The OAI and a disaggregated scholarly communication system Herbert Van de Sompel Los Alamos National Laboratory – Research Library Universiteit Gent –

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Partnering with Faculty / researchers to Enhance Scholarly Communication Caroline Mutwiri.
Advertisements

Herbert Van de Sompel Los Alamos National Laboratory – Research Library 3 rd OAF Workshop – Berlin, March 28 th 2003 the Open Archives Initiative
1 1 SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING & ACADEMIC RESOURCES COALITION SPARC EUROPE Open Archives, Open Access and the Scholarly Communication Process.
DARE First National Initiative for Institutional Repositories Report on Discussion Group Berlin, OAForum, 28 March 2003 Diann Rusch-Feja Digital Academic.
Creating Institutional Repositories Stephen Pinfield.
Throwing Open the Doors: Strategies and Implications for Open Access Heather Joseph Executive Director, SPARC October 23, 2009 Educause Live 1.
Open Access in Summary Amos Kujenga EIFL-FOSS National Coordinator, Zimbabwe Lupane State University, October 2013 Lesotho College.
Scholarly publishing distribution models In traditional model, libraries/others serve as mediators between information and researchers by buying books.
Y.T. a brief history of the OAI 0 Kaynak: Herbert van de Sompel.
Electronic publishing: issues and future trends Anne Bell.
DARE: building a networked academic repository in the Netherlands ICOLC October 25 Ronald Dekker Delft University of Technology Library.
E-prints: the Nottingham Experience Stephen Pinfield and Mike Gardner.
Scholarly Information A New Model for Brazil. Table of Contents Scholarly Communication today Scholarly Communication today Solution: Open Archives &
Institutional Repositories
Object Re-Use and Exchange Mellon Retreat, Nassau Inn, Princeton, NJ, March Herbert Van de Sompel, Carl Lagoze The OAI Object Re-Use & Exchange.
If We Build It, Will They Come (Eventually)? : Scholarly Communication and Institutional Repositories A Presentation to the NASIG 2005 Conference May 20.
How to Implement an Institutional Repository A NASIG 2006 Pre-Conference May 4, 2006 by Carol Hixson Head, Metadata and Digital Library Services
The Open Archives Initiative Simeon Warner (Cornell University) Symposium on “Scholarly Publishing and Archiving on the Web”, University.
Introduction to Implementing an Institutional Repository Delivered to Technical Services Staff Dr. John Archer Library University of Regina September 21,
OAI Standards for Sheet Music Meeting March 28-29, 2002 Basic OAI Principals How They Apply to Sheet Music Presenter: Curtis Fornadley, Senior Programmer/Analyst.
The Open Archives Initiative Simeon Warner (Cornell University) Open Archives seminar “Facilitating Free and Efficient Scientific.
The Promise of the Open Archives Initiative Simeon Warner (Cornell University) Thanks to Herbert van de Sompel (LANL) CARL conference.
California Digital Library eScholarship Repository Int’l Conference on Digital Institutional Repositories 9-10 December 2004, Hong Kong Catherine H.Candee.
Planning for a University of Guelph Institutional Repository: DSpace Implementation Helen Salmon & Ron MacKinnon Presentation to Information Services Committee.
Digital | Curation | Centre Reflections on Daedalus:etc End of Phase 2... Chris Rusbridge, Digital Curation Centre Funded by:
Presented by Ansie van der Westhuizen Unisa Institutional Repository: Sharing knowledge to advance research
Alma Swan Key Perspectives Ltd Truro, UK. Key Perspectives Ltd.
Alternative Models of Scholarly Communication: The "Toddler Years" for Open Access Journals and Institutional Repositories Greg Tananbaum President The.
Libraries and the Communication of Scholarship: Changing Times, Changing Roles David Ruddy.
Scholarly Information New model for Brazil. Table of Contents Scholarly Communication today Scholarly Communication today Solution: Open Archives & Open.
DAEDALUS Project William J Nixon Service Development Susan Ashworth Advocacy.
Supporting further and higher education The UK FAIR Programme: OAI in context Chris Awre OAI3, CERN, February 2004.
Perspectives on scholarly communication Herbert Van de Sompel Los Alamos National Laboratory – Research Library Universitaire Stichting – Brussels - October.
