Company LOGO Understanding the Evaluators Responsibilities Karen Froslid Jones Director, Office of Institutional Research and Assessment American University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation Team Chair Training
Advertisements

Workshop 2: Conflict Resolution Minutes & meeting procedures
Evaluator 101: An Introduction to Serving as a MSCHE Evaluator Dr. Luis G. Pedraja MSCHE Vice President.
PAINLESS PERIODIC REVIEW Cynthia Steinhoff Anne Arundel Community College Arnold, Maryland.
Tips and Strategies for Chairing a Successful Team Visit
MSCHE Follow-up Reporting Expectations MSCHE Annual Conference 2010 Mary Ellen Petrisko Linda Suskie.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Robert E. Kondziolka Salt Lake City, Utah May 6-7, 2007 WECC JGC Leadership Training Expectations of WECC Leadership.
Building Relationships
Outstanding Interviews.
Melbourne University 2009 Interview Techniques. Application Process Know your resume thoroughly Do your reading –VELS, PoLT, etc Think about strengths,
Why Do People Join Groups?
Acing the Graduate/Professional School Interview Tutorial.
How to optimize your internship experience
OVERVIEW OF ClASS METHODS and ACTIVITIES. Session Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Describe ClASS team composition.
How to Interpret and Apply the Characteristics of Excellence: A Framework for Determining Compliance Karen Stout, President Montgomery County Community.
Evaluation Team Chair Training Presented By Dr. Tim Eaton TRACS Regional Representative.
NCI Interviewer Training “… Each person can take you into a new part of the world. For the person who is willing to ask and listen the world will always.
The Role of Faculty During the Self-Study Process Ensuring Success at Cedar Crest LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
DEBRA G. KLINMAN, PH.D. ELLIE A. FOGARTY, ED.D. VICE PRESIDENTS, MSCHE Tips, Strategies, and Best Practices for Team Chairs.
Preparing for Your Performance Review (A Staff Perspective) Preparing for Your Performance Review (A Staff Perspective)
Building Team Facilitation Skills Presented by: Mary Jo Meyers M.S.
Orientation for Academic Program Reviews
The Interview – presenting yourself in person
1 Dissertation Process 4 process overview 4 specifics –dates, policies, etc.
Employment Certificate Program Guide School District 28.
Interview Tips.
Board Retreat Discussion and Review Non Profit Board Retreat Review and Discussion April 5, :30 AM- 11:30 AM Diana A. Bing 4/5/2011.
Make a Connection: Creating our Mosaic Speed Networking.
Focus groups ScWk 242 – Session 4 Slides.
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
The Why, What, When, How, and How- to of Book Clubs
Team Communication and Difficult Conversations Chapter 3.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
Community Board Orientation 6- Community Board Orientation 6-1.
JOB INTERVIEWS Mr. Cowan Futures Forum FHCI. PREPARING FOR A JOB INTERVIEW  The job interview is a crucial part of your job search because it’s an opportunity.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
QAAP Workshop (Basic). Conduct of the peer review * Commitment * Contribution to a smooth and effective process * The Developmental Engagement Report.
Successfully Conducting Employee Performance Appraisals Wendy L. McCoy Director HR & Benefits Florida Conference of The United Methodist Church.
TELEPHONE SKILLS USING THE PHONE TO HELP WITH YOUR JOB SEARCH.
Middle States Reaccreditation Process at The Catholic University of America.
December 8, 2010 Ensuring Educator Excellence Accreditation Handbook 2. Team Member Ethics 3. Responsibilities prior to arriving at the Site Visit.
INTERVIEW PREPERATION. Agenda What the employer is looking for What do I need to do before an Interview? How do I make a good impression at a job Interview?
2015 SAA Board Survey. Raw Board Survey ResultsStrongly Agree AgreeDisagreeStrongly Disagree Don't Know Total Points Responses minus DKs Average Score.
4 Communicating and Working in Teams “Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success.” ― Henry Ford, American.
JOB INTERVIEW Naviance Family Connection
Working and Writing in Teams Module Eighteen Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Workshop For Reviewers Operating the Developmental Engagements Prof. Dr. Hala SalahProf. Dr. Hoda ELTalawy.
Meetings Managers are people who do things right, while leaders are people who do the right thing. Warren Bennis, Ph.D. “On Becoming a Leader”
Preparing for your HIPPY Accreditation visit Accreditation 101.
Conducting Business Meetings Satorre, Joshua Jerem T. ENSP2 Instructor: Mr. Xavier Aquino Velasco - Associate/Lecturer III, FEU Tech.
1 The importance of Team Working and Personal Attributes.
MASS/MASC Annual Conference NOVEMBER 5, 2014 Effective Communication for District Administrators By Gail M. Zeman, Consulting School Business Administrator,
Conducting Interviews Preparing: What’s important? Explain the purpose of the interview to the person you will interview. If confidentiality is required,
The First Day of Class. Introduction Day one is unlike any other day of the semester. Treat it as such. On the first day, you and your students will meet.
How to Help Your Evaluation Team Help You: Peer Review and your ACCJC External Visiting team Stephanie Curry—Reedley College Dolores Davison—Area B Representative.
Judy Beachler, Cosumnes River College Julie Bruno, Sierra College Richard Mahon, Riverside City College The Accreditation Team(s)
4 Communicating and Working in Teams “Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success.” ― Henry Ford, American.
The Origin of the Success Networking Team Concept The Success Networking Team concept is based on research conducted by Napoleon Hill, who studied the.
Farm Bureau University 103. Please stand if they’ve ever attended a meeting. Remain standing if they’ve ever attended a meeting that went too long.
7 TIPS TO FINDING THE BEST FOOD CATERER FOR YOUR EVENT.
HIV CAPACITY BUILDING WORKSHOP 6-8 th September. » The focus group operates on the assumption that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. » In.
Team Contracts We can work together! Copyright © Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved. 1.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Building the Future of Housing with the External Review
Welcome to SSCC Structure and Roles (Workbook)
Performance Feedback Training
ASSISTANCE DOGS INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION PROCEDURES 2018
REACH Accreditation Preparing Your School for a Team Visit
Get on Board: Reaffirmation 2016
Presentation transcript:

