Www.forumfyi.org Ready by 21 is a trademark of the Forum for Youth Investment, core operating division of Impact Strategies, Inc. The SCPA uses the Forum.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.

Advertisements

Broward’s Infrastructure Design to Guide and Sustain Permanency for Young Foster Children (BRIDGES)

Building a Foundation for Community Change Proposed Restructure 2010.

Developed by the Center for the Study of Social Policy Funded by the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation.

CW/MH Learning Collaborative First Statewide Leadership Convening Lessons Learned from the Readiness Assessment Tools Lisa Conradi, PsyD Project Co-Investigator.

California Child Welfare Co-Investment Partnership Children’s Conference Monterey, California May 29, 2008.

A Shared Vision for Youth in Iowa. ICYD - Origins 1998 –selected to receive a Youth Development State Collaboration Demonstration Grant from the Family.

Linking Actions for Unmet Needs in Children’s Health

Questionnaire Report for Grades 6 to12 Eanes Independent Schools.

National Community of Practice on Transition Past, Present and Future.

JOINING THE DOTS Connecting schools, voluntary and community sector and commissioning for better outcomes in emotional health and wellbeing.

Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.

6/10/02 Independent Living Resource Center at the Hunter College School of Social Work The Foster Care Independence Act of 1999 Strengthening the System’s.

HEALTHY KIDS LEARN BETTER A Coordinated School Health Approach.

Promoting Inclusive Opportunities for Young Children with Disabilities: A Cross Agency Initiative OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 12,

FosterEd: Santa Cruz County Judge Denine Guy, Superior Court of Ca., Santa Cruz County, Juvenile Division Mark Holguin, Family and Children’s Services.

Mental Health is a Public Health Issue: What I Learned from Early Childhood.   Presented by  Charlie Biss 

PARENT, FAMILY, AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT

Ontario’s Special Needs Strategy Spring The Vision “An Ontario where children and youth with special needs get the timely and effective services.

OUR KIDS OF MIAMI-DADE/MONROE, INC. EDUCATION COLLABORATION PROJECT Presented by: Additional Key Project Team: Claudia Kitchens Robin Molan Director of.

1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 5-1.

Helping Families Receive the Best Start in Life.  Check In  AOK History  AOK Communities  Conceptual Framework  Advancing Collaborative Leadership.

National Parks & Recreation Conference & Trade Show ‘Healthy Communities- Cultivating the Vision’ ‘Healthy Communities- Cultivating the Vision’ Saskatoon.

United Way of Greater Toledo - Framework for Education Priority community issue: Education – Prepare children to enter and graduate from school.

Ionia County Great Start Collaborative Strategic Planning Reviewing trends from new information & data Setting Priorities for Goals & Strategies.

Afterschool and STEM National Network of Statewide Afterschool Networks.

Project conducted with support from JFK Partners, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Corey Robinson, Director Aging Families of Adults with.

Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.

Bringing Protective Factors to Life in the Child Welfare System New Hampshire.

Early Help for Shropshire Children & Families Children’s Trust Area Forum.

Participants Adoption Study 109 (83%) of 133 WSU Cooperative Extension county chairs, faculty, and program staff responded to survey Dissemination & Implementation.

All Youth Ready at 21. Connecticut Youth Futures Policy Team  Participates in: Youth Policy Institute of the National Conference of State Legislatures,

Planning for Sustainability National Child Traumatic Stress Network All Network Meeting February 6, 2007.

1 Current Funding Streams in New York State The 2008 Equity Symposium Comprehensive Educational Equity: Overcoming the Socioeconomic Barriers to School.

Early Help Strategy Achieving better outcomes for children, young people and families, by developing family resilience and intervening early when help.

DuPage One Stop Services Career Resource Center Access to quality jobs Job Search Resources Career Planning Assistance Unemployment Insurance Job Training.

Planning for A Single Point of Access For Families One Stop Family Support and Resource Center Baltimore, Maryland.

TOGETHER WE’RE BETTER Collaborative Approaches to Including Children With and Without Disabilities Camille Catlett & Jennie CoutureNovember 9, 2012.

A Framework to Guide Full Service Partnerships for Adults Maria Funk, Ph.D. Mental Health Clinical District Chief ASOC Countywide Programs Los Angeles.