Herbert van de sompel Workshop on OAI and peer review journals in Europe Geneva, Switserland – March 22nd to 24th 2001 Herbert Van de Sompel Cornell University.
Preserving Digital Collections for Future Scholarship Oya Y. Rieger Cornell University
What is happening 'Free Access' 3. The Position of SPARC Raf Dekeyser.
Annah Macha MPhil Student Department of Library & Information Science, UCT A/Prof Karin de Jager Centre for Information Literacy,
Extending Access: Priorities and Solutions, November 2005 What are publishers doing to support research needs? Martin Richardson.
1 Digital Archives - Past, Present & Future Issues Anne Van Camp Manager, Member Initiatives The Research Libraries Group Digital Archives Directions (DADs)
Creating Change in Scholarly Communications Heather Joseph Executive Director, SPARC September 21, 2009 TCAL, Austin, TX.
1 1 SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING & ACADEMIC RESOURCES COALITION An initiative of the Association of Research Libraries Gaining Independence through.
The OAI: overview and historical context OAI Open Meeting – Washington DC – January 23 rd 2001 Herbert Van de Sompel & Carl Lagoze Cornell University --
Networked Information Resources SPARC, E-prints & Open Access initiatives.
1 ARRO: Anglia Ruskin Research Online Making submissions: Benefits and Process.
Panel group 1 & 5 1.Organisational support for the European platform level action to support innovative efforts for a new scholarly communication framework.
Herbert Van de Sompel Los Alamos National Laboratory – Research Library DC Florence, October 14 th 2002 the things I work on (and/or think about)
Kurt Maly Department of Computer Science Old Dominion University Norfolk, Virginia 23529, USA Digital Libraries, OAI and Free Software.
The OAI: overview and historical context OAI Open Meeting – Washington DC – January 23 rd 2001 Herbert Van de Sompel & Carl Lagoze Cornell University --
SHARE (SHared Access Research Ecosystem) Tyler Walters Co-Chair, SHARE Steering Group (a joint committee of the ARL, the AAU, and the APLU) Eric Celeste.
EPrints The Glasgow Experience William J Nixon Glasgow University Library 27 February 2002.
ScholarSpace & Open UH Mānoa March 2013 Beth Tillinghast Web Support Librarian ScholarSpace & eVols Project Manager UHM Library.
Unless otherwise noted, the content of this course material is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Non-Commercial - Share Alike 3.0 License.
DOE Data Management Plan Requirements
Open Archives Initiative Gail McMillan Digital Library and Archives, Virginia Tech Society for Scholarly Publishing: June 1, 2000.
California Digital Library Managing and Federating e-Print Repositories: UC’s eScholarship Initiatives CNI Fall Task Force Meeting December 1999 John Ober.
DAEDALUS - An ePrints Case Study William J Nixon Service Development Susan Ashworth Advocacy.
Open Archives Initiative CNI Phoenix December 13, 1999 Dale Flecker, Harvard Carl Lagoze, Cornell John Ober, CDL Don Waters, Mellon.
California Digital Library eScholarship: a UC Publishing Initiative Catherine H.Candee Director, Publishing and Strategic Initiatives Office of Scholarly.
Carl Lagoze Digital Library Service Registry Workshop Services in a Scholarly Communication Framework.
Herbert van de sompel Frye Leadership Institute Emory University, June 11th 2002 Herbert Van de Sompel Los Alamos National Laboratory – Research Library.
Information Accesibility for learning December 11, 2015 University Policy on Open Access to scientific literature Chiara Cenderelli University Library.
DUO - the institutional repository for the University of Oslo Arne Jakobsson University of Oslo Library Library of Medicine and Health Sciences.
Prof S.M.Shafi & Nadim Akhtar Khan. services “a set of services that a university offers to the members of its community for the management and dissemination.
Herbert van de sompel CNI FALL 2000 – San Antonio, Texas – December 8th 2000 Closing Keynote Address Herbert Van de Sompel Cornell University Computer.
DAEDALUS Project William J Nixon Service Development Susan Ashworth Advocacy.
Publishing from the Library: New Roles for Libraries in Scholarly Communications David Ruddy Cornell University Library September, 2004.
Systems for scholarly communication
Athabasca University’s Institutional Repository
OAI protocol beyond discovery metadata
Introduction to Implementing an Institutional Repository
Presentation transcript:

the OAI and a disaggregated scholarly communication system Herbert Van de Sompel Los Alamos National Laboratory – Research Library Universiteit Gent – 15 Oktober 2002

the Open Archives Initiative

herbert van de sompel libraries are there to faciliate access to scholarly information core motivation we were trying hard, but...

herbert van de sompel library position AR PUBPUB D I S LIBLIB the input is far from optimal optimizing the output

herbert van de sompel serials crisis: increasing journal prices limit, rather than broaden, access to scholarly research IP drain: faculty signs away copyright publication delay: journal system can not cope with increasing volume of scholarly output criticism of peer-review: suppresses ideas, outcome criticized inertia: system is self-stabilizing the journal system

herbert van de sompel preprint systems xxx e-print archive (Physics Los Alamos - Ginsparg) RePEc (Economy - Surrey U - Krichel) NCSTRL (Computer Science - Cornell U - Lagoze) NDLTD (Theses - Virginia Tech - Fox) CogPrints (Cognitive Sciences - Southampton U - Harnad)

herbert van de sompel libraries are there to faciliate access to scholarly information core motivation we were trying hard, but... could there be other (better) ways?

herbert van de sompel alternative library position? AR capture & share the input… LIBLIB ? using the global network

herbert van de sompel The Open Archives Initiative has been set up to create a forum to discuss and solve matters of interoperability between electronic preprint solutions, as a way to promote their global acceptance. Paul Ginsparg, Rick Luce & Herbert Van de Sompel

herbert van de sompel Luce * Van de Sompel * Ginsparg

technology law economy sociology scholarly communication

technology law economy sociology establish a technological basis that allows addressing the other issues.

systems for scholarly communication

herbert van de sompel forget about who has been doing what and how in the existing system; let’s look at what has to be done in a system for scholarly communication free our minds

herbert van de sompel registrationestablishing intellectual priority certificationcertifying quality/validity of research awarenessensuring accessibility of research archivingpreserving research for future use {Roosendaal & Geurts} systems for scholarly communication

herbert van de sompel registrationestablishing intellectual priority certificationcertifying quality/validity of research awarenessensuring accessibility of research archivingpreserving research for future use rewardingevaluating & rewarding performance {Roosendaal & Geurts} systems for scholarly communication

herbert van de sompel AR registration awareness archiving certificationrewarding value chain systems for scholarly communication

herbert van de sompel registrationyes certificationno awarenessyes archivingno rewardingno preprint systems

herbert van de sompel registrationyes certificationno awarenessyes archivingno rewardingno preprint systems

the journal system integrates all functions

preprint systems suggest: the feasibility of a disaggregated system for scholarly communication the possibility of preprints being the starting point of a new value chain in which the raw material -- the non-certified preprint -- is in open access other functions being fullfilled in a discrete manner, by different networked parties

herbert van de sompel disaggregated system Lower prices by increasing cost efficiency: –decoupling value chain forces market efficiency of individual links –introduces competition throughout chain Reveal that academy contributes most of the value –academic labor & institutional investment drives content, certification, and archiving

herbert van de sompel content providers: discipline-specific eprint servers, institutional repositories, open access peer-to-peer research repositories, … service providers: value-added services that provide certification, awareness, and archiving, rewarding functions current agents of these functions (e.g., societies) can operate in disaggregated model new entrants in the system possible various business models possible disaggregated system: how?