Company LOGO Understanding the Evaluators Responsibilities Karen Froslid Jones Director, Office of Institutional Research and Assessment American University

Overview 1. Accreditation and the Visit 2. The Role of the Chair and Evaluators 3. Preparing for the Visit 4. What to Expect During the Visit 6. Keys to a Successful Evaluation 5. What Happens After you Leave

Participants in the Accreditation Process Commission Institution Middle States Rep Team Chair Visiting Team Public Self-Study Committee President Faculty, administrators Staff and Students

Putting The Visit in Context: The Road to Re-Accreditation Before Visit During Visit After Visit Self-Study Institute Chair and Steering Committee Selected Self-Study Design Submitted Visiting Team selected Self-Study Completed Visit to campus by MS Rep Logistics decided Materials Sent to Team Additional documents requested Travel info communicated Team meetings Reception/Dinner Meetings with Steering Committee, etc. Interviews Writing time Report written Recommendation on re-accreditation Oral Report Chair sends report to institution Institution corrects mistakes of fact Chair sends final report Institution sends response Chair attends commission meeting Commission acts on accreditation Institution – and team- is notified of commission action.

Purpose of Visit The importance of peer review. The value of meeting face-to-face. The opportunity for institution to benefit from others expertise. The need for objective assessment.

The Value of an Evaluator Colleague –Similar institution? –Similar mission? –Appreciation of the challenges facing institutions Expertise –Particular Area(s) –Characteristics of Excellence/Middle States Expectations Provide Outside Perspective –Not tied to politics/personalities/history of institution –Able to look at big picture and put it into context –No conflict of interest

The Role of the Chair Acts as conduit between visiting team and institution. –Visits Institution before team visit –Gets early copy of Self-Study –Represents team when planning logistics –Resolve problems/conflicts between team and institution –Main communicator between team and institution during visit –Represents team at Commission meeting

The Role of the Chair (cont.) Organizes and Leads Work of Visiting Team –Sets team member assignments (primary and secondary) –Sets up some meetings with campus groups in advance (board of trustees, steering committee, etc.) –Sets report format –Sets work agenda/deadlines Is draft required? When will team meet? When is final report due to chair? –Leads discussions –Leads/Organizes Exit Interview

The Role of the Evaluator Assigned one or two primary areas (usually connected to the Characteristics of Excellence) to review. Responsible for reading the self-study, conducting interviews, and reviewing documents to determine the degree to which Characteristics are being meet. Responsible for writing portion of final report. Responsible for contributing to overall report.