1 MODULE III Orientation to the UCEDD. 2 Introductions Name Part of state you are from Experience with disability Parent? Self-Advocate? Provider?

Health Data Initiative Forum III June 5, Our Mission ACF is responsible for federal programs that promote the economic and social well-being of.

1 The Federal Shared Youth Vision Partnership A Federal Partnership between the Corporation for National community Service;

Early Childhood Advisory Council. “ “ “ “ “ “ CECC Brief History … a vehicle for bringing together many community members to support issues of importance.

Evaluation Highlights from Pilot Phase July 2005 – June 2007 Prepared for Leadership Team Meeting January 11, 2008.

® Ready by 21 St. Louis A Collective Impact Initiative On Behalf of Children, Youth & Young Adults.

Kansas Youth Vision Team: Serving Our Neediest Youth Atlanta, GA September, 2006.

Addressing Maternal Depression Healthy Start Interconception Care Learning Collaborative Kimberly Deavers, MPH U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.

1 The Federal Shared Youth Vision Partnership A Federal Partnership between the United States Departments of Education, Health.

Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.

Skills for Success Program Savenia Falquist Youth Development Coordinator Jefferson County Juvenile Officer July 14, 2005.

Integrating Substance Abuse Competency Within A Child Welfare System Kim Bishop-Stevens LICSW Loretta Butehorn PhD Jan-Feb 2007.

Section I: Bringing The Community Together Center for Community Outreach Key Components of Afterschool Programs.

MOVING FROM DATA TO ACTION ADDRESSING HOMELESSNESS THROUGH A RBA FRAMEWORK POINT-IN-TIME COUNTS.

Austin Healthy Adolescent Program Overview

Project KEEP: San Diego 1. Evidenced Based Practice  Best Research Evidence  Best Clinical Experience  Consistent with Family/Client Values  “The.

A Better Start A bid for between £30 - £50million over 10 years, to achieve: A step change in outcomes for 0-3 year olds and their families, specifically.

Great Start Collaborative-Wayne Collaborative Meeting November 16, 2015.

Lincoln Community Learning Centers A system of partnerships that work together to support children, youth, families and neighborhoods. CLC.

1 Executive Summary of the Strategic Plan and Proposed Action Steps January 2013 Healthy, Safe, Smart and Strong 1.

Trinity Collaborative Recreation Assessment and Forest Contractor and Workforce Assessment.

Prepared by: Forging a Comprehensive Initiative to Improve Birth Outcomes and Reduce Infant Mortality in [State] Adapted from AMCHP Birth Outcomes Compendium.

K-12 And Early Childhood Data Connections NCES Forum February 2011 Presented by: Kathy Gosa Kansas State Department of Education.

Maryland’s School Mental Health Initiatives and Progress.

Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health PRENATAL TO FIVE PROGRAM Sam Chan, Ph.D. District Chief Child Youth & Family Program Administration Ilda.

COMMUNITY COLLABORATIVES Community Collaboratives around the state were an outgrowth of recommendations in the state report Mental Disability Prevention.

Durham County Board of County Commissioners June 4, 2012.

Collaboration for Success Preschool Screening, Assessment and Intervention.

Developing a Strategic Framework for Early Intervention: Children, Young People and Families Faith Mann Director of Targeted and Early Intervention Services.

City Afterschool System Framework

National Community of Practice on Transition Past, Present and Future

Presentation transcript:

Ready by 21 is a trademark of the Forum for Youth Investment, core operating division of Impact Strategies, Inc. The SCPA uses the Forum for Youth Investment’s Ready by 21 ™ approach as the basis for its youth development framework and related activities. Ready by 21 GRUNDY COUNTY Pilot Project Summary Facilitators: Joan Leigh & Anita Young, Education Service Network & Claudia Baird, Aunt Martha’s Youth Services Center Technical Assistance: Felicia Roberson, Prevention First Consultation: The Forum For Youth Investment Rb21 Symposium, Chicago IL June 28, 2007

The Changing Face of Grundy County

Youth Ages 5-17 in Grundy County

4 Why conduct a landscape mapping survey for Grundy County? Readiness “Moving Train” Goals -Assist Healthy Community Steering Group with planned assessment -Provide youth-specific data -Create a framework for discussion and planning -Help the county understand and address critical issues pertaining to youth