Paul Ginsparg

herbert van de sompel OAI’s role Achieve interoperability by ensuring that information about the fulfillment of the functions: can travel across the system can be shared by nodes of the system metadata

herbert van de sompel so far: harvesting of descriptive metadata but coming, harvesting of: references usage logs certification metadata rights metadata other issues to be identified at OAI Workshop at CERN OAI’s role

herbert van de sompel AR registration awareness archiving certificationrewarding interoperable grid OAI’s role

institutional repositories

herbert van de sompel institutional repositories Institutionally defined: content generated by institutional community Scholarly content: preprints and working papers, published articles, enduring teaching materials, student theses, etc. Cumulative & perpetual: preserve ongoing access to material Interoperable & open access: free online global

herbert van de sompel Local & immediate –Increases institutional visibility & prestige by clarifying institutional sources of research –Demonstrates institution’s value to public & private funding sources –Archives institutional production –Complements existing scholarly publishing model rationale for institutional repositories

herbert van de sompel rationale for institutional repositories Global & long-term –Key component in evolving disaggregated scholarly publishing model. –Part of global network of interoperable, distributed content repositories. –Complements existing scholarly publishing model. [duplication deliberate]

herbert van de sompel Registration: –Institutional repositories supply basic step of initial registration. –Alternative registration mechanisms accommodate increased volume of research output. –Journal model integrates registration & certification. institutional repositories: how?

herbert van de sompel Certification: –Certification necessary to validate registration. –Repository “certification” essentially imprimatur of sponsoring institution/department (sometimes more, sometimes less). –Disaggregation allows new mechanisms for certification in addition to peer review. institutional repositories: how?

herbert van de sompel institutional repositories: how? Awareness: –Service-level awareness tools enabled by OAI- compliance & interoperability. –Search engines index the descriptive metadata harvested from federated repositories. –Search engines can use other metadata in services: references, certification metadata, usage information, …

herbert van de sompel Archiving: –No final answer on digital archiving –However, disaggregation helps put institutions (libraries?) — rather than journal publishers — in charge of digital archiving. institutional repositories: how?

herbert van de sompel Rewarding: –Digital communication facilitates the generation of other metrics: –Citation databases not limited to selected journals –Usage information –Certification by which parties? institutional repositories: how?

herbert van de sompel Technical issues: global level (OAI, …) institutional level Unknown cost parameters Current journal system role in academic advancement Systemic inertia Faculty participation obstacles to implementation

herbert van de sompel potential faculty objection Faculty objections to participation include: –Impediment to subsequent formal publication –Intellectual property & data abuse issues –Perceived quality: lack of peer review & commingling of QC’d & non-QC’d material. –Undermines existing journal system, in which faculty deeply invested –Increased work load –Rewarding?

herbert van de sompel overcoming faculty objection Impediment to formal publication: trend for publishers to accept that online posting is not prior publication. Develop discipline-specific policies. Intellectual property issues: repository registration protects priority retain rights to eprint no more plagiarism online than offline machine readable rights

herbert van de sompel overcoming faculty objection Perceived quality: label & differentiate types of content reveal certification methods Undermines existing journals: repositories coexist with existing publishing system Increased work load: put library in charge of metadata tagging, formatting and reformatting, etc.

herbert van de sompel overcoming faculty objection Rewarding: Institutions must reward registration in institutional repository Funding agencies must reward institutions and scholars for registration in institutional repositories

herbert van de sompel Initiate institution- & consortia-based pilot projects Support academy-friendly author/publisher agreements Support learned societies in establishing new roles in disaggregated model Define alternative rewarding strategies: institutional, funding agencies, … ACTION!

herbert van de sompel questions