Before the Visit: What to do Now Know Characteristics of Excellence –Be prepared on standards you consider your areas of expertise –Know all standards thoroughly –Look for ways that standards interact Familiarize yourself with self-study options – be sure you understand the type of self-study your institution is using Know the Report Process/Possible Actions Begin to familiarize yourself with institution –Check out website

Before the Visit: What to do When you Receive the Report Read entire report several times at least a few weeks before visit. Clarify with chair your expected areas of coverage. Decide on must interviews – inform chair Any documents you need right away? Let chair know. Provide institution/chair with travel plans.

Arriving on Campus Accommodations –Usually stay at same location, close to campus –Leave plenty of time to get checked in/settled before first meeting. Transportation Meeting Room(s) -Usually a work room/ meeting room set up in central location

Arriving: The Atmosphere on Campus Keep in mind that this is a BIG deal –Welcoming –Nervous –Worried –Excited –Agendas –Protective –Defensive –Helpful

The Visit Begins 1 st Team Meeting –Discuss logistics/assignments/report format. –Come prepared to discuss initial impressions. –Have preliminary interview needs ready. Hosts Program –Chance to get to know individuals/players. –Convey interest/enthusiasm for visit. –Informal inquiries/ not hard line questions. –Be aware of time

Setting Up Interviews Read report (and other documents) with eye towards people you may want to meet. –Who seem to be a key players in the area you are covering? –Do certain names come up in the report? Dont be afraid to ask who would know about_____? Prioritize and Coordinate Can ask interviewees if they can suggest others that may be worth meeting.

Conducting Interviews Have a clear objective going in. –What needs clarification? –What is missing from self-study and needs to be answered? –What has happened since self-study was written? Be open to where the interview may go. Dont assume everyone you interview knows about accreditation. Create a friendly, open conversation. Avoid overt judgments. Dont make promises/commitments. Look for evidence of a culture of continuous improvement. –Example: –What did you learn about your institution as a result of doing the self- study? Did any findings surprise you? –How do you plan to implement the recommendations of the self-study? Ask questions that give you a sense of direction/commitment/focus

Conducting Interviews (cont.) Keep very good notes. –Get cards, if possible, from interviewees. Consider meeting them on their home turf. Consider how combinations of individuals together may change dynamics of interviews.

Tips for Interactions with Institution Be careful of off-hand remarks –Everything you say/do will be interpreted Be neutral/open Listen Observe Reserve judgments/opinions Smile

Using the Document Room Make sure you build in time early to view documents. Come prepared with a list of must see documents. Be open to looking through a wide range of information. –Meeting notes, school newspaper stories, survey results, annual reports, etc. Put things back where you found them! Shred – or take home - sensitive notes. Dont forget to erase info from borrowed computer!)

Writing the Report Informal Observation Self-Study Document Analysis Individual Interviews TEXT Team Members Institution Mission Characteristics Findings Significant Accomplishments Suggestions, Recommendations, Requirements

Writing the Report* DO Speak directly to the accreditation standards and institution mission Respond to/recognize the approach used in the self-study Concentrate on the fundamentals Cover all areas of activity, including off-cite, certificate programs, etc. Provide rationale and evidence for the teams recommendations –(model effective institutional assessment) Make clear distinctions between suggestions, recommendations and requirements. Emphasize the importance of outcomes and assessment of both overall institutional effectiveness and student learning. DONT Be highly prescriptive. Name individuals. Cite specific formulas, solutions, educational theories, etc. Reveal accreditation recommendation. * See pp.46-49, Team Visits

Writing Tips Clarify which voice you will use as a team. Begin writing early – you can always revise. Keep track of who you talked to/when Keep track of sources of factual information (keep citations) Integrate report as much as possible.

Team Interactions A friendly, collegial atmosphere Where you stand depends on where you sit. Ask questions, seek input from others. Offer insight from your perspective. Disagreements likely but usually resolvable.

Completing the Visit The final draft –Be open to last minute changes The oral report Leaving the institution

After the Visit: What Happens Next? Team Chair submits report to institution for review. Institution corrects factual errors. Team Chair submits final team report along with a confidential memo to the Commission. Institution sends team members final team report. Institution can provide formal response to report. Chair Attends commission meeting. Commission acts on report. Logistics: expense reports, evaluations, etc.

Miscellaneous Tips: (What you wont find in any official publication) Come to the visit rested Leave home institution at home Where comfortable/sensible clothing/shoes Alert the institution to any food allergies, special needs, etc. Bring a flash drive. Expect the unexpected – be prepared to go with the flow Dont try to preach/perfect. Have fun!