5 Methodology Development Adapted from long form developed by the Forum for Youth Investment Decided to look at the the entire county, not just one community Survey tailored by ESN & Aunt Martha’s with input from Healthy Community Steering Group Survey was test run by Grundy County Rb21 pilot team Rb21 framework & survey promoted at local meetings

Methodology Dissemination Survey was mailed during first week of April to list of 103 recipients identified as known or possible youth service providers. Deadline: April 25 Survey was accompanied by letter from Healthy Community Steering Group After deadline, follow-up calls were made to solicit survey return Telephone and in-person support were given to respondents as needed

Respondents Survey Participation To date, the Grundy County Rb21 survey team has received and inputted responses from 65 programs. Government Agencies7 programs Business Operations4 programs Community/Civic6 programs Schools15 programs Education/Training1 program Faith Organizations3 programs Nonprofit Organizations18 programs Workforce Providers1 program Other Organizations10 programs

8 Respondents  Many non-school respondents serve Grundy County from outside of Grundy County as part of a larger service area.  There is no higher education institution located in Grundy County.

Respondents Most of the organizations represented in the Grundy County survey are small (29% had staffing of 0 to 5 people). Only 4% had more than 100 staff members. 50% of programs had staff consisting of 5 or fewer people.

10 The most-cited goal area reported by Grundy County programs was CONNECTING, followed closely by LEARNING. Ready by 21 Goal Areas

11 Services, Supports & Opportunities

12 Numbers of Youth Served

What Time of Day Do Youth Receive Services?

What Days of the Week Do Youth Receive Services?

What Times of the Year Do Youth Receive Services?

For How Long Are the Youth Services Provided?

How Often Are Services Available?

Where Are Services Delivered?

Service Setting Most Grundy County programs offer services in both individual and group settings.

Languages

Charges for Service

Publicizing Services

Increasing Positive Outcomes LEARNINGWORKINGTHRIVINGCONNECTING LEADING Dotted line at 20.8 shows average number of organizations that report working to increase positive outcomes.

Decreasing Negative Outcomes LEARNINGWORKINGTHRIVINGCONNECTING LEADING Dotted line at 14.8 shows average number of organizations that report working to reduce negative outcomes.

Measuring Success How do Grundy County programs show progress? The chart at right shows the ways these organizations measure their outcomes.

Measuring Success What kinds of data do Grundy County organizations collect? The chart at left shows what kind of information is recorded to measure progress.

Measuring Success Most programs record attendance or participation to track the number of youth engaged.

Measuring Success Grundy County programs look most at the number of times youth participate and/or the number of repeat visitors

Populations Targeted Certain programs are limited to special groups, including pregnant teens, youth from low-income families, developmentally disabled, youth with emotional/behavioral disorders, sexual assault victims, runaways, etc.

Populations Targeted

Improvements Needed Nearly 3 out of 4 Grundy County Programs cite a need for funding and over 40% require more staff to expand and/or improve their programs.

Improvements Needed Over half of program respondents say they could serve 26 to 100 more youth as a result of needed improvements.

Improvements Needed 28% of respondents said they could serve youth better with improvements to their program.

Collaboration Most Grundy County programs report partnering with other organizations.

Collaboration Most partnerships are focused on program development, program delivery, and/or the sharing of information.

Collaboration

Collaboration

Collaboration Underage Drinking Youth with Disabilities Community Resources for Child Care Centers Increasing Mental Health Services for Youth Support for Foster & Adopted Children & Their Families Need for More After-School Programs Tobacco Prevention & Cessation for Youth Gangs Child Find for Special Education Issues Identified for New Collaborations

Very rapid growth and demographic changes are bringing challenges to providers Many youth providers are serving Grundy County from outside the county and therefore are not as strongly connected as local providers Long-time norm of low educational attainment in the county Are Grundy County Programs Positioned to Help Youth Be Ready by 21? A variety of programs are already serving Grundy County youth Most of these programs are already involved in partnerships and/or desire to get involved There is willingness to work together on projects There is a strong sense that Grundy County needs to do more to prepare for the future NEGATIVESPOSITIVES

40 Where Do We Go From Here? Meet with key stakeholders from Healthy Community Steering Group (Kitchen Cabinet) to share data Adjust presentation based on Steering Group input Make presentation to entire Steering Group Challenge Steering Group to use Rb21 planning framework to build on what has been learned so far and help all Grundy County youth to be ready for college, work and life.