event must inevitably follow from another without any rational claim. If we allow A to happen.
A Journey into the Mind Logic and Debate Unit. Week 2: May 23 through May 26 The Fallacies SWBAT: Identify the common fallacies in logic in order to be.
Logical Fallacies 13 Common Errors in Logic P in the book.
Rhetorical Devices and Fallacies
Logical Fallacies Academic Writing, Nov. 12
College English Yichun Liu
Logical Fallacies.
Logical Fallacies.
Common Logical Fallacies
Propaganda and Logical Fallacies
Logical Fallacies Unit 2.
Errors in reasoning that invalidate the argument
Fallacies Flaws in Reasoning.
Logical Fallacies
Common Mistakes in Weak Arguments
Logical fallacies.
More on Argument.
Common Mistakes in Weak Arguments
Logical Fallacies.
C/Maj Nicholas Schroder
Appeal to Force (Argumentum ad baculum)
Looking for false logic in someone’s argument
Chapter 14: Argumentation
More on Argument.
Logical Fallacies.
Arguments have Logic.
Chapter 6 Reasoning Errors
Logical Fallacies English III.
Common Mistakes in Weak Arguments
Presentation transcript:

Age of the Sage Advertising, Inc. “I cannot teach anybody anything; I can only make him think.” Socrates

“The only good is knowledge, and the only evil is ignorance.” Socrates

“False words are not only evil in themselves, but they infect the soul.” Socrates

The Problem Age of the Sage Advertising, Inc., has several new clients who would like our company to name and market their new products; however, the manufacturers do NOT want to trick customers into purchasing their goods. Can we promote their products without misrepresenting them with logical fallacies?

Socrates’ Method of Inquiry Suggest hypothesis Test and refute hypothesis through questioning Accept hypothesis as true OR explore counter examples Act accordingly!

Fallacy #1 Name: False Dilemma (Either – Or) Definition: Thinking of a problem as having only two possible extremes (causes, courses of action, etc.); assuming only two solutions

Example: “America: love it or leave it.” Proof: Identify the options given and show (with an example) that there is an additional option. OR

Fallacy #2 Name: Changing the Subject (Attacking the Man – ad hominem) Definition: An attempt to discredit an opponent’s view by attacking the opponent’s character or circumstances; against the man instead of the issue

Example: “Why vote for a man who can’t even keep a wife?” Proof: Identify the attack and show that it has nothing to do with the truth of the proposition being defended. X

Fallacy #3 Name: Hasty Generalization Definition: a generalization based on insufficient, scanty, inadequate, weak, or irrelevant evidence; key words are all, always, never, none, everyone, only; stereotyping

Example: “I asked six of my friends if they thought the plan was a good one, and they agreed. So the idea is a popular one.” Proof: Identify the size of the sample and the size of the population, then show that the sample size is too small.

Fallacy #4 Name: False Analogy Definition: a weak or far-fetched comparison; selecting and focusing on similarities that are not relevant to the issue VS.

Example: “Schools would turn out better products if they were run like businesses.” Proof: Identify the two objects and the property both are said to possess. Show that the two objects are different in a way which will affect whether they both have that property.

Fallacy #5 Name: Cause and Effect (post hoc, ergo propter hoc) Definition: literally “after this, therefore because of this”; assuming that because one event preceded another, the first event caused the second event

Example: “I took the new Tylenol Cold and Flu medicine, and my cold was gone in two hours.” Proof: Show that the effect would have occurred in the absence of the cause or that something else caused the effect.

Fallacy #6 Name: Missing the Point (Begging the Question) Definition: assuming that something is true in the course of an argument; assuming the truth of a proposition that actually needs to be proved

Example: “You should support the new housing bill. We can’t continue to see people living in the streets; we must have cheaper housing.” Proof: Show that the conclusion proved by the author is not the conclusion that the author set out to prove.

Fallacy #7 Name: Non Sequitur Definition: literally “it does not follow”; when a conclusion does not logically follow from a premise

Example: “If the mill were polluting the river, then we would see an increase in fish deaths. And fish deaths have increased. Thus, the mill is polluting the river.” Proof: Show that even though the premises are true, the conclusion could be false (Show that B may be a consequence of something other than A.)

The Project Working in groups as divisions, students will … 1. Select a product type 2. Analyze a real-life ad for product type 3. Create an original product name, packaging, and advertisement (free of logical fallacies)

The Product Each division will present its product and promotion campaign via PowerPoint show.

“The only good is knowledge, and the only evil is ignorance.” Socrates