The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interpreting & Applying the Standards October 4, 2006 Dr. Luis J. Pedraja, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
Advertisements

The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Interpreting and Applying the 14 Standards
Standard 2: Planning, Resource Allocation and Institutional Renewal Michael F. Middaugh Assistant Vice President Institutional Research and Planning University.
Understanding Middle States Expectations for Assessment
Meeting MSCHE Assessment Expectations
Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
ACCREDITATION Community Day February 1, Significance of Accreditation Accreditation – Accreditation – Allows the students at KC to apply for Federal.
QEP BASICS.
Bronwyn Kosman, Office of the DVC (Provost) No 1 TEACHING MATTERS DEVELOPING INDICATORS OF TEACHING QUALITY Researching (e)Learning and Teaching Presentation.
Understanding MSCHE Expectations for Assessment Linda Suskie, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education 3624 Market Street, Philadelphia.
Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
The Board’s Role in Accreditation Michael F. Middaugh Associate Provost for Institutional Effectiveness University of Delaware Celine R. Paquette Trustee,
New England Association for Schools and Colleges Re-Accreditation for Brandeis University Marty Wyngaarden Krauss Provost and Senior Vice President for.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
How to Interpret and Apply the Characteristics of Excellence: A Framework for Determining Compliance Karen Stout, President Montgomery County Community.
Enhancing Excellence in Assessment: Being Successful with MSCHE Standards 7 & 14 Deborah Moeckel Nancy Willie-Schiff SUNY Council on Assessment November.
Medical Education Grand Rounds Self-Study Overview Middle States Commission on Higher Education January 13, 2010.
An Assessment Primer Fall 2007 Click here to begin.
Educational Outcomes: The Role of Competencies and The Importance of Assessment.
Institutional Effectiveness Operational Update Presentation made to the Indiana State University Board of Trustees October 5, 2001.
Developing an Institutional Assessment Plan: Product and Process Bruce P. Szelest Winter Workshop - January 20-21, 2005 Saratoga Springs, NY Association.
Understanding Middle States’ Expectations for Assessment Linda Suskie, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education 3624 Market Street,
Self Study: Some Things to Consider The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey September 20, 2010.
Why Institutional Assessment is Important for Middle States Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated.
What is Middle States, Anyway? Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated by Joe Marchetti, Gene.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
ONE-STOP SHOP: INTEGRATED ONLINE PROGRAM REVIEW AND BUDGET PLANNING Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D. Director, Institutional Research Barry Gribbons, Ph.D. Assistant.
Develop Systematic processes Mission Performance Criteria Feedback for Quality Assurance Assessment: Collection, Analysis of Evidence Evaluation: Interpretation.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Program Assessment Workshop Kathleen Harring. What is Assessment? Assessment is the systematic gathering and analysis of information to inform and improve.
The Accreditation: The Policies on Distance Learning.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Chancellor’s Cabinet September 28, 2004.
Everything you wanted to know about Assessment… Dr. Joanne Coté-Bonanno Barbara Ritola September 2009 but were afraid to ask!
Focus on Learning: Student Outcomes Assessment and the Learning College.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
Dr. Constance Ray Vice President, Institutional Research, Planning, & Effectiveness.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
What the *!# Is Middle States Looking For? A Review of Standards 7 and 14—Institutional & Student Learning Assessment Presentation to the Association of.
What Does Middle States Want? Linda Suskie, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education 3624 Market Street, Philadelphia PA Web:
Middle States Steering Committee Overview of Standards March 20, 2008.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Periodic Program Review Guiding Programs in Today’s Assessment Climate LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Accreditation: What we learned about ourselves College Forum Talk August 19, 2015 Patricia A. Fleming, Ph.D. Provost/ Senior Vice President for Academic.
Institutional Effectiveness A set of ongoing and systematic actions, processes, steps and practices that include: Planning Assessment of programs and.
ASSESSMENT FOR EVIDENCE-BASED DECISION MAKING ASSESSMENT PLAN SYED A RIZVI INTERIM ASSOCIATE PROVOST FOR INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.
Middle States Reaccreditation Process at The Catholic University of America.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
SUBMITTED TO THE HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION OF THE NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND SCHOOLS MAY 2010 Progress Report on Outcomes Assessment.
Curriculum Renewal in the Faculty of the Professions: Overview.
2008 Spring Semester Workshop AN INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP T. Gilmour Reeve, Ph.D. Director of Strategic Planning.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Strategic Planning for the Department of Health and Human Performance Iowa State University T. Gilmour Reeve Director of Strategic Planning Office of the.
30/10/2006 University Leaders Meeting 1 Student Assessment: A Mandatory Requirement For Accreditation Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chair-Person National Quality.
DEEP DIVING INTO THE REVISED MSCHE STANDARDS FOR RE-ACCREDITATION ​ Brigitte Valesey, Ph.D. Widener University ​ Drexel Assessment Conference ​ September.
A Commitment to Continuous Improvement in Teaching and Learning Michaela Rome, Ph.D. NYU Assistant Vice Provost for Assessment.
Institutional Effectiveness at MVCC Institutional Effectiveness at MVCC.
Assurance of Learning “Eberly AOL” All College Meeting – January 21, 2009 Prashanth Bharadwaj, Dean’s Associate Cyndy Strittmatter, Assistant Dean.
Changing Expectations for Assessment Linda Suskie Assessment & Accreditation Consultant AICUP.
Middle States Re-Accreditation Town Hall September 29, :00-10:00 am Webpage
The Assessment Process: A Continuous Cycle
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Report from Curriculum Committee 4/3/2017
NICC Self-Study The Road to Excellence
Middle States Accreditation Standards and Processes
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
CUNY Graduate School and University Center
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Get on Board: Reaffirmation 2016
Presentation transcript:

The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs Professor of Psychology The College of New Jersey Chairs & Evaluators Workshop October 4, 2006

Session goals… Understanding and interpreting Standards 7 & 14 of the Characteristics of Excellence Institutional assessment Assessment of student learning MSCHE expectations for documenting compliance with both standards

Middle States Standards Standard 7 : Institutional Assessment The institution has developed and implemented an assessment plan and process that evaluates its overall effectiveness in: achieving its mission and goals; implementing planning, resource allocation, and institutional renewal processes; using institutional resources efficiently; providing leadership and governance; providing administrative structures and services; demonstrating institutional integrity; and assuring that institutional processes and resources support appropriate learning and other outcomes for its students and graduates.

Middle States Standards Fundamental Elements: Standard 7 Written assessment plan Use of assessment results Written strategic plan reflecting assessment data

Middle States Standards Standard 14 : Assessment of Student Learning Assessment of student learning demonstrates that the institutions students have knowledge, skills, and competencies consistent with institutional goals and that students at graduation have achieved appropriate higher education goals.

Middle States Standards Fundamental Elements: Standard 14 Articulated expectations of student learning at various levels (institution, program, course) A plan, including specific methods used to validate articulated student learning goals Evidence that student learning assessment information is used (closing the loop) Documented use of student learning assessment as part of institutional assessment

1. Mission & Goals 8. Admissions 9. Student Support Services 2. Planning 10. Faculty 3. Resources 11. Educational Offerings 4. Leadership/Governance 12. General Education 5. Administration 13. Related Educ. Activities 6. Integrity 7. Institutional Assessment 14. Asmt. of Student Learning

Assessment as a Four-Step Cycle 1. Goals 4. Using Results 2. Programs, Services & Initiatives 3. Assessment/ Evaluation

Student Learning Assessment as a Four-Step Cycle 1. Learning Goals 4. Using Results 2. Learning Opportunities 3. Assessment

Institutional Effectiveness: Are We Achieving… Community Service Scholarship Diversity Revenue Generation Productivity/ Efficiency Student Learning Mission & Goals Access

What is Good Assessment?

1. Good assessments are useful. Periodically evaluate assessments. Adapt as things change.

2. Good assessments are cost-effective. Keep things simple. Focus on a few (3-6) important goals in each program, unit, curriculum. Stagger assessments. Use samples.

3. Good assessments are reasonably accurate & truthful. Not dissertation-quality research Stay cost-effective. Goal and tool match Multiple kinds of tools Student learning: Include direct evidence Care in choosing/creating tools

4. Good assessments are organized, systematized, and sustained. Institutional Goals Program & Unit Goals Course Goals AssessmentsImprovements

What Should Institutions Document? Clear statements of goals Documented, organized, sustained assessment process (assessment plan) Principles, guidelines, support What assessments are already underway What assessments are planned, when, & how Assessment results documenting achievement of goals How results have been used for improvement

Why does MSCHE ask for this? Help ensure that Everyone at the institution knows what they are to do. Everyone is on the same page (priorities). Resources are available. The institution is indeed achieving its mission & goals. The institution is indeed making appropriate improvements.

How Might Institutions Document This? Not a fancy bound document! An overview in the self-study A chart or roadmap for assessment documentation in the self-study or as an appendix More thorough information in the on-site resource room and/or online A few samples of student work Exemplary, adequate, inadequate

Questions that an Evaluation Team or Reviewer Might Ask

Is there a culture of assessment? Do institutional leaders understand & value assessment? Is there adequate support for assessment? Are assessment efforts encouraged, recognized, & valued? Are efforts to improve teaching honored & valued?

Are goals clearly articulated? Are goals clearly articulated at every level? Institutional, units, programs, courses Do goals have appropriate interrelationships?

Are learning goals clearly articulated? Do the undergraduate curriculum & requirements address Institutional learning outcomes? MSCHEs general education competencies? Are learning outcomes of sufficient rigor?

Have appropriate assessment processes been implemented? Are assessments already implemented for an appropriate proportion of goals? Are assessments systematic and sustained? More than anecdotes? Which programs have implemented assessments? Are there multiple assessments? Do student learning assessments include direct evidence of student learning?

Have appropriate assessment processes been planned to plug holes? Are timelines appropriate? Do plans have sufficient detail, ownership, simplicity and practicality to be feasible?

What do assessment results tell us? Do they provide convincing evidence that the institution is achieving its mission and goals, including key learning goals?

How have assessment results been used? Have results been appropriately shared & discussed? Have results led to appropriate decisions? Curricula and pedagogy? Programs and services? Resource allocation? Institutional goals and plans?

Have assessment processes been evaluated? Are assessment processes reviewed regularly? Have the reviews led to improvements in Assessment processes? Support for assessment?

In Summary: Key elements: Planning Usefulness Involvement Dynamic culture of conceptualization, assessment, and reflection